Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Gezinstherapie Wereldwijd 3/2022

03-08-2022

Wat betekent ‘dialogisch’ werken in de Open dialoogbenadering en gezinstherapie? Een narratief literatuuroverzicht

Auteurs: Ben Ong, Niels Buus

Gepubliceerd in: Gezinstherapie Wereldwijd | Uitgave 3/2022

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Samenvatting

Internationaal is er de laatste tijd toenemende belangstelling voor de Open dialoogbenadering, die is ontstaan in Finland. Maar het kernprincipe ervan, dialoog bevorderen, kan lastig te onderwijzen en toe te passen zijn. Bovendien zijn er zoveel verschillende publicaties over de Open dialoog en dialogische benaderingen beschikbaar dat hulpverleners misschien niet weten waar te beginnen met het raadplegen ervan. In dit narratieve literatuuroverzicht geven we een beschrijving en samenvatting van het brede palet aan publicaties die gaan over hoe in gezinstherapie een dialoog op gang kan worden gebracht. Dit artikel behandelt de diverse interpretaties van de term ‘dialoog’, de dialogische mindset van de therapeut, aanbevelingen over mogelijke reacties op cliënten tijdens sessies, de betrokkenheid van het ‘zelf’ van de therapeut tijdens die ontmoetingen en de inzet van reflectieteams. Verder presenteren we een bondig lijstje met aanbevelingen, als hulpmiddel voor hulpverleners en ter bevordering van het gesprek over dialogische manieren van werken.
Literatuur
go back to reference Anderson, H. (2001). Postmodern collaborative and person-centred therapies: What would Carl Rogers say? Journal of Family Therapy, 23, 339–360.CrossRef Anderson, H. (2001). Postmodern collaborative and person-centred therapies: What would Carl Rogers say? Journal of Family Therapy, 23, 339–360.CrossRef
go back to reference Anderson, H. (2002). In the space between people: Seikkula’s open dialogue approach. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28(3), 279–281.CrossRef Anderson, H. (2002). In the space between people: Seikkula’s open dialogue approach. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28(3), 279–281.CrossRef
go back to reference Anderson, H. (2005). Myths about “not-knowing”. Family Process, 44(4), 497–504.CrossRef Anderson, H. (2005). Myths about “not-knowing”. Family Process, 44(4), 497–504.CrossRef
go back to reference Anderson, H. (2007). Dialogue: People creating meaning with each other and finding ways to go on. In H. Anderson & D. R. Gehart (red.), Collaborative therapy: Relationships and conversations that make a difference. New York: Routledge. Anderson, H. (2007). Dialogue: People creating meaning with each other and finding ways to go on. In H. Anderson & D. R. Gehart (red.), Collaborative therapy: Relationships and conversations that make a difference. New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Anderson, H. (2012). Collaborative relationships and dialogic conversations: Ideas for a relationally responsive practice. Family Process, 51(1), 8–24.CrossRef Anderson, H. (2012). Collaborative relationships and dialogic conversations: Ideas for a relationally responsive practice. Family Process, 51(1), 8–24.CrossRef
go back to reference Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. A. (1992). The client is the expert: A not-knowing approach to therapy. In S. McNamee & K. J. Gergan (red.), Therapy as social construction (pag. 25–39). London: SAGE. Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. A. (1992). The client is the expert: A not-knowing approach to therapy. In S. McNamee & K. J. Gergan (red.), Therapy as social construction (pag. 25–39). London: SAGE.
go back to reference Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
go back to reference Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRef Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Bertrando, P. (2007). The dialogical therapist. London: Karnac. Bertrando, P. (2007). The dialogical therapist. London: Karnac.
go back to reference Bråten, S., & Trevarthen, C. (2007). Prologue: From infant intersubjectivity and participant movements to simulation and conversation in cultural common sense. In S. Bråten (red.), On being moved: From mirror neurons to empathy (pag. 21–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef Bråten, S., & Trevarthen, C. (2007). Prologue: From infant intersubjectivity and participant movements to simulation and conversation in cultural common sense. In S. Bråten (red.), On being moved: From mirror neurons to empathy (pag. 21–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef
go back to reference Cecchin, G. (1992). Constructing therapeutic possibilities. In S. McNamee & K. J. Gergan (red.), Therapy as social construction (pag. 86–95). Los Angeles: SAGE. Cecchin, G. (1992). Constructing therapeutic possibilities. In S. McNamee & K. J. Gergan (red.), Therapy as social construction (pag. 86–95). Los Angeles: SAGE.
go back to reference Cecchin, G., Keeney, B. P., Lane, G., & Ray, W. A. (2018). Irreverence: A strategy for therapists’ survival. London: Taylor and Francis.CrossRef Cecchin, G., Keeney, B. P., Lane, G., & Ray, W. A. (2018). Irreverence: A strategy for therapists’ survival. London: Taylor and Francis.CrossRef
go back to reference Cooper, M., Chak, A., Cornish, F., & Gillespie, A. (2013). Dialogue: Bridging personal, community, and social transformation. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 53(1), 70–93.CrossRef Cooper, M., Chak, A., Cornish, F., & Gillespie, A. (2013). Dialogue: Bridging personal, community, and social transformation. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 53(1), 70–93.CrossRef
go back to reference Derish, P. A., & Annesley, T. M. (2011). How to write a rave review. Clinical Chemistry, 57(3), 388–391.CrossRef Derish, P. A., & Annesley, T. M. (2011). How to write a rave review. Clinical Chemistry, 57(3), 388–391.CrossRef
go back to reference Eiterå, A., Hansen, L., Vind, B., Hansen, A., Castella, J., & Sørensen, E. (2015). Open dialogue: Key markers and their context Eiterå, A., Hansen, L., Vind, B., Hansen, A., Castella, J., & Sørensen, E. (2015). Open dialogue: Key markers and their context
go back to reference Friedman, M. (1994). Reflections on the Buber-Rogers dialogue. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 34(1), 46–65.CrossRef Friedman, M. (1994). Reflections on the Buber-Rogers dialogue. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 34(1), 46–65.CrossRef
go back to reference Haarakangas, K., Seikkula, J., Alakare, B., & Aaltonen, J. (2007). Open Dialogue: An approach to psychotherapeutic treatment of psychosis in Northern Finland. In H. Anderson & D. R. Gehart (red.), Collaborative therapy: Relationships and conversations that make a difference (pag. 221–233). New York: Routledge. Haarakangas, K., Seikkula, J., Alakare, B., & Aaltonen, J. (2007). Open Dialogue: An approach to psychotherapeutic treatment of psychosis in Northern Finland. In H. Anderson & D. R. Gehart (red.), Collaborative therapy: Relationships and conversations that make a difference (pag. 221–233). New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Pilling, S. (2018). Development and evaluation of a social network intervention for severe mental illness: The ODDESSI research programme. In International Open Dialogue Research Collaboration (IODRC) Meeting, London. Pilling, S. (2018). Development and evaluation of a social network intervention for severe mental illness: The ODDESSI research programme. In International Open Dialogue Research Collaboration (IODRC) Meeting, London.
go back to reference Rober, P. (1999). The therapist’s inner conversation in family therapy practice: Some ideas about the self of the therapist, therapeutic impasse, and the process of reflection. Family Process, 38(2), 209–228.CrossRef Rober, P. (1999). The therapist’s inner conversation in family therapy practice: Some ideas about the self of the therapist, therapeutic impasse, and the process of reflection. Family Process, 38(2), 209–228.CrossRef
go back to reference Rober, P. (2005b). The therapist’s self in dialogical family therapy: Some ideas about not-knowing and the therapist’s inner conversation. Family Process, 44(4), 477–495.CrossRef Rober, P. (2005b). The therapist’s self in dialogical family therapy: Some ideas about not-knowing and the therapist’s inner conversation. Family Process, 44(4), 477–495.CrossRef
go back to reference Rober, P., & Seltzer, M. (2010). Avoiding colonizer positions in the therapy room: Some ideas about the challenges of dealing with the dialectic of misery and resources in families. Family Process, 49(1), 123–137.CrossRef Rober, P., & Seltzer, M. (2010). Avoiding colonizer positions in the therapy room: Some ideas about the challenges of dealing with the dialectic of misery and resources in families. Family Process, 49(1), 123–137.CrossRef
go back to reference Seikkula, J. (2008). Inner and outer voices in the present moment of family and network therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 478–491.CrossRef Seikkula, J. (2008). Inner and outer voices in the present moment of family and network therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 478–491.CrossRef
go back to reference Seikkula, J. (2011). Becoming dialogical: Psychotherapy or a way of life? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 32(3), 179–193. Seikkula, J. (2011). Becoming dialogical: Psychotherapy or a way of life? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 32(3), 179–193.
go back to reference Seikkula, J., & Arnkil, T. E. (2006). Dialogical meetings in social networks. London: Karnac. Seikkula, J., & Arnkil, T. E. (2006). Dialogical meetings in social networks. London: Karnac.
go back to reference Seikkula, J., & Trimble, D. (2005). Healing elements of therapeutic conversation: Dialogue as an embodiment of love. Family Process, 44(4), 461–475.CrossRef Seikkula, J., & Trimble, D. (2005). Healing elements of therapeutic conversation: Dialogue as an embodiment of love. Family Process, 44(4), 461–475.CrossRef
go back to reference Shotter, J. (2006). Understanding process from within: An argument for “withness” thinking. Organization Studies, 27, 585–604.CrossRef Shotter, J. (2006). Understanding process from within: An argument for “withness” thinking. Organization Studies, 27, 585–604.CrossRef
go back to reference Trevarthen, C. (1990). Signs before speech. In T. A. Sebeok & J. Umiker-Sebeok (red.), The semiotic web 1989 (pag. 689–756). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. Trevarthen, C. (1990). Signs before speech. In T. A. Sebeok & J. Umiker-Sebeok (red.), The semiotic web 1989 (pag. 689–756). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
go back to reference Waters, E., Ong, B., Mikes-Liu, K., McCloughen, A., Rosen, A., Mayers, S., et al. (2021). Open Dialogue, need-adapted mental health care, and implementation fidelity: A discussion paper. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 30(3), 805–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12866.CrossRef Waters, E., Ong, B., Mikes-Liu, K., McCloughen, A., Rosen, A., Mayers, S., et al. (2021). Open Dialogue, need-adapted mental health care, and implementation fidelity: A discussion paper. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 30(3), 805–813. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​inm.​12866.CrossRef
go back to reference White, M. (1995). Reflecting teamwork as definitional ceremony. In Re-authoring lives: Interviews and essays. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre. White, M. (1995). Reflecting teamwork as definitional ceremony. In Re-authoring lives: Interviews and essays. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre.
Metagegevens
Titel
Wat betekent ‘dialogisch’ werken in de Open dialoogbenadering en gezinstherapie? Een narratief literatuuroverzicht
Auteurs
Ben Ong
Niels Buus
Publicatiedatum
03-08-2022
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in
Gezinstherapie Wereldwijd / Uitgave 3/2022
Print ISSN: 1566-0206
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-5874
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12440-022-00178-w

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2022

Gezinstherapie Wereldwijd 3/2022 Naar de uitgave

EditorialNotes

Ten Geleide