Top

Gepubliceerd in:

03-08-2022

Wat betekent ‘dialogisch’ werken in de Open dialoogbenadering en gezinstherapie? Een narratief literatuuroverzicht

Auteurs: Ben Ong, Niels Buus

Gepubliceerd in: Gezinstherapie Wereldwijd | Uitgave 3/2022

Samenvatting

Internationaal is er de laatste tijd toenemende belangstelling voor de Open dialoogbenadering, die is ontstaan in Finland. Maar het kernprincipe ervan, dialoog bevorderen, kan lastig te onderwijzen en toe te passen zijn. Bovendien zijn er zoveel verschillende publicaties over de Open dialoog en dialogische benaderingen beschikbaar dat hulpverleners misschien niet weten waar te beginnen met het raadplegen ervan. In dit narratieve literatuuroverzicht geven we een beschrijving en samenvatting van het brede palet aan publicaties die gaan over hoe in gezinstherapie een dialoog op gang kan worden gebracht. Dit artikel behandelt de diverse interpretaties van de term ‘dialoog’, de dialogische mindset van de therapeut, aanbevelingen over mogelijke reacties op cliënten tijdens sessies, de betrokkenheid van het ‘zelf’ van de therapeut tijdens die ontmoetingen en de inzet van reflectieteams. Verder presenteren we een bondig lijstje met aanbevelingen, als hulpmiddel voor hulpverleners en ter bevordering van het gesprek over dialogische manieren van werken.

vorige artikel Ten Geleide

volgende artikel De stem van de cliënt centraal stellen: gedeelde besluitvorming met individuele cliënten en gezinnen met een laag inkomen

Andersen, T. (1987). The reflecting team: Dialogue and meta-dialogue in clinical work. Family Process, 26(4), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1987.00415.x.CrossRefPubMed

Anderson, H. (2001). Postmodern collaborative and person-centred therapies: What would Carl Rogers say? Journal of Family Therapy, 23, 339–360.CrossRef

Anderson, H. (2002). In the space between people: Seikkula’s open dialogue approach. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28(3), 279–281.CrossRef

Anderson, H. (2005). Myths about “not-knowing”. Family Process, 44(4), 497–504.CrossRef

Anderson, H. (2007). Dialogue: People creating meaning with each other and finding ways to go on. In H. Anderson & D. R. Gehart (red.), Collaborative therapy: Relationships and conversations that make a difference. New York: Routledge.

Anderson, H. (2012). Collaborative relationships and dialogic conversations: Ideas for a relationally responsive practice. Family Process, 51(1), 8–24.CrossRef

Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. A. (1988). Human systems as linguistic systems: Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theory. Family Process, 27(4), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1988.00371.x.CrossRefPubMed

Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. A. (1992). The client is the expert: A not-knowing approach to therapy. In S. McNamee & K. J. Gergan (red.), Therapy as social construction (pag. 25–39). London: SAGE.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRef

Bertrando, P. (2007). The dialogical therapist. London: Karnac.

Bertrando, P., & Lini, C. (2019). Theory and practice of systemic-dialogical therapy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 40(2), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/anzf.1365.CrossRef

Bråten, S., & Trevarthen, C. (2007). Prologue: From infant intersubjectivity and participant movements to simulation and conversation in cultural common sense. In S. Bråten (red.), On being moved: From mirror neurons to empathy (pag. 21–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef

Brown, J. M., & Mikes-Liu, K. (2015). Special issue: Dialogical practices. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 36(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/anzf.1101.CrossRef

Buus, N., Bikic, A., Jacobsen, E. K., Müller-Nielsen, K., Aagaard, J., & Rossen, C. B. (2017). Adapting and implementing Open Dialogue in the Scandinavian countries: A scoping review. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 38(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2016.1269377.CrossRef

Buus, N., Ong, B., Einboden, R., Lennon, E., Mikes-Liu, K., Mayers, S., & McCloughen, A. (2021). Implementing open dialogue approaches: A scoping review. Family Process. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12695.CrossRefPubMed

Cecchin, G. (1987). Hypothesizing, circularity, and neutrality revisited: An invitation to curiosity. Family Process, 26(4), 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1987.00405.x.CrossRefPubMed

Cecchin, G. (1992). Constructing therapeutic possibilities. In S. McNamee & K. J. Gergan (red.), Therapy as social construction (pag. 86–95). Los Angeles: SAGE.

Cecchin, G., Keeney, B. P., Lane, G., & Ray, W. A. (2018). Irreverence: A strategy for therapists’ survival. London: Taylor and Francis.CrossRef

Cooper, M., Chak, A., Cornish, F., & Gillespie, A. (2013). Dialogue: Bridging personal, community, and social transformation. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 53(1), 70–93.CrossRef

Derish, P. A., & Annesley, T. M. (2011). How to write a rave review. Clinical Chemistry, 57(3), 388–391.CrossRef

Eiterå, A., Hansen, L., Vind, B., Hansen, A., Castella, J., & Sørensen, E. (2015). Open dialogue: Key markers and their context

Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329.CrossRef

Friedman, M. (1994). Reflections on the Buber-Rogers dialogue. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 34(1), 46–65.CrossRef

Galbusera, L., & Kyselo, M. (2018). The difference that makes the difference: A conceptual analysis of the Open Dialogue approach. Psychosis, 10(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2017.1397734.CrossRef

Gordon, C., Gidugu, V., Rogers, E. S., DeRonck, J., & Ziedonis, D. (2016). Adapting open dialogue for early-onset psychosis into the U.S. health care environment: A feasibility study. Psychiatric Services, 67(11), 1166–1168. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201600271.CrossRefPubMed

Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gromer, J. (2012). Need-adapted and Open-Dialogue treatments: Empirically supported psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, 14(3), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1891/1559-4343.14.3.162.CrossRef

Guilfoyle, M. (2003). Dialogue and power: A critical analysis of power in dialogical therapy. Family Process, 42(3), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2003.00331.x.CrossRefPubMed

Haarakangas, K., Seikkula, J., Alakare, B., & Aaltonen, J. (2007). Open Dialogue: An approach to psychotherapeutic treatment of psychosis in Northern Finland. In H. Anderson & D. R. Gehart (red.), Collaborative therapy: Relationships and conversations that make a difference (pag. 221–233). New York: Routledge.

Mikes-Liu, K., Goldfinch, M., MacDonald, C., & Ong, B. (2016). Reflective practice: An exercise in exploring inner dialogue and vertical polyphony. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 37, 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/anzf.1166.CrossRef

Olson, M., Seikkula, J., & Ziedonis, D. (2014). The key elements of dialogic practice in open dialogue. The University of Massachusetts Medical School. http://umassmed.edu/psychiatry/globalinitiatives/opendialogue/. Accessed 20 November, 2014.

Ong, B., Barbara-May, R., Brown, J. M., Dawson, L., Gray, C., McCloughen, A., et al. (2019). Open dialogue: Frequently asked questions. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 40(4), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/anzf.1387.CrossRef

Pilling, S. (2018). Development and evaluation of a social network intervention for severe mental illness: The ODDESSI research programme. In International Open Dialogue Research Collaboration (IODRC) Meeting, London.

Rober, P. (1999). The therapist’s inner conversation in family therapy practice: Some ideas about the self of the therapist, therapeutic impasse, and the process of reflection. Family Process, 38(2), 209–228.CrossRef

Rober, P. (2005a). Family therapy as a dialogue of living persons: A perspective inspired by Bakhtin, Voloshinov, and Shotter. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31(4), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01578.x.CrossRefPubMed

Rober, P. (2005b). The therapist’s self in dialogical family therapy: Some ideas about not-knowing and the therapist’s inner conversation. Family Process, 44(4), 477–495.CrossRef

Rober, P. (2010). The interacting-reflecting training exercise: Addressing the therapist’s inner conversation in family therapy training. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 36(2), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2010.00192.x.CrossRefPubMed

Rober, P. (2011). The therapist’s experiencing in family therapy practice. Journal of Family Therapy, 33, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.2010.00502.x.CrossRef

Rober, P., & Seltzer, M. (2010). Avoiding colonizer positions in the therapy room: Some ideas about the challenges of dealing with the dialectic of misery and resources in families. Family Process, 49(1), 123–137.CrossRef

Robinson, A. (2011). In theory Bakhtin: Dialogism, polyphony, and heteroglossia. Ceasefire Magazine. https://ceasefiremagazine.co.uk/in-theory-bakhtin-1/. Accessed 29 July, 2011.

Seikkula, J. (2002). Open dialogues with good and poor outcomes for psychotic crises: Examples from families with violence. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28(3), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2002.tb01183.x.CrossRefPubMed

Seikkula, J. (2003). Open Dialogue integrates individual and systemic approaches in serious psychiatric crises. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 73(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377310309517683.CrossRef

Seikkula, J. (2008). Inner and outer voices in the present moment of family and network therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 478–491.CrossRef

Seikkula, J. (2011). Becoming dialogical: Psychotherapy or a way of life? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 32(3), 179–193.

Seikkula, J., & Arnkil, T. E. (2006). Dialogical meetings in social networks. London: Karnac.

Seikkula, J., & Trimble, D. (2005). Healing elements of therapeutic conversation: Dialogue as an embodiment of love. Family Process, 44(4), 461–475.CrossRef

Seikkula, J., Laitila, A., & Rober, P. (2012). Making sense of multi-actor dialogues in family therapy and network meetings. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(4), 667–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00238.x.CrossRefPubMed

Selvini, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1980). Hypothesizing-circularity-neutrality: Three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family Process, 19(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1980.00003.x.CrossRefPubMed

Shotter, J. (2006). Understanding process from within: An argument for “withness” thinking. Organization Studies, 27, 585–604.CrossRef

Tomm, K. (1984). One perspective on the Milan systemic approach: Part II. Description of session format, interviewing style and interventions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 10(3), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1984.tb00016.x.CrossRef

Tomm, K. (1988). Interventive interviewing: Part III. Intending to ask lineal, circular, strategic, or reflexive questions? Family Process, 27(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1988.00001.x.CrossRefPubMed

Trevarthen, C. (1990). Signs before speech. In T. A. Sebeok & J. Umiker-Sebeok (red.), The semiotic web 1989 (pag. 689–756). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.

Waters, E., Ong, B., Mikes-Liu, K., McCloughen, A., Rosen, A., Mayers, S., et al. (2021). Open Dialogue, need-adapted mental health care, and implementation fidelity: A discussion paper. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 30(3), 805–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12866.CrossRef

White, M. (1995). Reflecting teamwork as definitional ceremony. In Re-authoring lives: Interviews and essays. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre.

Titel: Wat betekent ‘dialogisch’ werken in de Open dialoogbenadering en gezinstherapie? Een narratief literatuuroverzicht
Auteurs: Ben Ong
Niels Buus
Publicatiedatum: 03-08-2022
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in: Gezinstherapie Wereldwijd / Uitgave 3/2022
Print ISSN: 1566-0206
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-5874
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12440-022-00178-w

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Wat betekent ‘dialogisch’ werken in de Open dialoogbenadering en gezinstherapie? Een narratief literatuuroverzicht

Samenvatting

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2022

Ten Geleide

Relatiegerichte cognitieve gedragstherapie voor vrouwelijke koppels van hetzelfde geslacht: een pilotstudie

De stem van de cliënt centraal stellen: gedeelde besluitvorming met individuele cliënten en gezinnen met een laag inkomen

IBCT-relatietherapie voor interculturele koppels: koppels helpen omgaan met culturele verschillen

Een beeld krijgen van de relaties tussen transgender en genderdiverse jongeren en hun verzorgers

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Ten Geleide

Relatiegerichte cognitieve gedragstherapie voor vrouwelijke koppels van hetzelfde geslacht: een pilotstudie

De stem van de cliënt centraal stellen: gedeelde besluitvorming met individuele cliënten en gezinnen met een laag inkomen

IBCT-relatietherapie voor interculturele koppels: koppels helpen omgaan met culturele verschillen

Een beeld krijgen van de relaties tussen transgender en genderdiverse jongeren en hun verzorgers