Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 3/2020

06-09-2018 | Original Article

Visuo-motor interference with a virtual partner is equally present in cooperative and competitive interactions

Auteurs: Vanessa Era, Salvatore Maria Aglioti, Carolina Mancusi, Matteo Candidi

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Automatic imitation of observed actions is thought to be a powerful mechanism, one that may mediate the reward value of interpersonal interactions, but that could also generate visuo-motor interference when interactions involve complementary movements. Since interpersonal coordination seems to be crucial both when cooperating and competing with others, the questions arises as to whether imitation—and thus visuo-motor interference—occurs in both scenarios. To address this issue, we asked human participants to engage in high- or low-interactive (Interactive or Cued condition, respectively), cooperative or competitive, joint reach-to-grasps with a virtual partner. More specifically, interactions occurred in: (i) a Cued condition, where participants simply adapted their movement timing to synchronize with (during cooperation) or anticipate (during competition) the virtual partner’s grasp; (ii) an Interactive condition requiring the same adaptation, as well as a real-time selection of their action according to the virtual character’s movement. To simulate a realistic human–human interaction, the virtual character would change its movement speed in consecutive trials according to participants’ behaviour. Results demonstrate that visuo-motor interference—as indexed by movement kinematics (higher maximum wrist height during complementary compared to imitative power grips)—emerge in both cooperative and competitive motor interactions only when predictions about the partner’s movements are needed to perform one’s own action (interactive condition). These results support the idea that simulative imitation is heavily present when individuals need to match their behaviours closely.
Literatuur
go back to reference Abreu, A. M., Candidi, M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2017). Catching on it early: Bodily and brain anticipatory mechanisms for excellence in sport. In M. R. Wilson, V. Walsh, & B. Parkin (Eds.), Progress in brain research (Vol. 234, pp. 53–67). New York: Elsevier. Abreu, A. M., Candidi, M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2017). Catching on it early: Bodily and brain anticipatory mechanisms for excellence in sport. In M. R. Wilson, V. Walsh, & B. Parkin (Eds.), Progress in brain research (Vol. 234, pp. 53–67). New York: Elsevier.
go back to reference Aglioti, S. M., Cesari, P., Romani, M., & Urgesi, C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11(9), 1109–1116.PubMed Aglioti, S. M., Cesari, P., Romani, M., & Urgesi, C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11(9), 1109–1116.PubMed
go back to reference Ansuini, C., Giosa, L., Turella, L., Altoè, G., & Castiello, U. (2008). An object for an action, the same object for other actions: Effects on hand shaping. Experimental Brain Research, 185(1), 111–119.PubMed Ansuini, C., Giosa, L., Turella, L., Altoè, G., & Castiello, U. (2008). An object for an action, the same object for other actions: Effects on hand shaping. Experimental Brain Research, 185(1), 111–119.PubMed
go back to reference Avenanti, A., Candidi, M., & Urgesi, C. (2013). Vicarious motor activation during action perception: Beyond correlational evidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 185.PubMedPubMedCentral Avenanti, A., Candidi, M., & Urgesi, C. (2013). Vicarious motor activation during action perception: Beyond correlational evidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 185.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Belot, M., Crawford, V. P., & Heyes, C. (2013). Players of Matching Pennies automatically imitate opponents’ gestures against strong incentives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(8), 2763–2768. Belot, M., Crawford, V. P., & Heyes, C. (2013). Players of Matching Pennies automatically imitate opponents’ gestures against strong incentives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(8), 2763–2768.
go back to reference Blikslager, F., & de Poel, H. J. (2017). Sync or separate? No compelling evidence for unintentional interpersonal coordination between Usain Bolt and Tyson Gay on the 100-meter world record race. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(7), 1466–1471.PubMed Blikslager, F., & de Poel, H. J. (2017). Sync or separate? No compelling evidence for unintentional interpersonal coordination between Usain Bolt and Tyson Gay on the 100-meter world record race. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(7), 1466–1471.PubMed
go back to reference Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschlager, A., & Prinz, W. (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition, 44(2), 124–143.PubMed Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschlager, A., & Prinz, W. (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition, 44(2), 124–143.PubMed
go back to reference Briggs, G. G., & Nebes, R. D. (1975). Patterns of hand preference in a student population. Cortex, 11(3), 230–238.PubMed Briggs, G. G., & Nebes, R. D. (1975). Patterns of hand preference in a student population. Cortex, 11(3), 230–238.PubMed
go back to reference Candidi, M., Curioni, A., Donnarumma, F., Sacheli, L. M., & Pezzulo, G. (2015). Interactional leader–follower sensorimotor communication strategies during repetitive joint actions. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 12(110), 20150644.PubMedCentral Candidi, M., Curioni, A., Donnarumma, F., Sacheli, L. M., & Pezzulo, G. (2015). Interactional leader–follower sensorimotor communication strategies during repetitive joint actions. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 12(110), 20150644.PubMedCentral
go back to reference Candidi, M., Sacheli, L. M., Era, V., Canzano, L., Tieri, G., & Aglioti, S. M. (2017). Come together: Human–avatar on-line interactions boost joint-action performance in apraxic patients. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(11), 1793–1802.PubMedPubMedCentral Candidi, M., Sacheli, L. M., Era, V., Canzano, L., Tieri, G., & Aglioti, S. M. (2017). Come together: Human–avatar on-line interactions boost joint-action performance in apraxic patients. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(11), 1793–1802.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Candidi, M., Maria Sacheli, L., Mega, I., & Aglioti, S. M. (2014). Somatotopic mapping of piano fingering errors in sensorimotor experts: TMS studies in pianists and visually trained musically naives. Cerebral Cortex, 24(2), 435–443.PubMed Candidi, M., Maria Sacheli, L., Mega, I., & Aglioti, S. M. (2014). Somatotopic mapping of piano fingering errors in sensorimotor experts: TMS studies in pianists and visually trained musically naives. Cerebral Cortex, 24(2), 435–443.PubMed
go back to reference Cirelli, L. K., Einarson, K. M., & Trainor, L. J. (2014). Interpersonal synchrony increases prosocial behavior in infants. Developmental Science, 17(6), 1003–1011.PubMed Cirelli, L. K., Einarson, K. M., & Trainor, L. J. (2014). Interpersonal synchrony increases prosocial behavior in infants. Developmental Science, 17(6), 1003–1011.PubMed
go back to reference Cook, R., Bird, G., Lünser, G., Huck, S., & Heyes, C. (2011). Automatic imitation in a strategic context: Players of rock–paper–scissors imitate opponents’ gestures. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 79(1729), 780–786. Cook, R., Bird, G., Lünser, G., Huck, S., & Heyes, C. (2011). Automatic imitation in a strategic context: Players of rock–paper–scissors imitate opponents’ gestures. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 79(1729), 780–786.
go back to reference Curioni, A., Minio-Paluello, I., Sacheli, L. M., Candidi, M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2017). Autistic traits affect interpersonal motor coordination by modulating strategic use of role-based behavior. Molecular Autism, 8(1), 23.PubMedPubMedCentral Curioni, A., Minio-Paluello, I., Sacheli, L. M., Candidi, M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2017). Autistic traits affect interpersonal motor coordination by modulating strategic use of role-based behavior. Molecular Autism, 8(1), 23.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Decety, J., Jackson, P. L., Sommerville, J. A., Chaminade, T., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2004). The neural bases of cooperation and competition: An fMRI investigation. Neuroimage, 23(2), 744–751.PubMed Decety, J., Jackson, P. L., Sommerville, J. A., Chaminade, T., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2004). The neural bases of cooperation and competition: An fMRI investigation. Neuroimage, 23(2), 744–751.PubMed
go back to reference Era, V., Candidi, M., Gandolfo, M., Sacheli, L. M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2018). Inhibition of left anterior intraparietal sulcus shows that mutual adjustment marks dyadic joint-actions in humans. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13(5), 492–500.PubMedPubMedCentral Era, V., Candidi, M., Gandolfo, M., Sacheli, L. M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2018). Inhibition of left anterior intraparietal sulcus shows that mutual adjustment marks dyadic joint-actions in humans. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13(5), 492–500.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Eskenazi, T., Rueschemeyer, S. A., de Lange, F. P., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2015). Neural correlates of observing joint actions with shared intentions. Cortex, 70, 90–100.PubMed Eskenazi, T., Rueschemeyer, S. A., de Lange, F. P., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2015). Neural correlates of observing joint actions with shared intentions. Cortex, 70, 90–100.PubMed
go back to reference Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Social norms and human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 185–190.PubMed Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Social norms and human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 185–190.PubMed
go back to reference Forbes, P. A., & Hamilton, A. F. D. C. (2017). Moving higher and higher: Imitators’ movements are sensitive to observed trajectories regardless of action rationality. Experimental Brain Research, 235(9), 2741–2753.PubMedPubMedCentral Forbes, P. A., & Hamilton, A. F. D. C. (2017). Moving higher and higher: Imitators’ movements are sensitive to observed trajectories regardless of action rationality. Experimental Brain Research, 235(9), 2741–2753.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron, 50(4), 531–534.PubMed Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron, 50(4), 531–534.PubMed
go back to reference Georgiou, I., Becchio, C., Glover, S., & Castiello, U. (2007). Different action patterns for cooperative and competitive behaviour. Cognition, 102(3), 415–433.PubMed Georgiou, I., Becchio, C., Glover, S., & Castiello, U. (2007). Different action patterns for cooperative and competitive behaviour. Cognition, 102(3), 415–433.PubMed
go back to reference Hasson, U., & Frith, C. D. (2016). Mirroring and beyond: Coupled dynamics as a generalized framework for modelling social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371(1693), 20150366. Hasson, U., & Frith, C. D. (2016). Mirroring and beyond: Coupled dynamics as a generalized framework for modelling social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371(1693), 20150366.
go back to reference Hove, M. J., & Risen, J. L. (2009). It’s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27(6), 949–960. Hove, M. J., & Risen, J. L. (2009). It’s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27(6), 949–960.
go back to reference Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7(1), 2. Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7(1), 2.
go back to reference Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D. (2007). Predictive coding: An account of the mirror neuron system. Cognitive Processing, 8(3), 159–166.PubMedPubMedCentral Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D. (2007). Predictive coding: An account of the mirror neuron system. Cognitive Processing, 8(3), 159–166.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Kilner, J. M., Paulignan, Y., & Blakemore, S. J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13(6), 522–525.PubMed Kilner, J. M., Paulignan, Y., & Blakemore, S. J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13(6), 522–525.PubMed
go back to reference Knoblich, G., & Jordan, J. S. (2003). Action coordination in groups and individuals: Learning anticipatory control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5), 1006.PubMed Knoblich, G., & Jordan, J. S. (2003). Action coordination in groups and individuals: Learning anticipatory control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5), 1006.PubMed
go back to reference Konvalinka, I., & Roepstorff, A. (2012). The two-brain approach: How can mutually interacting brains teach us something about social interaction? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 215.PubMedPubMedCentral Konvalinka, I., & Roepstorff, A. (2012). The two-brain approach: How can mutually interacting brains teach us something about social interaction? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 215.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Krishnan-Barman, S., Forbes, P. A., & Hamilton, A. F. D. C. (2017). How can the study of action kinematics inform our understanding of human social interaction? Neuropsychologia, 105, 101–110PubMed Krishnan-Barman, S., Forbes, P. A., & Hamilton, A. F. D. C. (2017). How can the study of action kinematics inform our understanding of human social interaction? Neuropsychologia, 105, 101–110PubMed
go back to reference Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14(4), 334–339.PubMed Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14(4), 334–339.PubMed
go back to reference Lakin, J. L., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). The chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27(3), 145–162. Lakin, J. L., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). The chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27(3), 145–162.
go back to reference Love, J., Selker, R., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Dropmann, D., Verhagen, A., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2015). JASP (Version 0.7) [Computer software]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: JASP Project. Love, J., Selker, R., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Dropmann, D., Verhagen, A., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2015). JASP (Version 0.7) [Computer software]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: JASP Project.
go back to reference Manera, V., Becchio, C., Cavallo, A., Sartori, L., & Castiello, U. (2011). Cooperation or competition? Discriminating between social intentions by observing prehensile movements. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 547–556.PubMed Manera, V., Becchio, C., Cavallo, A., Sartori, L., & Castiello, U. (2011). Cooperation or competition? Discriminating between social intentions by observing prehensile movements. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 547–556.PubMed
go back to reference Masson, M. E. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 679–690.PubMed Masson, M. E. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 679–690.PubMed
go back to reference Ménoret, M., Curie, A., des Portes, V., Nazir, T. A., Paulignan, Y. (2013). Simultaneous action execution and observation optimise grasping actions. Experimental Brain Research, 227(3), 407–419.PubMed Ménoret, M., Curie, A., des Portes, V., Nazir, T. A., Paulignan, Y. (2013). Simultaneous action execution and observation optimise grasping actions. Experimental Brain Research, 227(3), 407–419.PubMed
go back to reference Miles, L. K., Nind, L. K., & Macrae, C. N. (2009). The rhythm of rapport: Interpersonal synchrony and social perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 585–589. Miles, L. K., Nind, L. K., & Macrae, C. N. (2009). The rhythm of rapport: Interpersonal synchrony and social perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 585–589.
go back to reference Mitkidis, P., McGraw, J. J., Roepstorff, A., & Wallot, S. (2015). Building trust: Heart rate synchrony and arousal during joint action increased by public goods game. Physiology & Behavior, 149, 101–106. Mitkidis, P., McGraw, J. J., Roepstorff, A., & Wallot, S. (2015). Building trust: Heart rate synchrony and arousal during joint action increased by public goods game. Physiology & Behavior, 149, 101–106.
go back to reference Naber, M., Pashkam, M. V., & Nakayama, K. (2013). Unintended imitation affects success in a competitive game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(50), 20046–20050. Naber, M., Pashkam, M. V., & Nakayama, K. (2013). Unintended imitation affects success in a competitive game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(50), 20046–20050.
go back to reference Ocampo, B., & Kritikos, A. (2010). Placing actions in context: Motor facilitation following observation of identical And non-identical manual acts. Experimental Brain Research, 201(4), 743–751.PubMed Ocampo, B., & Kritikos, A. (2010). Placing actions in context: Motor facilitation following observation of identical And non-identical manual acts. Experimental Brain Research, 201(4), 743–751.PubMed
go back to reference Panasiti, M. S., Porciello, G., & Aglioti, S. M. (2017). The bright and the dark sides of motor simulation. Neuropsychologia, 105, 92–100.PubMed Panasiti, M. S., Porciello, G., & Aglioti, S. M. (2017). The bright and the dark sides of motor simulation. Neuropsychologia, 105, 92–100.PubMed
go back to reference Pfeiffer, U. J., Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Kuzmanovic, B., Georgescu, A. L., Bente, G., & Vogeley, K. (2014). Why we interact: On the functional role of the striatum in the subjective experience of social interaction. NeuroImage, 101, 124–137.PubMed Pfeiffer, U. J., Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Kuzmanovic, B., Georgescu, A. L., Bente, G., & Vogeley, K. (2014). Why we interact: On the functional role of the striatum in the subjective experience of social interaction. NeuroImage, 101, 124–137.PubMed
go back to reference Reader, A. T., & Holmes, N. P. (2016). Examining ecological validity in social interaction: Problems of visual fidelity, gaze, and social potential. Culture and Brain, 4(2), 134–146.PubMedPubMedCentral Reader, A. T., & Holmes, N. P. (2016). Examining ecological validity in social interaction: Problems of visual fidelity, gaze, and social potential. Culture and Brain, 4(2), 134–146.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Redcay, E., Dodell-Feder, D., Pearrow, M. J., Mavros, P. L., Kleiner, M., Gabrieli, J. D., & Saxe, R. (2010). Live face-to-face interaction during fMRI: A new tool for social cognitive neuroscience. Neuroimage, 50(4), 1639–1647.PubMed Redcay, E., Dodell-Feder, D., Pearrow, M. J., Mavros, P. L., Kleiner, M., Gabrieli, J. D., & Saxe, R. (2010). Live face-to-face interaction during fMRI: A new tool for social cognitive neuroscience. Neuroimage, 50(4), 1639–1647.PubMed
go back to reference Rilling, J. K., Gutman, D. A., Zeh, T. R., Pagnoni, G., Berns, G. S., & Kilts, C. D. (2002). A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron, 35(2), 395–405.PubMed Rilling, J. K., Gutman, D. A., Zeh, T. R., Pagnoni, G., Berns, G. S., & Kilts, C. D. (2002). A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron, 35(2), 395–405.PubMed
go back to reference Rouder, J. N. (2014). Optional stopping: No problem for Bayesians. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(2), 301–308. Rouder, J. N. (2014). Optional stopping: No problem for Bayesians. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(2), 301–308.
go back to reference Sacheli, L. M., Aglioti, S. M., & Candidi, M. (2015c). Social cues to joint actions: The role of shared goals. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1034.PubMedPubMedCentral Sacheli, L. M., Aglioti, S. M., & Candidi, M. (2015c). Social cues to joint actions: The role of shared goals. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1034.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Sacheli, L. M., Candidi, M., Era, V., & Aglioti, S. M. (2015a). Causative role of left aIPS in coding shared goals during human-avatar complementary joint actions. Nature Communications, 6, 7544.PubMed Sacheli, L. M., Candidi, M., Era, V., & Aglioti, S. M. (2015a). Causative role of left aIPS in coding shared goals during human-avatar complementary joint actions. Nature Communications, 6, 7544.PubMed
go back to reference Sacheli, L. M., Candidi, M., Pavone, E. F., Tidoni, E., & Aglioti, S. M. (2012). And yet they act together: Interpersonal perception modulates visuo-motor interference and mutual adjustments during a joint-grasping task. PloS One, 7(11), e50223.PubMedPubMedCentral Sacheli, L. M., Candidi, M., Pavone, E. F., Tidoni, E., & Aglioti, S. M. (2012). And yet they act together: Interpersonal perception modulates visuo-motor interference and mutual adjustments during a joint-grasping task. PloS One, 7(11), e50223.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Sacheli, L. M., Christensen, A., Giese, M. A., Taubert, N., Pavone, E. F., Aglioti, S. M., & Candidi, M. (2015b). Prejudiced interactions: Implicit racial bias reduces predictive simulation during joint action with an out-group avatar. Scientific Reports, 5, 8507.PubMedPubMedCentral Sacheli, L. M., Christensen, A., Giese, M. A., Taubert, N., Pavone, E. F., Aglioti, S. M., & Candidi, M. (2015b). Prejudiced interactions: Implicit racial bias reduces predictive simulation during joint action with an out-group avatar. Scientific Reports, 5, 8507.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Sacheli, L. M., Tidoni, E., Pavone, E. F., Aglioti, S. M., & Candidi, M. (2013). Kinematics fingerprints of leader and follower role-taking during cooperative joint actions. Experimental Brain Research, 226(4), 473–486.PubMed Sacheli, L. M., Tidoni, E., Pavone, E. F., Aglioti, S. M., & Candidi, M. (2013). Kinematics fingerprints of leader and follower role-taking during cooperative joint actions. Experimental Brain Research, 226(4), 473–486.PubMed
go back to reference Salazar Kämpf, M., Liebermann, H., Kerschreiter, R., Krause, S., Nestler, S., & Schmukle, S. C. (2017). Disentangling the sources of mimicry: Social relations analyses of the link between mimicry and liking. Psychological Science, 29, 131–138 (0956797617727121).PubMed Salazar Kämpf, M., Liebermann, H., Kerschreiter, R., Krause, S., Nestler, S., & Schmukle, S. C. (2017). Disentangling the sources of mimicry: Social relations analyses of the link between mimicry and liking. Psychological Science, 29, 131–138 (0956797617727121).PubMed
go back to reference Schilbach, L., Wilms, M., Eickhoff, S. B., Romanzetti, S., Tepest, R., Bente, G. et al. (2010). Minds made for sharing: Initiating joint attention recruits reward-related neurocircuitry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(12), 2702–2715.PubMed Schilbach, L., Wilms, M., Eickhoff, S. B., Romanzetti, S., Tepest, R., Bente, G. et al. (2010). Minds made for sharing: Initiating joint attention recruits reward-related neurocircuitry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(12), 2702–2715.PubMed
go back to reference Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: what, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 353–367.PubMed Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: what, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 353–367.PubMed
go back to reference Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70–76.PubMed Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70–76.PubMed
go back to reference Straulino, E., Scaravilli, T., Bulgheroni, M., D’Amico, E., & Castiello, U. (2016). It’s all in the type of the task: Dopamine modulates kinematic patterns during competitive vs. cooperative interaction in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 93, 106–115.PubMed Straulino, E., Scaravilli, T., Bulgheroni, M., D’Amico, E., & Castiello, U. (2016). It’s all in the type of the task: Dopamine modulates kinematic patterns during competitive vs. cooperative interaction in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 93, 106–115.PubMed
go back to reference Tieri, G., Tidoni, E., Pavone, E. F., & Aglioti, S. M. (2015). Mere observation of body discontinuity affects perceived ownership and vicarious agency over a virtual hand. Experimental Brain Research, 233(4), 1247–1259.PubMed Tieri, G., Tidoni, E., Pavone, E. F., & Aglioti, S. M. (2015). Mere observation of body discontinuity affects perceived ownership and vicarious agency over a virtual hand. Experimental Brain Research, 233(4), 1247–1259.PubMed
go back to reference Urgesi, C., Maieron, M., Avenanti, A., Tidoni, E., Fabbro, F., & Aglioti, S. M. (2010). Simulating the future of actions in the human corticospinal system. Cerebral Cortex, 20(11), 2511–2521.PubMed Urgesi, C., Maieron, M., Avenanti, A., Tidoni, E., Fabbro, F., & Aglioti, S. M. (2010). Simulating the future of actions in the human corticospinal system. Cerebral Cortex, 20(11), 2511–2521.PubMed
go back to reference Varlet, M., & Richardson, M. J. (2015). What would be Usain Bolt’s 100-meter sprint world record without Tyson Gay? Unintentional interpersonal synchronization between the two sprinters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(1), 36.PubMed Varlet, M., & Richardson, M. J. (2015). What would be Usain Bolt’s 100-meter sprint world record without Tyson Gay? Unintentional interpersonal synchronization between the two sprinters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(1), 36.PubMed
go back to reference Vesper, C., Butterfill, S., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. Neural Networks, 23(8), 998–1003.PubMed Vesper, C., Butterfill, S., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. Neural Networks, 23(8), 998–1003.PubMed
go back to reference Wagenmakers, E. J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 779–804. Wagenmakers, E. J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 779–804.
go back to reference Walter, H., Abler, B., Ciaramidaro, A., & Erk, S. (2005). Motivating forces of human actions: Neuroimaging reward and social interaction. Brain Research Bulletin, 67(5), 368–381.PubMed Walter, H., Abler, B., Ciaramidaro, A., & Erk, S. (2005). Motivating forces of human actions: Neuroimaging reward and social interaction. Brain Research Bulletin, 67(5), 368–381.PubMed
go back to reference Wang, Y., & Hamilton, A. F. D. C. (2012). Social top-down response modulation (STORM): A model of the control of mimicry in social interaction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 153.PubMedPubMedCentral Wang, Y., & Hamilton, A. F. D. C. (2012). Social top-down response modulation (STORM): A model of the control of mimicry in social interaction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 153.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Weller, L., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2018). Disarming the gunslinger effect: Reaction beats intention for cooperative actions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(2), 761–766. Weller, L., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2018). Disarming the gunslinger effect: Reaction beats intention for cooperative actions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(2), 761–766.
Metagegevens
Titel
Visuo-motor interference with a virtual partner is equally present in cooperative and competitive interactions
Auteurs
Vanessa Era
Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Carolina Mancusi
Matteo Candidi
Publicatiedatum
06-09-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1090-8

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2020

Psychological Research 3/2020 Naar de uitgave