Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Evidence Based Practice 2/2016

01-05-2016 | Toepassing in de praktijk

Verschillen tussen behandelaars in het omgaan met routinematige uitkomstmetingen

Auteur: dr. Kim de Jong

Gepubliceerd in: Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Evidence Based Practice | Uitgave 2/2016

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Samenvatting

Steeds meer disciplines in de gezondheidszorg meten behandeluitkomsten (PROM). Niet alle behandelaars gebruiken deze metingen echter om de behandeling van de individuele patiënten te verbeteren. Dit artikel geeft een samenvatting van het onderzoek naar verschillen tussen behandelaars in het omgaan met routinematige uitkomstmetingen.

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Evidence Based Practice

Met het Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Evidence Based Practice (NTvEBP) wordt een brug geslagen tussen de wetenschap en de verpleegkundige praktijk van alledag. Want verpleegkundigen professionaliseren voortdurend en zoeken naar wegen om het eigen handelen wetenschappelijk te onderbouwen.

TvZ

Het vakblad TvZ belicht de verpleegkundige praktijk én wetenschap. De diepgaande en wetenschappelijke artikelen gaan over onderzoek, opinie, beleid en management.

BSL Verpleegkundige Totaal

Literatuur
1).
go back to reference Marshall S, Haywood K, Fitzpatrick R, Impact of patientreported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. J Eval Clin Pract 2006; 12(5):559–568. CrossRefPubMed Marshall S, Haywood K, Fitzpatrick R, Impact of patientreported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. J Eval Clin Pract 2006; 12(5):559–568. CrossRefPubMed
2).
go back to reference van Kessel P, Triemstra M, de Boer D, Patient Reported Outcome Measures. 2014. van Kessel P, Triemstra M, de Boer D, Patient Reported Outcome Measures. 2014.
3).
go back to reference GGZ, S.B. 2016. Available from: http://​www.​sbggz.​nl/​ Benchmarken?contentitem = eadc77f5-f95e-4672-a8d8-f73fddc90036& paragraph = 3769ecfe-1942-42a7-823 f- 8141130bbfa0#Benchmarken-≠-ROM-≠-verantwoorden-≠- afrekenen. GGZ, S.B. 2016. Available from: http://​www.​sbggz.​nl/​ Benchmarken?contentitem = eadc77f5-f95e-4672-a8d8-f73fddc90036& paragraph = 3769ecfe-1942-42a7-823 f- 8141130bbfa0#Benchmarken-≠-ROM-≠-verantwoorden-≠- afrekenen.
4).
go back to reference Kendrick T, et al. Routine use of patient reported outcome measures for improving treatment of common mental health diorders in adults. The Cochrane Library, submitted. Kendrick T, et al. Routine use of patient reported outcome measures for improving treatment of common mental health diorders in adults. The Cochrane Library, submitted.
5).
go back to reference Carlier IVE, et al. Routine outcome monitoring and feedback on physical or mental health status: evidence and theory. J Eval Clin Pract 2012;18:104–110. CrossRef Carlier IVE, et al. Routine outcome monitoring and feedback on physical or mental health status: evidence and theory. J Eval Clin Pract 2012;18:104–110. CrossRef
6).
go back to reference Chen J, Ou L, Hollis SJ. A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13(1):1–24. CrossRef Chen J, Ou L, Hollis SJ. A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13(1):1–24. CrossRef
7).
go back to reference Shimokawa K, Lambert MJ, Smart DW. Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. J Consult Clin Psychol 2010;78:298–311. CrossRefPubMed Shimokawa K, Lambert MJ, Smart DW. Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. J Consult Clin Psychol 2010;78:298–311. CrossRefPubMed
8).
go back to reference Sapyta J, Riemer M, Bickman L. Feedback to clinicians: theory, research and practice. J Clin Psychol: In Session 2005; 61(2):145–153. CrossRefPubMed Sapyta J, Riemer M, Bickman L. Feedback to clinicians: theory, research and practice. J Clin Psychol: In Session 2005; 61(2):145–153. CrossRefPubMed
9).
go back to reference Kotronoulas G, et al. What is the value of the routine use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. J Clin Oncol 2014. Kotronoulas G, et al. What is the value of the routine use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. J Clin Oncol 2014.
10).
go back to reference Riemer M, Bickman L. Using program theory to link social psychology and program evaluation. In: Mark MM, Donaldson SI, Campbell B, Editors. Social psychology and evaluation. New York: Guilford Press; 2011. Riemer M, Bickman L. Using program theory to link social psychology and program evaluation. In: Mark MM, Donaldson SI, Campbell B, Editors. Social psychology and evaluation. New York: Guilford Press; 2011.
11).
go back to reference Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 1996; 119(2):254–284. CrossRef Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 1996; 119(2):254–284. CrossRef
12).
go back to reference de Jong K. De rol van de behandelaar: de ‘vergeten’ factor in ROM. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie 2012;54:197–201. PubMed de Jong K. De rol van de behandelaar: de ‘vergeten’ factor in ROM. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie 2012;54:197–201. PubMed
13).
go back to reference Aoun S, Pennebaker D, Janca A. Outcome measurement in rural mental health care: a field trial of rooming-in models. Aust J Rural Health 2002; 10(6):302–307. CrossRefPubMed Aoun S, Pennebaker D, Janca A. Outcome measurement in rural mental health care: a field trial of rooming-in models. Aust J Rural Health 2002; 10(6):302–307. CrossRefPubMed
14).
go back to reference Walter G, Cleary M, Rey JM. Attitudes of mental health personnel towards rating outcome. Journal of Quality in Clinical Practice 1998; 18(2):109–115. PubMed Walter G, Cleary M, Rey JM. Attitudes of mental health personnel towards rating outcome. Journal of Quality in Clinical Practice 1998; 18(2):109–115. PubMed
15).
go back to reference de Jong K, et al. Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial. Psychotherapy Research 2012; 22(4):464–474. CrossRef de Jong K, et al. Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial. Psychotherapy Research 2012; 22(4):464–474. CrossRef
16).
go back to reference Willis A, Deane FP, Coombs T. Improving clinicians’ attitudes toward providing feedback on routine outcome assessments. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2009; 18(3):211–215. CrossRefPubMed Willis A, Deane FP, Coombs T. Improving clinicians’ attitudes toward providing feedback on routine outcome assessments. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2009; 18(3):211–215. CrossRefPubMed
17).
go back to reference Kelley JM, et al. The influence of the patient-clinician relationship on healthcare outcomes: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. PloS one 2014; 9(4):e94207. CrossRef Kelley JM, et al. The influence of the patient-clinician relationship on healthcare outcomes: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. PloS one 2014; 9(4):e94207. CrossRef
18).
go back to reference Schoenthaler AM, et al. Patient and physician factors associated with adherence to diabetes medications. Diabetes Educ 2012; 38(3):397–408. CrossRef Schoenthaler AM, et al. Patient and physician factors associated with adherence to diabetes medications. Diabetes Educ 2012; 38(3):397–408. CrossRef
19).
go back to reference Ironson G, Lucette A, McIntosh RC. Doctor-patient relationship: active patient involvement (DPR: API) is related to long survival status and predicts adherence change in HIV. Journal of AIDS & Clinical Research 2015. Ironson G, Lucette A, McIntosh RC. Doctor-patient relationship: active patient involvement (DPR: API) is related to long survival status and predicts adherence change in HIV. Journal of AIDS & Clinical Research 2015.
20).
go back to reference Sitzmann T, Yeo G. A meta-analytic investigation of the within- person self-efficacy domain: is self-efficacy a product of past performance or a driver of future performance? Personnel Psychology 2013; 66(3):531–568. CrossRef Sitzmann T, Yeo G. A meta-analytic investigation of the within- person self-efficacy domain: is self-efficacy a product of past performance or a driver of future performance? Personnel Psychology 2013; 66(3):531–568. CrossRef
21).
go back to reference Higgins ET. Promotion and prevention: regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1998;30:1–46. CrossRef Higgins ET. Promotion and prevention: regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1998;30:1–46. CrossRef
22).
go back to reference de Jong K, de Goede M. Why do some therapists not deal with outcome monitoring feedback? A feasibility study on the effect of regulatory focus and person–organization fit on attitude and outcome. Psychotherapy Research 2015; 25(6):661–668. CrossRefPubMed de Jong K, de Goede M. Why do some therapists not deal with outcome monitoring feedback? A feasibility study on the effect of regulatory focus and person–organization fit on attitude and outcome. Psychotherapy Research 2015; 25(6):661–668. CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Verschillen tussen behandelaars in het omgaan met routinematige uitkomstmetingen
Auteur
dr. Kim de Jong
Publicatiedatum
01-05-2016
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in
Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Evidence Based Practice / Uitgave 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1572-2082
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-8806
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12468-016-0019-8