Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 7/2015

01-07-2015

Valuing EQ-5D health states for Sri Lanka

Auteurs: Sanjeewa Kularatna, Jennifer A. Whitty, Newell W. Johnson, Ruwan Jayasinghe, Paul A. Scuffham

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 7/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to derive an algorithm to estimate utility values for the EQ-5D-3L health states based on the preferences of a population sample from Sri Lanka.

Methods

The time trade-off method was used to directly value 198 EQ-5D-3L health states in a general population sample (n = 780) from Sri Lanka. Stratified cluster sampling with random selection within clusters was used to select the sample from four districts. Each participant valued 15 health states via face-to-face interviews. The best fit model was selected using consistency, parsimony, and goodness of fit. Based on logical inconsistency, numerous sub-samples were also used for model specification. For each model, the numbers of illogical orderings in the resulting value set were also examined.

Results

Generalised least squares with random effects were found to be the best specification. The sub-sample consisting of participants with less than seven logical inconsistent observations produced no illogical ordering in the final value set and is considered the preferred model. Compared to value sets in other countries, a high disutility is associated with level 3 deficits in the mobility dimension. More than 50 % of health states in the Sri Lankan value set are deemed worse than death health states.

Conclusions

Sri Lankan utility values for EQ-5D-3L states deviate markedly from existing values for upper middle and high-income countries. It is important to have country-specific utility values to conduct cost–utility analysis.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Scuffham, P. A., Whitty, J. A., Mitchell, A., & Viney, R. (2008). The use of QALY weights for QALY calculations: A review of industry submissions requesting listing on the Australian pharmaceutical benefits scheme 2002–4. Pharmacoeconomics, 26(4), 297–310.PubMedCrossRef Scuffham, P. A., Whitty, J. A., Mitchell, A., & Viney, R. (2008). The use of QALY weights for QALY calculations: A review of industry submissions requesting listing on the Australian pharmaceutical benefits scheme 2002–4. Pharmacoeconomics, 26(4), 297–310.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). (2008). Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. London: NICE. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). (2008). Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. London: NICE.
3.
go back to reference Drummond, M. F. (1999). Methods for the economic evaluation of healthcare programmes. UK: Oxford Medical Publications. Drummond, M. F. (1999). Methods for the economic evaluation of healthcare programmes. UK: Oxford Medical Publications.
4.
go back to reference Norman, R., Cronin, P., Viney, R., King, M., Street, D., & Ratcliffe, J. (2009). International comparisons in valuing EQ-5D health states: A review and analysis. Value Health, 12(8), 1194–1200.PubMedCrossRef Norman, R., Cronin, P., Viney, R., King, M., Street, D., & Ratcliffe, J. (2009). International comparisons in valuing EQ-5D health states: A review and analysis. Value Health, 12(8), 1194–1200.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Torrance, G. W., Furlong, W., Feeny, D., & Boyle, M. (1995). Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index Pharmacoeconomics, 7(6), 503–520. Torrance, G. W., Furlong, W., Feeny, D., & Boyle, M. (1995). Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index Pharmacoeconomics, 7(6), 503–520.
6.
go back to reference Kharroubi, S., O’Hagan, A., & Brazier, J. (2010). A comparison of United States and United Kingdom EQ-5D health states valuations using a nonparametric Bayesian method. Statistics in Medicine, 29(15), 1622–1634.PubMed Kharroubi, S., O’Hagan, A., & Brazier, J. (2010). A comparison of United States and United Kingdom EQ-5D health states valuations using a nonparametric Bayesian method. Statistics in Medicine, 29(15), 1622–1634.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Badia, X., Roset, M., Herdman, M., & Kind, P. (2001). A comparison of United Kingdom and Spanish general population time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states. Medical Decision Making, 21(1), 7–16.PubMedCrossRef Badia, X., Roset, M., Herdman, M., & Kind, P. (2001). A comparison of United Kingdom and Spanish general population time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states. Medical Decision Making, 21(1), 7–16.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kularatna, S., Whitty, J., Johnson, N., & Scuffham, P. (2013). Health state valuation in low and middle income countries: A systematic review of the literature. Value Health. 16(6), 1091–1099. Kularatna, S., Whitty, J., Johnson, N., & Scuffham, P. (2013). Health state valuation in low and middle income countries: A systematic review of the literature. Value Health. 16(6), 1091–1099.
10.
go back to reference Kularatna, S., Whitty, J. A., Johnson, N. W., & Scuffham, P. A. (2013). Study protocol for valuing EQ-5D-3L and EORTC-8D health states in a representative population sample in Sri Lanka. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), 149.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kularatna, S., Whitty, J. A., Johnson, N. W., & Scuffham, P. A. (2013). Study protocol for valuing EQ-5D-3L and EORTC-8D health states in a representative population sample in Sri Lanka. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), 149.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Viney, R., Norman, R., King, M. T., Cronin, P., Street, D. J., Knox, S., et al. (2011). Time trade-off derived EQ-5D weights for Australia. Value Health, 14(6), 928–936.PubMedCrossRef Viney, R., Norman, R., King, M. T., Cronin, P., Street, D. J., Knox, S., et al. (2011). Time trade-off derived EQ-5D weights for Australia. Value Health, 14(6), 928–936.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gudex, C. (1994). Time trade off user manual: Props and self completion methods. York: The University of York. Gudex, C. (1994). Time trade off user manual: Props and self completion methods. York: The University of York.
13.
go back to reference StataCorp. (2011). Stata statistical software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP. StataCorp. (2011). Stata statistical software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
14.
go back to reference Dolan, P., & Kind, P. (1996). Inconsistency and health state valuations. Social Science and Medicine, 42(4), 609–615.PubMedCrossRef Dolan, P., & Kind, P. (1996). Inconsistency and health state valuations. Social Science and Medicine, 42(4), 609–615.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lamers, L. M., Stalmeier, P. F. M., Krabbe, P. F. M., & Busschbach, J. J. V. (2006). Inconsistencies in TTO and VAS values for EQ-5D health states. Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 26(2), 173–181.CrossRef Lamers, L. M., Stalmeier, P. F. M., Krabbe, P. F. M., & Busschbach, J. J. V. (2006). Inconsistencies in TTO and VAS values for EQ-5D health states. Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 26(2), 173–181.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723.CrossRef Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464.CrossRef Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095–1108.PubMedCrossRef Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095–1108.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Augustovski, F. A., Irazola, V. E., Velazquez, A. P., Gibbons, L., & Craig, B. M. (2009). Argentine valuation of the EQ-5D health states. Value in Health: The journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 12(4), 587–596.CrossRef Augustovski, F. A., Irazola, V. E., Velazquez, A. P., Gibbons, L., & Craig, B. M. (2009). Argentine valuation of the EQ-5D health states. Value in Health: The journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 12(4), 587–596.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Tongsiri, S., & Cairns, J. (2011) Estimating population-based values for EQ-5D health states in Thailand. Value in Health: The Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. 14(8), 1142–1145. Tongsiri, S., & Cairns, J. (2011) Estimating population-based values for EQ-5D health states in Thailand. Value in Health: The Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. 14(8), 1142–1145.
Metagegevens
Titel
Valuing EQ-5D health states for Sri Lanka
Auteurs
Sanjeewa Kularatna
Jennifer A. Whitty
Newell W. Johnson
Ruwan Jayasinghe
Paul A. Scuffham
Publicatiedatum
01-07-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0906-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2015

Quality of Life Research 7/2015 Naar de uitgave