Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 7/2012

01-09-2012 | Brief Communication

Validation of the Swedish translation of the general self-efficacy scale

Auteurs: Jesper Löve, Crystal Dea Moore, Gunnel Hensing

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 7/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

To study the internal consistency, factorial structure, and convergent validity of the Swedish translation of the General Self-Efficacy scale (S-GSE).

Methods

The S-GSE and two items on mental and physical work capacity were completed by a randomized population cohort (n = 4,027) and two cohorts (n = 3,310 and n = 498) of incident cases of sick-leave (>14 days).

Results

S-GSE means were higher among men than women in two of the cohorts and higher in the randomized population cohort than in the two sick-leave cohorts. Internal consistency was high with α = .90. Unidimensionality was indicated and factor loadings ranged between .64 and .80. Moderate correlations (.35–.38) between the S-GSE and mental work capacity were found in all cohorts. Yet, the correlation between S-GSE and physical work capacity was weaker in the sick-leave cohorts. The psychometric properties showed similar patterns across gender.

Conclusions

Across three cohorts, additionally stratified by gender, the S-GSE comprised one single latent factor and showed high internal consistency. However, since S-GSE was more strongly related to self-assessments of mental work capacity than physical work capacity regardless of sick-leave status, the S-GSE may not be a strong predictor of beliefs about physical work capacity across all populations.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (p. 604). NY: W.H. Freeman. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (p. 604). NY: W.H. Freeman.
2.
go back to reference Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–336). CT: Information Age. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–336). CT: Information Age.
3.
go back to reference Scholz, U., et al. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 242–251.CrossRef Scholz, U., et al. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 242–251.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Self-efficacy measurement and generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A users’s portfolio. Causal control beliefs (pp. 33–39). Windsor: NFER-NELSON. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Self-efficacy measurement and generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A users’s portfolio. Causal control beliefs (pp. 33–39). Windsor: NFER-NELSON.
5.
go back to reference Sherer, M., et al. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construct and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663–671.CrossRef Sherer, M., et al. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construct and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663–671.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Luszczynska, A., Gutierrez-Dona, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 80–89.CrossRef Luszczynska, A., Gutierrez-Dona, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 80–89.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bubany, S. T., & Hansen, J. I. C. (2010). Ability self-estimates and self-efficacy: Meaningfully distinct? Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43(3), 168–187.CrossRef Bubany, S. T., & Hansen, J. I. C. (2010). Ability self-estimates and self-efficacy: Meaningfully distinct? Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43(3), 168–187.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lisiankova, K., & Wright, R. E. (2005). Demographic change and the European union labour market. National Institute Economic Review, 194, 74–81.CrossRef Lisiankova, K., & Wright, R. E. (2005). Demographic change and the European union labour market. National Institute Economic Review, 194, 74–81.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Radkiewicz, P., Widerszal-Bazyl, M., & NEXT-group. (2005). Psychometric properties of work ability index in the light of comparative survey study. In G. Costa, W. Goedhart, & J. Ilmarinen (Eds.), Assessment and promotion of work ability, health and well-being of ageing workers (pp. 304–309). Verona: International Congress Series, Elsevier. Radkiewicz, P., Widerszal-Bazyl, M., & NEXT-group. (2005). Psychometric properties of work ability index in the light of comparative survey study. In G. Costa, W. Goedhart, & J. Ilmarinen (Eds.), Assessment and promotion of work ability, health and well-being of ageing workers (pp. 304–309). Verona: International Congress Series, Elsevier.
11.
go back to reference Nunnaly, J., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Nunnaly, J., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
12.
go back to reference Leganger, A., Kraft, P., & Roysamb, E. (2000). Perceived self-efficacy in health behaviour research: Conceptualisation, measurement and correlates. Psychology & Health, 15(1), 51–69.CrossRef Leganger, A., Kraft, P., & Roysamb, E. (2000). Perceived self-efficacy in health behaviour research: Conceptualisation, measurement and correlates. Psychology & Health, 15(1), 51–69.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Validation of the Swedish translation of the general self-efficacy scale
Auteurs
Jesper Löve
Crystal Dea Moore
Gunnel Hensing
Publicatiedatum
01-09-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 7/2012
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0030-5

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2012

Quality of Life Research 7/2012 Naar de uitgave