Skip to main content
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
ZOEKEN
MENU 1 2 3 4
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 7/2017

26-02-2017

Validation of the PROMIS® measures of self-efficacy for managing chronic conditions

Auteurs: Ann L. Gruber-Baldini, Craig Velozo, Sergio Romero, Lisa M. Shulman

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 7/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) was designed to develop, validate, and standardize item banks to measure key domains of physical, mental, and social health in chronic conditions. This paper reports the calibration and validation testing of the PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions measures.

Methods

PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions item banks comprise five domains, Self-Efficacy for Managing: Daily Activities, Symptoms, Medications and Treatments, Emotions, and Social Interactions. Banks were calibrated in 1087 subjects from two data sources: 837 patients with chronic neurologic conditions (epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, neuropathy, Parkinson disease, and stroke) and 250 subjects from an online Internet sample of adults with general chronic conditions. Scores were compared with one legacy scale: Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item scale (SEMCD6) and five PROMIS short forms: Global Health (Physical and Mental), Physical Function, Fatigue, Depression, and Anxiety.

Results

The sample was 57% female, mean age = 53.8 (SD = 14.7), 76% white, 21% African American, 6% Hispanic, and 76% with greater than high school education. Full-item banks were created for each domain. All measures had good internal consistency and correlated well with SEMCD6 (r  = 0.56–0.75). Significant correlations were seen between the Self-Efficacy measures and other PROMIS short forms (r  > 0.38).

Conclusions

The newly developed PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions measures include five domains of self-efficacy that were calibrated across diverse chronic conditions and show good internal consistency and cross-sectional validity.
vorige artikel The Cancer Loneliness Scale and Cancer-related Negative Social Expectations Scale: development and validation
Literatuur
1.
Cella, D., et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. The American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. PubMedCrossRef
3.
Clark, N. M., & Dodge, J. A. (1999). Exploring self-efficacy as a predictor of disease management. Health Education & Behavior, 26(1), 72–89. CrossRef
4.
Ashford, S., Edmunds, J., & French, D. P. (2010). What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(Pt 2), 265–288. PubMedCrossRef
5.
Bodenheimer, T., et al. (2002). Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA, 288(19), 2469–2475. PubMedCrossRef
6.
Holman, H. R., & Lorig, K. (1992). Perceived self-efficacy in self-management of chronic disease, in Self-efficacy: thought control of action. New York: Hemishperes Publications.
7.
Lorig, K. R., et al. (2001). Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Effective Clinical Practice, 4(6), 256–262. PubMed
8.
Bandura, A., & Self-efficacy (1977). toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. PubMedCrossRef
9.
Schwartz, C. E., et al. (1996). Measuring self-efficacy in people with multiple sclerosis: a validation study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77(4), 394–398. PubMedCrossRef
10.
Wu, A. M., Tang, C. S., & Kwok, T. C. (2004). Self-efficacy, health locus of control, and psychological distress in elderly Chinese women with chronic illnesses. Aging & Mental Health, 8(1), 21–28. CrossRef
11.
Chlebowy, D. O., & Garvin, B. J. (2006). Social support, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations: impact on self-care behaviors and glycemic control in Caucasian and African American adults with type 2 diabetes. The Diabetes Educator, 32(5), 777–786. PubMedCrossRef
12.
Lorig, K., et al. (1985). Outcomes of self-help education for patients with arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 28(6), 680–685. PubMedCrossRef
13.
Beckham, J. C., et al. (1997). Self-efficacy and adjustment in cancer patients: A preliminary report. Behavioral Medicine, 23(3), 138–142. PubMedCrossRef
14.
Denison, E., Asenlof, P., & Lindberg, P. (2004). Self-efficacy, fear avoidance, and pain intensity as predictors of disability in subacute and chronic musculoskeletal pain patients in primary health care. Pain, 111(3), 245–252. PubMedCrossRef
15.
Kuijer, R. G., & D.T.D. De Ridder (2003). Discrepancy in illness-related goals and quality of life in chronically ill patients: The role of self-efficacy. Psychology & Health, 18(3), 313–330. CrossRef
16.
Riazi, A., Thompson, A. J., & Hobart, J. C. (2004). Self-efficacy predicts self-reported health status in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 10(1), 61–66. PubMedCrossRef
17.
Hellstrom, K., et al. (2003). Self-efficacy in relation to impairments and activities of daily living disability in elderly patients with stroke: A prospective investigation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 35(5), 202–207. PubMedCrossRef
18.
Edwards, R., et al. (2001). Self-efficacy as a predictor of adult adjustment to sickle cell disease: One-year outcomes. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63(5), 850–858. PubMedCrossRef
19.
Holman, H., Mazonson, P., & Lorig, K. (1989). Health education for self-management has significant early and sustained benefits in chronic arthritis. Transactions of the Association of American Physicians, 102, 204–208. PubMed
20.
Lenker, S. L., Lorig, K., & Gallagher, D. (1984). Reasons for the lack of association between changes in health behavior and improved health status: An exploratory study. Patient Education and Counseling, 6(2), 69–72. PubMedCrossRef
21.
Lorig, K., et al. (1989). The beneficial outcomes of the arthritis self-management course are not adequately explained by behavior change. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 32(1), 91–95. PubMedCrossRef
22.
Howorka, K., et al. (2000). Empowering diabetes out-patients with structured education: Short-term and long-term effects of functional insulin treatment on perceived control over diabetes. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 48(1), 37–44. PubMedCrossRef
23.
Rigby, S. A., Thornton, E. W., & Young, C. A. (2008). A randomized group intervention trial to enhance mood and self-efficacy in people with multiple sclerosis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13(Pt 4), 619–631. PubMedCrossRef
24.
Lev, E. L., & Owen, S.V. (1996). A measure of self-care self-efficacy. Research in Nursing & Health, 19(5), 421–429. CrossRef
25.
Fernandez, S., et al. (2008). Revision and validation of the medication adherence self-efficacy scale (MASES) in hypertensive African Americans. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31(6), 453–462. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
Rodgers, W. M., et al. (2008). Evidence for a multidimensional self-efficacy for exercise scale. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79(2), 222–234. PubMedCrossRef
27.
Frei, A., et al. (2009). Self-efficacy instruments for patients with chronic diseases suffer from methodological limitations—A systematic review. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 86. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Lorig, K. S. A., Ritter, P., González, V. (1996). Outcome measures for health education and other health care interventions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
29.
Lorig, K., Chastain, R. L., Ung, E., Shoors, S., & Holman, H. R. (1989). Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis. Arthritis & Rhuematology, 32(1), 37–44. CrossRef
30.
Reeve, B. B., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S22–S31. PubMedCrossRef
31.
DeWalt, D.A., Rothrock, N., Yount S., Stone, A., on behalf of the PROMIS Cooperative Group. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates—The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45, S12–S21. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
Sood, P., Romero, R., Velozo, C., Gruber-Baldini, A., Shulman L.(2015). Defining and prioritizing sub-domains of self-efficacy for managing chronic conditions: A web-based delphi technique. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 10, e4. CrossRef
33.
Rothrock, N. E., et al. (2010). Relative to the general US population, chronic diseases are associated with poorer health-related quality of life as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1195–1204. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
Hong, I., et al. (2016) Assessment of the psychometrics of a PROMIS item bank: Self-efficacy for managing daily activities. Quality of Life Research. 25(9), 2221–2232. PubMedCrossRef
35.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. ( 2012) Mplus. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
36.
Revicki, D. A., et al. (2014). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the PROMIS pain quality item bank. Quality of Life Research, 23(1), 245–255. PubMedCrossRef
37.
Cai, L., Thissen, D., & S.H.C. du Toit (2011). IRTPRO for Windows. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International.
38.
Bonita, R., & Beaglehole, R. (1988). Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke, 19(12), 1497–1500. PubMedCrossRef
39.
Collin, C., et al. (1988). The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. International Disability Studies, 10(2), 61–63. PubMedCrossRef
40.
Mahoney, F. I., & Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61–65. PubMed
41.
Wade, D. T., & Collin, C. (1988). The Barthel ADL Index: A standard measure of physical disability? International Disability Studies, 10(2), 64–67. PubMedCrossRef
42.
Melchior, M. A., et al. (2013). Intermediate outcomes of a chronic disease self-management program for spanish-speaking older adults in South Florida, 2008–2010. Preventing Chronic Disease, 10, E146. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously. A theory of socioemotional selectivity. The American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181. PubMedCrossRef
44.
Gruber-Baldini, A., Velozo, C., Romero, S., Barr, E., Armstrong, M., & Shulman, L. (2014). PROMIS physical and mental health measures across 5 neurologic disorders, platform, American neurologic association annual meeting. Annals of Neurology, 76, S36.
45.
Bjorner, J. B., et al. (2014). Difference in method of administration did not significantly impact item response: an IRT-based analysis from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) initiative. Quality of Life Research, 23(1), 217–227. PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Validation of the PROMIS® measures of self-efficacy for managing chronic conditions
Auteurs
Ann L. Gruber-Baldini
Craig Velozo
Sergio Romero
Lisa M. Shulman
Publicatiedatum
26-02-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1527-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2017

Quality of Life Research 7/2017 Naar de uitgave

Brief Communication

Comparison of quality of life among long-term melanoma survivors and non-melanoma controls: a cross-sectional study

OriginalPaper

The longitudinal course of depression symptomatology following a palliative rehabilitation program

Review

Systematic review of the health-related quality of life issues facing adolescents and young adults with cancer

OriginalPaper

Changes in quality of life from a homelessness intervention: true change, response shift, or random variation

OriginalPaper

Examining health-related quality of life patterns in women with breast cancer

OriginalPaper

General health status in army personnel: relations with health behaviors and psychosocial variables

Version: 0.2011.0