Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 7/2017

26-02-2017

Validation of the PROMIS® measures of self-efficacy for managing chronic conditions

Auteurs: Ann L. Gruber-Baldini, Craig Velozo, Sergio Romero, Lisa M. Shulman

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 7/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) was designed to develop, validate, and standardize item banks to measure key domains of physical, mental, and social health in chronic conditions. This paper reports the calibration and validation testing of the PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions measures.

Methods

PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions item banks comprise five domains, Self-Efficacy for Managing: Daily Activities, Symptoms, Medications and Treatments, Emotions, and Social Interactions. Banks were calibrated in 1087 subjects from two data sources: 837 patients with chronic neurologic conditions (epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, neuropathy, Parkinson disease, and stroke) and 250 subjects from an online Internet sample of adults with general chronic conditions. Scores were compared with one legacy scale: Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item scale (SEMCD6) and five PROMIS short forms: Global Health (Physical and Mental), Physical Function, Fatigue, Depression, and Anxiety.

Results

The sample was 57% female, mean age = 53.8 (SD = 14.7), 76% white, 21% African American, 6% Hispanic, and 76% with greater than high school education. Full-item banks were created for each domain. All measures had good internal consistency and correlated well with SEMCD6 (r  = 0.56–0.75). Significant correlations were seen between the Self-Efficacy measures and other PROMIS short forms (r  > 0.38).

Conclusions

The newly developed PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions measures include five domains of self-efficacy that were calibrated across diverse chronic conditions and show good internal consistency and cross-sectional validity.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Cella, D., et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cella, D., et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. The American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. PubMedCrossRef Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. The American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Clark, N. M., & Dodge, J. A. (1999). Exploring self-efficacy as a predictor of disease management. Health Education & Behavior, 26(1), 72–89. CrossRef Clark, N. M., & Dodge, J. A. (1999). Exploring self-efficacy as a predictor of disease management. Health Education & Behavior, 26(1), 72–89. CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ashford, S., Edmunds, J., & French, D. P. (2010). What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(Pt 2), 265–288. PubMedCrossRef Ashford, S., Edmunds, J., & French, D. P. (2010). What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(Pt 2), 265–288. PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bodenheimer, T., et al. (2002). Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA, 288(19), 2469–2475. PubMedCrossRef Bodenheimer, T., et al. (2002). Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA, 288(19), 2469–2475. PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Holman, H. R., & Lorig, K. (1992). Perceived self-efficacy in self-management of chronic disease, in Self-efficacy: thought control of action. New York: Hemishperes Publications. Holman, H. R., & Lorig, K. (1992). Perceived self-efficacy in self-management of chronic disease, in Self-efficacy: thought control of action. New York: Hemishperes Publications.
7.
go back to reference Lorig, K. R., et al. (2001). Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Effective Clinical Practice, 4(6), 256–262. PubMed Lorig, K. R., et al. (2001). Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Effective Clinical Practice, 4(6), 256–262. PubMed
8.
go back to reference Bandura, A., & Self-efficacy (1977). toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. PubMedCrossRef Bandura, A., & Self-efficacy (1977). toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Schwartz, C. E., et al. (1996). Measuring self-efficacy in people with multiple sclerosis: a validation study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77(4), 394–398. PubMedCrossRef Schwartz, C. E., et al. (1996). Measuring self-efficacy in people with multiple sclerosis: a validation study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77(4), 394–398. PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wu, A. M., Tang, C. S., & Kwok, T. C. (2004). Self-efficacy, health locus of control, and psychological distress in elderly Chinese women with chronic illnesses. Aging & Mental Health, 8(1), 21–28. CrossRef Wu, A. M., Tang, C. S., & Kwok, T. C. (2004). Self-efficacy, health locus of control, and psychological distress in elderly Chinese women with chronic illnesses. Aging & Mental Health, 8(1), 21–28. CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chlebowy, D. O., & Garvin, B. J. (2006). Social support, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations: impact on self-care behaviors and glycemic control in Caucasian and African American adults with type 2 diabetes. The Diabetes Educator, 32(5), 777–786. PubMedCrossRef Chlebowy, D. O., & Garvin, B. J. (2006). Social support, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations: impact on self-care behaviors and glycemic control in Caucasian and African American adults with type 2 diabetes. The Diabetes Educator, 32(5), 777–786. PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lorig, K., et al. (1985). Outcomes of self-help education for patients with arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 28(6), 680–685. PubMedCrossRef Lorig, K., et al. (1985). Outcomes of self-help education for patients with arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 28(6), 680–685. PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Beckham, J. C., et al. (1997). Self-efficacy and adjustment in cancer patients: A preliminary report. Behavioral Medicine, 23(3), 138–142. PubMedCrossRef Beckham, J. C., et al. (1997). Self-efficacy and adjustment in cancer patients: A preliminary report. Behavioral Medicine, 23(3), 138–142. PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Denison, E., Asenlof, P., & Lindberg, P. (2004). Self-efficacy, fear avoidance, and pain intensity as predictors of disability in subacute and chronic musculoskeletal pain patients in primary health care. Pain, 111(3), 245–252. PubMedCrossRef Denison, E., Asenlof, P., & Lindberg, P. (2004). Self-efficacy, fear avoidance, and pain intensity as predictors of disability in subacute and chronic musculoskeletal pain patients in primary health care. Pain, 111(3), 245–252. PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kuijer, R. G., & D.T.D. De Ridder (2003). Discrepancy in illness-related goals and quality of life in chronically ill patients: The role of self-efficacy. Psychology & Health, 18(3), 313–330. CrossRef Kuijer, R. G., & D.T.D. De Ridder (2003). Discrepancy in illness-related goals and quality of life in chronically ill patients: The role of self-efficacy. Psychology & Health, 18(3), 313–330. CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Riazi, A., Thompson, A. J., & Hobart, J. C. (2004). Self-efficacy predicts self-reported health status in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 10(1), 61–66. PubMedCrossRef Riazi, A., Thompson, A. J., & Hobart, J. C. (2004). Self-efficacy predicts self-reported health status in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 10(1), 61–66. PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hellstrom, K., et al. (2003). Self-efficacy in relation to impairments and activities of daily living disability in elderly patients with stroke: A prospective investigation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 35(5), 202–207. PubMedCrossRef Hellstrom, K., et al. (2003). Self-efficacy in relation to impairments and activities of daily living disability in elderly patients with stroke: A prospective investigation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 35(5), 202–207. PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Edwards, R., et al. (2001). Self-efficacy as a predictor of adult adjustment to sickle cell disease: One-year outcomes. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63(5), 850–858. PubMedCrossRef Edwards, R., et al. (2001). Self-efficacy as a predictor of adult adjustment to sickle cell disease: One-year outcomes. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63(5), 850–858. PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Holman, H., Mazonson, P., & Lorig, K. (1989). Health education for self-management has significant early and sustained benefits in chronic arthritis. Transactions of the Association of American Physicians, 102, 204–208. PubMed Holman, H., Mazonson, P., & Lorig, K. (1989). Health education for self-management has significant early and sustained benefits in chronic arthritis. Transactions of the Association of American Physicians, 102, 204–208. PubMed
20.
go back to reference Lenker, S. L., Lorig, K., & Gallagher, D. (1984). Reasons for the lack of association between changes in health behavior and improved health status: An exploratory study. Patient Education and Counseling, 6(2), 69–72. PubMedCrossRef Lenker, S. L., Lorig, K., & Gallagher, D. (1984). Reasons for the lack of association between changes in health behavior and improved health status: An exploratory study. Patient Education and Counseling, 6(2), 69–72. PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lorig, K., et al. (1989). The beneficial outcomes of the arthritis self-management course are not adequately explained by behavior change. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 32(1), 91–95. PubMedCrossRef Lorig, K., et al. (1989). The beneficial outcomes of the arthritis self-management course are not adequately explained by behavior change. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 32(1), 91–95. PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Howorka, K., et al. (2000). Empowering diabetes out-patients with structured education: Short-term and long-term effects of functional insulin treatment on perceived control over diabetes. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 48(1), 37–44. PubMedCrossRef Howorka, K., et al. (2000). Empowering diabetes out-patients with structured education: Short-term and long-term effects of functional insulin treatment on perceived control over diabetes. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 48(1), 37–44. PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Rigby, S. A., Thornton, E. W., & Young, C. A. (2008). A randomized group intervention trial to enhance mood and self-efficacy in people with multiple sclerosis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13(Pt 4), 619–631. PubMedCrossRef Rigby, S. A., Thornton, E. W., & Young, C. A. (2008). A randomized group intervention trial to enhance mood and self-efficacy in people with multiple sclerosis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13(Pt 4), 619–631. PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lev, E. L., & Owen, S.V. (1996). A measure of self-care self-efficacy. Research in Nursing & Health, 19(5), 421–429. CrossRef Lev, E. L., & Owen, S.V. (1996). A measure of self-care self-efficacy. Research in Nursing & Health, 19(5), 421–429. CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Fernandez, S., et al. (2008). Revision and validation of the medication adherence self-efficacy scale (MASES) in hypertensive African Americans. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31(6), 453–462. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fernandez, S., et al. (2008). Revision and validation of the medication adherence self-efficacy scale (MASES) in hypertensive African Americans. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31(6), 453–462. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Rodgers, W. M., et al. (2008). Evidence for a multidimensional self-efficacy for exercise scale. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79(2), 222–234. PubMedCrossRef Rodgers, W. M., et al. (2008). Evidence for a multidimensional self-efficacy for exercise scale. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79(2), 222–234. PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Frei, A., et al. (2009). Self-efficacy instruments for patients with chronic diseases suffer from methodological limitations—A systematic review. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 86. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Frei, A., et al. (2009). Self-efficacy instruments for patients with chronic diseases suffer from methodological limitations—A systematic review. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 86. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lorig, K. S. A., Ritter, P., González, V. (1996). Outcome measures for health education and other health care interventions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc. Lorig, K. S. A., Ritter, P., González, V. (1996). Outcome measures for health education and other health care interventions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
29.
go back to reference Lorig, K., Chastain, R. L., Ung, E., Shoors, S., & Holman, H. R. (1989). Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis. Arthritis & Rhuematology, 32(1), 37–44. CrossRef Lorig, K., Chastain, R. L., Ung, E., Shoors, S., & Holman, H. R. (1989). Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis. Arthritis & Rhuematology, 32(1), 37–44. CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Reeve, B. B., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S22–S31. PubMedCrossRef Reeve, B. B., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S22–S31. PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference DeWalt, D.A., Rothrock, N., Yount S., Stone, A., on behalf of the PROMIS Cooperative Group. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates—The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45, S12–S21. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef DeWalt, D.A., Rothrock, N., Yount S., Stone, A., on behalf of the PROMIS Cooperative Group. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates—The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45, S12–S21. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sood, P., Romero, R., Velozo, C., Gruber-Baldini, A., Shulman L.(2015). Defining and prioritizing sub-domains of self-efficacy for managing chronic conditions: A web-based delphi technique. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 10, e4. CrossRef Sood, P., Romero, R., Velozo, C., Gruber-Baldini, A., Shulman L.(2015). Defining and prioritizing sub-domains of self-efficacy for managing chronic conditions: A web-based delphi technique. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 10, e4. CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Rothrock, N. E., et al. (2010). Relative to the general US population, chronic diseases are associated with poorer health-related quality of life as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1195–1204. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Rothrock, N. E., et al. (2010). Relative to the general US population, chronic diseases are associated with poorer health-related quality of life as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1195–1204. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Hong, I., et al. (2016) Assessment of the psychometrics of a PROMIS item bank: Self-efficacy for managing daily activities. Quality of Life Research. 25(9), 2221–2232. PubMedCrossRef Hong, I., et al. (2016) Assessment of the psychometrics of a PROMIS item bank: Self-efficacy for managing daily activities. Quality of Life Research. 25(9), 2221–2232. PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. ( 2012) Mplus. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. ( 2012) Mplus. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
36.
go back to reference Revicki, D. A., et al. (2014). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the PROMIS pain quality item bank. Quality of Life Research, 23(1), 245–255. PubMedCrossRef Revicki, D. A., et al. (2014). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the PROMIS pain quality item bank. Quality of Life Research, 23(1), 245–255. PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Cai, L., Thissen, D., & S.H.C. du Toit (2011). IRTPRO for Windows. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International. Cai, L., Thissen, D., & S.H.C. du Toit (2011). IRTPRO for Windows. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International.
38.
go back to reference Bonita, R., & Beaglehole, R. (1988). Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke, 19(12), 1497–1500. PubMedCrossRef Bonita, R., & Beaglehole, R. (1988). Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke, 19(12), 1497–1500. PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Collin, C., et al. (1988). The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. International Disability Studies, 10(2), 61–63. PubMedCrossRef Collin, C., et al. (1988). The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. International Disability Studies, 10(2), 61–63. PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Mahoney, F. I., & Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61–65. PubMed Mahoney, F. I., & Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61–65. PubMed
41.
go back to reference Wade, D. T., & Collin, C. (1988). The Barthel ADL Index: A standard measure of physical disability? International Disability Studies, 10(2), 64–67. PubMedCrossRef Wade, D. T., & Collin, C. (1988). The Barthel ADL Index: A standard measure of physical disability? International Disability Studies, 10(2), 64–67. PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Melchior, M. A., et al. (2013). Intermediate outcomes of a chronic disease self-management program for spanish-speaking older adults in South Florida, 2008–2010. Preventing Chronic Disease, 10, E146. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Melchior, M. A., et al. (2013). Intermediate outcomes of a chronic disease self-management program for spanish-speaking older adults in South Florida, 2008–2010. Preventing Chronic Disease, 10, E146. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously. A theory of socioemotional selectivity. The American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181. PubMedCrossRef Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously. A theory of socioemotional selectivity. The American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181. PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Gruber-Baldini, A., Velozo, C., Romero, S., Barr, E., Armstrong, M., & Shulman, L. (2014). PROMIS physical and mental health measures across 5 neurologic disorders, platform, American neurologic association annual meeting. Annals of Neurology, 76, S36. Gruber-Baldini, A., Velozo, C., Romero, S., Barr, E., Armstrong, M., & Shulman, L. (2014). PROMIS physical and mental health measures across 5 neurologic disorders, platform, American neurologic association annual meeting. Annals of Neurology, 76, S36.
45.
go back to reference Bjorner, J. B., et al. (2014). Difference in method of administration did not significantly impact item response: an IRT-based analysis from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) initiative. Quality of Life Research, 23(1), 217–227. PubMedCrossRef Bjorner, J. B., et al. (2014). Difference in method of administration did not significantly impact item response: an IRT-based analysis from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) initiative. Quality of Life Research, 23(1), 217–227. PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Validation of the PROMIS® measures of self-efficacy for managing chronic conditions
Auteurs
Ann L. Gruber-Baldini
Craig Velozo
Sergio Romero
Lisa M. Shulman
Publicatiedatum
26-02-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1527-3