Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 10/2014

01-12-2014 | Brief Communication

Validation of the MOS Social Support Survey 6-item (MOS-SSS-6) measure with two large population-based samples of Australian women

Auteurs: Libby Holden, Christina Lee, Richard Hockey, Robert S. Ware, Annette J. Dobson

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 10/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to validate a 6-item 1-factor global measure of social support developed from the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS) for use in large epidemiological studies.

Methods

Data were obtained from two large population-based samples of participants in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health. The two cohorts were aged 53–58 and 28–33 years at data collection (N = 10,616 and 8,977, respectively). Items selected for the 6-item 1-factor measure were derived from the factor structure obtained from unpublished work using an earlier wave of data from one of these cohorts. Descriptive statistics, including polychoric correlations, were used to describe the abbreviated scale. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess internal consistency and confirmatory factor analysis to assess scale validity. Concurrent validity was assessed using correlations between the new 6-item version and established 19-item version, and other concurrent variables.

Results

In both cohorts, the new 6-item 1-factor measure showed strong internal consistency and scale reliability. It had excellent goodness-of-fit indices, similar to those of the established 19-item measure. Both versions correlated similarly with concurrent measures.

Conclusion

The 6-item 1-factor MOS-SSS measures global functional social support with fewer items than the established 19-item measure.
vorige artikel Psychometric properties and Dutch norm data of the PedsQL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale for Young Adults
volgende artikel Discriminatory power of a 25-item distress screening tool: a cross-sectional survey of 251 cancer survivors
Literatuur
1.
Umberson, D., & Montez, J. (2011). Social relationships and health: A flashpoint for health policy. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 51(S), S54–S66.
2.
Gjesfjeld, C. D., Greeno, C. G., & Kim, K. H. (2008). A confirmatory factor analysis of an abbreviated social support instrument: The MOS-SSS. Research on Social Work Practice, 18, 231–237.CrossRef
3.
Yu, D. S., Lee, D. T., & Woo, J. (2004). Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey MOS-SSS-C. Research in Nursing & Health, 27, 135–143.CrossRef
4.
Sherbourne, C., & Stewart, A. (1991). The MOS Social Support Survey. Social Science and Medicine, 32, 705–714.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Gomez-Campelo, P., et al. (2014). Psychometric properties of the eight-item modified Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey based on Spanish outpatients. Quality of Life Research,. doi:10.​1007/​s11136-014-0651-6.PubMed
6.
Lyons, S. J. (2010) The role of social support and psychological resources in depression in people living with HIV/Aids: eExamining the mediating role of mastery and self-esteem, in Graduate Department of Adult Education and Counselling Psychology. University of Toronto.
7.
Moser, A., et al. (2012). The eight-item modified Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey: Psychometric evaluation showed excellent performance. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65, 1107–1116.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
Soares, A., et al. (2012). Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey in Hodgkin’s lymphoma survivors. Supportive Care in Cancer, 20, 1895–1900.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Wang, W. et al. (2013) Psychometric testing of the Chinese Mandarin version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey in patients with coronary hear disease in mainland China. Quality of Life Research.
10.
Westaway, M. S., et al. (2005). The effects of social support on health, well-being ad management of diabetes mellitus: A black South African perspective. Ethnicity and Health, 10(1), 73–89.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Shyu, Y.-I. L., et al. (2006). Psychometric properties of the Social Support Survey in a Tiawanese sample. Nursing Research, 55(6), 411–417.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Giangrasso, B. & Casale S. (2013) Psychometric properties of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey with a general population sample of undergraduate students. Social Indicator Research.
13.
Robitaille, A., Orpana, H. M., & McIntosh, C. N. (2011). Psychometric properties, factor structure and measurement invariance of the English and French versions of the Medical Outcomes Study social support scale. Statistics Canada, 22(2), 1–8.
14.
Lee, C., et al. (2005). Cohort profile: The Australian longitudinal study of women’s health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 34, 987–991.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health (ALSWH). (2003). The Australian longitudinal study on women’s health: Report 20. Brisbane: University of Queensland.
16.
Ware, J., et al. (1993). SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: The New England Medical Centre.
17.
Scheiver, M., Carver, C., & Bridges, M. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A re-evaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078.CrossRef
18.
Andersen, E. M., & Malmgren, J. A. (1994). Screening for depression in well older adults: Evaluation of a short-form of the CES-D. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 10(2), 77–84.
19.
Rhemtulla, M., Briosseau-Liard, P., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling: A multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Validation of the MOS Social Support Survey 6-item (MOS-SSS-6) measure with two large population-based samples of Australian women
Auteurs
Libby Holden
Christina Lee
Richard Hockey
Robert S. Ware
Annette J. Dobson
Publicatiedatum
01-12-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 10/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0741-5

Andere artikelen Uitgave 10/2014

Quality of Life Research 10/2014 Naar de uitgave

Brief Communication

A comparison of three methods of assessing differential item functioning (DIF) in the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale: ordinal logistic regression, Rasch analysis and the Mantel chi-square procedure

OriginalPaper

Longitudinal quality of life data: a comparison of continuous and ordinal approaches

Review

Measurement properties of questionnaires assessing participation in children and adolescents with a disability: a systematic review

OriginalPaper

Quality of life, alcohol detoxification and relapse: Is quality of life a predictor of relapse or only a secondary outcome measure?

OriginalPaper

Cancer-related fatigue in breast cancer patients: factor mixture models with continuous non-normal distributions

OriginalPaper

Factors associated with quality of life measured by EQ-5D in patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease