Top

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Gepubliceerd in:

20-05-2016

Validation of the Five-Factor Model Personality Disorder Prototype Counts with the Personality Assessment Inventory

Auteurs: Joshua R. Oltmanns, Hilary L. DeShong, Catherine A. Sanders, John E. Kurtz

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 4/2016

Abstract

Five-factor model (FFM) personality disorder (PD) prototype scores drawn from the revised NEO-Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) have demonstrated strong convergent validity with clinical measures of PD (Miller in Journal of Personality, 80, 1565–1591, 2012). However, an examination of the relations between the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI; Morey 1991), which is widely used in personality assessment research, and the FFM PD prototype “count” method, has not been conducted. The present study examines the convergent validity of the FFM borderline, antisocial, and psychopathy prototype counts with the Borderline Features (BOR) and Antisocial Features (ANT) full scales and subscales from the PAI. Furthermore, the BOR and ANT scales are correlated with all 30 NEO-PI-3 facets to empirically evaluate the rationally-selected facet scales used in the borderline, antisocial, and psychopathy PD counts. Five hundred thirty-five undergraduate students completed both the NEO-PI-3 and the PAI. The PD counts demonstrated strong convergent and discriminant validity with the PAI clinical scales. Facet-level analyses generally supported the structure of the PD count formulas, and the exceptions align with previous evidence that the Competence, Dutifulness, and Self-Discipline facets (from the Conscientiousness domain of the FFM) associate strongly with the BOR scale.

vorige artikel Validation of a Brief Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-18) in Five Samples

volgende artikel The Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children (BPFS-C): Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance across Time and Sex in a Community-Based Sample

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRef

Clark, L. A. (2007). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: perennial issues and emerging reconceptualization. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 227–257. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190200.CrossRefPubMed

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Professional manual for the NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Decuyper, M., De Clerq, B., De Bolle, M., & De Fruyt, F. (2009). Validation of FFM PD counts for screening personality pathology and psychopathy in adolescence. Journal of Personality Disorders, 23, 587–605.CrossRefPubMed

Edens, J. F., Hart, S. D., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, J. K., & Olver, M. E. (2000). Use of the personality assessment inventory to assess psychopathy in offender populations. Psychological Assessment, 12, 132–139.CrossRefPubMed

Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2006). The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: Development, structural properties, and new directions. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 58–88). New York: Guilford.

Hicklin, J., & Widiger, T. A. (2005). Similarities and differences among antisocial and psychopathic self-report inventories from the perspective of general personality functioning. European Journal of Personality, 19, 325–342.CrossRef

Krueger, R. F., Hopwood, C. J., Wright, A. G. C., & Markon, K. E. (2014). DSM-5 and the path toward empirically based and clinically useful conceptualization of personality and psychopathology. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 21, 245–261.

Kurtz, J. E., Morey, L. C., & Tomarken, A. J. (1993). The concurrent validity of three self-report measures of borderline personality. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 15, 255–266.CrossRef

Lawton, E. M., Shields, A. J., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2011). Five-factor model personality disorder prototypes in a community sample: Self- and informant-reports predicting interview-based DSM diagnoses. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 279–292. doi:10.1037/a0022617.CrossRef

Lowe, J. R., Edmundson, M., & Widiger, T. A. (2009). Assessment of dependency, agreeableness, and their relationship. Psychological Assessment, 21, 543–553.CrossRefPubMed

Lynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2001). Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: an expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 3, 401–412.CrossRef

Lynam, D. R., Gaughan, E. T., Miller, J. D., Miller, D. J., Mullins-Sweatt, S. M., & Widiger, T. A. (2011). Assessing the basic traits associated with psychopathy: development and validation of the elemental psychopathy assessment. Psychological Assessment, 23, 108–124.CrossRefPubMed

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2010). NEO inventories: Professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.

McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., & Martin, T. A. (2005). The NEO-PI-3: a more readable revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 261–270. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_05.CrossRefPubMed

Miller, J. D. (2012). Five-factor model personality disorder prototypes: a review of their development, validity, and comparison to alternative approaches. Journal of Personality, 80, 1565–1591. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00773.x.CrossRefPubMed

Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2008). Dependent personality disorder: comparing an expert generated and empirically derived five-factor model personality disorder count. Assessment, 15, 4–15.CrossRefPubMed

Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., & Leukefeld, C. (2001). Personality disorders as extreme variants of common personality dimensions: can the five-factor model adequately represent psychopathy? Journal of Personality, 69, 253–276.CrossRefPubMed

Miller, J. D., Reynolds, S. K., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2004). The validity of the five-factor model prototypes for personality disorders in two clinical samples. Psychological Assessment, 16, 310–322.CrossRefPubMed

Miller, J. D., Bagby, R. M., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2005a). A comparison of the validity of the five-factor model (FFM) personality disorder prototypes using FFM self-report and interview measures. Psychological Assessment, 17, 497–500.CrossRefPubMed

Miller, J. D., Bagby, R. M., Pilkonis, P. A., Reynolds, S. K., & Lynam, D. R. (2005b). A simplified technique for scoring DSM-IV personality disorders with the five-factor model. Assessment, 12, 404–415. doi:10.1177/1073191105280987.CrossRefPubMed

Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Rolland, J. P., De Fruyt, F., Reynolds, S. K., Pham-Scottez, A., Baker, S. R., & Bagby, R. M. (2008). Scoring the DSM-IV personality disorders using the five-factor model: Development and validation of normative scores for North American, French, and Dutch-Flemish samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22, 433–450.CrossRefPubMed

Miller, J. D., Maples, J., Few, L. R., Morse, J. Q., Yaggi, K. E., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2010). Using clinican-rated five-factor model data to score the DSM-IV personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 296–305.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Morey, L. C. (1991). Professional manual for the personality assessment inventory. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Edmundson, M., Sauer-Zavala, S., Lynam, D. R., Miller, J. D., & Widiger, T. A. (2012). Five-factor measure of borderline personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 475–487.

Oltmanns, T. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2006). Perceptions of self and others regarding pathological personality traits. In R. F. Krueger & J. L. Tackett (Eds.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 71–111). New York: Guilford.

Patrick, C. J. (Ed.). (2006). Handbook of psychopathy. New York: Guilford.

Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326–1342.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Samuel, D. B., Edmundson, M., & Widiger, T. A. (2011). Five-factor model prototype matching scores: convergence within alternative methods. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 571–585.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Skodol, A. E. (2005). Manifestations, clinical diagnosis, and comorbidity. In J. M. Oldham, A. E. Skodol, & D. S. Bender (Eds.), The American psychiatric publishing textbook of personality disorders (pp. 37–61). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

Trull, T. J., Widiger, T. A., Lynam, D. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2003). Borderline personality disorder from the perspective of general personality functioning. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 193–202. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.112.2.193.CrossRefPubMed

Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62, 71–83. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.71.CrossRefPubMed

Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Dubo, E. D., Sickel, A. E., Trikha, A., Levin, A., & Reynolds, V. (1998). Axis I comorbidity of borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 1733–1739.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Validation of the Five-Factor Model Personality Disorder Prototype Counts with the Personality Assessment Inventory
Auteurs: Joshua R. Oltmanns
Hilary L. DeShong
Catherine A. Sanders
John E. Kurtz
Publicatiedatum: 20-05-2016
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-016-9549-7

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2016

Perfectionism, Components of Stress Reactivity, and Depressive Symptoms

Distress Tolerance and Social Support in Adolescence: Predicting Risk for Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms Following a Natural Disaster

Action Type-Based Factorial Structure of Brief COPE among Hong Kong Chinese

Reconsidering Criterion A for the Diagnosis of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Disorder

Bidimensional Emotional Health in College Students: a Comparison of Categorical and Continuous Analytic Approaches

The Underlying Role of Negative Affect in the Association between PTSD, Major Depressive Disorder, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder