Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

20-05-2016

Validation of the Five-Factor Model Personality Disorder Prototype Counts with the Personality Assessment Inventory

Auteurs: Joshua R. Oltmanns, Hilary L. DeShong, Catherine A. Sanders, John E. Kurtz

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 4/2016

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Five-factor model (FFM) personality disorder (PD) prototype scores drawn from the revised NEO-Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) have demonstrated strong convergent validity with clinical measures of PD (Miller in Journal of Personality, 80, 15651591, 2012). However, an examination of the relations between the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI; Morey 1991), which is widely used in personality assessment research, and the FFM PD prototype “count” method, has not been conducted. The present study examines the convergent validity of the FFM borderline, antisocial, and psychopathy prototype counts with the Borderline Features (BOR) and Antisocial Features (ANT) full scales and subscales from the PAI. Furthermore, the BOR and ANT scales are correlated with all 30 NEO-PI-3 facets to empirically evaluate the rationally-selected facet scales used in the borderline, antisocial, and psychopathy PD counts. Five hundred thirty-five undergraduate students completed both the NEO-PI-3 and the PAI. The PD counts demonstrated strong convergent and discriminant validity with the PAI clinical scales. Facet-level analyses generally supported the structure of the PD count formulas, and the exceptions align with previous evidence that the Competence, Dutifulness, and Self-Discipline facets (from the Conscientiousness domain of the FFM) associate strongly with the BOR scale.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRef American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRef
go back to reference Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Professional manual for the NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Professional manual for the NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
go back to reference Decuyper, M., De Clerq, B., De Bolle, M., & De Fruyt, F. (2009). Validation of FFM PD counts for screening personality pathology and psychopathy in adolescence. Journal of Personality Disorders, 23, 587–605.CrossRefPubMed Decuyper, M., De Clerq, B., De Bolle, M., & De Fruyt, F. (2009). Validation of FFM PD counts for screening personality pathology and psychopathy in adolescence. Journal of Personality Disorders, 23, 587–605.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Edens, J. F., Hart, S. D., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, J. K., & Olver, M. E. (2000). Use of the personality assessment inventory to assess psychopathy in offender populations. Psychological Assessment, 12, 132–139.CrossRefPubMed Edens, J. F., Hart, S. D., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, J. K., & Olver, M. E. (2000). Use of the personality assessment inventory to assess psychopathy in offender populations. Psychological Assessment, 12, 132–139.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2006). The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: Development, structural properties, and new directions. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 58–88). New York: Guilford. Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2006). The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: Development, structural properties, and new directions. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 58–88). New York: Guilford.
go back to reference Hicklin, J., & Widiger, T. A. (2005). Similarities and differences among antisocial and psychopathic self-report inventories from the perspective of general personality functioning. European Journal of Personality, 19, 325–342.CrossRef Hicklin, J., & Widiger, T. A. (2005). Similarities and differences among antisocial and psychopathic self-report inventories from the perspective of general personality functioning. European Journal of Personality, 19, 325–342.CrossRef
go back to reference Krueger, R. F., Hopwood, C. J., Wright, A. G. C., & Markon, K. E. (2014). DSM-5 and the path toward empirically based and clinically useful conceptualization of personality and psychopathology. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 21, 245–261. Krueger, R. F., Hopwood, C. J., Wright, A. G. C., & Markon, K. E. (2014). DSM-5 and the path toward empirically based and clinically useful conceptualization of personality and psychopathology. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 21, 245–261.
go back to reference Kurtz, J. E., Morey, L. C., & Tomarken, A. J. (1993). The concurrent validity of three self-report measures of borderline personality. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 15, 255–266.CrossRef Kurtz, J. E., Morey, L. C., & Tomarken, A. J. (1993). The concurrent validity of three self-report measures of borderline personality. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 15, 255–266.CrossRef
go back to reference Lawton, E. M., Shields, A. J., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2011). Five-factor model personality disorder prototypes in a community sample: Self- and informant-reports predicting interview-based DSM diagnoses. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 279–292. doi:10.1037/a0022617.CrossRef Lawton, E. M., Shields, A. J., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2011). Five-factor model personality disorder prototypes in a community sample: Self- and informant-reports predicting interview-based DSM diagnoses. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 279–292. doi:10.​1037/​a0022617.CrossRef
go back to reference Lowe, J. R., Edmundson, M., & Widiger, T. A. (2009). Assessment of dependency, agreeableness, and their relationship. Psychological Assessment, 21, 543–553.CrossRefPubMed Lowe, J. R., Edmundson, M., & Widiger, T. A. (2009). Assessment of dependency, agreeableness, and their relationship. Psychological Assessment, 21, 543–553.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2001). Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: an expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 3, 401–412.CrossRef Lynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2001). Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: an expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 3, 401–412.CrossRef
go back to reference Lynam, D. R., Gaughan, E. T., Miller, J. D., Miller, D. J., Mullins-Sweatt, S. M., & Widiger, T. A. (2011). Assessing the basic traits associated with psychopathy: development and validation of the elemental psychopathy assessment. Psychological Assessment, 23, 108–124.CrossRefPubMed Lynam, D. R., Gaughan, E. T., Miller, J. D., Miller, D. J., Mullins-Sweatt, S. M., & Widiger, T. A. (2011). Assessing the basic traits associated with psychopathy: development and validation of the elemental psychopathy assessment. Psychological Assessment, 23, 108–124.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2010). NEO inventories: Professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2010). NEO inventories: Professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.
go back to reference Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2008). Dependent personality disorder: comparing an expert generated and empirically derived five-factor model personality disorder count. Assessment, 15, 4–15.CrossRefPubMed Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2008). Dependent personality disorder: comparing an expert generated and empirically derived five-factor model personality disorder count. Assessment, 15, 4–15.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., & Leukefeld, C. (2001). Personality disorders as extreme variants of common personality dimensions: can the five-factor model adequately represent psychopathy? Journal of Personality, 69, 253–276.CrossRefPubMed Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., & Leukefeld, C. (2001). Personality disorders as extreme variants of common personality dimensions: can the five-factor model adequately represent psychopathy? Journal of Personality, 69, 253–276.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Miller, J. D., Reynolds, S. K., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2004). The validity of the five-factor model prototypes for personality disorders in two clinical samples. Psychological Assessment, 16, 310–322.CrossRefPubMed Miller, J. D., Reynolds, S. K., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2004). The validity of the five-factor model prototypes for personality disorders in two clinical samples. Psychological Assessment, 16, 310–322.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Miller, J. D., Bagby, R. M., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2005a). A comparison of the validity of the five-factor model (FFM) personality disorder prototypes using FFM self-report and interview measures. Psychological Assessment, 17, 497–500.CrossRefPubMed Miller, J. D., Bagby, R. M., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2005a). A comparison of the validity of the five-factor model (FFM) personality disorder prototypes using FFM self-report and interview measures. Psychological Assessment, 17, 497–500.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Rolland, J. P., De Fruyt, F., Reynolds, S. K., Pham-Scottez, A., Baker, S. R., & Bagby, R. M. (2008). Scoring the DSM-IV personality disorders using the five-factor model: Development and validation of normative scores for North American, French, and Dutch-Flemish samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22, 433–450.CrossRefPubMed Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Rolland, J. P., De Fruyt, F., Reynolds, S. K., Pham-Scottez, A., Baker, S. R., & Bagby, R. M. (2008). Scoring the DSM-IV personality disorders using the five-factor model: Development and validation of normative scores for North American, French, and Dutch-Flemish samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22, 433–450.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Miller, J. D., Maples, J., Few, L. R., Morse, J. Q., Yaggi, K. E., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2010). Using clinican-rated five-factor model data to score the DSM-IV personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 296–305.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Miller, J. D., Maples, J., Few, L. R., Morse, J. Q., Yaggi, K. E., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2010). Using clinican-rated five-factor model data to score the DSM-IV personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 296–305.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Morey, L. C. (1991). Professional manual for the personality assessment inventory. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources. Morey, L. C. (1991). Professional manual for the personality assessment inventory. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
go back to reference Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Edmundson, M., Sauer-Zavala, S., Lynam, D. R., Miller, J. D., & Widiger, T. A. (2012). Five-factor measure of borderline personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 475–487. Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Edmundson, M., Sauer-Zavala, S., Lynam, D. R., Miller, J. D., & Widiger, T. A. (2012). Five-factor measure of borderline personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 475–487.
go back to reference Oltmanns, T. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2006). Perceptions of self and others regarding pathological personality traits. In R. F. Krueger & J. L. Tackett (Eds.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 71–111). New York: Guilford. Oltmanns, T. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2006). Perceptions of self and others regarding pathological personality traits. In R. F. Krueger & J. L. Tackett (Eds.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 71–111). New York: Guilford.
go back to reference Patrick, C. J. (Ed.). (2006). Handbook of psychopathy. New York: Guilford. Patrick, C. J. (Ed.). (2006). Handbook of psychopathy. New York: Guilford.
go back to reference Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326–1342.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326–1342.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Samuel, D. B., Edmundson, M., & Widiger, T. A. (2011). Five-factor model prototype matching scores: convergence within alternative methods. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 571–585.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Samuel, D. B., Edmundson, M., & Widiger, T. A. (2011). Five-factor model prototype matching scores: convergence within alternative methods. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 571–585.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Skodol, A. E. (2005). Manifestations, clinical diagnosis, and comorbidity. In J. M. Oldham, A. E. Skodol, & D. S. Bender (Eds.), The American psychiatric publishing textbook of personality disorders (pp. 37–61). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. Skodol, A. E. (2005). Manifestations, clinical diagnosis, and comorbidity. In J. M. Oldham, A. E. Skodol, & D. S. Bender (Eds.), The American psychiatric publishing textbook of personality disorders (pp. 37–61). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
go back to reference Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Dubo, E. D., Sickel, A. E., Trikha, A., Levin, A., & Reynolds, V. (1998). Axis I comorbidity of borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 1733–1739.CrossRefPubMed Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Dubo, E. D., Sickel, A. E., Trikha, A., Levin, A., & Reynolds, V. (1998). Axis I comorbidity of borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 1733–1739.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Validation of the Five-Factor Model Personality Disorder Prototype Counts with the Personality Assessment Inventory
Auteurs
Joshua R. Oltmanns
Hilary L. DeShong
Catherine A. Sanders
John E. Kurtz
Publicatiedatum
20-05-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-016-9549-7