Top

Optie A:

Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
Optie B:

Deel de link per e-mail
Link delen

vorige artikel The Beneficial Role of Mindfulness Facets in Re...

volgende artikel Mindfulness Practice and Stress Following Mindf...

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

17-04-2019 | ORIGINAL PAPER | Uitgave 9/2019 Open Access

Validation of the Dutch Comprehensive Inventory of Mindfulness Experiences (CHIME) and Development of a Short Form (CHIME-SF)

Tijdschrift:: Mindfulness > Uitgave 9/2019

Auteurs:: Mira B. Cladder-Micus, Hanne Verweij, Hiske van Ravesteijn, Katleen Van der Gucht, Filip Raes, Anne E. M. Speckens

Extras

» Naar de volledige tekst

Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01125-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Objectives

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the assessment of mindfulness skills. The present study describes the validation of the Dutch Comprehensive Inventory of Mindfulness Experiences (CHIME) and the development of a short form.

Methods

The original scale was translated into Dutch. The psychometric properties of the CHIME were examined, including its factor structure, internal consistency, and convergent and discriminant validity in a group of 481 participants consisting of clinical and non-clinical samples. In addition, a 24-item short form (CHIME-SF) was developed and its psychometric properties were assessed in the same sample.

Results

Confirmatory factor analyses showed an acceptable model fit of an 8-factor structure of the CHIME with the following subscales: awareness of internal experiences, awareness of external experiences, acting with awareness, accepting and non-judgmental attitude, nonreactive decentering, openness to experiences, awareness of thought’s relativity, and insightful understanding (χ² = 1534.90, df = 601, χ²/df = 2.55, CFI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.057 [90% CI 0.053, 0.060], SRMR = 0.06). The CHIME-SF showed a good model fit (χ² = 486.13, df = 224, χ²/df = 0.17, CFI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.049 [90% CI 0.043, 0.055], SRMR = 0.05.) and the subscales of the CHIME and CHIME-SF showed high corrected correlations (r_c = .69–.88). The CHIME and the CHIME-SF proved to be sensitive to change.

Conclusions

The results indicate that the Dutch version of the CHIME and CHIME-SF are valid instruments to assess mindfulness skills in clinical and non-clinical populations. The psychometric properties of the CHIME-SF should be further evaluated in an independent sample.

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijft u als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen uw vak. Met het online abonnement heeft u toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kunt u op uw gemak en wanneer het u het beste uitkomt verdiepen in uw vakgebied.

Meer informatie

ESM 1 (DOCX 33 kb)

Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report - the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191104268029. CrossRefPubMed

Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. CrossRef

Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., et al. (2008). Construct validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 15(3), 329–342. CrossRef

Barrett, P. (2005). Shortform 1.1 [Software]. Retrieved from http://www.pbarrett.net/#software. Accessed 29 March 2017

Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W., & Kupper, Z. (2013a). The assessment of mindfulness with self-report measures: existing scales and open issues. Mindfulness, 4(3), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0110-9. CrossRef

Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W., & Kupper, Z. (2013b). Measuring mindfulness: first steps towards the development of a comprehensive mindfulness scale. Mindfulness, 4(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0102-9. CrossRef

Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W., & Kupper, Z. (2014). Construction and first validation of the Comprehensive Inventory of Mindfulness Experiences. Diagnostica, 60(3), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000109. CrossRef

Bohlmeijer, E., ten Klooster, P. M., Fledderus, M., Veehof, M., & Baer, R. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form. Assessment, 18(3), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111408231.

Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. CrossRef

Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge.

Cardaciotto, L., Herbert, J. D., Forman, E. M., Moitra, E., & Farrow, V. (2008). The assessment of present-moment awareness and acceptance - the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale. Assessment, 15(2), 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107311467. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Chadwick, P., Hember, M., Symes, J., Peters, E., Kuipers, E., & Dagnan, D. (2008). Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness questionnaire (SMQ). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 451–455. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466508X314891. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. CrossRef

Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284-290. CrossRef

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (pp. 20–26). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Curtiss, J., & Klemanski, D. H. (2014). Factor analysis of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in a heterogeneous clinical sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36(4), 683–694. CrossRef

Feldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: the development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29(3), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-006-9035-8. CrossRef

Gu, J., Strauss, C., Crane, C., Barnhofer, T., Karl, A., Cavanagh, K., & Kuyken, W. (2016). Examining the factor structure of the 39-item and 15-item versions of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire before and after mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for people with recurrent depression. Psychological Assessment, 28(7), 791-802.

Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417–1432. CrossRef

Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York: Delacourt: Random House LLC.

Kerkhof, A., Hermans, D., Figee, A., Laeremans, I., Pieters, G., & Aardema, A. (2000). De Penn State Worry Questionnaire en de Worry Domains Questionnaire: eerste resultaten bij Nederlandse en Vlaamse klinische en poliklinische populaties. Gedragstherapie, 33(2), 135–146.

Khoury, B., Lecomte, T., Fortin, G., Masse, M., Therien, P., Bouchard, V., et al. (2013). Mindfulness-based therapy: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(6), 763–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.05.005. CrossRefPubMed

Krägeloh, C. U., Bergomi, C., Siegert, R. J., & Medvedev, O. N. (2018). Response shift after a mindfulness-based intervention: measurement invariance testing of the Comprehensive Inventory of Mindfulness Experiences. Mindfulness, 9(1), 212-220.

Kuyken, W., Warren, F. C., Taylor, R. S., Whalley, B., Crane, C., Bondolfi, G., et al. (2016). Efficacy of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in prevention of depressive relapse: an individual patient data meta-analysis from randomized trials. JAMA Psychiatry, 73(6), 565–574. CrossRef

Lau, M. A., Bishop, S. R., Segal, Z. V., Buis, T., Anderson, N. D., Carlson, L., et al. (2006). The Toronto Mindfulness Scale: development and validation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(12), 1445–1467. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20326. CrossRefPubMed

Levy, P. (1967). The correction for spurious correlation in the evaluation of short-form tests. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23(1), 84–86. CrossRefPubMed

Marsh, H. W., Ellis, L. A., Parada, R. H., Richards, G., & Heubeck, B. G. (2005). A short version of the Self Description Questionnaire II: operationalizing criteria for short-form evaluation with new applications of confirmatory factor analyses. Psychological Assessment, 17(1), 81-102. CrossRefPubMed

Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1986). Maslach Burnout Inventory: second edition. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Meyer, T. J., Miller, M. L., Metzger, R. L., & Borkovec, T. D. (1990). Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28(6), 487–495. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Neff, K. D., & Vonk, R. (2009). Self-compassion versus global self-esteem: two different ways of relating to oneself. Journal of Personality, 77(1), 23–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00537.x. CrossRefPubMed

Raes, F., Pommier, E., Neff, K. D., & Van Gucht, D. (2011). Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the Self-Compassion Scale. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 18(3), 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/Cpp.702. CrossRef

Schaufeli, W., & Van Dierendonck, D. (2000). Handleiding van de Utrechtse Burnout Schaal (UBOS) [Manual Utrecht Burnout Scale]. Lisse: Swets Test Services.

Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2013). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression. New York, NY: Guilford.

Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102-111. CrossRef

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Thalmayer, A. G., Saucier, G., & Eigenhuis, A. (2011). Comparative validity of brief to medium-length Big Five and Big Six Personality Questionnaires. Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 995-1009. CrossRefPubMed

Van der Does, A. J. W. (2002). Handleiding bij de Nederlandse versie van Beck Depression Inventory—second edition (BDI-II-NL). Amsterdam: Harcourt.

Van Rijsoort, S., Vervaeke, G., & Emmelkamp, P. (1997). The Penn-State Worry Questionnaire en de Worry Domains Questionnaire: Eerste resultaten bij een Nederlandse populatie. Gedragstherapie, 30.

Walach, H., Buchheld, N., Buttenmuller, V., Kleinknecht, N., & Schmidt, S. (2006). Measuring mindfulness - the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Personality and Individual Differences, 40(8), 1543–1555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.025. CrossRef

Watkins, D. (1989). The role of confirmatory factor analysis in cross-cultltral research. International Journal of Psychology, 24(6), 685–701. CrossRef

Titel: Validation of the Dutch Comprehensive Inventory of Mindfulness Experiences (CHIME) and Development of a Short Form (CHIME-SF)
Auteurs:: Mira B. Cladder-Micus
Hanne Verweij
Hiske van Ravesteijn
Katleen Van der Gucht
Filip Raes
Anne E. M. Speckens
Publicatiedatum: 17-04-2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01125-7
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Tijdschrift: Mindfulness
Uitgave 9/2019
Print ISSN: 1868-8527
Elektronisch ISSN: 1868-8535

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Electronic supplementary material

Publisher’s Note

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 9/2019

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Caregivers of Veterans

Unshakeable Well-Being: Is the Buddhist Concept of Enlightenment a Meaningful Possibility in the Current Age

Mindfulness Training Offered In-person and in a Virtual World—Weekly Self-reports of Stress, Energy, Pain, and Sleepiness among US Military Active Duty and Veteran Personnel

Neurogenetic Mechanisms of Self-Compassionate Mindfulness: the Role of Oxytocin-Receptor Genes

Do Contemplative Moments Matter? Effects of Informal Meditation on Emotions and Perceived Social Integration

Validation of a Scale for Assessing Social Validity in Mindfulness-Based Educational Programs