Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 10/2013

01-12-2013

Using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 in clinical practice for patient management: identifying scores requiring a clinician’s attention

Auteurs: Claire F. Snyder, Amanda L. Blackford, Toru Okuyama, Tatsuo Akechi, Hiroko Yamashita, Tatsuya Toyama, Michael A. Carducci, Albert W. Wu

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 10/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used increasingly for individual patient management. Identifying which PRO scores require a clinician’s attention is an ongoing challenge. Previous research used a needs assessment to identify EORTC-QLQ-C30 cutoff scores representing unmet needs. This analysis attempted to replicate the previous findings in a new and larger sample.

Methods

This analysis used data from 408 Japanese ambulatory breast cancer patients who completed the QLQ-C30 and Supportive Care Needs Survey-Short Form-34 (SCNS-SF34). Applying the methods used previously, SCNS-SF34 item/domain scores were dichotomized as no versus some unmet need. We calculated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to evaluate QLQ-C30 scores’ ability to discriminate between patients with no versus some unmet need based on SCNS-SF34 items/domains. For QLQ-C30 domains with AUC ≥ 0.70, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of various cutoffs for identifying unmet needs. We hypothesized that compared to our original analysis, (1) the same six QLQ-C30 domains would have AUC ≥ 0.70, (2) the same SCNS-SF34 items would be best discriminated by QLQ-C30 scores, and (3) the sensitivity and specificity of our original cutoff scores would be supported.

Results

The findings from our original analysis were supported. The same six domains with AUC ≥ 0.70 in the original analysis had AUC ≥ 0.70 in this new sample, and the same SCNS-SF34 item was best discriminated by QLQ-C30 scores. Cutoff scores were identified with sensitivity ≥0.84 and specificity ≥0.54.

Conclusion

Given these findings’ concordance with our previous analysis, these QLQ-C30 cutoffs could be implemented in clinical practice and their usefulness evaluated.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Snyder, C. F., & Aaronson, N. K. (2009). Use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. The Lancet, 374, 369–370. CrossRef Snyder, C. F., & Aaronson, N. K. (2009). Use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. The Lancet, 374, 369–370. CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Greenhalgh, J. (2009). The applications of PROs in clinical practice: What are they, do they work, and why? Quality of Life Research, 18, 115–123. PubMedCrossRef Greenhalgh, J. (2009). The applications of PROs in clinical practice: What are they, do they work, and why? Quality of Life Research, 18, 115–123. PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22, 714–724. PubMedCrossRef Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22, 714–724. PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Berry, D. L., Blumenstein, B. A., Halpenny, B., et al. (2011). Enhancing patient-provider communication with the electronic self-report assessment for cancer: A randomized trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29, 1029–1035. PubMedCrossRef Berry, D. L., Blumenstein, B. A., Halpenny, B., et al. (2011). Enhancing patient-provider communication with the electronic self-report assessment for cancer: A randomized trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29, 1029–1035. PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Santana, M. J., Feeny, D., Johnson, J. A., et al. (2010). Assessing the use of health-related quality of life measures in the routine clinical care of lung-transplant patients. Quality of Life Research, 19, 371–379. PubMedCrossRef Santana, M. J., Feeny, D., Johnson, J. A., et al. (2010). Assessing the use of health-related quality of life measures in the routine clinical care of lung-transplant patients. Quality of Life Research, 19, 371–379. PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Detmar, S. B., Muller, M. J., Schornagel, J. H., Wever, L. D. V., & Aaronson, N. K. (2002). Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication. A randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 3027–3034. PubMedCrossRef Detmar, S. B., Muller, M. J., Schornagel, J. H., Wever, L. D. V., & Aaronson, N. K. (2002). Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication. A randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 3027–3034. PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Greenhalgh, J., & Meadows, K. (1999). The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: A literature review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 5, 401–416. PubMedCrossRef Greenhalgh, J., & Meadows, K. (1999). The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: A literature review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 5, 401–416. PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Marshall, S., Haywood, K., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2006). Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: A structured review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 12, 559–568. PubMedCrossRef Marshall, S., Haywood, K., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2006). Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: A structured review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 12, 559–568. PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Haywood, K., Marshall, S., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2006). Patient participation in the consultation process: A structured review of intervention strategies. Patient Education and Counseling, 63, 12–23. PubMedCrossRef Haywood, K., Marshall, S., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2006). Patient participation in the consultation process: A structured review of intervention strategies. Patient Education and Counseling, 63, 12–23. PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cleeland, C. S., Wang, X. S., Shi, Q., et al. (2011). Automated symptom alerts reduce postoperative symptom severity after cancer surgery: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29, 994–1000. PubMedCrossRef Cleeland, C. S., Wang, X. S., Shi, Q., et al. (2011). Automated symptom alerts reduce postoperative symptom severity after cancer surgery: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29, 994–1000. PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference McLachlan, S.-A., Allenby, A., Matthews, J., et al. (2001). Randomized trial of coordinated psychosocial interventions based on patient self-assessments versus standard care to improve the psychosocial functioning of patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 19, 4117–4125. PubMed McLachlan, S.-A., Allenby, A., Matthews, J., et al. (2001). Randomized trial of coordinated psychosocial interventions based on patient self-assessments versus standard care to improve the psychosocial functioning of patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 19, 4117–4125. PubMed
12.
go back to reference Snyder, C. F., Blackford, A. L., Aaronson, N. K., et al. (2011). Can patient-reported outcome measures identify cancer patients’ most bothersome issues? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29, 1216–1220. PubMedCrossRef Snyder, C. F., Blackford, A. L., Aaronson, N. K., et al. (2011). Can patient-reported outcome measures identify cancer patients’ most bothersome issues? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29, 1216–1220. PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Snyder, C. F., Blackford, A. L., Wolff, A. C., et al. (2012). Feasibility and value of PatientViewpoint: a web system for patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice. Psycho-Oncology,. doi: 10.​1002/​pon.​3087. Snyder, C. F., Blackford, A. L., Wolff, A. C., et al. (2012). Feasibility and value of PatientViewpoint: a web system for patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice. Psycho-Oncology,. doi: 10.​1002/​pon.​3087.
14.
go back to reference Snyder, C. F., Blackford, A. L., Brahmer, J. R., et al. (2010). Needs assessments can identify scores on HRQOL questionnaires that represent problems for patients: an illustration with the Supportive Care Needs Survey and the QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research, 19, 837–845. PubMedCrossRef Snyder, C. F., Blackford, A. L., Brahmer, J. R., et al. (2010). Needs assessments can identify scores on HRQOL questionnaires that represent problems for patients: an illustration with the Supportive Care Needs Survey and the QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research, 19, 837–845. PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Okuyama, T., Akechi, T., Yamashita, H., et al. (2009). Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the short-form supportive care needs survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34-J). Psycho-Oncology, 18, 1003–1010. PubMedCrossRef Okuyama, T., Akechi, T., Yamashita, H., et al. (2009). Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the short-form supportive care needs survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34-J). Psycho-Oncology, 18, 1003–1010. PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bonevski, B., Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Girgis, A., et al. (2000). Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Cancer, 88, 217–225. PubMedCrossRef Bonevski, B., Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Girgis, A., et al. (2000). Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Cancer, 88, 217–225. PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sanson-Fisher, R., Girgis, A., Boyes, A., et al. (2000). The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Cancer, 88, 226–237. PubMedCrossRef Sanson-Fisher, R., Girgis, A., Boyes, A., et al. (2000). The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Cancer, 88, 226–237. PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., et al. (1993). The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85, 365–376. PubMedCrossRef Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., et al. (1993). The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85, 365–376. PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Velikova, G., Brown, J. M., Smith, A. B., & Selby, P. J. (2002). Computer-based quality of life questionnaires may contribute to doctor-patient interactions in oncology. British Journal of Cancer, 86, 51–59. PubMedCrossRef Velikova, G., Brown, J. M., Smith, A. B., & Selby, P. J. (2002). Computer-based quality of life questionnaires may contribute to doctor-patient interactions in oncology. British Journal of Cancer, 86, 51–59. PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kobayashi, K., Takeda, F., Teramukai, S., et al. (1998). A cross-validation of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) for Japanese with lung cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 34, 810–815. PubMedCrossRef Kobayashi, K., Takeda, F., Teramukai, S., et al. (1998). A cross-validation of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) for Japanese with lung cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 34, 810–815. PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression (2nd ed.). Chichester, New York: Wiley. CrossRef Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression (2nd ed.). Chichester, New York: Wiley. CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Snyder, C. F., Jensen, R., Courtin, S. O., Wu, A. W., & Website for Outpatient QOL Assessment Research Network. (2009). PatientViewpoint: A website for patient-reported outcomes assessment. Quality of Life Research, 18, 793–800. PubMedCrossRef Snyder, C. F., Jensen, R., Courtin, S. O., Wu, A. W., & Website for Outpatient QOL Assessment Research Network. (2009). PatientViewpoint: A website for patient-reported outcomes assessment. Quality of Life Research, 18, 793–800. PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Fayers, P. M., Weeden, S., Curran, D., & on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. (1998). EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference Values. Brussels: EORTC (ISBN: 2-930064-11-0). Fayers, P. M., Weeden, S., Curran, D., & on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. (1998). EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference Values. Brussels: EORTC (ISBN: 2-930064-11-0).
24.
go back to reference Hughes, E. F., Wu, A. W., Carducci, M. A., & Snyder, C. F. (2012). What can I do? Recommendations for responding to issues identified by patient-reported outcomes assessments used in clinical practice. Journal of Supportive Oncology, 10, 143–148. PubMedCrossRef Hughes, E. F., Wu, A. W., Carducci, M. A., & Snyder, C. F. (2012). What can I do? Recommendations for responding to issues identified by patient-reported outcomes assessments used in clinical practice. Journal of Supportive Oncology, 10, 143–148. PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 in clinical practice for patient management: identifying scores requiring a clinician’s attention
Auteurs
Claire F. Snyder
Amanda L. Blackford
Toru Okuyama
Tatsuo Akechi
Hiroko Yamashita
Tatsuya Toyama
Michael A. Carducci
Albert W. Wu
Publicatiedatum
01-12-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 10/2013
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0387-8

Andere artikelen Uitgave 10/2013

Quality of Life Research 10/2013 Naar de uitgave