Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1195-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The structural equation modeling (SEM) approach for detection of response shift (Oort in Qual Life Res 14:587–598, 2005. doi:10.1007/s11136-004-0830-y) is especially suited for continuous data, e.g., questionnaire scales. The present objective is to explain how the SEM approach can be applied to discrete data and to illustrate response shift detection in items measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) of cancer patients.
The SEM approach for discrete data includes two stages: (1) establishing a model of underlying continuous variables that represent the observed discrete variables, (2) using these underlying continuous variables to establish a common factor model for the detection of response shift and to assess true change. The proposed SEM approach was illustrated with data of 485 cancer patients whose HRQL was measured with the SF-36, before and after start of antineoplastic treatment.
Response shift effects were detected in items of the subscales mental health, physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, and bodily pain. Recalibration response shifts indicated that patients experienced relatively fewer limitations with “bathing or dressing yourself” (effect size d = 0.51) and less “nervousness” (d = 0.30), but more “pain” (d = −0.23) and less “happiness” (d = −0.16) after antineoplastic treatment as compared to the other symptoms of the same subscale. Overall, patients’ mental health improved, while their physical health, vitality, and social functioning deteriorated. No change was found for the other subscales of the SF-36.
The proposed SEM approach to discrete data enables response shift detection at the item level. This will lead to a better understanding of the response shift phenomena at the item level and therefore enhances interpretation of change in the area of HRQL.
Aaronson, N. K., Muller, M., Cohen, P. D. A., Essink-Bot, M.-L., Fekkes, M., Sanderman, R., et al. (1998). Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 health survey in community and chronic disease populations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1055–1068. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00097-3. CrossRefPubMed
Boomsma, A., & Hoogland, J. J. (2001). The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. In R. Cudeck, S. Du Toit, & D. Sorbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 139–168). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B), 39, 1–38. doi:10.1.1.133.4884.
Dolan, C. V. (1994). Factor analysis of variables with 2, 3, 5 and 7 response categories: A comparison of categorical variable estimators using simulated data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 309–326. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1994.tb01039.x.
Guilleux, A., Blanchin, M., Vanier, A., Guillemin, F., Falissard, B., Schwartz, C. E., et al. (2015). Response shift algorithm in item response theory (ROSALI) for response shift detection with missing data in longitudinal patient-reported outcome studies. Quality of Life Research, 24, 553–564. CrossRefPubMed
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 users’guide (2nd ed.). Chcago, IL: Scientific software international Inc.
Jöreskog, K. G. (2002). Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables using LISREL. Retrieved from: http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/ordinal.pdf.
Karnofsky, D. A., & Burchenal, J. H. (1949). The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: C. MacLeod (Eds.), Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents (pp. 191–205). New York: Columbia University.
Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G., & Maes, H. H. (2003). Mx: Statistical modeling (6th ed.). Richmond, VA: Department of Psychiatry.
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. CrossRef
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1988). Scaling corrections for Chi square statistics in covariance structure analysis. In Proceedings of the business and economic statistics section of the American Statistical Association, pp. 308–313.
Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (1993). SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
- Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change in discrete variables: an application to the items of the SF-36
Mathilde G. E. Verdam
Frans J. Oort
Mirjam A. G. Sprangers
- Springer International Publishing