Top

Optie A:

Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
Optie B:

Deel de link per e-mail
Link delen

vorige artikel A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Caring in Chao...

volgende artikel The Relation between Electronic Game Play and E...

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

15-02-2020 | Original Paper | Uitgave 10/2020

Using Focus Groups to Understand the Dynamics of Mothers and Daughters on Social Networking Sites

Tijdschrift:: Journal of Child and Family Studies > Uitgave 10/2020

Auteurs:: Sara Santarossa, Sarah J. Woodruff

» Toegang tot de volledige tekst krijgen

Belangrijke opmerkingen

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Objectives

The mother/daughter relationship has been deemed critical for the positive development of self-esteem, body image, and eating behaviors for adolescent girls. As maternal modeling exists offline between mothers and adolescent daughters, a similar influence could be exercised by the fast evolution of digital culture, such as social networking sites (SNSs), thus making it imperative that online mother/daughter relationship be considered and investigated.

Methods

The current study qualitatively examined the mother/daughter dynamic on SNSs with particular emphasis on exploring the SNS-related influences and understanding what role mothers play in developing their daughters’ SNSs beliefs, attitudes social norms, and behaviors as well as to determine what daughters have learned from their mothers about SNSs. Sixteen mothers of girls born in 2003–2007 (M_age of their daughters = 12.78, SD = 1.31) participated in one of four focus group discussions. In addition, 26 girls born in 2003–2007 (M_age = 13.17, SD = 1.16) participated in one of four focus group discussions.

Results

The transcripts from the focus groups (N = 8) were looked at as a whole and themes were drawn across the mothers and girls focus groups. Using a deductive and inductive approach, thematic analysis revealed five themes: being your authentic self, co-creating a digital footprint and online expectations, mother as a role model, connecting offline, and transmission of beauty ideals.

Conclusions

Results suggest that further research is needed to aid in the development of tools that will help foster positive online mother/daughter relationships.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Hier inloggen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijf je als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen jouw vak. Met het online abonnement heb je toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kun je op je gemak en wanneer het jou het beste uitkomt verdiepen in jouw vakgebied.

Meer informatie

American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (2017). Social networking and children. http://www.aacap.org/aacap/families_and_youth/facts_for_families/FFF-Guide/Children-and-Social-Networking-100.aspx.

Appel, M., Stiglbauer, B., Batinic, B., & Holtz, P. (2014). Internet use and verbal aggression: the moderating role of parents and peers. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.007. CrossRef

Askelson, N. M., Campo, S., & Smith, S. (2012). Mother–daughter communication about sex: the influence of authoritative parenting style. Health Communication, 27(5), 439–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.606526. CrossRefPubMed

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Barak-Brandes, S., & Lachover, E. (2015). Branding relations: mother–daughter discourse on beauty and body in an Israeli campaign by Dove. Communication, Culture & Critique, 9(3), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12111. CrossRef

Barbour, R. S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal, 322(7294), 1115–1117. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115. CrossRefPubMed

Barnes, S. B. (2006). A privacy paradox: social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v11i9.1394.

Bartels, J. S. (2016). Parents’ growing pains on social media: modeling authenticity. Character and…Social Media, 1, 51–70. http://digitalud.dbq.edu/ojs/characterParents.

Benedikt, R., Wertheim, E. H., & Love, A. (1998). Eating attitudes and weight-loss attempts in female adolescents and their mothers. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 27(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022876715005. CrossRef

Berge, J. M., MacLehose, R. F., Loth, K. A., Eisenberg, M. E., Fulkerson, J. A., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2015). Parent–adolescent conversations about eating, physical activity and weight: prevalence across sociodemographic characteristics and associations with adolescent weight and weight-related behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38(1), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-014-9584-3. CrossRefPubMed

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. CrossRef

Buelga, S., Martínez-Ferrer, B., & Musitu, G. (2016). Family relationships and cyberbullying. Cyberbullying across the globe (pp. 99–114). New York City, NY: Springer Publishing. CrossRef

Burr, V. (2015). Social constructionism. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge Publishing. CrossRef

Chua, T. H. H., & Chang, L. (2016). Follow me and like my beautiful selfies: Singapore teenage girls’ engagement in self-presentation and peer comparison on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.011. CrossRef

Collett, J. L. (2005). What kind of mother am I? Impression management and the social construction of motherhood. Symbolic Interaction, 28(3), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2005.28.3.327. CrossRef

Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1999). Doing qualitative research. Oaks, CA,: Sage Publications.

Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Duggan, M., Lenhart, A., Lampe, C., & Ellison, N. B. (2015). Parents and social media. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/07/16/parents-and-social-media/.

Dumas, T. M., Maxwell-Smith, M., Davis, J. P., & Giulietti, P. A. (2017). Lying or longing for likes? Narcissism, peer belonging, loneliness and normative versus deceptive like-seeking on Instagram in emerging adulthood. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.037. CrossRef

Erickson, C. (2013). ‘STFU, Parents:’ the latest in social media baby poop. Mashable. Retrieved from https://mashable.com/2013/04/29/stfu-parentsovershare/.

Espinoza, G., & Juvonen, J. (2011). The pervasiveness, connectedness, and intrusiveness of social network site use among young adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(12), 705–709. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0492. CrossRef

Fardouly, J., & Vartanian, L. R. (2015). Negative comparisons about one’s appearance mediate the relationship between Facebook usage and body image concerns. Body Image, 12, 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.10.004. CrossRefPubMed

Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2003). Reflexivity: a practical guide for researchers in health and the social sciences. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossRef

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Flaake, K. (2005). Girls, adolescence and the impact of bodily changes: family dynamics and social definitions of the female body. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 12(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506805051241. CrossRef

Fox, G. L. (1980). The mother-adolescent daughter relationship as a sexual socialization structure: a research review. Family Relations, 29(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/583712. CrossRef

Franzese, A. (2007). To thine own self be true? An exploration of authenticity. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Durham, NC: Duke University.

Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108. CrossRef

Freysinger, V. J. (1999). Life span and life course perspectives on leisure. In E. Jackson & T. L. Burton (Eds), Leisure studies: prospects for the twenty-first century (pp. 253–270). State College, PA: Venture Publishing, Inc.

Gilligan, C. (1982). New maps of development: new visions of maturity. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1982.tb02682.x. CrossRefPubMed

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York City, NY: Doubleday and Company.

Goldberg, J. E. (1994). Mutuality in mother-daughter relationships. Families in Society, 75, 236–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/104438949407500405. CrossRef

Guassi Moreira, J. F., & Telzer, E. H. (2018). Mother still knows best: maternal influence uniquely modulates adolescent reward sensitivity during risk taking. Developmental Science, 21(1), e12484. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12484. CrossRef

Handford, C. M., Rapee, R. M., & Fardouly, J. (2018). The influence of maternal modeling on body image concerns and eating disturbances in preadolescent girls. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 100, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2017.11.001. CrossRefPubMed

He, M., Piché, L., Beynon, C., & Harris, S. (2010). Screen-related sedentary behaviors: children’s and parents’ attitudes, motivations, and practices. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 42(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2008.11.011. CrossRefPubMed

Hiniker, A., Schoenebeck, S. Y., & Kientz, J. A. (2016). Not at the dinner table: parents’ and children’s perspectives on family technology rules. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Suppor ted Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 1376–1389). ACM.

Holland, G., & Tiggemann, M. (2017). “Strong beats skinny every time”: disordered eating and compulsive exercise in women who post fitspiration on Instagram. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 50(1), 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22559. CrossRefPubMed

Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687. CrossRefPubMed

James, C., & Jenkins, H. (2014). Disconnected: youth, new media, and the ethics gap. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossRef

Jensen, L. A., & Dost‐Gözkan, A. (2015). Adolescent–parent relations in Asian Indian and Salvadoran immigrant families: a cultural–developmental analysis of autonomy, authority, conflict, and cohesion. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(2), 340–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12116. CrossRef

Jong, S. T., & Drummond, M. J. (2013). Shaping adolescent girls’ body image perceptions: the effect of social media on Australian adolescent girls. In J. Quay, & A. Mooney (Eds.), Pr oceedings from ACHPER 13’: 28 t h International Conference (pp. 74–83). Hindmarsh, South Australia: Australian Council for Health Physical Education and Recreation (ACHPER). Retrieved from https://www.achper.org.au/documents/item/266.

Keizer, R., Helmerhorst, K. O., & van Rijn-van Gelderen, L. (2019). Perceived quality of the mother–adolescent and father–adolescent attachment relationship and adolescents’ self-esteem. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01007-0.

Krueger, R. A. (1998). Moderating focus groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. CrossRef

Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kumar, P., & Schoenebeck, S. (2015). The modern day baby book: enacting good mothering and stewarding privacy on Facebook. In Proceedings from 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 1302–1312). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675149.

LaBrie, J. W., Boyle, S. C., & Napper, L. E. (2015). Alcohol abstinence or harm-reduction? Parental messages for college-bound light drinkers. Addictive Behaviors, 46, 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.02.019. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Law, D. M., Shapka, J. D., & Olson, B. F. (2010). To control or not to control? Parenting behaviours and adolescent online aggression. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1651–1656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.013. CrossRef

Lewis, B. (2014). Raising children in a digital age: enjoying the best, avoiding the worst. Oxford: Lion Books.

Mabe, A. G., Forney, K. J., & Keel, P. K. (2014). Do you “like” my photo? Facebook use maintains eating disorder risk. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 47(5), 516–523. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22254. CrossRefPubMed

MacQueen, K. M., McLellan-Lemal, E., Bartholow, K., & Milstein, B. (2008). Teambased codebook development: structure, process, and agreement. In G. Guest & K. M. MacQueen (Eds), Handbook for team-based qualitative research (pp. 119–137). Plymouth: AltaMira Press.

Mehdizadeh, S. (2010). Self-presentation 2.0: narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(4), 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0257. CrossRef

Meier, E. P., & Gray, J. (2014). Facebook photo activity associated with body image disturbance in adolescent girls. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(4), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0305. CrossRef

Mingoia, J., Hutchinson, A. D., Gleaves, D. H., & Wilson, C. (2019). The relationship between posting and photo manipulation activities on social networking sites and internalization of a tanned ideal among Australian adolescents and young adults. Social Media + Society, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118820419. CrossRef

Morgan, D. L. (1998). Planning focus groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. CrossRef

Muir, I., Munroe-Chandler, K. J., & Loughead, T. (2018). A qualitative investigation of young female dancers’ use of imagery. The Sport Psychologist, 32(4), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2017-0123. CrossRef

Nelissen, S., & Van den Bulck, J. (2018). When digital natives instruct digital immigrants: active guidance of parental media use by children and conflict in the family. Information, Communication & Society, 21(3), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1281993. CrossRef

Newland, L. A. (2015). Family well‐being, parenting, and child well‐being: pathways to healthy adjustment. Clinical Psychologist, 19(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/cp.12059. CrossRef

Notar, M., & McDaniel, S. A. (1986). Feminist attitudes and mother-daughter relationships in adolescence. Adolescence, 21(81), 11. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1295934878?accountid=14789.

O’Keeffe, G. S., & Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800–804. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0054. CrossRefPubMed

Ortlipp, M. (2008). Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 695–705. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol13/iss4/8.

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010. CrossRef

Pfeifer, J. H., Masten, C. L., Moore, W. E., Oswald, T. M., Mazziotta, J. C., Iacoboni, M., & Dapretto, M. (2011). Entering adolescence: resistance to peer influence, risky behavior, and neural changes in emotion reactivity. Neuron, 69(5), 1029–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.019. CrossRef

Piko, B. F. (2007). Self-perceived health among adolescents: the role of gender and psychosocial factors. European Journal of Pediatrics, 166(7), 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-006-0311-0. CrossRefPubMed

Poole, M., & Gelder, A. (1985). Family cohesiveness and adolescent autonomy in decision-making. Australian Journal of Sex, Marriage, & Family, 5, 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/01591487.1984.11004277. CrossRef

Rastogi, M., & Wampler, K. S. (1999). Adult daughters’ perceptions of the mother-daughter relationship: a cross-cultural comparison. Family Relations, 327–336. https://doi.org/10.2307/585643.

Rodgers, R. F., Paxton, S. J., & Chabrol, H. (2009). Effects of parental comments on body dissatisfaction and eating disturbance in young adults: a sociocultural model. Body Image, 6(3), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.04.004. CrossRefPubMed

Rosen, L. D., Cheever, N. A., & Carrier, L. M. (2008). The association of parenting style and child age with parental limit setting and adolescent MySpace behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.005. CrossRef

Santarossa, S., & Woodruff, S. J. (2017). #SocialMedia: exploring the relationship of social networking sites on body image, self-esteem, and eating disorders. Social Media + Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117704407.

Shannon, C. S., & Shaw, S. M. (2008). Mothers and daughters: teaching and learning about leisure. Leisure Sciences, 30(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400701544659. CrossRef

Shin, W., & Kang, H. (2016). Adolescents’ privacy concerns and information disclosure online: the role of parents and the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 114–123. CrossRef

Slater, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2015). Media exposure, extracurricular activities, and appearance-related comments as predictors of female adolescents’ self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(3), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314554606. CrossRef

Smithson, J. (2000). Using and analysing focus groups: limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/136455700405172. CrossRef

Statistics Canada. (2013). Canadian internet use survey, 2012. Catalogue no. 11-001-X. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/131126/dq131126d-eng.htm.

Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2000). Parental monitoring: a reinterpretation. Child Development, 71(4), 1072–1085. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00210. CrossRefPubMed

Steinberg, L., & Silk, J. S. (2002). Parenting adolescents. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: vol. 1 children and parenting (pp. 103–133). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Steinberg, S. B. (2016). Sharenting: Children’s privacy in the age of social media. Emory Law Journal, 66(4), 839–884. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/emlj66&i=865.

Stuckey, H. L. (2015). The second step in data analysis: coding qualitative research data. Journal of Social Health and Diabetes, 3(1), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-0656.140875. CrossRef

Sullivan, B. (2005). Kids, blogs and too much information: children reveal more online than parents know. NBC News. http://www.nbcnews.com/.

Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2014). NetTweens: the internet and body image concerns in preteenage girls. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(5), 606–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431613501083. CrossRef

Upton, J. (2013). Psychosocial factors. In M. D. Gellman & J. R. Turner (Eds), Encyclopedia of behavioral medicine. New York, NY: Springer.

Usmiani, S., & Daniluk, J. (1997). Mothers and their adolescent daughters: relationship between self-esteem, gender role identity, body image. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024588112108. CrossRef

Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(5), 584–590. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.584. CrossRef

Vannini, P., & Franzese, A. (2008). The authenticity of self: conceptualization, personal experience, and practice. Sociology Compass, 2(5), 1621–1637. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00151.x. CrossRef

Vazou, S., Ntoumanis, N., & Duda, J. L. (2005). Peer motivational climate in youth sport: a qualitative inquiry. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6(5), 497–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2004.03.005. CrossRef

Vescio, J., Wilde, K., & Crosswhite, J. J. (2005). Profiling sport role models to enhance initiatives for adolescent girls in physical education and sport. European Physical Education Review, 11(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X05052894. CrossRef

Wisniewski, P., Jia, H., Xu, H., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2015). Preventative vs. reactive: how parental mediation influences teens’ social media privacy behaviors. In Proceedings of th e 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Coo perative Work & Social Computing (pp. 302–316). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675293.

Yardi, S., & Bruckman, A. (2011). Social and technical challenges in parenting teens’ social media use. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3237–3246). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979422.

Youniss, J., & Ketterlinus, R. D. (1987). Communication and connectedness in mother- and father-adolescent relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02139094. CrossRefPubMed

Zhang, N., Campo, S., Yang, J., Janz, K. F., Snetselaar, L. G., & Eckler, P. (2015). Effects of social support about physical activity on social networking sites: applying the theory of planned behavior. Health Communication, 30(12), 1277–1285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.940669. CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Using Focus Groups to Understand the Dynamics of Mothers and Daughters on Social Networking Sites
Auteurs:: Sara Santarossa
Sarah J. Woodruff
Publicatiedatum: 15-02-2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01700-w
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Tijdschrift: Journal of Child and Family Studies
Uitgave 10/2020
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Using Focus Groups to Understand the Dynamics of Mothers and Daughters on Social Networking Sites

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 10/2020

Parental Concerns about their School-aged Children’s Use of Digital Devices

Is the Development of Family Functioning Dependent on Trajectories of Antisocial Behavior? A TRAILS Study

The Home-based Involvement Experiences of Low-income Latino Families with Preschoolers Transitioning to Kindergarten: Qualitative Findings

Parental Empowerment and Child Behavioral Problems in Single and Two-Parent Families During Family Treatment

Examination of the Relationship between Cyberbullying and Cyber Victimization

The Moral Emotions of Guilt and Shame in Children: Relationship with Parenting and Temperament