Top

Gepubliceerd in:

11-10-2021 | Editorial

Using feedback tools to enhance the quality and experience of care

Auteurs: Jan R. Boehnke, Claudia Rutherford

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 11/2021

Excerpt

In 2019, we issued a call for papers interested in approaches to data-based feedback mechanisms to enhance quality and experience of care, focusing on (health-related) quality of life (HRQL). We were looking for current and innovative state-of-the-art use of data-based feedback mechanisms to enhance quality and experience of care. For the purposes of this special issue, we defined ‘data-based feedback mechanisms’ as systems that generate and capture data during an individual care process and that are fed back into the same individual care process. In line with the scope of our journal covering quality of life aspects of treatment, care, and rehabilitation, we kept ‘care process’ intentionally broad, describing active treatments in inpatient and outpatient settings, as well as supportive care and other interventions extending beyond typical treatment settings. We received the exceptional number of 29 expressions of interest of which 22 papers are now collected in this special issue. For the issue, we have grouped the studies in four sections that align with elements of the call. But as all of the studies were deeply rooted in clinical practice and applications, there are a lot of themes that are common across the studies and sections, and we invite readers to explore and cross-read these papers with their own research and practice in mind. …

volgende artikel Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings

Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., Elliott, T. E., Greenhalgh, J., Halyard, M. Y., et al. (2012). Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research, 21(8), 1305–1314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0054-xCrossRefPubMed

Anatchkova, M., Donelson, S. M., Skalicky, A. M., McHorney, C. A., Jagun, D., & Whiteley, J. (2018). Exploring the implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in cancer care: need for more real-world evidence results in the peer reviewed literature. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 2(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-018-0091-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

de Jong, K. (2016). Deriving implementation strategies for outcome monitoring feedback from theory, research and practice. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 43(3), 292–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-014-0589-6CrossRefPubMed

Stover, A. M., Haverman, L., van Oers, H. A., Greenhalgh, J., Potter, C. M., & Group, I. P. P. i. C. P. I. S. W. (2020). Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02564-9CrossRef

van der Wees, P. J., Verkerk, E. W., Verbiest, M. E. A., Zuidgeest, M., Bakker, C., Braspenning, J., et al. (2019). Development of a framework with tools to support the selection and implementation of patient-reported outcome measures. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-019-0171-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Manalili, K., Santana, M. J., & group, I. P. P. i. c. p. i. s. w. . (2020). Using implementation science to inform the integration of electronic patient-reported experience measures (ePREMs) into healthcare quality improvement: description of a theory-based application in primary care. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02588-1CrossRefPubMed

Ahmed, S., Zidarov, D., Eilayyan, O., & Visca, R. (2020). Prospective application of implementation science theories and frameworks to inform use of PROMs in routine clinical care within an integrated pain network. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02600-8CrossRefPubMed

van Oers, H. A., Teela, L., Schepers, S. A., Grootenhuis, M. A., Haverman, L., PROMs, I., , et al. (2020). A retrospective assessment of the KLIK PROM portal implementation using the consolidated framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02586-3CrossRefPubMed

Roberts, N. A., Janda, M., Stover, A. M., Alexander, K. E., Wyld, D., Mudge, A., et al. (2020). The utility of the implementation science framework “integrated promoting action on research implementation in health services” (i-PARIHS) and the facilitator role for introducing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a medical oncology outpatient department. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02669-1CrossRefPubMed

10.

Howard, K. I., Moras, K., Brill, B. L., Martinovich, Z., & Lutz, W. (1996). Evaluation of psychotherapy. Efficacy, effectiveness and patient progress. American Psychologist, 51, 1059–1064.CrossRef

11.

Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., & Kleinstäuber, M. (2018). Collecting and delivering progress feedback: a meta-analysis of routine outcome monitoring. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000167CrossRefPubMed

12.

Castonguay, L. G., Barkham, M., Lutz, W., & McAleavey, A. (2013). Practice-oriented research: Approaches and applications. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th edition ed., pp. 85–133). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

13.

Nordberg, S. S., McAleavey, A. A., & Moltu, C. (2021). Continuous quality improvement in measure development: lessons from building a novel clinical feedback system. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02768-7CrossRefPubMed

14.

McAleavey, A. A., Nordberg, S. S., & Moltu, C. (2021). Initial quantitative development of the norse feedback system: a novel clinical feedback system for routine mental healthcare. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02825-1CrossRefPubMed

15.

Solstad, S. M., Kleiven, G. S., & Moltu, C. (2020). Complexity and potentials of clinical feedback in mental health: an in-depth study of patient processes. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02550-1CrossRefPubMed

16.

Greenhalgh, J., Gooding, K., Gibbons, E., Dalkin, S., Wright, J., Valderas, J., et al. (2018). How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 2, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-018-0061-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Kwon, J. Y., Thorne, S., & Sawatzky, R. (2019). Interpretation and use of patient-reported outcome measures through a philosophical lens. Quality of Life Research, 28(3), 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2051-9CrossRefPubMed

18.

Truijens, F. L., Van Nieuwenhove, K., De Smet, M. M., Desmet, M., & Meganck, R. (2021). How questionnaires shape experienced symptoms. A qualitative case comparison study of questionnaire administration in psychotherapy research. Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2021.1886383CrossRef

19.

Truijens, F. L., Desmet, M., De Coster, E., Uyttenhove, H., Deeren, B., & Meganck, R. (2019). When quantitative measures become a qualitative storybook: a phenomenological case analysis of validity and performativity of questionnaire administration in psychotherapy research. Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1579287CrossRef

20.

McClimans, L. (2011). Interpretability, validity, and the minimum important difference. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 32(6), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-011-9186-9CrossRefPubMed

21.

Mayoral, K., Garin, O., Caballero-Rabasco, M. A., Praena-Crespo, M., Bercedo, A., Hernandez, G., et al. (2021). Smartphone app for monitoring asthma in children and adolescents. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02706-zCrossRefPubMed

22.

Wasson, J. H. (2020). Standardized assessment, information, and networking technologies (SAINTs): lessons from three decades of development and testing. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02528-zCrossRefPubMed

23.

Withers, K., Palmer, R., Lewis, S., & Carolan-Rees, G. (2020). First steps in PROMs and PREMs collection in Wales as part of the prudent and value-based healthcare agenda. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02711-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Franklin, P. D., Zheng, H., Bond, C., & Lavallee, D. C. (2020). Translating clinical and patient-reported data to tailored shared decision reports with predictive analytics for knee and hip arthritis. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02557-8CrossRefPubMed

25.

Krause, M. S., Lutz, W., & Boehnke, J. R. (2011). The role of sampling in clinical trial design. Psychotherapy Research, 21(3), 243–251.CrossRef

26.

Fisher, A. J., Medaglia, J. D., & Jeronimus, B. F. (2018). Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(27), E6106–E6115. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711978115CrossRef

27.

Molenaar, P., & Campbell, C. G. (2009). The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(2), 112–117.CrossRef

28.

Bringmann, L. F., van der Veen, D. C., Wichers, M., Riese, H., & Stulp, G. (2020). ESMvis: a tool for visualizing individual experience sampling method (ESM) data. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02701-4CrossRefPubMed

29.

R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (4.1.1 ed.). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

30.

Chang, W., Cheng, J., Allaire, J., Sievert, C., Schloerke, B., Xie, Y., et al. (2021). shiny: Web Application Framework for R. (1.7.0 ed.).

31.

Golafshar, M. A., Petersen, M., Vargas, C. E., Samadder, N. J., Kunze, K. L., McCormick, N., et al. (2020). Utilizing open-source platforms to build and deploy interactive patient-reported quality of life tracking tools for monitoring protocol adherence. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02617-zCrossRefPubMed

32.

Mozafarinia, M., Rajabiyazdi, F., Brouillette, M. J., Fellows, L. K., & Mayo, N. E. (2020). Development and usability of a feedback tool, “my personal brain health dashboard”, to improve setting of self-management goals among people living with HIV in Canada. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02555-wCrossRefPubMed

33.

Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., et al. (2006). Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.47CrossRefPubMed

34.

Wilson, I. B., & Cleary, P. D. (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA, 273(1), 59–65.

35.

Samuel, C. A., Smith, A. B., Elkins, W., Richmond, J., Mahbooba, Z., Basch, E., et al. (2020). Racial differences in user experiences and perceived value of electronic symptom monitoring in a cohort of black and white bladder and prostate cancer patients. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02442-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Richards, H. S., Portal, A., Absolom, K., Blazeby, J. M., Velikova, G., & Avery, K. N. L. (2020). Patient experiences of an electronic PRO tailored feedback system for symptom management following upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02539-wCrossRefPubMed

37.

Naughton, M. J., Salani, R., Peng, J., Lustberg, M., DeGraffinreid, C., Moon, J., et al. (2020). Feasibility of implementing a text-based symptom-monitoring program of endometrial, ovarian, and breast cancer patients during treatment. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02660-wCrossRefPubMed

38.

Mouillet, G., Falcoz, A., Fritzsch, J., Almotlak, H., Jacoulet, P., Pivot, X., et al. (2021). Feasibility of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment for cancer patients using electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) in daily clinical practice. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02721-0CrossRefPubMed

39.

Teela, L., van Muilekom, M. M., Kooij, L. H., Gathier, A. W., van Goudoever, J. B., Grootenhuis, M. A., et al. (2020). Clinicians’ perspective on the implemented KLIK PROM portal in clinical practice. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02522-5CrossRefPubMed

40.

Braunschneider, L. E., Lehmann, M., Magaard, J. L., Seeralan, T., Marx, G., Eisele, M., et al. (2020). GPs’ views on the use of depression screening and GP-targeted feedback: a qualitative study. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02703-2CrossRefPubMed

41.

Boyce, M. B., Browne, J. P., & Greenhalgh, J. (2014). The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ Quality and Safety, 23(6), 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002524CrossRefPubMed

42.

Schilling, V., Zimmermann, D., Rubel, J. A., Boyle, K. S., & Lutz, W. (2020) Why do patients go off track? Examining potential influencing factors for being at risk of psychotherapy treatment failure. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02664-6.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Lutz, W., Rubel, J. A., Schwartz, B., Schilling, V., & Deisenhofer, A. K. (2019). Towards integrating personalized feedback research into clinical practice: development of the trier treatment navigator (TTN). Behaviour Research and Therapy, 120, 103438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.103438CrossRefPubMed

44.

Spitzer, W. O. (1987). State of science 1986: quality of life and functional status as target variables for research. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40(6), 465–471.CrossRef

45.

Lutz, W. (2002). Patient-focused psychotherapy research and individual treatment progress as scientific groundwork for an empirical based clinical practice. Psychotherapy Research, 12, 251–273.CrossRef

46.

Espallargues, M., Valderas, J. M., & Alonso, J. (2000). Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: a systematic review of its impact. Medical Care, 38(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200002000-00007CrossRefPubMed

47.

Valderas, J., Kotzeva, A., Espallargues, M., Guyatt, G., Ferrans, C., Halyard, M., et al. (2008). The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Quality of Life Research, 17(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9295-0CrossRefPubMed

48.

Greenhalgh, J., & Meadows, K. (1999). The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 5(4), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2753.1999.00209.xCrossRefPubMed

49.

Greenhalgh, J. (2008). The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why? Quality of Life Research, 18(1), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9430-6CrossRefPubMed

50.

Kendrick, T., El-Gohary, M., Stuart, B., Gilbody, S., Churchill, R., Aiken, L., et al. (2016). Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 7, CD011119, doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011119.pub2

51.

Boyce, M. B., & Browne, J. P. (2013). Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 22(9), 2265–2278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0390-0.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Ishaque, S., Karnon, J., Chen, G., Nair, R., & Salter, A. B. (2019). A systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Quality of Life Research, 28(3), 567–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2016-zCrossRefPubMed

53.

Mackrill, T., & Sørensen, K. M. (2019). Implementing routine outcome measurement in psychosocial interventions – a systematic review. European Journal of Social Work, 23(5), 790–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2019.1602029CrossRef

54.

Campbell, R. D., & Rutherford, C. (2021). Perceived benefits and limitations of using patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice with individual patients: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03003-zCrossRefPubMed

55.

Ovretveit, J., Zubkoff, L., Nelson, E. C., Frampton, S., Knudsen, J. L., & Zimlichman, E. (2017). Using patient-reported outcome measurement to improve patient care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 29(6), 874–879. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx108CrossRefPubMed

56.

Greenhalgh, J., Long, A. F., & Flynn, R. (2005). The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory? Social Science & Medicine, 60(4), 833–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.022CrossRef

57.

Greenhalgh, J., Dalkin, S., Gooding, K., Gibbons, E., Wright, J., Meads, D., et al. (2017). Functionality and feedback: a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of patient-reported outcome measures data to improve patient care. Health Services and Delivery Research, 5(2), 1–280. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr05020CrossRef

58.

Austen, J. (1813). [1998]). Pride and Prejudice. Project Gutenberg. Accessed 22.09.2021.

59.

Jensen-Doss, A., Douglas, S., Phillips, D. A., Gencdur, O., Zalman, A., & Gomez, N. E. (2020). Measurement-based care as a practice improvement tool: Clinical and organizational applications in youth mental health. Evidence-Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 5(3), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2020.1784062.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

60.

Black, N., Burke, L., Forrest, C. B., Sieberer, U. H., Ahmed, S., Valderas, J. M., et al. (2016). Patient-reported outcomes: pathways to better health, better services, and better societies. Quality of Life Research, 25(5), 1103–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1168-3CrossRefPubMed

61.

Porter, I., Goncalves-Bradley, D., Ricci-Cabello, I., Gibbons, C., Gangannagaripalli, J., Fitzpatrick, R., et al. (2016). Framework and guidance for implementing patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: evidence, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 5(5), 507–519. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2015-0014.CrossRefPubMed

62.

Kish, L. J., & Topol, E. J. (2015). Unpatients-why patients should own their medical data. Nature Biotechnology, 33(9), 921–924. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3340CrossRefPubMed

63.

Cruz Rivera, S., Mercieca-Bebber, R., Aiyegbusi, O. L., Scott, J., Hunn, A., Fernandez, C., et al. (2021). The need for ethical guidance for the use of patient-reported outcomes in research and clinical practice. Nature Medicine, 27(4), 572–573. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01275-zCrossRefPubMed

64.

Muir, H. J., Coyne, A. E., Morrison, N. R., Boswell, J. F., & Constantino, M. J. (2019). Ethical implications of routine outcomes monitoring for patients, psychotherapists, and mental health care systems. Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.), 56(4), 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000246CrossRef

65.

Nguyen, H., Butow, P., Dhillon, H., & Sundaresan, P. (2021). A review of the barriers to using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine cancer care. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, 68(2), 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.421.CrossRefPubMed

66.

Hancock, S. L., Ryan, O. F., Marion, V., Kramer, S., Kelly, P., Breen, S., et al. (2020). Feedback of patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals for comparing health service performance: a scoping review. British Medical Journal Open, 10(11), e038190. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038190CrossRef

Titel: Using feedback tools to enhance the quality and experience of care
Auteurs: Jan R. Boehnke
Claudia Rutherford
Publicatiedatum: 11-10-2021
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 11/2021
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03008-8

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Excerpt

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 11/2021

Patient experiences of an electronic PRO tailored feedback system for symptom management following upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery

Initial quantitative development of the Norse Feedback system: a novel clinical feedback system for routine mental healthcare

A retrospective assessment of the KLIK PROM portal implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)

Racial differences in user experiences and perceived value of electronic symptom monitoring in a cohort of black and white bladder and prostate cancer patients

First steps in PROMs and PREMs collection in Wales as part of the prudent and value-based healthcare agenda

Prospective application of implementation science theories and frameworks to inform use of PROMs in routine clinical care within an integrated pain network