Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

11-10-2021 | Editorial

Using feedback tools to enhance the quality and experience of care

Auteurs: Jan R. Boehnke, Claudia Rutherford

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 11/2021

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Excerpt

In 2019, we issued a call for papers interested in approaches to data-based feedback mechanisms to enhance quality and experience of care, focusing on (health-related) quality of life (HRQL). We were looking for current and innovative state-of-the-art use of data-based feedback mechanisms to enhance quality and experience of care. For the purposes of this special issue, we defined ‘data-based feedback mechanisms’ as systems that generate and capture data during an individual care process and that are fed back into the same individual care process. In line with the scope of our journal covering quality of life aspects of treatment, care, and rehabilitation, we kept ‘care process’ intentionally broad, describing active treatments in inpatient and outpatient settings, as well as supportive care and other interventions extending beyond typical treatment settings. We received the exceptional number of 29 expressions of interest of which 22 papers are now collected in this special issue. For the issue, we have grouped the studies in four sections that align with elements of the call. But as all of the studies were deeply rooted in clinical practice and applications, there are a lot of themes that are common across the studies and sections, and we invite readers to explore and cross-read these papers with their own research and practice in mind. …
Literatuur
4.
go back to reference Stover, A. M., Haverman, L., van Oers, H. A., Greenhalgh, J., Potter, C. M., & Group, I. P. P. i. C. P. I. S. W. (2020). Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02564-9CrossRef Stover, A. M., Haverman, L., van Oers, H. A., Greenhalgh, J., Potter, C. M., & Group, I. P. P. i. C. P. I. S. W. (2020). Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings. Quality of Life Research. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-020-02564-9CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Manalili, K., Santana, M. J., & group, I. P. P. i. c. p. i. s. w. . (2020). Using implementation science to inform the integration of electronic patient-reported experience measures (ePREMs) into healthcare quality improvement: description of a theory-based application in primary care. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02588-1CrossRefPubMed Manalili, K., Santana, M. J., & group, I. P. P. i. c. p. i. s. w. . (2020). Using implementation science to inform the integration of electronic patient-reported experience measures (ePREMs) into healthcare quality improvement: description of a theory-based application in primary care. Quality of Life Research. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-020-02588-1CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Roberts, N. A., Janda, M., Stover, A. M., Alexander, K. E., Wyld, D., Mudge, A., et al. (2020). The utility of the implementation science framework “integrated promoting action on research implementation in health services” (i-PARIHS) and the facilitator role for introducing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a medical oncology outpatient department. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02669-1CrossRefPubMed Roberts, N. A., Janda, M., Stover, A. M., Alexander, K. E., Wyld, D., Mudge, A., et al. (2020). The utility of the implementation science framework “integrated promoting action on research implementation in health services” (i-PARIHS) and the facilitator role for introducing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a medical oncology outpatient department. Quality of Life Research. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-020-02669-1CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Howard, K. I., Moras, K., Brill, B. L., Martinovich, Z., & Lutz, W. (1996). Evaluation of psychotherapy. Efficacy, effectiveness and patient progress. American Psychologist, 51, 1059–1064.CrossRef Howard, K. I., Moras, K., Brill, B. L., Martinovich, Z., & Lutz, W. (1996). Evaluation of psychotherapy. Efficacy, effectiveness and patient progress. American Psychologist, 51, 1059–1064.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Castonguay, L. G., Barkham, M., Lutz, W., & McAleavey, A. (2013). Practice-oriented research: Approaches and applications. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th edition ed., pp. 85–133). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Castonguay, L. G., Barkham, M., Lutz, W., & McAleavey, A. (2013). Practice-oriented research: Approaches and applications. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th edition ed., pp. 85–133). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
19.
go back to reference Truijens, F. L., Desmet, M., De Coster, E., Uyttenhove, H., Deeren, B., & Meganck, R. (2019). When quantitative measures become a qualitative storybook: a phenomenological case analysis of validity and performativity of questionnaire administration in psychotherapy research. Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1579287CrossRef Truijens, F. L., Desmet, M., De Coster, E., Uyttenhove, H., Deeren, B., & Meganck, R. (2019). When quantitative measures become a qualitative storybook: a phenomenological case analysis of validity and performativity of questionnaire administration in psychotherapy research. Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​14780887.​2019.​1579287CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Krause, M. S., Lutz, W., & Boehnke, J. R. (2011). The role of sampling in clinical trial design. Psychotherapy Research, 21(3), 243–251.CrossRef Krause, M. S., Lutz, W., & Boehnke, J. R. (2011). The role of sampling in clinical trial design. Psychotherapy Research, 21(3), 243–251.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Molenaar, P., & Campbell, C. G. (2009). The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(2), 112–117.CrossRef Molenaar, P., & Campbell, C. G. (2009). The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(2), 112–117.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (4.1.1 ed.). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (4.1.1 ed.). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
30.
go back to reference Chang, W., Cheng, J., Allaire, J., Sievert, C., Schloerke, B., Xie, Y., et al. (2021). shiny: Web Application Framework for R. (1.7.0 ed.). Chang, W., Cheng, J., Allaire, J., Sievert, C., Schloerke, B., Xie, Y., et al. (2021). shiny: Web Application Framework for R. (1.7.0 ed.).
32.
34.
go back to reference Wilson, I. B., & Cleary, P. D. (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA, 273(1), 59–65. Wilson, I. B., & Cleary, P. D. (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA, 273(1), 59–65.
44.
go back to reference Spitzer, W. O. (1987). State of science 1986: quality of life and functional status as target variables for research. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40(6), 465–471.CrossRef Spitzer, W. O. (1987). State of science 1986: quality of life and functional status as target variables for research. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40(6), 465–471.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Lutz, W. (2002). Patient-focused psychotherapy research and individual treatment progress as scientific groundwork for an empirical based clinical practice. Psychotherapy Research, 12, 251–273.CrossRef Lutz, W. (2002). Patient-focused psychotherapy research and individual treatment progress as scientific groundwork for an empirical based clinical practice. Psychotherapy Research, 12, 251–273.CrossRef
50.
57.
go back to reference Greenhalgh, J., Dalkin, S., Gooding, K., Gibbons, E., Wright, J., Meads, D., et al. (2017). Functionality and feedback: a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of patient-reported outcome measures data to improve patient care. Health Services and Delivery Research, 5(2), 1–280. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr05020CrossRef Greenhalgh, J., Dalkin, S., Gooding, K., Gibbons, E., Wright, J., Meads, D., et al. (2017). Functionality and feedback: a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of patient-reported outcome measures data to improve patient care. Health Services and Delivery Research, 5(2), 1–280. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3310/​hsdr05020CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Austen, J. (1813). [1998]). Pride and Prejudice. Project Gutenberg. Accessed 22.09.2021. Austen, J. (1813). [1998]). Pride and Prejudice. Project Gutenberg. Accessed 22.09.2021.
61.
go back to reference Porter, I., Goncalves-Bradley, D., Ricci-Cabello, I., Gibbons, C., Gangannagaripalli, J., Fitzpatrick, R., et al. (2016). Framework and guidance for implementing patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: evidence, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 5(5), 507–519. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2015-0014.CrossRefPubMed Porter, I., Goncalves-Bradley, D., Ricci-Cabello, I., Gibbons, C., Gangannagaripalli, J., Fitzpatrick, R., et al. (2016). Framework and guidance for implementing patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: evidence, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 5(5), 507–519. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2217/​cer-2015-0014.CrossRefPubMed
64.
go back to reference Muir, H. J., Coyne, A. E., Morrison, N. R., Boswell, J. F., & Constantino, M. J. (2019). Ethical implications of routine outcomes monitoring for patients, psychotherapists, and mental health care systems. Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.), 56(4), 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000246CrossRef Muir, H. J., Coyne, A. E., Morrison, N. R., Boswell, J. F., & Constantino, M. J. (2019). Ethical implications of routine outcomes monitoring for patients, psychotherapists, and mental health care systems. Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.), 56(4), 459–469. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​pst0000246CrossRef
65.
Metagegevens
Titel
Using feedback tools to enhance the quality and experience of care
Auteurs
Jan R. Boehnke
Claudia Rutherford
Publicatiedatum
11-10-2021
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 11/2021
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03008-8

Andere artikelen Uitgave 11/2021

Quality of Life Research 11/2021 Naar de uitgave