Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
To demonstrate the assessment of measurement invariance property in a health status instrument and to increase the awareness of its importance, we evaluate the measurement invariance of the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) across age and gender subgroups.
Data are obtained from children 7–12 years of age at entry into a randomized trial, which evaluates the effect of a telephone coaching program on improving asthma outcome. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis is used to assess the comparability of factor loadings and intercepts across age and gender subgroups. Since age is a continuous variable, two different categorizations (7–10 vs 11–12 and 7–9 vs 10–12) are analyzed.
The factor loadings and intercepts of all six items in ACQ are comparable across gender subgroups. Although the factor loadings are comparable across age 7–10 and 11–12 subgroups, one intercept is statistically but not practically different. For age 7–9 versus 10–12 subgroup comparison, the factor loadings are not comparable.
In children, the ACQ can be used to compare asthma control construct between boys and girls and between age 7–10 and 11–12 subgroups. Measurement invariance is an important property that should be examined when the latent construct(s) are compared across different subgroups.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research, 11, 193–205. CrossRef
Little, T. D., & Slegers, D. W. (2005). Factor analysis: Multiple groups. In B. S. Everitt & D. C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (pp. 617–623). Chichester: Wiley.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariate structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. CrossRef
Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York: Routledge.
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthen, B. O. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466. CrossRef
SAS. SAS Institute Inc. (2010). SAS/STAT software. Release 9.3 Edition. Release 9.1 ed. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.
Muthen, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide. (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2013). BSEM measurement invariance analysis. Web note 17.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. CrossRef
- Use of factor analysis models to evaluate measurement invariance property of the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)
Robert C. Strunk
- Springer International Publishing