Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Although research indicates that empathy inhibits youth aggression, little is known about the prospective associations between different components of empathy and aggression, as well as whether family and school factors moderate the aforementioned associations in early adolescents. Based on prior research, the current study examined whether empathic concern and perspective taking would contribute to subsequent overt and relational aggression over a 1-year period in middle school. Guided by the social development model, we also examined if positive family relations and school connectedness would differentially moderate the associations between both components of empathy and aggression. Participants were 481 10- to 14-year old students (54 % female; 78 % European American) who completed the first wave of a survey in 6th and 7th grades. Hierarchical regression analyses indicated that only for girls did lower levels of empathic concern, not perspective taking, contribute to increases in subsequent overt, not relational, aggression. Although neither positive family relations nor school connectedness played protective roles for girls, results indicated that boys’ reports of positive family relations buffered the negative impact of low empathic concern on both forms of aggression 1 year later. Over and above the two components of empathy, school connectedness also contributed to a decline in boys’ subsequent overt aggression. Recommendations are made to foster family and school relationships among boys, as well as to more heavily consider the role of emotion processes in the study and prevention of early adolescents’ aggression.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, PA: Sage.
Anderman, E. M. (2002). School effects on psychological outcomes during adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 795–809. CrossRef
Anderman, L. H., & Freeman, T. M. (2004). Students’ sense of belonging in school. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 13, pp. 27–63). Oxford: Elsevier.
Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291–322. CrossRef
Arsenio, W. F., & Lemerise, E. A. (2001). Varieties of childhood bullying: Values, emotion processes, and social competence. Social Development, 10, 59–73. CrossRef
Barr, J., & D’Alessandro, A. (2009). How adolescent empathy and prosocial behavior change in the context of school culture: A two-year longitudinal study. Adolescence, 44(176), 751–752. PubMed
Bjorkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends regarding direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 117–127. CrossRef
Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (2000). Social intelligence – empathy = aggression? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5(2), 191–200. CrossRef
Bosacki, S. L. (2003). Psychological pragmatics in preadolescents: Sociomoral understanding, self-worth, and school behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32(2), 141–155. CrossRef
Caravita, S., Blasio, P. D., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18(1), 141–163. CrossRef
Caravita, S., Blasio, P. D., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Early adolescents’ participation in bullying: Is ToM involved? The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 138–170. CrossRef
Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V., Samper, P., Tur, A., & Armenta, B. E. (2010). The longitudinal relations among parenting styles, sympathy, prosocial moral reasoning, and prosocial behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(2), 116–124. CrossRef
Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (1996). The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 149–196). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 67, 2317–2327. CrossRef
Crosnoe, R., Erickson, K. G., & Dornbusch, S. M. (2002). Protective functions of family relationships and school factors on the deviant behavior of adolescent boys and girls: Reducing the impact of risky friendships. Youth & Society, 33(4), 515–544. CrossRef
Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 225–241. CrossRef
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Series Eds.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 646–718). New York, NY: John Wiley.
Endresen, I. M., & Olweus, D. (2001). Self-reported empathy in Norwegian adolescents: Sex differences, age trends, and relationship to bullying. In A. C. Bohart & D. J. Stipek (Eds.), Constructive and destructive behavior: Implications for family, school and society (pp. 147–166). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. CrossRef
Espelage, D. L., Mebane, S. E., & Adams, R. S. (2004). Empathy, caring and bullying: Toward an understanding of complex associations. In D. L. Espelage & S. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools (pp. 37–61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Flanagan, C. A., Cumsille, P., Gill, S., & Gallay, L. S. (2007). School and community climates and civic commitments: Patterns for ethnic minority and majority students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 421–431. CrossRef
Gini, G. (2006). Social cognition and moral cognition in bullying: What’s wrong? Aggressive Behavior, 32, 528–539. CrossRef
Gini, G., Pozzoloi, T., & Hauser, M. (2011). Bullies have enhanced moral competence to judge relative to victims, but lack moral compassion. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 603–608. CrossRef
Grusec, J. E., & Hastings, P. D. (2007). Handbook of socialization: Theory and research. New York: The Guilford Press.
Hart, D., & Carlo, G. (2005). Moral development in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15, 223–233. CrossRef
Hastings, P. D., Utendale, W. T., & Sullivan, C. (2007). The socialization of prosocial development. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 638–664). New York: The Guilford Press.
Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 279–309. CrossRef
Hoffman, M. (2000). Empathy and moral development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Holt, M. K., & Keyes, M. A. (2004). Teachers’ attitudes toward bullying. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 121–139). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
James, D. J., Lawlor, M., Courtney, P., Flynn, A., Henry, B., & Murphy, N. (2008). Bullying behavior in secondary schools: What roles do teachers play? Child Abuse Review, 17, 160–173. CrossRef
Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 540–550. CrossRef
Kaukiainen, A., Bjorkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K., Osterman, K., Salmivalli, C., Rothberg, S., et al. (1999). The relationships between social intelligence, empathy, and three types of aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 81–89. CrossRef
Laible, D., Eye, J., & Carlo, G. (2008). Dimensions of conscience in mid-adolescence: Links with social behavior, parenting, and temperament. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 875–887. CrossRef
Loukas, A., & Murphy, J. L. (2007). Middle school student perceptions of school climate: Examining protective functions on subsequent adjustment problems. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 293–309. CrossRef
Ma, X. (2002). Bullying in middle school: Individual and school characteristics of victims and offenders. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13(1), 63–89. CrossRef
Malti, T., & Latzko, B. (2010). Children’s moral emotions and moral cognition: Towards an integrative perspective. In B. Latzko & T. Malti (Eds.), Children’s moral emotions and moral cognition: Developmental and educational perspectives. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development (Vol. 129, pp. 1–10). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mayberry, M. L., & Espelage, D. L. (2007). Associations among empathy, social competence, and reactive/proactive aggression subtypes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 787–798. CrossRef
McHale, S. M., Crouter, A. C., & Whiteman, S. D. (2003). The family contexts of gender development. Social Development, 12(1), 125–148. CrossRef
Metzler, C. W., Biglan, A., Ary, D. V., & Li, F. (1998). The stability and validity of early adolescents’ reports of parenting constructs. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 600–619. CrossRef
Moos, R., & Moos, B. (1986). The family environment scale manual (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Ojanen, T., Findley, D., & Fuller, S. (2012). Physical and relational aggression in early adolescents: Associations with narcissism, temperament, and social goals. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 99–107.
Paquette, J. A., & Underwood, M. A. (1999). Young adolescents’ experiences of peer victimization: Gender differences in accounts of social and physical aggression. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 233–258.
Peets, K., & Kikas, E. (2006). Aggressive strategies and victimization during adolescence: Grade and gender differences, and cross-informant agreement. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 68–79. CrossRef
Robinson, R., Roberts, W. L., Strayer, J., & Koopman, R. (2007). Empathy and emotional responsiveness in delinquent and non-delinquent adolescents. Social Development, 16(3), 555–579. CrossRef
Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. J. (2000). School as a context of early adolescents’ academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research findings. Elementary School Journal, 100, 443–471. CrossRef
Salmivalli, C., & Kaukiainen, A. (2004). ‘‘Female aggression’’ revisited: Variable- and person-centered approaches to studying gender differences in different types of aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 30(2), 158–163. CrossRef
Strayer, J., & Roberts, W. (2004). Empathy and observed anger and aggression in 5-year olds. Social Development, 13(1), 1–13. CrossRef
Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999a). Bullying and ‘theory of mind’: A critique of the ‘social skills deficit’ approach to anti-social behavior. Social Development, 8, 117–127. CrossRef
Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999b). Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 435–450. CrossRef
Underwood, M. K., Galen, B. R., & Paquette, J. A. (2001). Top ten challenges for understanding gender and aggression in children: Why can’t we all just get along? Social Development, 10, 248–266. CrossRef
Xie, H., Swift, D. J., Cairns, B. D., & Cairns, R. B. (2002). Aggressive behaviors in social interaction and developmental adaptation: A narrative analysis of interpersonal conflicts during early adolescence. Social Development, 11, 205–224. CrossRef
Young, E. L., Boye, A., & Nelson, D. (2006). Relational aggression: Understanding, identifying, and responding in schools. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 297–312. CrossRef
- Unique and Interactive Effects of Empathy, Family, and School Factors on Early Adolescents’ Aggression
- Springer US