Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 5/2020

12-12-2018 | Original Article

Unidirectional influence of vision on locomotion in multimodal spatial representations acquired from navigation

Auteurs: Yu Du, Weimin Mou, Lei Zhang

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 5/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Visual and idiothetic information is coupled in forming multimodal spatial representations during navigation (Tcheang et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(3):1152–1157, 2011). We investigated whether idiothetic representations activate visual representations but not vice versa (unidirectional coupling) or whether these two representations activate each other (bidirectional coupling). In a virtual reality environment, participants actively rotated in place to face certain orientations to become adapted to a new vision–locomotion relationship (gain). In particular, the visual turning angle was equal to 0.7 times the physical turning angle. After adaptation, participants walked a path with a turn in darkness (idiothetic input only) or watched a video of the traversed path (visual input only). Then, the participants pointed to the origin of the path. The participants who were presented with only idiothetic input showed that their pointing responses were influenced by the new gain (adaptation effect). By contrast, the participants who were presented with only visual input did not show any adaptation effect. These results suggest that idiothetic input contributed to spatial representations indirectly via the coupling, which resulted in the adaptation effect, whereas vision alone contributed to spatial representations directly, which did not result in the adaptation effect. Hence, the coupling between vision and locomotion is unidirectional.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
The distinction between visual and locomotion systems here is similar to the distinction between piloting and path integration in the literature (e.g., Chen et al., 2017) except that optic flow may be included in the visual system in the former but in path integration in the latter.
 
2
This model does not have a clear claim on whether idiothetic representations also directly contribute to spatial representations without activating the coupling relationship between vision and locomotion systems. See the “General discussion” for more details.
 
3
Cohen’s d of the gain effect was calculated based on \(\sqrt {\frac{{2F}}{N}}\). In Tcheang et al. (2011), F value for the gain effect was 16.12 and N was 20.
 
4
If participants were allowed to turn their head to preview the direction of the pole before turning their body to face the pole, one may argue that participants visually saw the direction of the pole before they turned their body. Hence they learned the turning angle both from visual direction of the pole and idiothetic inputs during turning.
 
5
The mean absolute error collapsed across turning angles for Experiment 1 was 17° (17°, 18°, and 16° for the turning angles of 63°, 90°, and 117°, respectively).
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Berkeley, G. (1709). An essay towards a new theory of vision. Dublin: Aaron Rhames. Berkeley, G. (1709). An essay towards a new theory of vision. Dublin: Aaron Rhames.
go back to reference Giudice, N. A., Betty, M. R., & Loomis, J. M. (2011). Functional equivalence of spatial images from touch and vision: Evidence from spatial updating in blind and sighted individuals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022331.CrossRefPubMed Giudice, N. A., Betty, M. R., & Loomis, J. M. (2011). Functional equivalence of spatial images from touch and vision: Evidence from spatial updating in blind and sighted individuals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 621–634. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​a0022331.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. New York: Sage Publications. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. New York: Sage Publications.
go back to reference Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Golledge, R. G., & Philbeck, J. W. (1999). Human navigation by path integration. In R. G. Golledge (Ed.), Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes (pp. 125–151). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Golledge, R. G., & Philbeck, J. W. (1999). Human navigation by path integration. In R. G. Golledge (Ed.), Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes (pp. 125–151). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
go back to reference Nardini, M., & Cowie, D. (2012). The development of multisensory balance, locomotion, orientation and navigation. In A. J. Bremner, D. J. Lewkowicz, & C. Spencer (Eds.), Multisensory development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof.CrossRef Nardini, M., & Cowie, D. (2012). The development of multisensory balance, locomotion, orientation and navigation. In A. J. Bremner, D. J. Lewkowicz, & C. Spencer (Eds.), Multisensory development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​acprof.CrossRef
go back to reference Philbeck, J. W., Klatzky, R. L., Berhrman, M., Loomis, J. M., & Goodridge, J. (2001). Active control of locomotion facilities nonvisual navigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 27(1), 141–153. Philbeck, J. W., Klatzky, R. L., Berhrman, M., Loomis, J. M., & Goodridge, J. (2001). Active control of locomotion facilities nonvisual navigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 27(1), 141–153.
go back to reference Philbeck, J. W., & O’Leary, S. (2005). Remembered landmarks enhance the precision of path integration. Psicologica, 26, 7–24. Philbeck, J. W., & O’Leary, S. (2005). Remembered landmarks enhance the precision of path integration. Psicologica, 26, 7–24.
go back to reference Pick, H. L., Rieser, J. J., Wagner, D., & Garing, A. E. (1999). The recalibration of rotational locomotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(5), 1179–1188. Pick, H. L., Rieser, J. J., Wagner, D., & Garing, A. E. (1999). The recalibration of rotational locomotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(5), 1179–1188.
go back to reference Rieser, J. J. (1999). Dynamic spatial orientation and the coupling of representation and action. In R. G. Golledge (Ed.), Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes (pp. 168–190). Baltimore: JHU Press. Rieser, J. J. (1999). Dynamic spatial orientation and the coupling of representation and action. In R. G. Golledge (Ed.), Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes (pp. 168–190). Baltimore: JHU Press.
go back to reference Rieser, J. J., Guth, D. A., & Hill, E. W. (1986). Sensitivity to perspective structure while walking without vision. Perception, 15, 173–188.CrossRef Rieser, J. J., Guth, D. A., & Hill, E. W. (1986). Sensitivity to perspective structure while walking without vision. Perception, 15, 173–188.CrossRef
go back to reference Rieser, J. J., & Heiman, M. L. (1982). Spatial self-reference systems and shortest-route behavior in toddlers. Child Development, 53(2), 524–533.CrossRef Rieser, J. J., & Heiman, M. L. (1982). Spatial self-reference systems and shortest-route behavior in toddlers. Child Development, 53(2), 524–533.CrossRef
go back to reference Rieser, J. J., & Pick, H. L. (2007). Using locomotion to update spatial orientation: What changes with learning and development? In J. M. Plumert & J. P. Spencer (Eds.), The emerging spatial mind (pp. 77–103). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Rieser, J. J., & Pick, H. L. (2007). Using locomotion to update spatial orientation: What changes with learning and development? In J. M. Plumert & J. P. Spencer (Eds.), The emerging spatial mind (pp. 77–103). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Rieser, J. J., Pick, H. L., Ashmead, D. H., & Garing, A. E. (1995). Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 480–497.PubMed Rieser, J. J., Pick, H. L., Ashmead, D. H., & Garing, A. E. (1995). Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 480–497.PubMed
go back to reference Zhao, M., & Warren, W. H. (2015). How you get there from here: Interaction of visual landmarks and path integration in human navigation. Psychological Science, 26, 1–10.CrossRef Zhao, M., & Warren, W. H. (2015). How you get there from here: Interaction of visual landmarks and path integration in human navigation. Psychological Science, 26, 1–10.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Unidirectional influence of vision on locomotion in multimodal spatial representations acquired from navigation
Auteurs
Yu Du
Weimin Mou
Lei Zhang
Publicatiedatum
12-12-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1131-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2020

Psychological Research 5/2020 Naar de uitgave