Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

19-10-2019 | Original Paper | Uitgave 3/2020

Journal of Child and Family Studies 3/2020

Unidimensionality and Measurement Invariance of the 11-Item Korean CES-D Scale among Examining Parents of Individuals with Cerebral Palsy

Tijdschrift:
Journal of Child and Family Studies > Uitgave 3/2020
Auteurs:
Eun-Young Park, Jung-Hee Kim
Belangrijke opmerkingen
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Objectives

Parents of children with disabilities are more likely to experience depressive symptoms and other issues associated with poor mental health than parents of children without disabilities. A lack of measurement invariance in a depression scale could produce inconsistencies in study results and limit the generalizability of findings. The present study aimed to investigate the unidimensionality of the 11-item Korean version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D-11) and confirm its measurement invariance among parents of individuals with cerebral palsy (CP).

Methods

Data were collected from the 2012 Korea Welfare Panel Study and from research examining support services and policies for people with brain lesions. Comparative fit index values were compared to verify the fit of the measurement invariance models.

Results

The unidimensionality of the CES-D-11 was supported based on principal component analysis, the factor loadings of each item, and fit index (NFI = 0.932, TLI = 0.967; CFI = 0.981, RMSEA = 0.048). The invariance analysis confirmed configural invariance, metric invariance, scalar invariance, and uniqueness invariance. Internal consistency reliabilities were acceptable.

Conclusion

Our findings indicated that the CES-D-11 is unidimensional, and that comparisons can be made between the general population and parents of individuals with CP. Additionally, this study supplements prior literature on invariance and strengthens the validity of the CES-D-11 as a useful screening tool, particularly for comparing measurements across groups to establish measurement invariance for outcome measures.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijft u als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen uw vak. Met het online abonnement heeft u toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kunt u op uw gemak en wanneer het u het beste uitkomt verdiepen in uw vakgebied.

Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2020

Journal of Child and Family Studies 3/2020 Naar de uitgave