Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
While medical educators typically attend to group trends, groups are made up of unique individuals. An exploration of Bourdieu’s concept of habitus, defined as a system of dispositions, may help medical educators think relationally about the collective trajectory of the group and the individual trajectory of each student.
We built on our 4‑year, longitudinal study which reported how field, capital, and habitus worked together to explain how medical students, as a group, navigated transitions in undergraduate medical education. In this secondary analysis, we reviewed serial collections of narratives about students’ peak learning experiences in medical school (19 students, 5 narratives per student), concentrating on first-person representations of self. We then explored the relation between collective and individual trajectories in three illustrative cases.
The social space of undergraduate medical education harmonized students’ experience and helped explain the collective trajectory, as evidenced by students’ consistent reports of taking initiative and staying open-minded. But individuals were not totally harmonized. They had unique dispositions that influenced their ability to access valued resources and shaped their behaviour. For example, Emily consistently spoke of being driven by her own goals; Zach focused on meeting expectations of authorities; Hilary routinely oriented toward abstract medical knowledge.
Habitus provides a useful conceptual lens for thinking relationally about collective and individual trajectories of medical students. Our work may inform faculty as they seek to situate individualized learning within standardized curricula, and is a step toward researching transitions in medical training from a holistic perspective that includes, but is not limited to, individual trajectories.
Bourdieu P. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1977. CrossRef
Brubaker R. Rethinking classical theory: the sociological vision of Pierre Bourdieu. Theory Soc. 1985;14:745–75. CrossRef
Reay D. ‘It’s all becoming a habitus’: beyond the habitual use of habitus in educational research. Br J Sociol Educ. 2004;25:431–44. CrossRef
Bourdieu P, Wacquant L. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1992.
Grenfell M. (editor) Pierre Bourdieu: key concepts. New York: Routledge; 2014.
Varpio L. AM last page. How Pierre Bourdieu’s theory and concepts can apply to medical education. Acad Med. 2013;88:1189. CrossRef
Guttman O, Lingard L. Credentials as cultural capital: the pursuit of higher degrees among academic medical trainees. Acad Med. 2010;85(10 Suppl):S21–S24. CrossRef
Wright S. Medical school personal statements: a measure of motivation or proxy for cultural privilege? Adv Health Sci Educ. 2015;20:627–43. CrossRef
Varpio L, Bidlake E, Humphrey-Murto S, Sutherland S, Hamstra SJ. Key considerations for the success of medical education research and innovation units in Canada: unit director perceptions. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2014;19:361–77. CrossRef
Brosnan C. Making sense of differences between medical schools through Bourdieu’s concept of ‘field’. Med Educ. 2010;44:645–52. CrossRef
Balmer D, Richards B, Varpio L. How students experience and navigate transitions in undergraduate medical education: an application of Bourdieu’s theoretical model. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2015;20:1073–85. CrossRef
Gilligan C, Spencer R, Weinberg K, Bertsch T. On the Listening Guide: a voice-centered relational model. In: Hesse-Biber S, Leavy P, eds. Emergent Methods in Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2006:157–72.
Edwards R, Weller S. Shifting analytic ontology: using I‑poems in qualitative longitudinal research. Qual Res. 2012;12:202–17. CrossRef
Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE; 2012.
Monrouxe L. Identity, identification and medical education: why should we care? Med Educ. 2010;44:40–9. CrossRef
Hemlich E, Bolhuis S, Dornan T, Laan R, Koopmans R. Entering medical practice for the very first time: emotional talk, meaning and identity development. Med Educ. 2012;46:1074–86. CrossRef
Sharpless J, Baldwin N, Cook R, et al. The becoming: students’ reflections on the process of professional identity formation in medical education. Acad Med. 2015;90:713–7. CrossRef
Vivekananda-Schmidt P, Crossley J, Murdoch-Eaton D. A model of professional self-identity formation in student doctors and dentists: a mixed method study. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:83. CrossRef
Murinson B, Klick B, Haythornthwaite J, Schochet R, Levine R, Wright S. Formative experiences of emerging physicians: gauging the impact of events that occur during medical school. Acad Med. 2010;85:1331–7. CrossRef
Teunissen P, Westerman M. Opportunity or threat: the ambiguity of the consequences of transitions in medical education. Med Educ. 2011;45:51–9. CrossRef
Englander R, Cameron T, Ballard AJ, Dodge J, Bull J, Aschenbrenner C. Toward a common taxonomy of competency domains for the health professions and competencies for physicians. Acad Med. 2013;88:1088–94. CrossRef
Frost H, Regehr G. ‘I am a doctor’: negotiating the discourses of standardization and diversity in professional identity construction. Acad Med. 2013;88:1570–7. CrossRef
Jarvis-Selinger S, Pratt D, Regehr G. Competency is not enough: integrating identity formation into the medical education discourse. Acad Med. 2012;87:1185–90. CrossRef
- Understanding the relation between medical students’ collective and individual trajectories: an application of habitus
Dorene F. Balmer
Michael J. Devlin
Boyd F. Richards
- Bohn Stafleu van Loghum