Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

22-06-2016 | Uitgave 3/2017

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 3/2017

Two-Year Findings from a National Effectiveness Trial: Effectiveness of Behavioral and Non-Behavioral Parenting Programs

Tijdschrift:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology > Uitgave 3/2017
Auteurs:
Jens Högström, Viveca Olofsson, Metin Özdemir, Pia Enebrink, Håkan Stattin
Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1007/​s10802-016-0178-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Long-term follow-up studies of selective parent training (PT) programs are scarce, particularly in the case of effectiveness trials conducted within regular care settings. This study evaluated the 2-year effects of 4 programs: Comet, Incredible Years, Cope, and Connect and differences in the rate of change among programs were investigated using Latent Growth Modeling (LGM). Participants were parents who had sought help at 30 local service sector units (e.g., child psychiatric clinics and social services centers) for major problems in managing their children’s externalizing behavior. Parents of 749 children (63 % boys) with moderate levels of externalizing behavior, aged 3–12, were randomized to one of the 4 PT programs. Assessments included parent-reported measures of child externalizing, hyperactivity and inattention, as well as parenting practices, sense of competence, and parents’ stress and depressive symptoms. At 2-year follow-up, there were no differences in any of the child outcomes among the programs. All programs had reduced externalizing behaviors with large effect sizes (d = 1.21 to d = 1.32), and negative parenting practices with moderate to large effect sizes (d = 0.49 to d = 0.83). LGM analyses showed that the 2 behavioral programs, Comet and Incredible Years, produced more rapid reductions in externalizing behavior during the course of the intervention than the non-behavioral program, Connect. Connect, however, was the only program where children continued to improve after the intervention. Overall, the results indicate that the 4 programs were equally effective in a clinical setting, despite differences in their theoretical origin.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijft u als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen uw vak. Met het online abonnement heeft u toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kunt u op uw gemak en wanneer het u het beste uitkomt verdiepen in uw vakgebied.

Extra materiaal
ESM 1 Supplementary material 1 Means and standard deviations of all outcome measures (DOCX 26 kb)
10802_2016_178_MOESM1_ESM.docx
ESM 1 Supplementary material 2 Correlations among study variables at baseline (DOCX 17 kb)
10802_2016_178_MOESM2_ESM.docx
Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2017

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 3/2017 Naar de uitgave