Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 4/2020

01-01-2020

Translation, cross-cultural and construct validity of the Dutch–Flemish PROMIS® upper extremity item bank v2.0

Auteurs: Erik-Jan A. Haan, Caroline B. Terwee, Marieke F. Van Wier, Nienke W. Willigenburg, Derek F. P. Van Deurzen, Martijn F. Pisters, Aaron J. Kaat, Leo D. Roorda

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 4/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

To develop a Dutch–Flemish translation of the PROMIS® upper extremity (PROMIS-UE) item bank v2.0, and to investigate its cross-cultural and construct validity as well as its floor and ceiling effects in patients with musculoskeletal UE disorders.

Methods

State of the art translation methodology was used to develop the Dutch–Flemish PROMIS-UE item bank v2.0. The item bank and four legacy instruments were administered to 205 Dutch patients with musculoskeletal UE disorders visiting an orthopedic outpatient clinic. The validity of cross-cultural comparisons between English and Dutch patients was evaluated by studying differential item functioning (DIF) for language (Dutch vs. English) with ordinal logistic regression models and McFadden’s pseudo R2-change of ≥ 2% as critical value. Construct validity was assessed by formulating a priori hypotheses and calculating correlations with legacy instruments. Floor/ceiling effects were evaluated by determining the proportion of patients who achieved the lowest/highest possible raw score.

Results

Eight items showed DIF for language, but their impact on the test score was negligible. The item bank correlated, as hypothesized, moderately with the Dutch–Flemish PROMIS pain intensity item (Pearson’s r = − 0.43) and strongly with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, Subscale Disability/Symptoms (Spearman’s ρ = − 0.87), the Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (ρ = − 0.86), and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, Subscale Activities of Daily Living (ρ = 0.87). No patients achieved the lowest or highest possible raw score.

Conclusions

A Dutch–Flemish PROMIS-UE item bank v2.0 has been developed that showed sufficient cross-cultural and construct validity as well as absence of floor and ceiling effects.
Literatuur
3.
go back to reference Hudak, P. L., Amadio, P. C., & Bombardier, C. (1996). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). American Journal of Industrial Medicine,29(6), 602–608.CrossRefPubMed Hudak, P. L., Amadio, P. C., & Bombardier, C. (1996). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). American Journal of Industrial Medicine,29(6), 602–608.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Forget, N. J., & Higgins, J. (2014). Comparison of generic patient-reported outcome measures used with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: Linking process using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine,46(4), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1784.CrossRefPubMed Forget, N. J., & Higgins, J. (2014). Comparison of generic patient-reported outcome measures used with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: Linking process using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine,46(4), 327–334. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2340/​16501977-1784.CrossRefPubMed
9.
12.
go back to reference Reeve, B. B., Wyrwich, K. W., Wu, A. W., Velikova, G., Terwee, C. B., Snyder, C. F., et al. (2013). ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Quality of Life Research,22(8), 1889–1905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0344-y.CrossRefPubMed Reeve, B. B., Wyrwich, K. W., Wu, A. W., Velikova, G., Terwee, C. B., Snyder, C. F., et al. (2013). ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Quality of Life Research,22(8), 1889–1905. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-012-0344-y.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Hays, R. D., Spritzer, K. L., Amtmann, D., Lai, J. S., Dewitt, E. M., Rothrock, N., et al. (2013). Upper-extremity and mobility subdomains from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) adult physical functioning item bank. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,94(11), 2291–2296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.014.CrossRefPubMed Hays, R. D., Spritzer, K. L., Amtmann, D., Lai, J. S., Dewitt, E. M., Rothrock, N., et al. (2013). Upper-extremity and mobility subdomains from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) adult physical functioning item bank. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,94(11), 2291–2296. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​apmr.​2013.​05.​014.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Beleckas, C. M., Padovano, A., Guattery, J., Chamberlain, A. M., Keener, J. D., & Calfee, R. P. (2017). Performance of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) versus physical function (PF) computer adaptive tests (CATs) in upper extremity clinics. Journal of Hand Surgery,42(11), 867–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.06.012.CrossRefPubMed Beleckas, C. M., Padovano, A., Guattery, J., Chamberlain, A. M., Keener, J. D., & Calfee, R. P. (2017). Performance of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) versus physical function (PF) computer adaptive tests (CATs) in upper extremity clinics. Journal of Hand Surgery,42(11), 867–874. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jhsa.​2017.​06.​012.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Bonomi, A. E., Cella, D. F., Hahn, E. A., Bjordal, K., Sperner-Unterweger, B., Gangeri, L., et al. (1996). Multilingual translation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system. Quality of Life Research,5(3), 309–320.CrossRefPubMed Bonomi, A. E., Cella, D. F., Hahn, E. A., Bjordal, K., Sperner-Unterweger, B., Gangeri, L., et al. (1996). Multilingual translation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system. Quality of Life Research,5(3), 309–320.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Gershon, R., & Kaat, A. (2019). PROMIS physical function upper extremity v2.0 extension (V1 ed.). Harvard Dataverse. Gershon, R., & Kaat, A. (2019). PROMIS physical function upper extremity v2.0 extension (V1 ed.). Harvard Dataverse.
36.
go back to reference Veehof, M. M., Sleegers, E. J., van Veldhoven, N. H., Schuurman, A. H., & van Meeteren, N. L. (2002). Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV). Journal of Hand Therapy,15(4), 347–354.CrossRefPubMed Veehof, M. M., Sleegers, E. J., van Veldhoven, N. H., Schuurman, A. H., & van Meeteren, N. L. (2002). Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV). Journal of Hand Therapy,15(4), 347–354.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Klokker, L., Terwee, C. B., Waehrens, E. E., Henriksen, M., Nolte, S., Liegl, G., et al. (2016). Hand-related physical function in rheumatic hand conditions: A protocol for developing a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument. British Medical Journal Open,6(12), e011174. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011174.CrossRef Klokker, L., Terwee, C. B., Waehrens, E. E., Henriksen, M., Nolte, S., Liegl, G., et al. (2016). Hand-related physical function in rheumatic hand conditions: A protocol for developing a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument. British Medical Journal Open,6(12), e011174. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmjopen-2016-011174.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Dreiser, R. L., Maheu, E., Guillou, G. B., Caspard, H., & Grouin, J. M. (1995). Validation of an algofunctional index for osteoarthritis of the hand. Revue du Rhumatisme. English Edition,62(6 Suppl 1), 43S–53S. Dreiser, R. L., Maheu, E., Guillou, G. B., Caspard, H., & Grouin, J. M. (1995). Validation of an algofunctional index for osteoarthritis of the hand. Revue du Rhumatisme. English Edition,62(6 Suppl 1), 43S–53S.
40.
go back to reference Dreiser, R. L., Maheu, E., & Guillou, G. B. (2000). Sensitivity to change of the Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage,8(Suppl A), S25–S28.CrossRefPubMed Dreiser, R. L., Maheu, E., & Guillou, G. B. (2000). Sensitivity to change of the Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage,8(Suppl A), S25–S28.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Chung, K. C., Hamill, J. B., Walters, M. R., & Hayward, R. A. (1999). The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): Assessment of responsiveness to clinical change. Annals of Plastic Surgery,42(6), 619–622.CrossRefPubMed Chung, K. C., Hamill, J. B., Walters, M. R., & Hayward, R. A. (1999). The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): Assessment of responsiveness to clinical change. Annals of Plastic Surgery,42(6), 619–622.CrossRefPubMed
44.
45.
go back to reference McMillan, C. R., & Binhammer, P. A. (2009). Which outcome measure is the best? Evaluating responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale following hand and wrist surgery. Hand (N Y),4(3), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-009-9167-x.CrossRef McMillan, C. R., & Binhammer, P. A. (2009). Which outcome measure is the best? Evaluating responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale following hand and wrist surgery. Hand (N Y),4(3), 311–318. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11552-009-9167-x.CrossRef
52.
54.
55.
go back to reference Choi, S. W., Gibbons, L. E., & Crane, P. K. (2011). lordif: an R package for detecting differential item functioning using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item response theory and Monte Carlo Simulations. Journal of Statistical Software,39(8), 1–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Choi, S. W., Gibbons, L. E., & Crane, P. K. (2011). lordif: an R package for detecting differential item functioning using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item response theory and Monte Carlo Simulations. Journal of Statistical Software,39(8), 1–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
64.
go back to reference Crins, M. H. P., Terwee, C. B., Ogreden, O., Schuller, W., Dekker, P., Flens, G., et al. (2019). Differential item functioning of the PROMIS physical function, pain interference, and pain behavior item banks across patients with different musculoskeletal disorders and persons from the general population. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2087-x.CrossRefPubMed Crins, M. H. P., Terwee, C. B., Ogreden, O., Schuller, W., Dekker, P., Flens, G., et al. (2019). Differential item functioning of the PROMIS physical function, pain interference, and pain behavior item banks across patients with different musculoskeletal disorders and persons from the general population. Quality of Life Research. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-018-2087-x.CrossRefPubMed
65.
go back to reference Minoughan, C. E., Schumaier, A. P., Fritch, J. L., & Grawe, B. M. (2018). Correlation of PROMIS Physical Function Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test with American shoulder and elbow surgeons shoulder assessment form and simple shoulder test in patients with shoulder arthritis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery,27(4), 585–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.036.CrossRefPubMed Minoughan, C. E., Schumaier, A. P., Fritch, J. L., & Grawe, B. M. (2018). Correlation of PROMIS Physical Function Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test with American shoulder and elbow surgeons shoulder assessment form and simple shoulder test in patients with shoulder arthritis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery,27(4), 585–591. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jse.​2017.​10.​036.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Translation, cross-cultural and construct validity of the Dutch–Flemish PROMIS® upper extremity item bank v2.0
Auteurs
Erik-Jan A. Haan
Caroline B. Terwee
Marieke F. Van Wier
Nienke W. Willigenburg
Derek F. P. Van Deurzen
Martijn F. Pisters
Aaron J. Kaat
Leo D. Roorda
Publicatiedatum
01-01-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02388-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2020

Quality of Life Research 4/2020 Naar de uitgave