Top

Optie A:

Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
Optie B:

Deel de link per e-mail
Link delen

volgende artikel Adult Recidivism in United States: A Meta-Analy...

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

13-11-2017 | Original Paper | Uitgave 3/2018

Traditional vs. Alternative Teacher Preparation Programs: A Meta-Analysis

Tijdschrift:: Journal of Child and Family Studies > Uitgave 3/2018

Auteurs:: Denise K. Whitford, Dake Zhang, Antonis Katsiyannis

» Toegang tot de volledige tekst krijgen

Abstract

A meta-analysis is presented of the academic achievement effects on students taught by teachers from alternative teacher preparation (ATP) programs, compared to students taught by teachers from traditional teacher preparation (TTP) programs. The literature has indicated mixed results on the student-level academic outcomes of ATP programs. Findings from this meta-analysis indicate an overall statistically significant, yet small, difference in ATP and TTP programs (g = 0.03; 95% CI = 0.01, 0.04, p = 0.001), with the mean achievement of students who had ATP teachers was about 0.03 standard deviations above that of students who had TTP teachers. Further, there were differences in student achievement by type of ATP program, school level, and academic subject area. These results, as well as implications for policy and practice are discussed.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Hier inloggen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijft u als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen uw vak. Met het online abonnement heeft u toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kunt u op uw gemak en wanneer het u het beste uitkomt verdiepen in uw vakgebied.

Meer informatie

* Identifies studies included in the meta-analysis.

Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., & Sander, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago Public High Schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1), 95–135. CrossRef

*Antecol, H., Eren, O., & Ozbeklik, S. (2013). The effect of Teach for America on the distribution of student achievement in primary school: evidence from a randomized experiment. Economics of Education Review, 37, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.08.004. CrossRef

Ball, D.L., Hill, H.C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(1), 14–17, 20–22, 43–46. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/65072/Ball_F05.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y.

Betts, J. R., Zau, A. C., & Rice, L. A. (2003). Determinants of student achievement: new evidence from San Diego. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. CrossRef

Boyd, D., Goldhaber, D., Lankford, H., & Wyckoff, J. (2007). The effect of certification and preparation on teacher quality. The Future of Children, 17, 45–68. CrossRefPubMed

Brownell, M. T., Bishop, A. M., & Sindelar, P. T. (2005). NCLB and the demand for highly qualified teachers: challenges and solutions for rural schools. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24(1), 9–15. https://acres-sped.org/journal. CrossRef

*Clark, M.A., Isenberg, E., Liu, A.Y., Makowsky, L., Zukiewicz, M. (2015). Impacts of the Teach for America investing in innovations scale-up. (Ref #: 06889.740). Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica-mpr.com/~/media/publications/pdfs/education/tfa_investing_innovation.pdf.

*Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2010). Teacher credentials and student achievement in high school: a cross-subject analysis with student fixed effects. Journal of Human Resources, 45, 655–681. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2010.0023.

Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 3) [CMA; Computer Software] (2014) Englewood, NJ: Biostat.

Constantine, J., Player, D., Silva, T., Hallgren, K., Grider, M., & Deke, J. (2009). An evaluation of teachers trained through different routes to certification (NCEE 20094043). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20094043/pdf/20094044.pdf

Cooper, H. M. (1979). Statistically combining independent studies: a meta-analysis of sex differences in conformity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.131. CrossRef

Dalton, S.S., & Henderson, A. (2015). HEA title II accountability: impact of alternative route teacher preparation. Paper presented at the 25th Annual National Association for Alternative Certification Route Teacher Preparation, Chicago, IL. https://alt-teachercert.org/HEA%20Title%20II%20.pdf

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: a review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–44. https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/392/515. CrossRef

Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D. J., Gatlin, S. J., & Heilig, J. V. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach for America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v13n42.2005.

Dee, T. S., & Jacob, B. (2011). The impact of No Child Left Behind on student achievement. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30, 418–446. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20586. CrossRef

Deeks, J. J., Dinnes, J., D’Amico, R., Sowden, A. J., Sakarovitch, C., Song, F., … European Trial Collaborative Group (2003). Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technology Assessment, 7(27), 1–173.

Every Student Succeeds Act [ESSA], Text - S.1177 - 114th Congress (2015–2016). https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/1177/text.

Feuer, M. J., Floden, R. E., Chudowsky, N., & Ahn, J. (2013). Evaluation of teacher preparation programs: purposes, methods, and policy options. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.

Gansle, K. A., Noell, G. H., & Burns, J. M. (2012). Do student achievement outcomes differ across teacher preparation programs? An analysis of teacher education in Louisiana. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 304–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112439894. CrossRef

Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164. CrossRef

Gimbert, B., Bol, L., & Wallace, D. (2007). The influence of teacher preparation on student achievement and the application of national standards by teachers of mathematics in urban secondary schools. Education and Urban Society, 40, 91–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124507303993. CrossRef

*Gimbert, B., Cristol, D., & Sene, A. M. (2007). The impact of teacher preparation on student achievement in algebra in a “hard-to-staff” urban preK–12–university partnership. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18, 245–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450601147528. CrossRef

*Glazerman, S., Mayer, D., & Decker, P. (2006). Alternative routes to teaching: the impacts of Teach for America on student achievement and other outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25, 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20157. CrossRef

*Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 129–145. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737022002129. CrossRef

Hedges, L. J., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Heilig, J. V., & Jez, S. J. (2010). Teach for America: a review of the evidence. Boulder, CO: Education and the Public Interest Center. Retrieved from National Education Policy Center website http://epicpolicy.org/publication/teach-for-america.

*Henry, G. T., Purtell, K. M., Bastian, K. C., Fortner, C. K., Thompson, C. L., Campbell, S. L., & Patterson, K. M. (2014). The effects of teacher entry portals on student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113503871. CrossRef

Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327, 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371–406. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002371. CrossRef

Humphrey, D., & Wechsler, M. (2007). Insights into alternative certification: initial findings from a national study. Teachers College Record, 109, 483–530. https://www.tcrecord.org

Hutchison, L. F. (2012). Addressing the STEM teacher shortage in American schools: ways to recruit and retain effective STEM teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 34, 541–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2012.729483. CrossRef

Losinski, M., Maag, J. W., Katsiyannis, A., & Parks Ennis, R. (2014). Examining the effects and quality of interventions based on the assessment of contextual variables: a meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 80, 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527243. CrossRef

Mason-Williams, L. (2015). Unequal opportunities: a profile of the distribution of special education teachers. Exceptional Children, 81, 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914551737. CrossRef

*Miller, J. W., McKenna, M. C., & McKenna, B. A. (1998). A comparison of alternatively and traditionally prepared teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 49, 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487198049003002. CrossRef

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G., The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 6(7), e1000097 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed1000097. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

National Education Association [NEA] (2015). Research spotlight on alternative routes to teacher certification. https://www.nea.org/tools/16578.htm.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2002). Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf.

*Nunnery, J., Kaplan, L., Owings, W. A., & Pribesh, S. (2009). The effects of troops to teachers on student achievement: one state’s study. NASSP Bulletin, 93, 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636509359338. CrossRef

Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237–257. CrossRef

Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development [OECD] (2015). Universal basic skills: what countries stand to gain. Washington, DC: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264234833-en.

*Piro, J. S., Shutt, T., & Stewart, G. (2010). Value added student achievement in alternative and traditional teacher preparation pathways. The Journal of Academic Administration in Higher Education, 6(2), 1–8. https://jwpress.com/JLHE/JLHE.htm.

Rosenthal, R. (1979). The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638. CrossRef

*Sharkey, N. S., & Goldhaber, D. (2008). Teacher licensure status and student achievement: lessons from private schools. Economics of Education Review, 27, 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.09.009. CrossRef

Shuls, J. V., & Trivitt, J. R. (2015). Teacher effectiveness: an analysis of licensure screens. Educational Policy, 29(4), 645–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904813510777. CrossRef

Stronge & Associates (2013). Stronge teacher evaluation system: a validation report. Oshkosh, WI: Strong & Associates Educational Consulting, LLC. Retrieved from http://www.cesa6.org/effectiveness_project/Validation-Report-of-Stronge-Evaluation-System.pdf.

Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., & Grant, L. W. (2011). What makes good teachers good? A cross-case analysis of the connection between teacher effectiveness and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 339–355. CrossRef

Teach for America [TFA] (2016). https://www.teachforamerica.org/.

The White House (2015). Every Student Succeeds Act: a progress report on elementary and secondary education. Executive Office of the President (December). https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/documents/ESSA_Progress_Report.pdf.

U.S. Census Bureau (2016). Census regions and divisions of the United States. https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/maps-data/maps/reference/us_regdiv.pdf.

U.S. Department of Education (2002). New No Child Left Behind. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-107publ110/html/PLAW-107publ110.htm.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education (2002). Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: the secretary’s annual report on teacher quality. https://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/teachprep/2002title-ii-report.pdf.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education (2013). Preparing and credentialing the nation’s teachers: the secretary’s ninth report on teacher quality. https://title2.ed.gov/TitleIIReport13.pdf.

U.S. Department of Education, Race to the Top (2009). Race to the top program executive summary. https://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/executive-summary.pdf.

Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2012). Elementary and middle school mathematics: teaching developmentally (8th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.

Wilson, D.B. (2011). Effect size calculation and basic meta-analysis. The Campbell Collaboration [Training video]. https://www.campbellcollaboration.org.

Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2002). Teacher preparation research: an insider’s view from the outside. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 190–204. CrossRef

Wilson, S.M., Floden, R.E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Document R-01-3. https://www.education.uw.edu/ctp/sites/default/files/ctpmail/PDFs/TeacherPrep-WFFM-02-2001.pdf.

Wright, S. P., Horn, S. P., & Sanders, W. L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57–67.

*Xu, Z., Hannaway, J., & Taylor, C. (2011). Making a difference? The effects of Teach for America in high school. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30, 447–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20585. CrossRef

Zhang, D., Wang, Q., Losinski, M., & Katsiyannis, A. (2014). An examination of preservice teachers’ intentions to pursue careers in special education. Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113510743. CrossRef

Titel: Traditional vs. Alternative Teacher Preparation Programs: A Meta-Analysis
Auteurs:: Denise K. Whitford
Dake Zhang
Antonis Katsiyannis
Publicatiedatum: 13-11-2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0932-0
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Tijdschrift: Journal of Child and Family Studies
Uitgave 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2018

The Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS): an Indonesian Validation Study

Ecological Factors Influencing Breastfeeding Decisions among Korean Immigrant Mothers in America

The Mediating Role of Korean Immigrant Mothers’ Psychological Well-Being in the Associations between Social Support and Authoritarian Parenting Style

Adult Recidivism in United States: A Meta-Analysis 1994–2015

Author Correction: A Dynamic Approach to Risk Factors for Maternal Corporal Punishment in Early to Middle Childhood

Chronic Illness, Placement Stability, and Hospitalizations within Child Welfare: The Role of Initial Living Arrangement