Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research 3/2013

01-06-2013 | Original Article

Tolerance of Negative Affective States (TNAS): Development and Evaluation of a Novel Construct and Measure

Auteurs: Amit Bernstein, Hadas Brantz

Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research | Uitgave 3/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The purpose of the present research was to develop and evaluate a novel conceptual model and measure of Tolerance of Negative Affective States (TNAS). Exploratory factor and parallel analyses and subsequent confirmatory factor analyses supported a hierarchical multi-dimensional model of TNAS. We observed one higher-order factor, labeled Tolerance of Negative Emotions, and six lower-order factors, including, FI Tolerance of Fear-Distress, FII Tolerance of Sadness-Depression, FIII Tolerance of Anger, FIV Tolerance of Disgust, FV Tolerance of Anxious-Apprehension, and FVI Tolerance of Negative Social Emotions. A series of tests documented that TNASS sub-scale scores demonstrate internal consistency as well as convergent and discriminant validity. We discuss the findings with respect to understanding the nature of the emergent TNAS construct and its measurement.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
In contrast to other identified emotions and affective states, the emotion construct/term contempt was not included. Relative to other emotions, contempt has been identified as potentially unfamiliar and inaccessible and therefore unreliably reported upon by research subjects (Wagner 2000). Moreover, relative to other identified affective states, contempt has been scrutinized as a discrete emotion (Russell 1994).
 
Literatuur
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
go back to reference Barlow, D. H. (2002). Anxiety and its disorders (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford. Barlow, D. H. (2002). Anxiety and its disorders (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
go back to reference Barlow, D. H., Allen, L. B., & Choate, M. L. (2004). Toward a unified treatment for emotional disorders. Behavior Therapy, 35, 205–230.CrossRef Barlow, D. H., Allen, L. B., & Choate, M. L. (2004). Toward a unified treatment for emotional disorders. Behavior Therapy, 35, 205–230.CrossRef
go back to reference Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
go back to reference Bernstein, A., Trafton, J., Ilgen, M., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2008). An evaluation of the role of smoking context on a biobehavioral index of distress tolerance. Addictive Behaviors, 33, 1409–1415.PubMedCrossRef Bernstein, A., Trafton, J., Ilgen, M., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2008). An evaluation of the role of smoking context on a biobehavioral index of distress tolerance. Addictive Behaviors, 33, 1409–1415.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bernstein, A., Zvolensky, M. J., Vujanovic, A. A., & Moos, R. (2009). Anxiety sensitivity, distress tolerance, and discomfort intolerance: A hierarchical model of affect sensitivity and Tolerance. Behavior Therapy, 40, 291–301.PubMedCrossRef Bernstein, A., Zvolensky, M. J., Vujanovic, A. A., & Moos, R. (2009). Anxiety sensitivity, distress tolerance, and discomfort intolerance: A hierarchical model of affect sensitivity and Tolerance. Behavior Therapy, 40, 291–301.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bernstein, A., Marshall-Berenz, E. C., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2011a). Multi-method evaluation of distress tolerance measures and construct(s): Concurrent relations to mood and anxiety psychopathology and quality of life. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 2(3), 386–399. Bernstein, A., Marshall-Berenz, E. C., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2011a). Multi-method evaluation of distress tolerance measures and construct(s): Concurrent relations to mood and anxiety psychopathology and quality of life. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 2(3), 386–399.
go back to reference Bernstein, A., Vujanovic, A. A., Leyro, T., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2011b). Distress tolerance: Research synthesis and future directions. In M. J. Zvolensky, A. Bernstein, & A. A. Vujanovic (Eds.), Distress tolerance. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Bernstein, A., Vujanovic, A. A., Leyro, T., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2011b). Distress tolerance: Research synthesis and future directions. In M. J. Zvolensky, A. Bernstein, & A. A. Vujanovic (Eds.), Distress tolerance. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
go back to reference Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.CrossRef Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.CrossRef
go back to reference Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Byrne, B. M. (2009). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis. Byrne, B. M. (2009). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
go back to reference Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.PubMedCrossRef Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion. New York: Wiley. Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion. New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.CrossRef Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.CrossRef
go back to reference Geisinger, K. F. (1994). Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 6, 304–312.CrossRef Geisinger, K. F. (1994). Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 6, 304–312.CrossRef
go back to reference Gorsuch, R. (1983). Factor Analysis. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Gorsuch, R. (1983). Factor Analysis. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 41–54.CrossRef Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 41–54.CrossRef
go back to reference Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., & Toarmino, D. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. Psychological Record, 54, 553–578. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., & Toarmino, D. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. Psychological Record, 54, 553–578.
go back to reference Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7, 238–247.CrossRef Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7, 238–247.CrossRef
go back to reference Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191–205.CrossRef Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191–205.CrossRef
go back to reference Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modeling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modeling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60.
go back to reference Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.PubMedCrossRef Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural Equation Modeling. Concepts, Issues, and Applications (pp. 76–99). London: Sage. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural Equation Modeling. Concepts, Issues, and Applications (pp. 76–99). London: Sage.
go back to reference Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.​1080/​1070551990954011​8
go back to reference Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum Press. Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum Press.
go back to reference Izard. C. E., Dougherty. F. E., Bloxom. B. M. L., and Kotsch, W. E. (1974). The Differential Emotions Scale: A method of measuring the subjective experience of discrete emotions. Unpublished manuscript. Vanderbilt University. Nashville. TN. Izard. C. E., Dougherty. F. E., Bloxom. B. M. L., and Kotsch, W. E. (1974). The Differential Emotions Scale: A method of measuring the subjective experience of discrete emotions. Unpublished manuscript. Vanderbilt University. Nashville. TN.
go back to reference Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
go back to reference James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (1982). Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (1982). Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.CrossRef Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.CrossRef
go back to reference Keltner, D. (1995). The signs of appeasement: Evidence for the distinct displays of embarrassment, amusement and shame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 441–454.CrossRef Keltner, D. (1995). The signs of appeasement: Evidence for the distinct displays of embarrassment, amusement and shame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 441–454.CrossRef
go back to reference Larsen, R. J., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1999). Measurement issues in emotion research. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 40–60). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Larsen, R. J., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1999). Measurement issues in emotion research. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 40–60). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
go back to reference Leyro, T. M., Zvolensky, M. J., & Bernstein, A. (2010). Distress tolerance and psychopathological symptoms and disorders: A review of the empirical literature among adults. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 576–600.PubMedCrossRef Leyro, T. M., Zvolensky, M. J., & Bernstein, A. (2010). Distress tolerance and psychopathological symptoms and disorders: A review of the empirical literature among adults. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 576–600.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
go back to reference MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99.CrossRef MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99.CrossRef
go back to reference Marlatt, G. A., & Gordon, J. R. (1985). Relapse prevention: Maintenance strategies in addictive behavior change. New York: Guilford. Marlatt, G. A., & Gordon, J. R. (1985). Relapse prevention: Maintenance strategies in addictive behavior change. New York: Guilford.
go back to reference Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2003). Personality traits (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2003). Personality traits (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference McHugh, R. K., Daughters, S. B., Lejuez, C. W., Murray, H. W., Hearon, B. A., Gorka, S. M., and Otto, M. W. (2011). Shared variance among self-report and behavioral measures of distress intolerance. Journal of Cognitive Therapy and Research, 35(3), 266–275. doi:10.1007/s10608-010-9295-1. McHugh, R. K., Daughters, S. B., Lejuez, C. W., Murray, H. W., Hearon, B. A., Gorka, S. M., and Otto, M. W. (2011). Shared variance among self-report and behavioral measures of distress intolerance. Journal of Cognitive Therapy and Research, 35(3), 266–275. doi:10.​1007/​s10608-010-9295-1.
go back to reference McIntosh, C. N. (2007). Rethinking fit assessment in structural equation modelling: A commentary and elaboration on barrett (2007). Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 859–867. McIntosh, C. N. (2007). Rethinking fit assessment in structural equation modelling: A commentary and elaboration on barrett (2007). Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 859–867.
go back to reference Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749.CrossRef Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749.CrossRef
go back to reference O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computer, 32, 396–402.CrossRef O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computer, 32, 396–402.CrossRef
go back to reference Olatunji, B. O., & Wolitzky-Taylor, K. B. (2009). Anxiety sensitivity and the anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 974–999.PubMedCrossRef Olatunji, B. O., & Wolitzky-Taylor, K. B. (2009). Anxiety sensitivity and the anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 974–999.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Orsillo, S. M., & Roemer, L. (2005). Acceptance and mindfulness-based approaches to anxiety: Conceptualization and treatment. New York: Springer.CrossRef Orsillo, S. M., & Roemer, L. (2005). Acceptance and mindfulness-based approaches to anxiety: Conceptualization and treatment. New York: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Russell, J. A. (1994). Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expression? Psychological Bulletin, 115, 102–141.PubMedCrossRef Russell, J. A. (1994). Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expression? Psychological Bulletin, 115, 102–141.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, Second edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, Second edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Simons, J., & Gaher, R. (2005). The Distress Tolerance Scale: Development and validation of a self report measure. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 83–102.CrossRef Simons, J., & Gaher, R. (2005). The Distress Tolerance Scale: Development and validation of a self report measure. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 83–102.CrossRef
go back to reference Tangney, J. P., Miller, R. S., Flicker, L., & Barlow, D. H. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1256–1269.PubMedCrossRef Tangney, J. P., Miller, R. S., Flicker, L., & Barlow, D. H. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1256–1269.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89–99.CrossRef Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89–99.CrossRef
go back to reference Wagner, H. L. (2000). The accessibility of the term “contempt” and the meaning of the unilateral lip curl. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 689–710.CrossRef Wagner, H. L. (2000). The accessibility of the term “contempt” and the meaning of the unilateral lip curl. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 689–710.CrossRef
go back to reference Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of the brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.PubMedCrossRef Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of the brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Zvolensky, M. J., Arrindell, W. A., Taylor, S., Bouvard, M., Cox, B. J., & Stewart, S. H. (2003). Anxiety sensitivity in six countries. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 841–859.PubMedCrossRef Zvolensky, M. J., Arrindell, W. A., Taylor, S., Bouvard, M., Cox, B. J., & Stewart, S. H. (2003). Anxiety sensitivity in six countries. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 841–859.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Zvolensky, M. J., Vujanovic, A. A., Bernstein, A., & Leyro, T. (2010). Distress tolerance: Theory, measurement, and relations to psychopathologyy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 406–410.CrossRef Zvolensky, M. J., Vujanovic, A. A., Bernstein, A., & Leyro, T. (2010). Distress tolerance: Theory, measurement, and relations to psychopathologyy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 406–410.CrossRef
go back to reference Zvolensky, M. J., Bernstein, A., & Vujanovic, A. A. (Eds.). (2011a). Distress tolerance. New York: Guilford Press. Zvolensky, M. J., Bernstein, A., & Vujanovic, A. A. (Eds.). (2011a). Distress tolerance. New York: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Zvolensky, M. J., Leyro, T., Bernstein, A., & Vujanovic, A. A. (2011b). Distress tolerance: Historical perspectives, theory, and measurement. In M. J. Zvolensky, A. Bernstein, & A. A. Vujanovic (Eds.), Distress tolerance. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Zvolensky, M. J., Leyro, T., Bernstein, A., & Vujanovic, A. A. (2011b). Distress tolerance: Historical perspectives, theory, and measurement. In M. J. Zvolensky, A. Bernstein, & A. A. Vujanovic (Eds.), Distress tolerance. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Metagegevens
Titel
Tolerance of Negative Affective States (TNAS): Development and Evaluation of a Novel Construct and Measure
Auteurs
Amit Bernstein
Hadas Brantz
Publicatiedatum
01-06-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Cognitive Therapy and Research / Uitgave 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0147-5916
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2819
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-012-9471-6

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2013

Cognitive Therapy and Research 3/2013 Naar de uitgave