Top

Gepubliceerd in:

30-03-2024

Time, age, gender and cultural measurement invariance of the CASP-12, a measure of psychological quality of life in adulthood

Auteurs: Arielle Bonneville-Roussy, Florence Khoriaty, François Laberge

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 6/2024

Abstract

Purpose

Whereas Quality of Life in older populations has long been conceptualized in regards to health or illness, the Control, Autonomy, Self-Realization and Pleasure scale (CASP-12) focuses on the positive facets of aging. Although the CASP is a widely used scale, its measurement invariance has seldom been examined. The present study aims to ascertain the measurement invariance of the CASP-12 over a period of 10 years and between age, culture and gender.

Methods

Secondary data analyses were conducted on the longitudinal data collected in four waves between 2006 and 2016–2017 of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe study (SHARE). The factorial validity of the CASP-12 was examined and its measurement invariance was tested with a sample of 3684 men and 4955 women aged 30–99 years, coming from 10 different European countries.

Results

Results showed a strong theoretical and empirical dimensionality of the CASP-12, a well as invariance of time (10 years), age and culture. It was also found that the scale is gender invariant at the strict level. These results were replicated with two more waves of SHARE, measured six years apart.

Conclusion

This study replicates the CASP-12 dimensional structure, factorial structure and factor loadings. The scale has demonstrated to be a reliable and valid measurement of the positive aspects of quality of life to be used across time, age, gender and culture. The Autonomy dimension of the scale warrants further investigation.

vorige artikel Exploratory factor analysis and Rasch analysis to assess the structural validity of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit Proxy version (ASCOT-Proxy) completed by care home staff

volgende artikel Estimation of health utility values for alopecia areata

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

WHO. (2022). Mental health: strengthening our response. WHO. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response

Rojo-Pérez, F., & Fernández-Mayoralas, G. (2021). Handbook of active ageing and quality of life: From concepts to applications. Springer.CrossRef

Ferreira, M. C. G., Tura, L. F. R., da Silva, R. C., de Ferreira, M., & A. (2017). Social representations of older adults regarding quality of life. Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 70(4), 806–813. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0097CrossRefPubMed

Van Malderen, L., De Vriendt, P., Mets, T., & Gorus, E. (2016). Active ageing within the nursing home: A study in Flanders. Belgium. European Journal of Ageing, 13(3), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-016-0374-3CrossRefPubMed

Steptoe, A., Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A. (2015). Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing. The Lancet, 385(9968), 640–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61489-0CrossRef

Holzhausen, M., & Martus, P. (2013). Validation of a new patient-generated questionnaire for quality of life in an urban sample of elder residents. Quality of Life Research, 22(1), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0115-9CrossRefPubMed

Pequeno, N. P. F., de Cabral, N. L., Marchioni, D. M., Lima, S. C. V. C., & de Lyra, C. (2020). Quality of life assessment instruments for adults: A systematic review of population-based studies. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1), 1–13.CrossRef

Pérez-Rojo, G., Martín, N., Noriega, C., & López, J. (2018). Psychometric properties of the CASP-12 in a Spanish older community dwelling sample. Aging & Mental Health, 22(5), 700–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1292208CrossRef

Sexton, E., King-Kallimanis, B. L., Conroy, R. M., & Hickey, A. (2013). Psychometric evaluation of the CASP-19 quality of life scale in an older Irish cohort. Quality of Life Research, 22(9), 2549–2559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0388-7CrossRefPubMed

10.

Hyde, M., Wiggins, R. D., Higgs, P., & Blane, D. B. (2003). A measure of quality of life in early old age: The theory, development and properties of a needs satisfaction model (CASP-19). Aging & Mental Health, 7(3), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360786031000101157CrossRef

11.

Hyde, M., Higgs, P., Wiggins, R. D., & Blane, D. (2015). A decade of research using the CASP scale: Key findings and future directions. Aging & Mental Health, 19(7), 571–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2015.1018868CrossRef

12.

Maslow, A. (1968). Some educational implications of the humanistic psychologies. Harvard Educational Review, 38(4), 685–696.CrossRef

13.

Wiggins, R. D., Netuveli, G., Hyde, M., Higgs, P., & Blane, D. (2008). The Evaluation of a self-enumerated scale of quality of life (CASP-19) in the context of research on ageing: A combination of exploratory and confirmatory approaches. Social Indicators Research, 89(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9220-5CrossRef

14.

Oliver, A., Sentandreu-Mañó, T., Tomás, J. M., Fernández, I., & Sancho, P. (2021). Quality of life in European older adults of SHARE Wave 7: Comparing the old and the oldest-old. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(13), 2850. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132850CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Tan, L. T., Østbye, T., Visaria, A., & Malhotra, R. (2022). Derivation, and establishment of the validity and reliability, of the CASP-11-SG quality of life scale among community-dwelling older adults. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03238-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Borrat-Besson, C., Ryser, V.-A., & Gonçalves, J. (2015). An evaluation of the CASP-12 scale used in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) to measure Quality of Life among people aged 50. Lausanne: FORS.

17.

Lima, F. M., Hyde, M., Chungkham, H. S., Correia, C., Siqueira Campos, A., Campos, M., & Petribu, K. (2014). Quality of life amongst older Brazilians: A cross-cultural validation of the CASP-19 into Brazilian-Portuguese. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e94289. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094289CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Hamren, K., Chungkham, H. S., & Hyde, M. (2015). Religion, spirituality, social support and quality of life: Measurement and predictors CASP-12(v2) amongst older Ethiopians living in Addis Ababa. Aging & Mental Health, 19(7), 610–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2014.952709CrossRef

19.

Wu, T.-Y., Chie, W.-C., Kuo, K.-L., Wong, W.-K., Liu, J.-P., Chiu, S.-T., & Blane, D. (2013). Quality of life (QOL) among community dwelling older people in Taiwan measured by the CASP-19, an index to capture QOL in old age. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 57(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2013.03.010CrossRefPubMed

20.

Rodríguez-Blázquez, C., Ribeiro, O., Ayala, A., Teixeira, L., Araújo, L., & Forjaz, M. J. (2020). Psychometric properties of the CASP-12 scale in Portugal: An analysis using SHARE data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186610CrossRef

21.

Bowling, A., & Stenner, P. (2011). Which measure of quality of life performs best in older age? A comparison of the OPQOL, CASP-19 and WHOQOL-OLD. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 65(3), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.087668CrossRef

22.

Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825CrossRef

23.

von Faber, M., van der Bootsma Wiel, A., van Exel, E., Gussekloo, J., Lagaay, A. M., van Dongen, E., & Westendorp, R. G. J. (2001). Successful aging in the oldest old. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161(22), 2694. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.161.22.2694CrossRef

24.

Liu, Y., Millsap, R. E., West, S. G., Tein, J. Y., Tanaka, R., & Grimm, K. J. (2017). Testing measurement invariance in longitudinal data with ordered-categorical measures. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 486–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000075CrossRefPubMed

25.

Wu, H., & Estabrook, R. (2016). Identification of confirmatory factor analysis models of different levels of invariance for ordered categorical outcomes. Psychometrika, 81(4), 1014–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-016-9506-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740CrossRef

27.

Lee, S., Liu, M., & Hu, M. (2017). Relationship between future time orientation and item nonresponse on subjective probability questions: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(5), 698–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117698572CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Muthen, B., & Muthén, L. K. (2023). Mplus Language Addendum 8.9. Los Angeles.

29.

Bowen, N. K., & Masa, R. D. (2015). Conducting measurement invariance tests with ordinal data: A guide for social work researchers. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 6(2), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1086/681607CrossRef

30.

Pokropek, A., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (2019). A monte carlo simulation study to assess the appropriateness of traditional and newer approaches to test for measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 26(5), 724–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1561293CrossRef

31.

Berg, A. I., Hoffman, L., Hassing, L. B., McClearn, G. E., & Johansson, B. (2009). What matters, and what matters most, for change in life satisfaction in the oldest-old? A study over 6 years among individuals 80+. Aging & Mental Health, 13(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860802342227CrossRef

32.

Smith, J., Borchelt, M., Maier, H., & Jopp, D. (2002). Health and well-being in the young old and oldest old. Journal of Social Issues, 58(4), 715–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00286CrossRef

33.

Ayala, A., Rodríguez-Blázquez, C., Calderón-Larrañaga, A., Beridze, G., Teixeira, L., Araújo, L., & Forjaz, M. J. (2021). Influence of active and healthy ageing on quality of life changes: Insights from the comparison of three european countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084152CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Börsch-Supan, A., Brandt, M., Hunkler, C., Kneip, T., Korbmacher, J., Malter, F., Schaan, B., Stuck, S., & Zuber, S. (2013). Data resource profile: The survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (SHARE). International Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt088CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Börsch-Supan, A. (2022). Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Wave 2. Release version: 8.0.0. SHARE-ERIC. Data set. https://doi.org/10.6103/SHARE.w2.800CrossRef

36.

Bergmann, M., Kneip, T., De Luca, G., & Scherpenzeel A. (2019). Survey participation in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), Wave 1-7. Based on Release 7.0.0. SHARE Working Paper Series 41-2019. Munich: MEA, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.

37.

Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle: Selected papers. Psychological Issues, 1, 1–171.

38.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across cultures. Sage.

39.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and Organizations Author ( s ): Geert Hofstede Source : International Studies of Management & Organization, Winter, 1980 / 1981. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10(4), 15–41.CrossRef

40.

Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. (1985). Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: A review and synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4278955CrossRef

41.

Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2019). Structural equation modeling. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119422730CrossRef

42.

Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2CrossRef

43.

Millsap, R. E., & Yun-Tein, J. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(3), 479–515. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3903_4CrossRef

44.

Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2013). Mplus Language Addendum 7.1. Los Angeles.

45.

Chen, F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504.CrossRef

46.

Sass, D. A., Schmitt, T. A., & Marsh, H. W. (2014). Evaluating Model Fit With Ordered Categorical Data Within a Measurement Invariance Framework: A Comparison of Estimators. Structural Equation Modeling, 21(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.882658CrossRef

47.

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus Version 8.0. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

48.

Chen, P.-Y., Wu, W., Garnier-Villarreal, M., Kite, B. A., & Jia, F. (2020). Testing Measurement Invariance with Ordinal Missing Data: A Comparison of Estimators and Missing Data Techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 55(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1608799CrossRefPubMed

49.

Graham, J. W. (2012). Missing data: Analysis and design. Springer Science & Business Media.

50.

Kunzmann, U., Little, T. D., & Smith, J. (2000). Is age-related stability of subjective well-being a paradox? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from the Berlin aging study. Psychology and Aging, 15(3), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.15.3.511CrossRefPubMed

51.

Kokko, K., Korkalainen, A., Lyyra, A.-L., & Feldt, T. (2013). Structure and continuity of well-being in mid-adulthood: A longitudinal study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9318-yCrossRef

52.

Huang, X., Zhang, M., Fang, J., Zeng, Q., Wang, J., & Li, J. (2022). Classifying and characterizing the development of self-reported overall quality of life among the Chinese elderly: A twelve-year longitudinal study. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13314-6CrossRef

53.

Lee, K. H., Xu, H., & Wu, B. (2020). Gender differences in quality of life among community-dwelling older adults in low- A nd middle-income countries: Results from the Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8212-0CrossRef

54.

Alonso, J., Ferrer, M., Gandek, B., Ware, J. E., Jr., Aaronson, N. K., Mosconi, P., & Leplège, A. (2004). Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: Results from the international quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project. Quality of Life Research, 13(2), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000018472.46236.05CrossRefPubMed

55.

Kang, Y., McNeish, D. M., & Hancock, G. R. (2016). The role of measurement quality on practical guidelines for assessing measurement and structural invariance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(4), 533–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415603764CrossRefPubMed

56.

Luong, R., & Flake, J. K. (2023). Measurement invariance testing using confirmatory factor analysis and alignment optimization: A tutorial for transparent analysis planning and reporting. Psychological Methods, 28(4), 905–924. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000441CrossRefPubMed

57.

McWilliam, C. L., Brown, J. B., Carmichael, J. L., & Lehman, J. M. (1994). A new perspective on threatened autonomy in elderly persons: The disempowering process. Social Science & Medicine, 38(2), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)90402-2CrossRef

58.

Tang, M., Wang, D., & Guerrien, A. (2021). The contribution of basic psychological need satisfaction to psychological well-being via autonomous motivation among older adults: A cross-cultural study in China and France. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(November), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734461CrossRef

59.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.CrossRef

60.

Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Time, age, gender and cultural measurement invariance of the CASP-12, a measure of psychological quality of life in adulthood
Auteurs: Arielle Bonneville-Roussy
Florence Khoriaty
François Laberge
Publicatiedatum: 30-03-2024
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 6/2024
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03639-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2024

COVID-19-related health utility values and changes in COVID-19 patients and the general population: a scoping review

Review

Symptom profiles in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis and their association with quality of life: a longitudinal study

The phenotype of recovery XI: associations of sleep quality and perceived stress with discounting and quality of life in substance use recovery

Open Access

Patient adherence and response time in electronic patient-reported outcomes: insights from three longitudinal clinical trials

It’s time for change: inequities and determinants of health-related quality of life among gender and sexually diverse young people in Australia

Open Access

When better is the enemy of good: two cautionary tales of conceptual validity versus parsimony in clinical psychometric research

Commentary