Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-03-2010 | FIP Congres

Tibiotalaire autologe kraakbe encelimplantatie: fundamentele aspecten van een biopsielocatie in de enkel

Auteur: Giovanni A. Matricali, MD. PhD.

Gepubliceerd in: Podosophia | Uitgave 2/2010

Samenvatting

Dr. Matricali heeft onderzocht hoe de morbiditeit van een donorsite in de enkel minimaal kan blijven na kraakbeenbiopsie ten behoeve van een celexpansieprocedure voor autologe kraakbeenimplantatie. Hij vond een biopsielocatie in de enkel die veilig te gebruiken is voor dit doeleinde. Verder deed hij onderzoek naar de mogelijkheid van het gebruik van gedebrideerd kraakbeen, om een biopsie in zijn geheel overbodig te maken.

vorige artikel Ontwikkelingen en discussies

volgende artikel SALSA: de juiste mix voor het redden van levens en ledematen

Vanlauwe J, Almqvist KF, Bellemans J, Huskin J-P, Verdonk R, Victor J. Repair of symptomatic cartilage lesions of the knee. The place of autologous chondrocyte implantation. Acta Orthop Belg 2007;73:145–58.PubMed

Aurich M, Venbrocks RA, Fuhrmann RA. Autologe chondrozyten-transplantation am oberen sprunggelenk. Rational oder irrational? Orthopäde 2008;37:188–95.PubMedCrossRef

Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L. Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 1994;331:889–95.PubMedCrossRef

Whittaker J-P, Smith G, Makwana N, Roberts S, Harrison PE, Laing P, et al. Early results of autologous chondrocyte implantation in the talus. J Bone Joint Surg 2005;87-B:179–83.CrossRef

Nam EK, Ferkel RD, Applegate GR. Autologous chondrocyte implantation of the ankle, a 2-5 year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2009;37:274–84.PubMedCrossRef

Thomas JT, Lin K, Nandedkar M, Camargo M, Cervenka J, Luyten FP. A human chondrodysplasia due to a mutation in a TGF-â superfamily member. Nature Genetics 1996;12:315–7.PubMedCrossRef

Thomas JT, Kilpatrick MW, Lin K, Erlacher L, Lembessis P, Costa T, et al. Disruption of human limb morphogenesis by a dominant negative mutation in CDMP1. Nature Genetics 1997;17:58–64.PubMedCrossRef

Athanasiou KA, Niederauer GG, Schenck RC. Biomechanical topography of human ankle cartilage. Ann Biomed Eng 1995;23:697–704.PubMedCrossRef

Kuettner KE, Cole AA. Cartilage degeneration in different human joints. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005;13:93–103.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Barna M, Pandolfi PP, Niswander L. Gli3 and Plzf cooperate in proximal limb patterning at early stages of limb development. Nature 2005;436:277–81.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Chaipinyo K, Oakes BW, Van Damme M-PI. The use of debrided human articular cartilage for autologous chondrocyte implantation: maintenance of chondrocyte differentiation and proliferation in type I collagen gels. J Orthop Res 2004;22:446–55.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Giannini S, Buda R, Grigolo B, Vannini F, De Franceschi L, Facchini A. The detached osteochondral fragment as a source of cells for autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) in the ankle joint. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005;13:601–7.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Biant LC, Bentley G. Stem cells and debrided waste. Two alternative sources of cells for transplantation of cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 2007;89-B:1110–4.CrossRef

14.

Reimann R, Anderhuber F, Gerold J. Über die geometrie der menschlichen sprungbeinrolle. Acta anat 1986;127:271–8.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Thoma W, Scale D, Kurth A. Computergestütze analyse der kinematik des oberen sprunggelenks. Z Orthop 1993;131:14–7.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Hintermann B, Nigg BM. In vitro kinematics of the axially loaded ankle complex in response to dorsiflexion and plantarflexion. Foot Ankle Int 1995;16:514–8.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Leardini A, O’Connor JJ, Catani F, Giannini S. A geometric model of the human ankle joint. J Biomech 1999;32:585–91.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Komistek RD, Stiehl JB, Buechel FF, Northcut EJ, Hajner ME. A determination of ankle kinematics using fluoroscopy. Foot Ankle Int 2000;21:343–50.PubMed

19.

Dettwyler M, Stacoff A, Kramers-de Quervain IA, Stüssi E. Modelling of the ankle joint complex. Reflections with regards to ankle prostheses. Foot and Ankle Surgery 2004;10:109–19.CrossRef

20.

Leardini A, O’Connor JJ, Catani F, Giannini S. The role of the passive structures in the mobility and stability of the human ankle joint: a literature review. Foot Ankle Int 2000;21:602–15.PubMed

21.

Meachim G. Cartilage fibrillation at the ankle joint in Liverpool necropsies. J Anat 1975;119:601–10.PubMedCentralPubMed

22.

Muehleman C, Bareither D, Huch K, Cole AA, Kuettner KE. Prevalence of degenerative morphological changes in the joints of the lower extremity. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1997;5:23–37.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Seireg A, Arvikar RJ. The prediction of muscular load sharing and joint forces in the lower extremities during walking. J Biomech 1975;8:89–102.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Procter P, Paul JP. Ankle joint biomechanics. J Biomech 1982;15:627–34.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Stauffer RN, Chao EYS, Brewster RC. Force and motion analysis of the normal, diseased, and prosthetic ankle joint. Clin Orthop 1977;127:189–96.PubMed

26.

Inman VT, Mann RA. Biomechanics of the foot and ankle. In: Mann RA, ed. DuVries’ Surgery of the foot. Saint Louis: The C.V. Mosby Company, 1978;3–21.

27.

Perry J. Ankle foot complex. In: Perry J, ed. Gait analysis; Normal and pathological function. Thorofare: SLACK Incorporated, 1992;51–87.

28.

Glitsch U, Baumann W. The three-dimensional determination of internal loads in the lower extremity. J Biomech 1997;30:1123–31.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Suckel A, Muller O, Herberts T, Langenstein P, Reize P, Wulker N. Talonavicular arthrodesis or triple arthrodesis, peak pressure in the adjacent joints measured in 8 cadaver specimens. Acta Orthopaedica 2007;78:592–7.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Rodgers MM. Dynamic biomechanics of the normal foot and ankle during walking and running. Phys Ther 1988;68:1822–30.PubMed

31.

Hartford JM, Gorczyca JT, McNamara JL, Mayor MB. Tibiotalar contact area. Contribution of posterior malleolus and deltoid ligament. Clin Orthop 1995;320:182–7.PubMed

32.

Matricali GA, Dereymaeker GPhE, Luyten FP. The postero-medial rim of the talar dome as the site to harvest cartilage in the ankle: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 2006;22:1241–5.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Matricali GA, Bartels W, Labey L, Dereymaeker GPhE, Luyten FP, Vander Sloten J. Changes in contact area characteristics of the ankle after a cartilage biopsy at the postero-medial rim of the talar dome. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009;17:1477–84.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Matricali GA, Bartels W, Labey L, Dereymaeker GPhE, Luyten FP, Vander Sloten J. High inter-specimen variability of baseline data for the tibiotalar contact area. Clin Biomech 2009;24:117–20.CrossRef

Titel: Tibiotalaire autologe kraakbe encelimplantatie: fundamentele aspecten van een biopsielocatie in de enkel
Auteur: Giovanni A. Matricali, MD. PhD.
Publicatiedatum: 01-03-2010
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in: Podosophia / Uitgave 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0929-5380
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-5815
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12481-010-0036-x

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2010

Opleidingen diabetische voet zorg in ontwikkelingslanden: een curriculum voor assistenten diabetische voetzorg

In de schijnwerpers: de FIP

De handen uit de mouwen

Ontwikkelingen en discussies

Vaststellen van functionele afwijkingen en de factoren die samengaan met de gelokalis eerde ‘impact’ van deze ziekte

Tekort aan orthopedisch chirurgen