Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 5/2014

01-09-2014 | Original Article

Throwing in the dark: improved prediction of action outcomes following motor training without vision of the action

Auteurs: Desmond Mulligan, Nicola J. Hodges

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 5/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Traditional models of action understanding emphasise the idea that long-term exposure to a wide array of visual patterns of particular actions allows for effective action anticipation or prediction. More recently, a greater emphasis has been placed on the motor system’s role in the perceptual understanding and prediction of action outcomes. There have been attempts to isolate the contributions of visual and motor experience in action prediction, but to date, these studies have relied on comparisons of motor-visual experience to visual-only (observational) experience. We conducted a learning study, where visual experience was directly manipulated during practice. Novice participants practised throwing darts to 3 specific areas of a dartboard. A group trained without vision of their action, only feedback about the final landing position, significantly improved in their ability to predict the landing position of a thrown dart, from temporally occluded video clips. The performance of this ‘no-vision’ group did not differ from a Full-vision group and was significantly more accurate than an observation-only and a no-practice control group (with the latter two groups not improving pre- to post-practice). These results suggest that motor experience specifically modulates the perceptual prediction of action outcomes. This is thought to occur through simulative mechanisms, whereby observed actions are mapped onto the observer’s own motor representations.
Voetnoten
1
We also converted the percent correct to the normally-distributed d’ sensitivity measure for M-alternative forced choice tasks (Smith, 1982; Stanislaw & Todorov, 1999) based on the Luce (1959) choice model. A 4 Group (Full-vision, No-vision, Observers, Control) × 2 Test (pre, post) RM ANOVA was conducted on these data. These data mirrored the pattern of results observed with the unconverted % accuracy data, including the significant Group × Test interaction, F(1,36) = 19.31, p < 0.001, η p 2  = 0.62. The No-vision group significantly improved their discrimination ability from d’ = 0.59 (SD = 0.19) in the pre-test to d’ = 1.02 (SD = 0.31) in the post-test. The Full-vision showed a similar pattern (Pre d’ = 0.62 (SD = 0.26); Post d’ = 0.91 (SD = 0.32)). The Control and Observer groups did not improve in their ability to discriminate between target sections; Control, pre d’ = 0.66 (SD = 0.31); post d’ = 0.64 (SD = 0.26); Observer, pre d’ = 0.66 (SD = 0.31); post d’ = 0.67 (SD = 0.30).
 
2
Pearson correlations were conducted to compare (a) motor proficiency scores on the final block of practice of day 2 to post-practice anticipation performance and (b) anticipation accuracy and motor performance for each target section. All of the correlations were low and non-significant; (a) r(18) = −0.12, p = 0.60, (b) Top, r(18) = −0.28, p = 0.23, Middle, r(18) = 0.04, p = 0.86, Bottom, r(18) = −0.02, p = 0.93.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Abernethy, B., & Zawi, K. (2007). Pickup of essential kinematics underpins expert perception of movement patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 39, 353–367.PubMedCrossRef Abernethy, B., & Zawi, K. (2007). Pickup of essential kinematics underpins expert perception of movement patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 39, 353–367.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Abernethy, B., Zawi, K., & Jackson, R. C. (2008). Expertise and attunement to kinematic constraints. Perception, 37, 931–948.PubMedCrossRef Abernethy, B., Zawi, K., & Jackson, R. C. (2008). Expertise and attunement to kinematic constraints. Perception, 37, 931–948.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Aglioti, S. M., Cesari, P., Romani, M., & Urgesi, C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1109–1116.PubMedCrossRef Aglioti, S. M., Cesari, P., Romani, M., & Urgesi, C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1109–1116.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Allwood, C. M., Granhag, P. A., & Johansson, H. (2000). Realism in confidence judgements of performance based on implicit learning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 165–188.CrossRef Allwood, C. M., Granhag, P. A., & Johansson, H. (2000). Realism in confidence judgements of performance based on implicit learning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 165–188.CrossRef
go back to reference Beets, I. A., Hart, B. M., Rosler, F., Henriques, D. Y., Einhauser, W., et al. (2010). Online action-to-perception transfer: Only percept-dependent action affects perception. Vision Research, 50, 2633–2641.PubMedCrossRef Beets, I. A., Hart, B. M., Rosler, F., Henriques, D. Y., Einhauser, W., et al. (2010). Online action-to-perception transfer: Only percept-dependent action affects perception. Vision Research, 50, 2633–2641.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Blakemore, S. J., & Decety, J. (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 561–567.PubMedCrossRef Blakemore, S. J., & Decety, J. (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 561–567.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Calvo-Merino, B., Grezes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cereberal Cortex, 15, 1243–1249.CrossRef Calvo-Merino, B., Grezes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cereberal Cortex, 15, 1243–1249.CrossRef
go back to reference Calvo-Merino, B., Grezes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2006). Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current Biology, 16, 1905–1910.PubMedCrossRef Calvo-Merino, B., Grezes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2006). Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current Biology, 16, 1905–1910.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Casile, A., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception. Current Biology, 16, 69–74.PubMedCrossRef Casile, A., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception. Current Biology, 16, 69–74.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). The mind’s eye in chess. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 215–281). New York: Academic Press.CrossRef Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). The mind’s eye in chess. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 215–281). New York: Academic Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Cheesman, J., & Merikle, P. M. (1984). Priming with and without awareness. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 387–395.CrossRef Cheesman, J., & Merikle, P. M. (1984). Priming with and without awareness. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 387–395.CrossRef
go back to reference Cross, E. S., Hamilton, A. F. D. C., Kraemer, D. J. M., Kelley, W. M., & Grafton, S. T. (2009). Dissociable substrates for body motion and physical experience in the human action observation network. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 1383–1392.PubMedCrossRef Cross, E. S., Hamilton, A. F. D. C., Kraemer, D. J. M., Kelley, W. M., & Grafton, S. T. (2009). Dissociable substrates for body motion and physical experience in the human action observation network. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 1383–1392.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference de Groot, A. D. (1978). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton Publishers (First Dutch edition in 1946). de Groot, A. D. (1978). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton Publishers (First Dutch edition in 1946).
go back to reference Demougeot, L., & Papaxanthis, C. (2011). Muscle fatigue affects mental simulation of action. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 10712–10720.PubMedCrossRef Demougeot, L., & Papaxanthis, C. (2011). Muscle fatigue affects mental simulation of action. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 10712–10720.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 9, 176–180.CrossRef Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 9, 176–180.CrossRef
go back to reference Didierjean, A., & Marmèche, E. (2005). Anticipatory representation of visual basketball scenes by novice and expert players. Visual Cognition, 12, 265–283. Didierjean, A., & Marmèche, E. (2005). Anticipatory representation of visual basketball scenes by novice and expert players. Visual Cognition, 12, 265–283.
go back to reference Dienes, Z., Altmann, G. T. M., Kwan, L., & Goode, A. (1995). Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1322–1338. Dienes, Z., Altmann, G. T. M., Kwan, L., & Goode, A. (1995). Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1322–1338.
go back to reference Eskenazi, T., Grosjean, M., Humphreys, G. W., & Knoblich, G. (2009). The role of motor simulation in action perception: A neuropsychological case study. Psychological Research, 73, 477–485.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Eskenazi, T., Grosjean, M., Humphreys, G. W., & Knoblich, G. (2009). The role of motor simulation in action perception: A neuropsychological case study. Psychological Research, 73, 477–485.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fogassi, L., Ferrari, P. F., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., Chersi, F., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Parietal lobe: From action organization to intention understanding. Science, 308, 662–667.PubMedCrossRef Fogassi, L., Ferrari, P. F., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., Chersi, F., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Parietal lobe: From action organization to intention understanding. Science, 308, 662–667.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593–609.PubMedCrossRef Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593–609.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hecht, H., Vogt, S., & Prinz, W. (2001). Motor learning enhances perceptual judgement: A case for action-perception transfer. Psychological Research, 65, 3–14.PubMedCrossRef Hecht, H., Vogt, S., & Prinz, W. (2001). Motor learning enhances perceptual judgement: A case for action-perception transfer. Psychological Research, 65, 3–14.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hodges, N. J., Starkes, J. L., & MacMahon, C. (2006). Expert performance in sport: A cognitive perspective. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 471–488). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Hodges, N. J., Starkes, J. L., & MacMahon, C. (2006). Expert performance in sport: A cognitive perspective. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 471–488). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B., Musseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849–937.CrossRef Hommel, B., Musseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849–937.CrossRef
go back to reference Hubbard, T. L. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the Findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 822–851.CrossRef Hubbard, T. L. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the Findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 822–851.CrossRef
go back to reference Iacoboni, M., Moinar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology, 3(3), e79.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Iacoboni, M., Moinar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology, 3(3), e79.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526–2528.PubMedCrossRef Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526–2528.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Intraub, H. (2002). Anticipatory spatial representation of natural scenes: Momemtum without movement? Visual Cognition, 9, 93–119.CrossRef Intraub, H. (2002). Anticipatory spatial representation of natural scenes: Momemtum without movement? Visual Cognition, 9, 93–119.CrossRef
go back to reference Jackson, R. C., Abernethy, B., & Wernhart, S. (2009). Sensitivity to fine-grained and coarse visual information: The effect of blurring on anticipation skill. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 40, 461–475. Jackson, R. C., Abernethy, B., & Wernhart, S. (2009). Sensitivity to fine-grained and coarse visual information: The effect of blurring on anticipation skill. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 40, 461–475.
go back to reference Jackson, R. C., Warren, S., & Abernethy, B. (2006). Anticipation skill and susceptibility to deceptive movement. Acta Psychologica, 123, 355–371.PubMedCrossRef Jackson, R. C., Warren, S., & Abernethy, B. (2006). Anticipation skill and susceptibility to deceptive movement. Acta Psychologica, 123, 355–371.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14, 103–109.CrossRef Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14, 103–109.CrossRef
go back to reference Knoblich, G., & Flach, R. (2001). Predicting the effects of actions: Interactions of perception and action. Psychological Science, 12, 467–472.PubMedCrossRef Knoblich, G., & Flach, R. (2001). Predicting the effects of actions: Interactions of perception and action. Psychological Science, 12, 467–472.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Knoblich, G., Seigerschmidt, E., Flach, R., & Prinz, W. (2002). Authorship effects in the prediction of handwriting strokes: Evidence for action simulation during action perception. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1027–1046.CrossRef Knoblich, G., Seigerschmidt, E., Flach, R., & Prinz, W. (2002). Authorship effects in the prediction of handwriting strokes: Evidence for action simulation during action perception. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1027–1046.CrossRef
go back to reference Kunimoto, C., Miller, J., & Pashler, H. (2001). Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses. Consciousness and Cognition, 10, 294–340.PubMedCrossRef Kunimoto, C., Miller, J., & Pashler, H. (2001). Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses. Consciousness and Cognition, 10, 294–340.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley. Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Maslovat, D., Chua, R., & Hodges, N. J. (2013). When unintended movements “leak” out: A startling acoustic stimulus can elicit a prepared response during motor imagery and action observation. Neuropsychologia, 5, 838–844.CrossRef Maslovat, D., Chua, R., & Hodges, N. J. (2013). When unintended movements “leak” out: A startling acoustic stimulus can elicit a prepared response during motor imagery and action observation. Neuropsychologia, 5, 838–844.CrossRef
go back to reference Miall, R. C., & Wolpert, D. M. (1996). Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks, 9, 1265–1279.PubMedCrossRef Miall, R. C., & Wolpert, D. M. (1996). Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks, 9, 1265–1279.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Mukamel, R., Ekstrom, A., Kaplan, J., Iacoboni, M., & Fried, I. (2010). Single neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Current Biology, 20, 750–756.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mukamel, R., Ekstrom, A., Kaplan, J., Iacoboni, M., & Fried, I. (2010). Single neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Current Biology, 20, 750–756.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ong, N. T., Larssen, B., & Hodges, N. J. (2012). In the absence of physical practice, observation and imagery do not result in the updating of internal models for aiming. Experimental Brain Research, 218, 9–19.PubMedCrossRef Ong, N. T., Larssen, B., & Hodges, N. J. (2012). In the absence of physical practice, observation and imagery do not result in the updating of internal models for aiming. Experimental Brain Research, 218, 9–19.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pobric, G., & Hamilton, A. F. (2006). Action understanding requires the left inferior frontal cortex. Current Biology, 16, 524–529.PubMedCrossRef Pobric, G., & Hamilton, A. F. (2006). Action understanding requires the left inferior frontal cortex. Current Biology, 16, 524–529.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Prinz, W. (1992). Why don’t we perceive our brain states? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1–20.CrossRef Prinz, W. (1992). Why don’t we perceive our brain states? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1–20.CrossRef
go back to reference Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154.CrossRef Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154.CrossRef
go back to reference Prinz, W., & Hommel, B. (2002). Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance, Vol. XIX. New York: Oxford University Press. Prinz, W., & Hommel, B. (2002). Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance, Vol. XIX. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Reithler, J., van Mier, H. I., Peters, J. C., & Goebel, R. (2007). Nonvisual motor learning influences abstract action observation. Current Biology, 17, 1201–1207.PubMedCrossRef Reithler, J., van Mier, H. I., Peters, J. C., & Goebel, R. (2007). Nonvisual motor learning influences abstract action observation. Current Biology, 17, 1201–1207.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.PubMedCrossRef Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661–670.PubMedCrossRef Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661–670.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Runeson, S., Juslin, P., & Olsson, H. (2000). Visual perception of dynamic properties: Cue heuristic versus direct perceptual competence. Psychological Review, 107, 525–555.PubMedCrossRef Runeson, S., Juslin, P., & Olsson, H. (2000). Visual perception of dynamic properties: Cue heuristic versus direct perceptual competence. Psychological Review, 107, 525–555.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Saygin, A. P. (2007). Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception. Brain, 130, 2452–2461.PubMedCrossRef Saygin, A. P. (2007). Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception. Brain, 130, 2452–2461.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schubotz, R. I. (2007). Prediction of external events with our motor system: Towards a new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 211–218.PubMedCrossRef Schubotz, R. I. (2007). Prediction of external events with our motor system: Towards a new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 211–218.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schutz-Bosbach, S., & Prinz, W. (2007). Perceptual resonance: Action-induced modulation of perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 349–355.PubMedCrossRef Schutz-Bosbach, S., & Prinz, W. (2007). Perceptual resonance: Action-induced modulation of perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 349–355.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Smith, J. E. K. (1982). Simple algorithms for m-alternative forced choice calculations. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 95–96.CrossRef Smith, J. E. K. (1982). Simple algorithms for m-alternative forced choice calculations. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 95–96.CrossRef
go back to reference Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 137–149.CrossRef Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 137–149.CrossRef
go back to reference Tunney, R. J., & Shanks, D. R. (2003). Subjective measures of awareness and implicit cognition. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1060–1071.CrossRef Tunney, R. J., & Shanks, D. R. (2003). Subjective measures of awareness and implicit cognition. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1060–1071.CrossRef
go back to reference Urgesi, C., Savonitto, M. M., Fabbro, F., & Aglioti, M. (2011). Long- and short-term plastic modeling of action prediction abilities in volleyball. Psychological Research, 76(4), 542–560.PubMedCrossRef Urgesi, C., Savonitto, M. M., Fabbro, F., & Aglioti, M. (2011). Long- and short-term plastic modeling of action prediction abilities in volleyball. Psychological Research, 76(4), 542–560.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ward, P., Williams, A. M., & Bennett, S. J. (2002). Visual search and biological motion perception in tennis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 107–112.PubMedCrossRef Ward, P., Williams, A. M., & Bennett, S. J. (2002). Visual search and biological motion perception in tennis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 107–112.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Williams, A. M., & Davids, K. (1995). Declarative knowledge in sport: A by-product of experience or a characteristic of expertise? Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 259–275. Williams, A. M., & Davids, K. (1995). Declarative knowledge in sport: A by-product of experience or a characteristic of expertise? Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 259–275.
go back to reference Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 460–473.PubMedCrossRef Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 460–473.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wright, R. L., & Burton, A. M. (1995). Implicit learning of an invariant: Just say no. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 783–796.CrossRef Wright, R. L., & Burton, A. M. (1995). Implicit learning of an invariant: Just say no. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 783–796.CrossRef
go back to reference Zago, M., & Lacquaniti, F. (2005). Visual perception and interception of falling objects: A review of evidence for an internal model of gravity. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2, S198–S208.PubMedCrossRef Zago, M., & Lacquaniti, F. (2005). Visual perception and interception of falling objects: A review of evidence for an internal model of gravity. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2, S198–S208.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Throwing in the dark: improved prediction of action outcomes following motor training without vision of the action
Auteurs
Desmond Mulligan
Nicola J. Hodges
Publicatiedatum
01-09-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0526-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2014

Psychological Research 5/2014 Naar de uitgave