Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Accumulating laboratory-based evidence indicates that reducing delay discounting (devaluation of delayed outcomes) with the use of episodic future thinking (EFT; mental simulation of future events) improves dietary decision-making and other maladaptive behaviors. Recent work has adapted EFT for use in the natural environment to aid in dietary and weight control by engaging participants in EFT repeatedly throughout the day. These efforts may benefit from minimizing the amount of time required for measurement and implementation of EFT. Using Amazon Mechanical Turk in the present study, we show that EFT effectively reduces delay discounting in overweight/obese participants (N = 131) using the recently developed 5-trial, adjusting-delay discounting task, which can be completed rapidly (25 s) and is therefore ideally suited for ecological momentary assessment. Moreover, measures of delay discounting from this task were strongly correlated with those from the commonly used adjusting-amount task (r = .859). Significant effects of EFT on discounting, however, depended on the number of future events participants generated and imagined. Use of a range of events and future time frames (as is typical in the literature) significantly reduced delay discounting, whereas use of only a single event did not.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Bickel, W. K., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Mueller, E. T., Koffarnus, M. N., & Gatchalian, K. M. (2012). Excessive discounting of delayed reinforcers as a trans-disease process contributing to addiction and other disease-related vulnerabilities: Emerging evidence. Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 134(3), 287–297. CrossRef
Daniel, T. O., Sawyer, A., Dong, Y., Bickel, W. K., & Epstein, L. H. (2016). Remembering versus imagining: When does episodic retrospection and episodic prospection aid decision making? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(3), 352–358. CrossRef
Du, W., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2002). Cross-cultural comparisons of discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards. The Psychological Record, 52(4), 479. CrossRef
MacLeod, A. K., & Salaminiou, E. (2001). Reduced positive future-thinking in depression: Cognitive and affective factors. Cognition and Emotion, 15(1), 99–107. CrossRef
Madden, G. J., & Johnson, P. S. (2010). A delay-discounting primer. In G. J. Madden & W. K. Bickel (Eds.), Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurological science of discounting (pp. 11–37). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. CrossRef
Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative analysis of behavior. The effect of delay and of intervening events of reinforcement value (Vol. 5, pp. 55–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Reach, G., Michault, A., Bihan, H., Paulino, C., Cohen, R., & Le Clésiau, H. (2011). Patients’ impatience is an independent determinant of poor diabetes control. Diabetes & Metabolism, 37(6), 497–504. CrossRef
Sze, Y. Y., Stein, J. S., Bickel, W. K., Paluch, P. A., & Epstein, L. H. (2017). Bleak present, bright future: Online episodic future thinking, scarcity, delay discounting and food demand. Clinical Psychological Science. doi: 10.1177/2167702617696511.
- Think fast: rapid assessment of the effects of episodic future thinking on delay discounting in overweight/obese participants
Jeffrey S. Stein
Yan Yan Sze
Mikhail N. Koffarnus
Leonard H. Epstein
Warren K. Bickel
- Springer US