Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in:

05-12-2018

The weight-specific adolescent instrument for economic evaluation (WAItE): psychometric evaluation using a Rasch model approach

Auteurs: Yemi Oluboyede, Adam B. Smith, Andrew Hill, Claire Hulme

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 4/2019

Abstract

Purpose

The Weight-specific Adolescent Instrument for Economic evaluation (WAItE) is a 7-item condition-specific tool assessing the impact of weight status on seven dimensions of quality of life. The content of the WAItE was developed with both treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking adolescents aged 11–18 years. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the WAItE in adolescent and adult populations.

Methods

Treatment-seeking adolescents with obesity (females n = 155; males n = 123; mean age = 13.3; 13.1 years, respectively) completed the WAItE twice. An adult general population sample completed the WAItE via an online survey (females n = 236; males n = 231; mean age = 41.2; 44.3 years, respectively). The Partial Credit Model was applied to the data and item fit evaluated against published criteria.

Results

The WAItE had a unidimensional structure both for adolescents and adults. There was no item misfit observed for either participant samples and no differential item functioning (DIF) was present by age or gender for the adolescents. Some DIF was observed across age groups for the adult sample. For the adolescent sample, stable item locations were observed over time.

Conclusions

The aim of the WAItE is to assess the impact of weight status on the lives of adolescents in cost-effectiveness evaluation of weight management programmes. The results of this study demonstrated that the WAItE has reliable psychometric properties. The instrument may therefore be used to aid informed decision around the identification of cost-effective weight management programmes in both adolescent and adult populations.

vorige artikel Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale by gender, age, marital status and educational level

volgende artikel SF-36 normative values according to level of functioning in older women

Griffiths, L., Parsons, T., & Hill, A. (2010). Self-esteem and quality of life in obese children and adolescents: A systematic review. International Journal of Paediatric Obesity, 5(4), 282–304. CrossRef

Tsiros, M., Olds, T., Buckley, J., Grimshaw, P., Brennan, L., Walkley, J., et al. (2009). Health-related quality of life in obese children and adolescents. International Journal of Obesity, 33, 387–400. CrossRef

National-Institute-for-Clinical-Excellence. (April 2013). Guide to the methods of technology appraisal.

Ravens-Sieberer, U., Redegeld, M., & Bullinger, M. (2001). Quality of life after in-patient rehabilitation in children with obesity. [Research Support. Non-U.S. Gov’t]. International Journal of Obesity & Related Metabolic Disorders: Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 25(Suppl 1), S63–S65. CrossRef

Kolotkin, R., Zeller, M., Modi, A., Samsa, G., Quinlan, N., Yanovski, J., et al. (2006). Assessing weight-related quality of life in adolescents. [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t Validation Studies]. Obesity, 14(3), 448–457. CrossRefPubMed

Moorehead, M., Ardelt-Gattinger, E., Lechner, H., & Oria, H. (2003). The validation of the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II. Obesity Surgery, 13(5), 684–692. CrossRefPubMed

Zeller, M., & Modi, A. (2009). Development and initial validation of an obesity-specific quality-of-life measure for children: sizing me up. Obesity, 17(6), 1171–1177. PubMed

Morales, L., Edwards, T., Flores, Y., Barr, L., & Patrick, D. (2011). Measurement properties of a multicultural weight-specific quality-of-life instrument for children and adolescents. [Validation Studies]. Quality of Life Research, 20(2), 215–224. CrossRefPubMed

Brazier, J., Ratcliffe, J., Salomon, J., & Tsuchiya, A. (2007). Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

10.

Oluboyede, Y., Hulme, C., & Hill, A. (2017). Development and refinement of the WAItE: A new obesity-specific quality of life measure for adolescents. Quality of Life Research, 26(8), 2025–2039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1561-1. CrossRefPubMed

11.

Oluboyede, O. (2013). Quality of life assessment in adolescent obesity: Development of a new instrument for economic evaluation. Leeds: University of Leeds.

12.

Prieto, L., Alonso, J., & Lamarca, R. (2003). Classical test theory versus Rasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reduction. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-27. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

More-Life. http://www.more-life.co.uk/. Retrieved September 2017.

14.

Watch-It-Programmes. https://www.leedscommunityhealthcare.nhs.uk/our-services-a-z/watch-it-family-weight-management-service/watch-it-programmes/. Retrieved September 2017.

15.

Cole, T., Freeman, J., & Preece, M. (1995). Body mass index reference curves for the UK, 1990. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 73, 25–29. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Gately, P., Cooke, C., Barth, J., Bewick, B., Radley, D., & Hill, A. (2005). Children’s residential weight-loss programs can work: A prospective cohort study of short-term outcomes for overweight and obese children. Pediatrics, 116(1), 73–77. CrossRefPubMed

17.

Linacre, J. (2014). A user’s guide to Winsteps.

18.

Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Reprinted 1980.

19.

Masters, G. N. (1982). A rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02296272. CrossRef

20.

Smith, A. B., Rush, R., Fallowfield, L. J., Velikova, G., & Sharpe, M. (2008). Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 33–33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-33. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Raîche, G. (2005). Critical eigenvalue sizes (variances) in standardized residual principal components analysis. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 19:1, 1012.

22.

Lord, F. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

23.

Lai, J.-S., Teresi, J., & Gershon, R. (2005). Procedures for the analysis of differential item functioning (DIF) for small sample sizes. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 28(3), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278705278276. CrossRef

24.

Ratcliffe, J., Stevens, K., Flynn, T., Brazier, J., & Sawyer, M. (2012). An assessment of the construct validity of the CHU9D in the Australian adolescent general population. Quality of Life Research, 21(4), 717–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9971-y. CrossRefPubMed

25.

Ravens-Sieberer, U., Gosch, A., Rajmil, L., Erhart, M., Bruil, J., Power, M., et al. (2008). The KIDSCREEN-52 quality of life measure for children and adolescents: psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 european countries. Value in Health, 11(4), 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00291.x. CrossRefPubMed

26.

Amin, L., Rosenbaum, P., Barr, R., Sung, L., Klaassen, R. J., Dix, D. B., et al. (2012). Rasch analysis of the PedsQL: An increased understanding of the properties of a rating scale. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65(10), 1117–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.04.014. CrossRefPubMed

Titel: The weight-specific adolescent instrument for economic evaluation (WAItE): psychometric evaluation using a Rasch model approach
Auteurs: Yemi Oluboyede
Adam B. Smith
Andrew Hill
Claire Hulme
Publicatiedatum: 05-12-2018
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2074-2

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2019

Is it possible to determine the level of functional impairment that distinguishes the patients with ADHD from those without ADHD?

Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale by gender, age, marital status and educational level

Defining the cut-off point of clinically significant postoperative fatigue in three common fatigue scales

Communication changes with laryngectomy and impact on quality of life: a review

Assessing test–retest reliability of patient-reported outcome measures using intraclass correlation coefficients: recommendations for selecting and documenting the analytical formula

Perceived social support from teachers and classmates does not moderate the inverse association between body mass index and health-related quality of life in adolescents