Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The stimulus–response compatibility (SRC) effect refers to the phenomenon that responses are faster and more accurate when stimulus and response correspond than when they do not. The phenomenon is robust in that it is observed even when SRC is irrelevant to performing the task, a variant known as the Simon effect. Recent studies also demonstrated that responses are faster when they are spatially compatible with their effects in the environment (action effects) than when they are incompatible. This response–effect (R–E) compatibility effect is thought to stem from the fact that stimuli first activate anticipated effect codes, which then activate corresponding action codes. In the present study, the Simon task was used to examine influences of multiple response components on performance. Three response components were orthogonally manipulated. The results of three experiments indicated that there are two separate processes that are influenced by R–E compatibility; one that is responsible for the SRC effect (S–R translation) and the other that is independent of SRC (action programming). The influence of R–E compatibility on the former process depended on manipulations that varied attentional demands of the task.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Guiard, Y. (1983). The lateral coding of rotations: A study of the Simon effect with wheel-rotation responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 331–342. PubMed
Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention. Psychological Research, 55, 270–279. CrossRef
Hommel, B. (2010). The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. Acta Psychologica. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.04.011
Lien, M.-C., & Proctor, R. W. (2002). Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 212–238. CrossRef
Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207. CrossRef
Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2006). Stimulus-response compatibility principles: Data, theory and application. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Roswarski, T. E., & Proctor, R. W. (1996). Multiple spatial codes and temporal overlap in choice-reaction tasks. Psychological Research, 59, 196–211. CrossRef
Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31–86). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Wang, D.-Y. D., Proctor, R. W., & Pick, D. F. (2007). Coding controlled and triggered cursor movements as action effects: Influences on the auditory Simon effect for wheel-rotation responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 657–669.
Yamaguchi, M., & Proctor, R. W. (2010). Compatibility of motion information in two attitude displays for tracking task. American Journal of Psychology, 123, 81–92. PubMed
- The Simon task with multi-component responses: two loci of response–effect compatibility
Robert W. Proctor