Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 2/2007

01-03-2007 | Original Article

The Simon effect for vertical S–R relations: changing the mechanism by randomly varying the S–R mapping rule?

Auteurs: Katrin Wiegand, Edmund Wascher

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 2/2007

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Recent findings indicate that the shape of the effect function of the Simon effect—derived by analysing the response time distribution for corresponding and non-corresponding trials—differs depending on the task. Specifically, decreasing effect functions have been reported for horizontal and stable rather increasing effect functions have been obtained for vertical stimulus–response (S–R) relations. Furthermore, it has been assumed that these differences reflect distinct mechanisms underlying the Simon effect. However, in two studies decreasing effect functions were reported for the vertical dimension. In order to investigate these contradictory findings four experiments were conducted. Since both studies—in which a decreasing effect function was obtained—used a modified version of the Simon task, that is, randomly varying S–R mapping rules, the Simon effect for fixed and random S–R mapping rules was investigated using vertical (Experiments 1, 2, and 4) and horizontal (Experiment 3) S–R relations. The results indicate that randomly varying S–R mapping rules affect the shape of the effect function for vertical but not for horizontal S–R relations. It was concluded that these findings indicate that the alternation of S–R mapping rules changes the information processing for the vertical dimension in a way, that the same mechanism as for horizontal S–R relations occurs.
Voetnoten
1
In order to control for carry-over effects an additional ANOVA including the between subjects factor block order was conducted. The results revealed that this factor had no influence on this interaction (F[8,120] = 0.22; p > .7).
 
2
Because of the non-linearity of the effect function and inter-individual differences, an analysis of the slope of the effect function is problematic. However, since the (non-)existence of slope differences between the two conditions is crucial for the hypothesis tested, an additional analysis of the slopes—within the overlapping time range of the two effect functions - was conducted. This was done, by fitting linear regression functions (of the form Y=a+b*[mean bin RT]) to parts of the effect functions obtained for each subject (see also, de Jong et al., 1994). For the fixed mapping condition bin six to nine, and for the random mapping condition bin two to five were included in the analysis. The obtained slope parameters for the two conditions (on average −0.11 for fixed and −0.10 for random mapping) were compared by paired t-tests, which indicated no differences between the two conditions (t(12) = 0.1; p > 0.9).
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Ansorge, U. (2003). Influences of response-activating stimuli and passage of time on the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 67(3), 174–183.CrossRefPubMed Ansorge, U. (2003). Influences of response-activating stimuli and passage of time on the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 67(3), 174–183.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Balota, D. A., & Spieler, D. H. (1999). Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: Beyond measures of central tendency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(1), 32–55.CrossRef Balota, D. A., & Spieler, D. H. (1999). Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: Beyond measures of central tendency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(1), 32–55.CrossRef
go back to reference De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(4), 731–750.CrossRefPubMed De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(4), 731–750.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Eimer, M., Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (1995). S–R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica, 90(1–3), 301–313.CrossRef Eimer, M., Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (1995). S–R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica, 90(1–3), 301–313.CrossRef
go back to reference Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S–R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199–210.PubMedCrossRef Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S–R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199–210.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Heister, G., Schroeder-Heister, P., & Ehrenstein, W. H. (1990). Spatial coding and spatio-anatomical mapping: Evidence for a hierarchical model of spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 117–143). Amsterdam: North-Holland. Heister, G., Schroeder-Heister, P., & Ehrenstein, W. H. (1990). Spatial coding and spatio-anatomical mapping: Evidence for a hierarchical model of spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 117–143). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55(4), 280–290.CrossRef Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55(4), 280–290.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56(4), 261–268.CrossRefPubMed Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56(4), 261–268.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1995). Conflict versus misguided search as explanation of S–R correspondence effects. Acta Psychologica, 89(1), 37–51.CrossRef Hommel, B. (1995). Conflict versus misguided search as explanation of S–R correspondence effects. Acta Psychologica, 89(1), 37–51.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(5), 1368–1384.CrossRefPubMed Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(5), 1368–1384.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hommel, B. (2000). The prepared reflex: automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In Monsell S. & Driver J. (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 247–273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Hommel, B. (2000). The prepared reflex: automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In Monsell S. & Driver J. (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 247–273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Hommel, B., & Eglau, B. (2002). Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Psychological Research, 66, 260–273.CrossRefPubMed Hommel, B., & Eglau, B. (2002). Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Psychological Research, 66, 260–273.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRefPubMed Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional Overlap: Cognitive Basis for Stimulus-Response Compatibility-A Model and Taxonomy. Psychological Review April, 97(2), 253–270.CrossRef Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional Overlap: Cognitive Basis for Stimulus-Response Compatibility-A Model and Taxonomy. Psychological Review April, 97(2), 253–270.CrossRef
go back to reference Mapelli, D., Rusconi, E., & Umiltà, C. (2003). The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect? Cognition, 88(3), B1-B10.CrossRefPubMed Mapelli, D., Rusconi, E., & Umiltà, C. (2003). The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect? Cognition, 88(3), B1-B10.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mewhort, D. J., Braun, J. G., & Heathcote, A. (1992). Response time distributions and the Stroop task: A test of the Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland (1990) model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 872–882.CrossRefPubMed Mewhort, D. J., Braun, J. G., & Heathcote, A. (1992). Response time distributions and the Stroop task: A test of the Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland (1990) model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 872–882.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Proctor, R. W., Vu, K.-P. L., & Nicoletti, R. (2003). Does right-left prevalence occur for the Simon effect? Perception and Psychophysics, 65(8), 1318–1329.PubMed Proctor, R. W., Vu, K.-P. L., & Nicoletti, R. (2003). Does right-left prevalence occur for the Simon effect? Perception and Psychophysics, 65(8), 1318–1329.PubMed
go back to reference Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group Reaction Time Distributions and an Analysis of Distribution Statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 446–461.CrossRefPubMed Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group Reaction Time Distributions and an Analysis of Distribution Statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 446–461.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002a). Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 494–519): Oxford University Press. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002a). Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 494–519): Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002b). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research, 66(4), 312–323.CrossRefPubMed Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002b). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research, 66(4), 312–323.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Roswarski, T. E., & Proctor, R. W. (2003). Intrahemispherical Activation, Visuomotor Transmission, and the Simon Effect: Comment on Wascher et al. (2001). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 152–158.PubMedCrossRef Roswarski, T. E., & Proctor, R. W. (2003). Intrahemispherical Activation, Visuomotor Transmission, and the Simon Effect: Comment on Wascher et al. (2001). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 152–158.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Simon, J. R., Acosta, E., Mewaldt, S. P., & Speidel, C. R. (1976). The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing. Perception and Psychophysics, 19(1), 16–22. Simon, J. R., Acosta, E., Mewaldt, S. P., & Speidel, C. R. (1976). The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing. Perception and Psychophysics, 19(1), 16–22.
go back to reference Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S–R Compatibility - Effect of an Irrelevant Cue on Information Processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51(3), 300–304.PubMedCrossRef Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S–R Compatibility - Effect of an Irrelevant Cue on Information Processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51(3), 300–304.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Stuermer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schroeter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(6), 1345–1363.CrossRef Stuermer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schroeter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(6), 1345–1363.CrossRef
go back to reference Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C., & Bassignani, F. (2000). The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(2), 648–670.CrossRefPubMed Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C., & Bassignani, F. (2000). The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(2), 648–670.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Valle-Inclán, F., & Redondo, M. (1998). On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect. Psychophysiology, 35(4), 366–371.CrossRefPubMed Valle-Inclán, F., & Redondo, M. (1998). On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect. Psychophysiology, 35(4), 366–371.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Vallesi, A., Mapelli, D., Schiff, S., Amodio, P., & Umiltà, C. (2005). Horizontal and vertical Simon effect: different underlying mechanisms? Cognition, 96, B33-B43.CrossRefPubMed Vallesi, A., Mapelli, D., Schiff, S., Amodio, P., & Umiltà, C. (2005). Horizontal and vertical Simon effect: different underlying mechanisms? Cognition, 96, B33-B43.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wascher, E., Schatz, U., Kuder, T., & Verleger, R. (2001). Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(3), 731–751.CrossRefPubMed Wascher, E., Schatz, U., Kuder, T., & Verleger, R. (2001). Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(3), 731–751.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wascher, E., Verleger, R., & Wauschkuhn, B. (1996). In pursuit of the Simon effect: The effect of S–R compatibility investigated by event-related potentials. Journal of Psychophysiology, 10(4), 336–346. Wascher, E., Verleger, R., & Wauschkuhn, B. (1996). In pursuit of the Simon effect: The effect of S–R compatibility investigated by event-related potentials. Journal of Psychophysiology, 10(4), 336–346.
go back to reference Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E. (2005). Dynamic Aspects of S–R Correspondence: Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(3), 453–464.CrossRefPubMed Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E. (2005). Dynamic Aspects of S–R Correspondence: Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(3), 453–464.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Zhang, J., & Kornblum, S. (1997). Distributional analysis and De Jong, Liang, and Lauber’s (1994) dual-process model of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(5), 1543–1551.CrossRef Zhang, J., & Kornblum, S. (1997). Distributional analysis and De Jong, Liang, and Lauber’s (1994) dual-process model of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(5), 1543–1551.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The Simon effect for vertical S–R relations: changing the mechanism by randomly varying the S–R mapping rule?
Auteurs
Katrin Wiegand
Edmund Wascher
Publicatiedatum
01-03-2007
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 2/2007
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0023-5

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2007

Psychological Research 2/2007 Naar de uitgave