Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies 1/2006

01-02-2006

The Role of Fidelity and Feedback in the Wraparound Approach

Auteurs: Benjamin M. Ogles, Ph.D., David Carlston, Ph.D., Derek Hatfield, M.S., Gregorio Melendez, Ph.D., Kathy Dowell, Ph.D., Scott A. Fields, Ph.D.

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies | Uitgave 1/2006

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Wraparound approaches are being implemented with children in many mental health systems around the country. Evidence for the effectiveness of the wraparound approach, however, is limited. In addition, the degree to which wraparound interventions adhere to the principles of wraparound has rarely been assessed. We examined the influence of adherence to wraparound principles and outcome feedback within the wraparound approach. Children participating in family team meetings were enrolled in a feedback or no feedback condition. Teams receiving feedback were given a brief report regarding outcome progress four times over a three-month period. In addition, adherence to wraparound principles was assessed in the initial team meeting and examined in relationship to outcome at three months and nine months. Although youth in both feedback and non-feedback groups improved with intervention, there were few differences between the groups based on outcome feedback. Similarly, adherence was uniformly high and did not influence the outcome for individual cases. Although the wraparound approach was helpful for youth in our sample, outcome feedback and adherence to wraparound principles had limited influence on these effects.
Literatuur
go back to reference Battle, C. C., Imber, S. D., Hoehn-Saric, R., Stone, A. R., Nash, E. H., & Frank, J. D. (1966). Target complaints as a criteria of improvement. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 20, 184–192. Battle, C. C., Imber, S. D., Hoehn-Saric, R., Stone, A. R., Nash, E. H., & Frank, J. D. (1966). Target complaints as a criteria of improvement. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 20, 184–192.
go back to reference Bickman, L., Smith, D. M., Lambert, E. W., & Andrade, M. R. (2003). Evaluation of a congressionally mandated wraparound demonstration. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12, 135–157.CrossRef Bickman, L., Smith, D. M., Lambert, E. W., & Andrade, M. R. (2003). Evaluation of a congressionally mandated wraparound demonstration. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12, 135–157.CrossRef
go back to reference Brown, R. A., & Hill, B. A. (1996). Opportunity for change: Exploring an alternative to residential treatment. Child Welfare, 75, 35–57. Brown, R. A., & Hill, B. A. (1996). Opportunity for change: Exploring an alternative to residential treatment. Child Welfare, 75, 35–57.
go back to reference Burchard, J. D., & Clark, R. T. (1990). The role of individualized care in a service delivery system for children and adolescents with severely maladjusted behavior. The Journal of Mental Health Administration, 17, 48–60.CrossRef Burchard, J. D., & Clark, R. T. (1990). The role of individualized care in a service delivery system for children and adolescents with severely maladjusted behavior. The Journal of Mental Health Administration, 17, 48–60.CrossRef
go back to reference Burns, E. J., Burchard, J. D., & Yoe, J. T. (1995). Evaluating the Vermont system of care: Outcomes associated with community-based wraparound services. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 4, 321–339.CrossRef Burns, E. J., Burchard, J. D., & Yoe, J. T. (1995). Evaluating the Vermont system of care: Outcomes associated with community-based wraparound services. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 4, 321–339.CrossRef
go back to reference Burns, B. J., Schoenwald, S. K., Burchard, J. D., Faw, L., & Santos, A. B. (2000). Comprehensive community-based interventions for youth with severe emotional disorders: Multisystemic therapy and the wraparound approach. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 9, 283–315.CrossRef Burns, B. J., Schoenwald, S. K., Burchard, J. D., Faw, L., & Santos, A. B. (2000). Comprehensive community-based interventions for youth with severe emotional disorders: Multisystemic therapy and the wraparound approach. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 9, 283–315.CrossRef
go back to reference Clark, H. B., Lee, B., Prange, M. E., & McDonald, B. A. (1996). Children lost within the foster care system: Can wraparound service strategies improve placement outcomes? Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 39–54.CrossRef Clark, H. B., Lee, B., Prange, M. E., & McDonald, B. A. (1996). Children lost within the foster care system: Can wraparound service strategies improve placement outcomes? Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 39–54.CrossRef
go back to reference Eber, L., Osuch, R., & Redditt, C. A. (1996). School-based applications of the wraparound process: Early results on service provision and student outcomes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 83–99.CrossRef Eber, L., Osuch, R., & Redditt, C. A. (1996). School-based applications of the wraparound process: Early results on service provision and student outcomes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 83–99.CrossRef
go back to reference Epstein, M. H., Jayanthi, M., McKelvey, J., Frankenberry, E., Hardy, R., & Dennis, K. (1998). Reliability of the Wraparound Observation Form: An instrument to measure the wraparound process. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 7, 161–170.CrossRef Epstein, M. H., Jayanthi, M., McKelvey, J., Frankenberry, E., Hardy, R., & Dennis, K. (1998). Reliability of the Wraparound Observation Form: An instrument to measure the wraparound process. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 7, 161–170.CrossRef
go back to reference Hart, R. R. (1978). Therapeutic effectiveness of setting and monitoring goals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 1242–1245.CrossRef Hart, R. R. (1978). Therapeutic effectiveness of setting and monitoring goals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 1242–1245.CrossRef
go back to reference Kanfer, F. H., & Gaelick-Buys, L. (1991). Self-management methods. In F. H. Kanfer & A. P. Goldstein (Eds.). Helping people change (4th ed.; pp. 305–360). New York: Pergamon. Kanfer, F. H., & Gaelick-Buys, L. (1991). Self-management methods. In F. H. Kanfer & A. P. Goldstein (Eds.). Helping people change (4th ed.; pp. 305–360). New York: Pergamon.
go back to reference Kiresuk, T. J., Smith, A., & Cardillo, J. E. (Eds.). (1994). Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory, and measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Kiresuk, T. J., Smith, A., & Cardillo, J. E. (Eds.). (1994). Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory, and measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
go back to reference Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Smart, D. W., Vermeersch, D. A., Nielsen, S. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2001). The effects of providing therapists with feedback on patient progress during psychotherapy: Are outcomes enhanced? Psychotherapy Research, 11, 49–68.CrossRef Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Smart, D. W., Vermeersch, D. A., Nielsen, S. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2001). The effects of providing therapists with feedback on patient progress during psychotherapy: Are outcomes enhanced? Psychotherapy Research, 11, 49–68.CrossRef
go back to reference Lueger, R. J. (1998). Using feedback on patient progress to predict the outcome of psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 383–393.CrossRef Lueger, R. J. (1998). Using feedback on patient progress to predict the outcome of psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 383–393.CrossRef
go back to reference Myaard, M. J. (2000). Applying behavior analysis within the wraparound process: A multiple baseline study. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 216–229.CrossRef Myaard, M. J. (2000). Applying behavior analysis within the wraparound process: A multiple baseline study. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 216–229.CrossRef
go back to reference Ogles, B. M., Hatfield, D., Carlston, D., Fields, S. A., Dowell, K., & Melendez, G. (2002). The role of fidelity and feedback in the wraparound approach: initial data. New Research in Mental Health: 2000-2001 Biennium, 15, 240–245. Ogles, B. M., Hatfield, D., Carlston, D., Fields, S. A., Dowell, K., & Melendez, G. (2002). The role of fidelity and feedback in the wraparound approach: initial data. New Research in Mental Health: 2000-2001 Biennium, 15, 240–245.
go back to reference Ogles, B. M., Melendez, G., Davis, D. C., & Lunnen, K. M. (2001). The Ohio Scales: Practical outcome assessment. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 10, 199–212.CrossRef Ogles, B. M., Melendez, G., Davis, D. C., & Lunnen, K. M. (2001). The Ohio Scales: Practical outcome assessment. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 10, 199–212.CrossRef
go back to reference Olson, D. H., Portner, J., & Lavee, Y. (1985). FACES-III. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota. Olson, D. H., Portner, J., & Lavee, Y. (1985). FACES-III. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota.
go back to reference Rosenblatt, A. (1996). Bows and ribbons, tape and twine: Wrapping the wraparound process for children with multi-system needs. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 101–116.CrossRef Rosenblatt, A. (1996). Bows and ribbons, tape and twine: Wrapping the wraparound process for children with multi-system needs. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 101–116.CrossRef
go back to reference Stroul, B. A., & Friedman, R. M. (1986). A system of care for children and youth with severe emotionally disturbances (Rev. Ed.). Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Child Development Center. Stroul, B. A., & Friedman, R. M. (1986). A system of care for children and youth with severe emotionally disturbances (Rev. Ed.). Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Child Development Center.
go back to reference Toffalo, D. A. D. (2000). An investigation of treatment integrity and outcomes in wraparound services. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 9, 351–361.CrossRef Toffalo, D. A. D. (2000). An investigation of treatment integrity and outcomes in wraparound services. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 9, 351–361.CrossRef
go back to reference VanDenBerg, J. E., & Grealish, E. M. (1996). Individualized services and supports through the wraparound process: Philosophies and procedures. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 7–21.CrossRef VanDenBerg, J. E., & Grealish, E. M. (1996). Individualized services and supports through the wraparound process: Philosophies and procedures. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 7–21.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The Role of Fidelity and Feedback in the Wraparound Approach
Auteurs
Benjamin M. Ogles, Ph.D.
David Carlston, Ph.D.
Derek Hatfield, M.S.
Gregorio Melendez, Ph.D.
Kathy Dowell, Ph.D.
Scott A. Fields, Ph.D.
Publicatiedatum
01-02-2006
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Child and Family Studies / Uitgave 1/2006
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-005-9008-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2006

Journal of Child and Family Studies 1/2006 Naar de uitgave

BookReview

Book Review