Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Two experiments investigated the effect of facial expressions on clinically-relevant ambiguity resolution in a nonclinical sample. Experiment 1 investigated the effect of negative facial feedback (frowning) on a basic threat-interpretation bias procedure using a homophone spelling task and found that participants in a frowning condition interpreted significantly more threat/neutral homophones as threats than did participants in a neutral control condition. Experiment 2 investigated how frowning affected interpretation of bodily sensations. The findings indicated that participants in the frowning condition generated fewer positive consequences for bodily sensation scenarios and also rated the imagined bodily sensations as more negative and more of a cause for health concern. These effects could not simply be explained by differences in self-reported mood or by demand characteristics. These findings suggest that facial expressions have a moderating effect on the cognitive processes that contribute to clinically-relevant ambiguity resolution, and this has implications for clinical interventions.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Adelman, P. K., & Zajonc, R. B. (1989). Facial efference and the experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 249–280. CrossRef
Barlow, D. H. (2002). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic. New York: Guilford Press.
Blanchette, I., & Richards, A. (2003). Anxiety and the interpretation of ambiguous information: Beyond the emotion-congruent effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 294–309.
Blanchette, I., & Richards, A. (2010). The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgment, decision making and reasoning. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 561–595. CrossRef
Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1983). Cognitive processes in anxiety. Advances in Behaviour Research & Therapy, 5, 51–62. CrossRef
Byrne, A., & Eysenck, M. W. (1993). Individual differences in positive and negative interpretive biases. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 849–851. CrossRef
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Losch, M. E., & Kim, H. S. (1989). Electromyographic activity over facial muscle regions can differentiate the valence and intensity of affective reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 260–268. CrossRef
Camras, L. A., Holland, E. A., & Patterson, M. J. (1993). Facial expression. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 199–208). New York: Guilford.
Cavanagh, K., & Davey, G. C. L. (2004). Access to information about harm and safety in spider fearful and non-fearful individuals: When they were good they were very very good but when they were bad they were horrid. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 34, 269–281. CrossRef
Clark, D. M. (1986). A cognitive approach to panic. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 348–351.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Davey, G. C. L. (2006). Cognitive mechanisms in fear acquisition and maintenance. In M. G. Craske, D. Hermans & D. Vansteenwegen (Eds.), Fear and learning: From basic processes to clinical implications (pp. 99–116). Washington, DC, US.
Davey, G. C. L., Hampton, J., Farrell, J., & Davidson, S. (1992). Some characteristics of worrying: Evidence for worrying and anxiety as separate constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 133–147. CrossRef
Dimberg, U., & Söderkvist, S. (2011). The voluntary facial action technique: A method to test the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 35, 17–33. CrossRef
Duclos, S. E., Laird, J. D., Schneider, E., Sexter, M., Stern, L., & Van Lighten, O. (1989). Emotion-specific effects of facial expressions and postures on emotional experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 100–108. CrossRef
Ekman, P., Levenson, R. W., & Friesen, W. V. (1983). Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes between emotions. Science, 22L, 1208–1210.
Flack, W. F., Laird, J. D., & Cavallaro, L. A. (1999). Separate and combined effects of facial expressions and bodily postures on emotional feelings. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 203–217. CrossRef
Halberstadt, J. B., Niedenthal, P. M., & Kushner, J. (1995). Resolution of lexical ambiguity by emotional state. Psychological Science, 6, 278–282. CrossRef
Harrigan, J. A., & O’Connell, D. M. (1996). How do you look when feeling anxious? Facial displays of anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 205–212. CrossRef
Hertel, P. T., Mathews, A., Peterson, S., & Kinter, K. (2003). Transfer of training emotionally biased interpretations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 775–784. CrossRef
Hoch, J. S. (1984). Availability and interference in predictive judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 649–662. CrossRef
Laird, J. D., Cuniff, M., Sheehan, K., Shulman, D., & Strum, G. (1989). Emotion specific effects of facial expressions on memory for life events. In D. Kuiken (Ed) Mood and memory: Theory, research and applications (Special Issue). Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 4, 87–98.
Larsen, R. J., Kasimatis, M., & Frey, K. (1992). Facilitating the furrowed brow: An unobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis applied to unpleasant affect. Cognition and Emotion, 6(5), 321–338. CrossRef
Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2002). Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 331–354. CrossRef
McIntosh, D. N. (1996). Facial feedback hypotheses: Evidence, implications and directions. Motivation & Emotion, 20, 121–147. CrossRef
Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., & Hallowell, N. (1994). Attentional bias to threats: Roles of trait anxiety, stressful events, and awareness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 841–864.
Neidenthal, P. M. (2010). Emotion concepts. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), The handbook of emotion (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Richards, A., & French, C. C. (1992). An anxiety-related bias in semantic activation when processing threat/neutral homographs. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 503–525.
Richards, A., Reynolds, A., & French, C. C. (1993). Anxiety and the spelling and use in sentences of threat/neutral homophones. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 12, 18–25. CrossRef
Russo, R., Patterson, N., Roberson, D., Stevenson, N., & Upward, J. (1996). Emotional value of information and its relevance in the interpretation of homophones in anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 213–220. CrossRef
Schwartz, G. E., Fair, P. L., Salt, P., Mandel, M. R., & Klerman, G. L. (1976). Facial expression and imagery in depression: An electromyographic study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38, 337–347. PubMed
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1987). How do I feel about it?: The informative function of affective states. In K. Fiedler & J. Forgas (Eds.), Affect, cognition and social behavior. Toronto: Hogrefe International.
Sinha, R. (1996). Multivariate response patterning of fear and anger. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 173–198. CrossRef
Tassinary, L. G., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1992). Unobservable facial actions and emotion. Psychological Science, 3, 28–33. CrossRef
Tversky, A., & Kahnemann, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232. CrossRef
- The Role of Facial Feedback in the Modulation of Clinically-Relevant Ambiguity Resolution
Graham C. L. Davey
Suzanne R. Dash
- Springer US