Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Previous research has linked greater social connectedness with a lowered risk of self-directed violence among adolescents. However, few studies have analyzed the comparative strength of different domains of connectedness (e.g., family, peers and school) to determine where limited resources might best be focused. Data to address that gap were taken from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Student Health and Safety Survey, administered to 4,131 7th–12th graders (51.5% female; 43.8% Hispanic; 22.6% African American or Black). Logistic regressions (controlling for age, gender, race/ethnicity, family structure, academic performance, and depressive symptoms) suggest that family connectedness was a stronger predictor than connectedness to peers, school, or adults at school for non-suicidal self-harm, suicidal ideation, suicide plans, and non-fatal suicidal behavior. In some analyses, peer connectedness was unexpectedly a risk factor. Results have implications for prevention of suicide in adolescence, especially in the context of the current trend towards school-based prevention programs.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York: Wiley.
Borowsky, I., Resnick, M. D., Ireland, M., & Blum, R. W. (1999). Suicide attempts among American Indian and Alaska Native youth: Risk and protective factors. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 153, 573–580. PubMed
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2003). 2003 Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Available at: www.cdc.gov/yrbss. Accessed on September 30, 2009.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). Strategic direction for the prevention of suicidal behavior. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/Suicide_Strategic_Direction_Full_Version-a.pdf Accessed June 5, 2009.
Donald, M., Dower, J., Correa-Velez, I., & Jones, M. (2006). Risk and protective factors for medically serious suicide attempts: A comparison of hospital-based with population-based samples of young adults. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40, 87–96. PubMed
Eaton, D. K., Kann, L., Kinchen, S., Shanklin, S., Ross, J., Hawkins, J., et al. (2007). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 57(SS-4), 1–131.
Orpinas, P. (1993). Modified depression scale. Houston: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Rubenstein, J. L., Heeren, T., Housman, D., Rubin, C., & Stechler, G. (1989). Suicidal behavior in “normal” adolescents: Risk and protective factors. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1, 59–71.
Townsend, K. C., & McWhirter, B. T. (2005). Connectedness: A review of the literature with implications for counseling, assessment, and research. Journal of Counseling and Development, 83, 191–201.
U.S. Public Health Service. (2001). National strategy for suicide prevention: Goals and objectives for action. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Vaux, A. (1988). Social support: Theory, research and intervention. New York: Praeger.
- The Relative Influence of Different Domains of Social Connectedness on Self-Directed Violence in Adolescence
Jennifer W. Kaminski
Richard W. Puddy
Diane M. Hall
Sandra Y. Cashman
Alexander E. Crosby
LaVonne A. G. Ortega
- Springer US