Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

Open Access 06-07-2024 | Original Article

The Relationships Between Metacognitive Beliefs, Executive Functioning, and Psychological Distress in Early Adolescence

Auteurs: Rebekah G. Belte, Tamara De Regt, Lee Kannis-Dymand, Amanda Boyes, Marcella Parker, Daniel F. Hermens

Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research | Uitgave 6/2024

share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
insite
ZOEKEN

Abstract

Background

Increased endorsement of metacognitions and poorer executive functioning have been associated with increased adolescent psychological distress. However, it is unknown whether poorer executive functioning strengthens the metacognitions–psychological distress relationship.

Methods

This cross-sectional study investigated unique and interactive contributions of self-reported positive metacognitions (beliefs that repetitive thinking is beneficial), negative metacognitions (beliefs that repetitive thinking is uncontrollable) and an objective test of executive function on self-reported psychological distress in N = 85 Australian adolescents (49% female, 51% male) aged 12–14 years (M = 13.22, SD = 0.45).

Results

Results of the hierarchical regression revealed both positive and negative metacognitions significantly, positively, and strongly predicted psychological distress. Furthermore, poorer executive functioning significantly strengthened the negative metacognitions–psychological distress relationship. These findings indicate that adolescents who endorse beliefs that their repetitive thinking is uncontrollable, dangerous, or helpful are more likely to be psychologically distressed. Furthermore, findings indicate adolescents with poorer inhibition were particularly vulnerable to the impact of negative metacognitions (e.g., repetitive thinking is uncontrollable) on psychological distress. This vulnerability is likely because negative metacognitions are highly intrusive, rendering their activation difficult to ignore.

Conclusions

Overall, findings support the self-regulatory executive function model, indicating metacognitions and executive functioning influence adolescent psychological distress. These findings have practical implications for clinical interventions.
Opmerkingen

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Adolescence is a sensitive developmental period between 10 and 18 years characterised by significant physical, neurobiological, and social changes that typically produce beneficial outcomes (Larsen & Luna, 2018; Rapee et al., 2019). However, global estimates indicate that psychopathology onset peaks at approximately 14.5 years (Solmi et al., 2021). Concerningly, younger adolescents experiencing non-specific symptoms (e.g., psychological distress) are at an increased risk of transitioning past subthreshold stages of psychopathology to discrete disorders characterised by increased symptom severity, functional impairment, and neurobiological dysfunction (Cross et al., 2016; Enticott et al., 2022; Hickie et al., 2019; Iorfino et al., 2019). Therefore, research on contributors to emerging psychological distress in younger adolescents is essential to inform evidence-based, preventative interventions for psychopathology. To date, research has investigated various contributors to adolescent psychological distress; two factors proposed are metacognitions and executive functions.

Metacognitions

Metacognitions include beliefs, knowledge, or strategies involved in the interpretation or regulation of one’s thinking (Wells, 2000). According to the self-regulatory executive function (S-REF) model (Wells & Matthews, 1996), cognitive and metacognitive processes are spread across three interacting levels, which include low-level processing, cognitive style, and meta-system. The S-REF model proposes that psychopathology is maintained by the cognitive attentional syndrome (CAS). The CAS involves conceptual components (e.g., perseverative processing in the form of worrying or rumination), attentional components (e.g., fixation of attention on threat-related stimuli), thought control strategies (e.g., thought suppression), and behavioural, cognitive, and emotional avoidance. Together, these processes are part of the individual’s strategy for dealing with threat, self-discrepancies, and any emotion aroused by threats or self-discrepancies (Wells, 2013). However, through these processes, the CAS prolongs biased and repetitive processing of threat-related thought, emotion, and belief, as well as exacerbates emotional distress, and impairs cognitive flexibility, fostering a negative feedback loop that maintains psychopathology. Essentially, the CAS is a perseverative thinking style that consists of worry, rumination, threat monitoring, and typically leads to ineffective coping strategies (e.g., thought suppression or avoidance) that produces maladaptive outcomes and prevents adaptive learning (Wells, 2013).
Research supports the proposition that the CAS can maintain psychosis (Sellers et al., 2018), depression (Normann et al., 2021), and anxiety (Nordahl & Wells, 2019). However, CAS-activation is theoretically contingent upon the endorsement of either positive or negative metacognitive beliefs—herein referred to as positive or negative metacognitions (Wells, 2009). Positive metacognitions involve beliefs that repetitive thinking is beneficial or necessary (e.g., worrying about an upcoming test prevents failure). Negative metacognitions concern the danger or uncontrollability of thoughts or feelings (e.g., worrying is uncontrollable; Wells, 2013). Therefore, based on the assertions of the S-REF model, adolescents who endorse more positive and negative metacognitions are likely to be more psychologically distressed.

Metacognitions and Adolescent Psychological Distress

Metacognitions have been consistently associated with adolescent psychological distress (Campbell et al., 2018; Esbjørn et al., 2015; Köcher et al., 2021). However, discrepant relationships have been reported for the positive metacognition subscale, as assessed by the Metacognitive Questionnaire for Adolescents (MCQ-A; Cartwright-Hatton & Wells, 2004). For example, Debbané et al. (2012) found positive metacognitions were not significantly associated with anxiety in a cross-sectional study of N = 179 Swiss adolescents aged 12–19. Conversely, Ellis and Hudson (2012) reported increased positive metacognitions were associated with increased levels of worry, anxiety, and depression in N = 123 Australians aged 12–17, with no significant sex differences. Small to moderate significant positive associations between positive metacognition and anxiety were also found via meta-analysis (Köcher et al., 2021). Despite discrepant findings, which may be accountable to differences in samples, measures, or uncontrolled factors that increase CAS-vulnerability (e.g., executive deficits), increased positive metacognitions are typically associated with elevated psychological distress in adolescents. Together, this research supports the S-REF model as positive metacognitions require intrusive cognitions to be perceived as helpful, which ultimately increases CAS-activation that subsequently maintains psychological distress (Wells, 2009).
Similarly, negative metacognitions have also been consistently associated with adolescent psychological distress (Köcher et al., 2021; Smith & Hudson, 2013; White & Hudson, 2016). For example, using the MCQ-A Dutch version, Wolters et al. (2016) identified increased negative metacognitions were significantly associated with increased anxiety and depression in N = 317 non-clinical adolescents aged 12 to 18. This research supports the S-REF model, which proposes negative metacognitions directly increase psychological distress and CAS-activation. Overall, there is evidence of theoretical and empirical relationships between positive and negative metacognitions, the CAS, and psychological distress in non-clinical adolescent samples. While metacognitions in adolescents may be influenced by a range of neurodevelopmental factors, including the impacts of early life stress and trauma, which can affect brain circuits involved with emotional and cognitive processing, there appears to be a key role in prefrontal cortex development and the associated executive functions.

Executive Functions

Executive Functions (EFs), which involve higher-order cognitive skills that regulate goal-directed behaviour (Snyder et al., 2015), are conceptualised by the unity and diversity model (Miyake & Friedman, 2012) into three orthogonal yet interrelated components. These include (1) updating working memory (i.e., constant monitoring and rapid revision of working-memory contents), (2) set-shifting (i.e., moving flexibly between multiple tasks or mental sets), and (3) inhibition (i.e., deliberate overriding of prepotent thought or behavioural responses; Friedman & Miyake, 2017). The interrelated component, termed common EF, involves a general ability to maintain a task set and biases lower-level processing. This basic ability is necessary for all three EFs and is particularly critical for inhibition (Friedman & Miyake, 2017). Throughout adolescence, significant neurobiological changes involving the frontal lobe subserve the development of EFs (Moura et al., 2017). Notably, research indicates EFs are best explained by a single-factor before age 12 and by a three-factor model in late adolescence (Laureys et al., 2022). This supports the unity and diversity model and suggests a gradual differentiation throughout adolescence. Importantly, poor executive functioning (EF) has been shown to be associated with increased psychological distress in adolescents with a range of developmental disorders (Halse et al., 2022).
When considered with the S-REF model, poor common EF appears to conceptually overlap with the maladaptive processing aspects of the CAS, which is theorised to be precipitated by metacognitions, maintain psychopathology, and predominantly manifest as a preservative and biased thinking style. For example, an inability to inhibit intrusive thoughts or emotions (i.e., poor inhibition) in favour of task-relevant behaviour is comparable to maladaptive perseverative processing of intrusions that produces maladaptive outcomes by the CAS (Kraft et al., 2017). Furthermore, research has also identified relationships between EFs and aspects of the CAS, supporting that poorer EFs can predict adolescent worry, rumination, thought suppression, and avoidant coping (Geronimi et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2024; Mennies et al., 2021; Wante et al., 2017). Thus, adolescents with poorer common EF are likely to be psychologically distressed as they may struggle to inhibit the initial intrusive metacognitions that precipitate the CAS, disengage from the perseverative nature of the CAS, or maintain attentional focus on adaptive goal-relevant pursuits. Therefore, poorer common EF may contribute to increased adolescent psychological distress. Furthermore, poorer common EF may strengthen the relationship between metacognitions and adolescent psychological distress. As such, the potential direct and moderating role of EF on the association between psychological distress and metacognitions in adolescents requires investigation.

Executive Functions and Adolescent Psychological Distress

Cross-sectional and longitudinal research utilising child and adolescent samples has identified pervasive deficits in multiple EFs across various psychological disorders (Halse et al., 2022; Romer & Pizzagalli, 2021). For example, psychopathology has been associated with poorer performance on a single EF composite task and inhibition, shifting, and updating subtests in children and adolescents (Bloemen et al., 2018; Kertz et al., 2016; Martel et al., 2017). Research has also found that in older adolescents, the relationship between EF and psychopathology in N = 292 Americans was attributed to poorer common EF (Snyder et al., 2019), which positively correlates with and can be measured using inhibition tasks (Miyake & Friedman, 2012). Conversely, in their study of N = 9,498 community-dwelling adolescents (aged 8–21 years), White et al. (2017) found the relationships between poorer inhibition, common EF, and general psychopathology symptoms were stronger for younger participants. These findings collectively indicate that poor common EF may be a transdiagnostic risk factor for emerging psychopathology in youth. One explanation for this finding may be that adolescents with poorer common EF may struggle to inhibit low-level processing (e.g., intrusive emotions or thoughts) or metacognitions to maintain adaptive behavioural or cognitive regulation. Consequently, this may activate the CAS and heighten psychological distress (Wells, 2009).
Poor common EF has been associated with adolescent psychological distress and as noted above adolescent worry, rumination, and maladaptive coping. Given this, it is conceivable that poorer common EF overlaps with or impacts the maladaptive processing aspects of the CAS, which is theorised to be activated by metacognitions and predominantly manifest as a preservative and biased thinking style. Therefore, it is possible the relationship between metacognitions and psychological distress may be stronger in adolescents with poorer common EF, as they may struggle to inhibit metacognitions and disengage from the CAS (i.e., worrying and rumination). Accordingly, the potential moderating role of executive functioning on the metacognitions and adolescent psychological distress relationship requires empirical investigation.

Impact of Executive Functions on Metacognitions and Psychological Distress

Cross-sectional research with adults has supported an association between increased metacognitions and lower self-reported attentional control and increased shifting errors (Barua et al., 2020; Fernie et al., 2016; Kraft et al., 2017; Nordahl et al., 2019; Spada & Roarty, 2015). However, despite the theoretical and empirical connections between metacognitions and EFs, research investigating their interactive contribution to adolescent psychological distress is limited. Given the lack of evidence in adolescents, the following summary of research in older and clinical populations provides some insight into the potential moderating role of EFs in the link between metacognitions and psychological distress. Firstly, when investigating moderation by self-reported attentional control, Fergus et al. (2012) found the effect of CAS-activation—which is theoretically activated by metacognitions—on anxiety and depressive symptoms, strengthened in N = 456 American undergraduates (Mage = 19.70 years), as attentional control decreased. Furthermore, poorer self-reported EF was found to strengthen the effect of positive—but not negative—metacognitions on post-traumatic stress symptoms in N = 469 trauma-exposed adults (Mage = 35.90; Bardeen & Fergus, 2018). Of note, research has indicated post-traumatic stress symptoms and psychological distress symptoms are significantly and positively correlated (Liang et al., 2022), highlighting the relevance of the findings from Barden and Fergus (2018). Finally, Reinholdt-Dunne et al. (2019) found the positive relationship between total metacognitions and symptoms of anxiety and depression weakened at higher levels of self-reported attentional control in a non-clinical sample of N = 182 Danish children aged 7–14.
To re-iterate, the above-mentioned findings were in a range of populations, however, this research indicates increased metacognitions and poorer EF uniquely and interactively predict increased psychological distress in both clinical and non-clinical groups, and across various ages. Importantly, this evidence suggests that poor EF may moderate the relationship between metacognitions and psychological distress. That is, the impact of dysfunctional metacognitions on increased psychological distress may be worsened for individuals with poorer EFs. This interaction extends the S-REF model, potentially indicating individuals with poor EF cannot disengage from the CAS to maintain attentional focus on adaptive goal-pursuits. However, as previous research with adolescents has only assessed metacognitions as a unidimensional construct it remains uncertain whether positive and negative metacognitions uniquely interact with EF in adolescent community samples. Furthermore, self-report EF measures are subject to bias, and their validity in reflecting actual cognitive abilities has been questioned (Løvstad et al., 2016; Williams et al., 2017). Therefore, further research utilising objective EF measures is required. One objective EF measure is the Multi-Tasking Test, a subtest from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB, 2009), which assesses an individual’s ability to manage conflicting information and inhibit incongruent task-irrelevant information. Specifically, an outcome measure from this subtest, called incongruency cost, measures the difference between median response latency across types of trials. This outcome measure of incongruency cost controls for participants’ baseline processing speed (CANTAB, 2009), ensuring a purer measure of participants’ inhibitory abilities and one that is not influenced by the biases known to impact self-reports.

The Present Study

The CAS conceptually overlaps with poor EFs, particularly poorer common EF. However, despite theoretical connections, current research is limited to individual contributions or relies predominantly upon adult samples or self-report questionnaires.
The rationale for the current study was to examine the relationships between positive metacognitions, negative metacognitions, EF, and psychological distress in early adolescents utilising objective EF measures, to elucidate the nature of their unique and interactive relationships. Specifically, the study aims to extend previous research by investigating the relationships between positive metacognitions, negative metacognitions, EF, and psychological distress in early adolescents aged 12–14 with an objective inhibitory measure representing common EF. Firstly, it was hypothesised that higher positive metacognitions (H1a) and negative metacognitions (H1b) would significantly predict increased psychological distress. Secondly, it was hypothesised that poor common EF, represented by a higher incongruency cost, would significantly predict increased psychological distress (H2). Lastly, it was hypothesised that the relationship between increased psychological distress and increased positive (H3a) and negative metacognitions (H3b) would be further increased by poorer common EF (i.e., higher incongruency cost).

Method

Participants, Procedure, and Design

The present study analysed data collected as part of the Longitudinal Adolescent Brain Study (LABS). LABS is currently being conducted at the Thompson Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast (UniSC), and is an ongoing multimodal, community-based, longitudinal cohort study that aims to investigate adolescent behaviour, mental health, and neurobiological development. Participants, recruited between ages 12 (first year of secondary education, Grade 7) to 15, are tested up to a maximum of 15 times, every four months until they reach age 17 (final year of secondary education, Grade 12). Inclusion criteria required participants to be aged 12 and in the first year of secondary education (Grade 7) to 15 years at intake and proficient in verbal and written English. Exclusion criteria included self-reported head injury involving loss of consciousness (for ≥ 30 min), major medical illness, intellectual disability, or major neurological disorder, as such factors can influence cognitive functioning (Pelicioni et al., 2020; Tsermentseli et al., 2018). The LABS design, recruitment, and procedure is outlined in Beaudequin et al. (2020). Here, only relevant components of the protocol will be discussed.
A correlational, cross-sectional design was implemented in this study. There was one criterion variable (total psychological distress score) and four predictor variables (biological sex, positive metacognitions, negative metacognitions, and EF). The sample size was estimated using a priori power analysis in G*Power 3.1.9.7 (Faul et al., 2007), using a moderate effect size in line with prior literature (Reinholdt et al., 2019). The analysis indicated that 85 participants were required to detect a moderate effect size (f2 = 0.15) with sufficient power of 0.80 (α = 0.05) for linear regression with four predictors.
Data from N = 87 adolescents were analysed. Two cases were removed due to missing data, resulting in a final sample (N = 85) comprised of n = 42 females and n = 43 males aged 12.43 to 14.04 years (M = 13.22, SD = 0.45). Most participants were right-handed (89.4%), 8.2% were left-handed, and 2.4% were ambidextrous. Participants were enrolled in seventh (47.1%), eighth (51.8%), and ninth grade (1.2%) and attended both public (48.2%) and private (51.8%) schools. Participants received a $20 gift voucher as reimbursement for participation following each visit.

Measures

Demographic Questionnaire

Participants completed a demographic and brief medical and mental health history questionnaire. The current study included data on age, biological sex, handedness, and school year (i.e., grade) and type (public/private).

Psychological Distress

The 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10; Kessler & Mroczek, 1992), which measures non-specific anxiety and depressive symptoms, was used to measure participants’ psychological distress. Participants self-estimated the intensity of various emotional experiences over the past 30-days (e.g., “During the last 30 days, about how often did you feel nervous?”) on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). Scores were summated and valid scores ranged from 10 to 50. Higher scores indicated increased psychological distress. Overall scores ≥ 20 indicated a psychological disorder classified by differing levels of severity (i.e., 20–24 = mild, 25–29 = moderate, 30–50 = severe; Victorian Government Department of Human Services, 2002). The K10 has demonstrated high sensitivity (85%), high specificity (83%), good internal consistency (α = 0.86) within adolescent samples (Chan & Fung, 2014), and high convergent validity with anxiety and depression measures (Kessler et al., 2002; Lace et al., 2019).

Metacognitive Beliefs

The 30-item Metacognitions Questionnaire for Adolescents (MCQ-A; Cartwright-Hatton & Wells, 2004) was used to measure participants’ positive and negative metacognitions. Participants rated their agreement with 30 statements on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (do not agree) to 4 (agree very much). Five subscales are generated which include (1) positive beliefs about worry, (2) negative beliefs about worry, (3) cognitive confidence, (4) beliefs about the need to control thoughts, and (5) cognitive self-consciousness. This study only used the positive (MCQ-PBW) and negative beliefs about worry (MCQ-NBW) subscales (i.e., positive and negative metacognitions). The MCQ-PBW (six items, ‘positive metacognitions’) measures the extent to which an individual believes that perseverative thinking is useful (e.g., “worrying helps me cope”). The MCQ-NBW (six items, ‘negative metacognitions’) measures the extent to which an individual believes that perseverative thinking is uncontrollable and dangerous (e.g., “my worrying is bad for me”). Scores were summated and could range from 6 to 24 (per subscale). Higher scores indicated higher endorsement of metacognitions. The MCQ-A has received the most extensive psychometric support as an adolescent measure of metacognitions (Myers et al., 2019), demonstrating robust internal consistency overall (α = 0.91) and good internal consistency for both positive (α = 0.88) and negative (α = 0.84) metacognition subscales. Moreover, the MCQ-A has correlated with anxiety and depression measures and accurately differentiated between clinical and non-clinical samples of anxious adolescents (Cartwright-Hatton et al., 2004), demonstrating good convergent and discriminant validity.

The Multi-Tasking Test

The Multi-Tasking Test (MTT), which is a computerised subtest from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB, 2009), was used to measure participants’ common EF. The MTT measures a participant’s ability to manage conflicting information and inhibit incongruent task-irrelevant information. A singular black arrow pointed to the left or right, was presented on the left or right side of the screen. Each trial displayed a cue in the upper screen centre that indicated whether to identify the arrow’s direction or side. Participants were required to respond to the cue correctly and quickly by selecting the left or right button at the bottom of the tablet screen. The task, which lasted 8-min and included 40 practice and 120 assessment trials, was separated into three blocks. Voice over provided instructions followed by a practice session with feedback (i.e., voiceover reporting correct or incorrect for each response) preceded each block to ensure participants understood the task. In the first two blocks, the rule was consistent across trials (e.g., only cued “direction” or “side”). In the third block, the rule randomly switched across trials. Across all blocks, some trials displayed congruent stimuli (e.g., right-directed, right-side) whereas other trials displayed incongruent stimuli (e.g., right-directed, left-side).
This study used the outcome measure of incongruency cost (i.e., the difference between median response latency, from stimulus presentation to button press, on the trials that were incongruent versus the trials that were congruent). Two scores are calculated for each participant across trials. One score represents the median time from stimulus presentation to correct response button press for incongruent trials, another represents the median time from stimulus to correct response button press for congruent trials. Incorrect responses did not contribute to this outcome measure. The difference between these two median scores is then calculated to determine a new score (i.e., incongruency cost). This calculation controlled for participants’ baseline processing speed, ensuring a purer measure of participants’ inhibitory abilities (CANTAB, 2009). A positive score indicates faster performance on congruent trials and a negative score indicates faster performance on incongruent trials. A higher incongruency cost, measured in milliseconds (ms), indicates the participant takes longer to process conflicting information. Scores can range between −1900 ms to 1900 ms (CANTAB, 2009). The underlying premise of this task is that the greater the delay in responding (time from stimulus presentation to accurate response), the more cognitive effort was required, thus reflecting poor executive control. The MTT has demonstrated reasonable sensitivity (82.80%) and specificity (74.50%) for detecting mild cognitive impairment and good internal consistency (α = 0.85) as a Stroop-measure within adolescent samples (Martínez-Loredo et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2022).

Statistical Analyses

The IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Version 28.0) was used for all analyses. Results were considered significant at an alpha of 0.05. To assess whether positive metacognitions, negative metacognitions, and EF would positively predict psychological distress, a multiple hierarchical regression was conducted. Sex was dummy coded (male = 0, female = 1) and entered into the first block, to control for its influence on the criterion (Van Droogenbroeck et al., 2018). The second and third block included predictor variables relevant to the hypotheses, entered into the model in their theoretical order of importance for predicting the criterion (Field, 2018). Thus, positive metacognitions and negative metacognitions were entered into the second block to assess H1. EF was entered into the third block to assess H2.
To assess whether EF would strengthen the positive association between metacognitions and psychological distress (H3), two separate multiple regression analyses were conducted using PROCESS Macro 4, Model 1 (Hayes, 2022). PROCESS has several advantages. Firstly, PROCESS can centre predictor scores to create standardised coefficients and compute the interaction term. Secondly, PROCESS provides simple slopes analysis data to examine the conditional effect of the focal predictor on the criterion at varying values of the moderator. Lastly, PROCESS indicates the level of the moderator at which the focal predictor–criterion relationship becomes non-significant via the Johnson-Neyman conditional effects (Hayes, 2022).
Moderation regression tests the conditional effect of X on Y, where X is the predictor, W is the moderator that exerts a conditional effect on the relationship between X and Y, and Y is the criterion (Hayes, 2022). In this study, psychological distress was entered as the criterion (Y), EF was entered as the moderator (W), positive or negative metacognitions (X) were entered as the predictor, and sex and positive or negative metacognitions were entered as covariates. A conceptual model of the hypothesised relationship is provided in Fig. 1.

Results

Assumption Testing

Data (N = 87) was screened for errors and missing values. Two cases were removed due to non-completion of the MTT. An analysis of standard residuals detected three univariate outliers outside ± Z = 3.29. Significance of the Shapiro-Wilks test (p < 0.05), visual examination of histograms and Q-Q Plots, and positively skewed K10 (Zskew = 6.18), MCQ-PBW (Zskew = 5.95), and MCQ-NBW (Zskew = 4.51) indicated the assumption of univariate normality was violated. Although positive skew is expected in a community sample (Butterworth et al., 2020), a Log10 transformation was applied (Tabachnick & Fidell, 2012). Two separate analyses were conducted, one with transformed and the other with untransformed data, to determine if transformation impacted the model and improved assumption violations. Transformation improved normality slightly for the K10 (Zskew = 3.57) and MCQ-PBW (Zskew = 3.46), largely for MCQ-NBW (Zskew = 1.95), and the histograms appeared normally distributed. Transformation did not appear to impact the model significance or direction of effects. A visual examination of scatterplots indicated the assumption of linearity between the criterion and each predictor was met. Therefore, to maximise power given the small sample size (Field, 2018), univariate outliers were retained, and analyses were conducted with data transformed for N = 85.
Assessment of multivariate outliers indicated no Mahalanobis’ distance scores exceeded the critical χ2 of 18.47 (p < 0.001) for a regression model with four predictors (Tabachnick & Fidell, 2012). Cook’s distance was below 1 for all cases, indicating no cases exhibited undue influence on the estimates within the regression model, also supporting the decision to retain the univariate outliers (Cook & Weisberg, 1982). The data met the assumption of independent errors, as the Durbin-Watson value of 1.98 was within the required range of 1.5–2.5 (Field, 2018). There was no presence of multicollinearity, with VIF < 10, Tolerance > 0.20, and bivariate correlations between predictor variables acceptable (r ≤ 0.85; Cohen, 2003; Field, 2018), with non-zero variances (MCQ-PBW = 13.09, MCQ-NBW = 16.99, MTT-EF = 2202.22, K10 = 46.50). A visual inspection of residual histogram and ZRED against ZRESID scatterplots indicated residuals were distributed non-symmetrically, curved, and cone-shaped, violating the assumptions of normality, linearity, and homoscedasticity of residuals. However, this was also improved by transformation, with all these residual assumptions considered met.

Preliminary Analysis

Mean scores, standard deviations, the range of scores, and Cronbach’s alpha for each variable are presented in Table 1. All measures demonstrated good psychometric properties for use with adolescent populations. Mean psychological distress, negative metacognitions, and incongruency cost scores were slightly but not significantly above normative values for adolescents (i.e., listed in CANTAB, 2009; Cartwright & Wells, 2004; Kessler & Mroczek, 1992; Slade et al., 2011; Slykerman et al., 2018). However, mean positive metacognitions scores were significantly below normative values for adolescents, t(84) = −4.75, p =  < 0.001. Together, this indicates that the sample was predominantly psychologically healthy and reported a lower endorsement of maladaptive beliefs that worrying is helpful (i.e., positive metacognitions) relatives to norms.
Table 1
Descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s alpha, and zero-order correlations between study variables
Variable
Mean
(SD)
Range
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Age in years
13.22
(0.45)
12.43–14.04
     
2. Biological sex
0.04
    
3. Positive metacognitions
8.84
(3.62)
6–22
0.07
0.19*
(0.91)
   
4. Negative metacognitions
10.53
(4.12)
6–23
−0.01
0.43***
0.46***
(0.85)
  
5. Executive function
50.84
(46.93)
−79 to 186
0.12
0.19*
−0.02
0.18
 
6. Psychological distress
16.21
(6.82)
10–39
0.03
0.31**
0.46***
0.66***
0.14
(0.91)
Data reported in untransformed format. Cronbach’s alphas are presented in brackets
Biological sex, male = 0, female = 1
*p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001
Correlations between study variables are also presented in Table 1. Results indicated moderate to strong, significant, positive correlations between positive metacognitions, negative metacognitions, and psychological distress. EF was not significantly correlated with psychological distress. Biological sex had small to moderate, significant positive correlations with positive metacognitions, negative metacognitions, EF, and psychological distress.
The impact of sex was assessed using a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The MANOVA demonstrated significant differences between males and females on the combined variables [V = 0.188, F(4, 80) = 4.64, p = 0.002, η2 = 0.19, 1 – β = 0.94]. Of the univariate tests, sex impacted levels of psychological distress, [F(1, 83) = 9.00, p < 0.004, η2 = 0.10, 1 – β = 0.84] and negative metacognitions, [F(1, 83) = 18.74, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.18, 1 − β = 0.99]. Females scored higher on both variables.

Main Analyses

Hypothesis 1 and 2: Metacognitions and Executive Function on Psychological Distress

A hierarchical multiple regression analysis was conducted to assess whether biological sex, positive metacognitions, negative metacognitions, and EF positively predicted psychological distress. Results are presented in Table 2. In the first block, sex significantly accounted for increased variability in psychological distress, [R2 = 0.10, F(1, 83) = 9.00, p = 0.004]. The addition of positive metacognitions and negative metacognitions in the second block significantly accounted for an additional 37% of variance in psychological distress scores, [ΔR2 = 0.37, ΔF(2, 81) = 27.67, p < 0.001]. The addition of EF in the third block did not significantly contribute to variance in psychological distress, [ΔR2 = 0.00, ΔF(1, 80) = 0.24, p = 0.629]. In combination, the four variables significantly and positively predicted psychological distress, [R2 = 0.47, F(4, 80) = 17.42, p < 0.001]. According to Cohen’s (1988) conventions, a combined effect of this magnitude is considered large (f2 < 0.35). Negative metacognitions were the strongest predictor and accounted for 19.36% of significant unique variance, while positive metacognitions predicted approximately 3.06% of significant unique variance in psychological distress. Therefore, increased positive and negative metacognition scores predicted increased levels of adolescent psychological distress, supporting H1a and H1b. However, higher incongruency cost (i.e., poorer EF) did not significantly predict increased psychological distress, failing to support H2.
Table 2
Hierarchical multiple regression analysis predicting psychological distress from predictors
Variable
B
95% CI for B
SE B
β
R2
ΔR2
LL
UL
Step 1
     
0.10
0.10**
 Constant
1.13
1.09
1.18
0.02
   
 Sex
0.10
0.03
0.16
0.03
0.31**
  
Step 2
     
0.46
0.37***
 Constant
0.45
0.26
0.64
0.10
   
 Sex
0.01
−0.04
0.07
0.03
0.04
  
 Positive metacognitions
0.20
0.01
0.38
0.09
0.19*
  
 Negative metacognitions
0.55
0.35
0.75
0.10
0.55***
  
Step 3
     
0.47
0.01
 Constant
0.43
0.25
0.63
0.10
   
 Sex
0.01
−0.05
0.07
0.03
0.04
  
 Positive metacognitions
0.20
0.01
0.39
0.09
0.20*
  
 Negative metacognitions
0.54
0.34
0.75
0.10
0.55***
  
 Executive functioning
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
  
CI confidence interval, LL lower limit, UL upper limit, B unstandardised beta coefficient, SE standard error, β standardised beta coefficient
*p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001

Hypothesis 3: Moderating Role of Executive Function

The results for the PROCESS multiple regression analysis are summarised in Table 3. To assess whether EF strengthened the positive effect of positive metacognitions on psychological distress (H3a), positive metacognitions was entered as the predictor and psychological distress was entered as the criterion. To account for their influence as identified in the preliminary analysis, sex and negative metacognitions were entered as covariates. The model indicated a significant direct positive effect of positive metacognitions on psychological distress. The direct effect of EF on psychological distress was not significant. The interaction effect of EF on positive metacognitions and psychological distress was not significant. Therefore, the relationship between positive metacognitions and psychological distress was not significantly moderated by EF.
Table 3
Multiple regression analyses for moderation by executive function
Model
B
95% CI
SE B
t
LL
UL
Model 1
    
 Intercept
6.29
0.45
0.81
0.09
7.00***
 Positive metacognitions
0.20
0.00
0.39
0.10
2.01*
 Executive function
0.00
−0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
 Positive metacognition x executive function
0.00
−0.00
0.01
0.00
0.74
 Sex
0.01
−0.05
0.07
0.03
0.40
 Negative metacognitions
0.55
0.35
0.75
0.10
5.54***
Model 2
    
 Intercept
0.94
0.76
1.11
0.09
10.55***
 Negative metacognitions
0.48
0.30
0.67
0.09
5.23***
 Executive function
0.00
−0.00
0.00
0.00
0.93
 Negative metacognitions x executive function
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
3.42***
 Sex
0.01
−0.04
0.06
0.03
0.42
 Positive metacognitions
0.25
0.06
0.44
0.09
2.66**
CI confidence interval, B unstandardized beta coefficient, SE standard error
*p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001
To assess whether EF strengthened the positive effect of negative metacognitions on psychological distress (H3b), negative metacognitions was entered as the predictor and psychological distress was entered as the criterion. To control for their influence, sex and positive metacognitions were entered as covariates. The model indicated a significant direct positive effect of negative metacognitions on psychological distress. The direct effect of EF on psychological distress was not significant. The interactive effect of EF on negative metacognitions and psychological distress was positive and significant, accounting for approximately 6% of the variance in psychological distress scores, [ΔR2 = 0.06, F(1, 79) = 11.68, p = 0.001]. Therefore, the positive effect of negative metacognition on psychological distress was significantly strengthened by EF.
As presented in Fig. 2, the simple slopes analysis tested the significance of the interaction effect at varying levels of EF. Negative metacognitions and psychological distress were strongly related at high incongruency costs (indicating poorer EF, 1 SD above the mean) but not significantly related at low incongruency costs (indicating better EF, 1 SD below the mean). Thus, participants who demonstrated higher incongruency costs reported increased levels of psychological distress when negative metacognitions scores were high, compared to when negative metacognitions scores were low. Participants with average incongruency costs also reported higher psychological distress scores when negative metacognitions scores were high, compared to when negative metacognitions scores were low. However, participants with lower incongruency costs (i.e., better EF) displayed similar levels of psychological distress at low and high levels of negative metacognitions. The Johnson-Neyman technique (Hayes, 2012) indicated the relationship between negative metacognitions and psychological distress became unconditional when incongruency costs were below −44.71. Therefore, negative metacognitions did not directly impact psychological distress scores for participants who scored below −44.71.

Discussion

This study revealed that higher endorsement of positive and negative metacognitions significantly predicted increased psychological distress, supporting H1a and H1b. Furthermore, increased incongruency costs (i.e., poorer EF) significantly strengthened the relationship between negative metacognitions and psychological distress, supporting H3b. However, poorer EF did not significantly predict increased psychological distress nor strengthen the positive metacognitions–psychological distress relationship, failing to support H2 and H3a. Overall, these findings demonstrate positive and negative metacognitions significantly and positively predict adolescent psychological distress. Furthermore, the positive effect of negative metacognitions on psychological distress is significantly exacerbated in adolescents with poorer EF.

Preliminary Findings

The presence of significant, positive bivariate relationships between psychological distress, positive metacognitions, and negative metacognitions found in this study is consistent with the established relationships between these variables (Köcher et al., 2021). Furthermore, the higher levels of psychological distress self-reported by females here is consistent with prior literature (Van Droogenbroeck et al., 2018). Although research has predominantly suggested that there are no significant sex differences in metacognitions (Ellis & Hudson, 2011; Smith & Hudson, 2013; White & Hudson, 2016), this study supports emerging literature indicating that females report significantly more negative metacognitions (Shakeshaft et al., 2020). Overall, these results highlight the importance of controlling for the effect of sex when investigating relationships between metacognitions and psychological distress in future research.

Metacognitions on Psychological Distress (H1)

As predicted, increased positive and negative metacognition scores significantly predicted increased levels of psychological distress, beyond the effect of sex. The effect size for their collective contribution was large, suggesting that metacognitions are meaningfully and clinically significant in understanding adolescent psychological distress. These findings suggest that adolescents who endorse more positive and negative metacognitions are more likely to experience symptoms of psychological distress. This is consistent with previous studies (Ellis & Hudson, 2012; Köcher et al., 2021; Lachat Shakeshaft et al., 2020; Schultz et al., 2023; Şen Demirdöğen et al., 2021; White & Hudson, 2016), but is partially consistent with Debbané et al. (2012), who only found negative metacognitions were associated with adolescent anxiety. The current results are congruent with the S-REF model, which proposes that as metacognitions are experienced as intrusions, they are appraised in a perseverative and biased manner which activates rumination and worry (Wells, 2009). Specifically, this self-directed, biased, and negative processing causes adolescents to attend to evidence that supports the initial intrusion, thereby exacerbating their psychological distress (Wells, 2013). Overall, these findings provide support for the S-REF model, validating the relationships between metacognitions and psychological distress in adolescents.

Executive Functioning on Psychological Distress (H2)

Contrary to the hypothesis, poorer EF (i.e., higher incongruency costs) did not significantly predict increased psychological distress. This indicates that adolescents with poorer EF were not more likely to be psychological distressed. These results differ from literature that has found poor EF predicted psychological distress in younger adolescents (Kertz et al., 2016; White et al., 2017), but is consistent with research that has only observed an association between EF performance and internalising symptoms in older adolescents (Snyder et al., 2019). The study sample may provide some explanation for this discrepancy. Firstly, a larger proportion attended private schools (51.80%) compared to the typical percentage enrolled in private schools (34.90%; Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2021). Research suggests that adolescents who attend private schools are often from well-educated, higher income families, with well-organised parental involvement (Park & Bills, 2015), which all predict improved academic, social, and emotional outcomes in adolescents (Pianta & Ansari, 2018). Secondly, the sample comprised of younger adolescents. It has been speculated that at younger ages (i.e., 13–16), adult caretakers can compensate for an adolescent’s poor EF (e.g., correcting maladaptive social behaviours), preventing EF deficits from translating into behaviours that generate psychological distress (e.g., interpersonal conflict; Snyder & Hankin, 2016). Therefore, parental support or resources may have compensated for any deleterious effects of poorer EF on psychological distress in this sample. In addition, the measurement of psychological distress may explain the null findings. Research investigating relationships between EF and adolescent psychopathology (Halse et al., 2022; Romer et al., 2021) has found that poorer EF was associated with adolescent psychopathology in community samples, when measured as a latent construct (i.e., the “P factor”) representing shared psychopathological mechanisms across multiple mental disorders (e.g., fear, distress, and externalising). Therefore, in community samples, future research should investigate the relationships between EF and psychological distress as measured by a latent factor of psychopathology.
Alternatively, the measurement of common EF used here may explain why poor EF did not predict psychological distress. Although the MTT theoretically overlaps with common EF (Friedman & Miyake, 2017), Synder et al. (2015) recommends that multiple measures corresponding to each component of the unity and diversity model—aggregated into a latent variable—is required for effective measurement. Furthermore, the CANTAB subtests were originally devised for detecting EF impairments in those with dementia (Fray & Robbins, 1996). Therefore, future research should incorporate multiple objective EF measures that are aggregated, targeted, and sensitive enough to detect the magnitude of deficits expected in non-clinical adolescent populations. For example, Miyake et al. (2000) has developed multiple tasks to assess inhibition, shifting, and updating which could be aggregated to improve clinical utility. Overall, further research using additional objective measures is needed to elucidate the relationship between common EF and psychological distress in younger adolescents.

Moderating Role of Executive Functioning (H3)

The results for the third hypothesis will be discussed in order of relative value, as determined by the significance of the moderating impact of EF.

Negative Metacognitions on Psychological Distress

The current finding revealed that increased incongruency costs (i.e., poorer EF) significantly strengthened the effect of negative metacognitions on psychological distress. That is, adolescents who endorsed more beliefs that worry is uncontrollable or damaging combined with poorer EF were more likely to report higher levels of psychological distress. This finding is consistent with prior research that demonstrates better self-reported EF weakened the association between psychological distress symptoms and metacognitions (Reinholdt-Dunne et al., 2019) yet inconsistent with others that found poorer self-reported EF did not strengthen the negative metacognitions–post-traumatic stress symptoms relationship (Bardeen & Fergus, 2018). This discrepancy may highlight the differential impact of EF abilities on the psychological distress–metacognitions relationship relative to their impact on the post-traumatic stress symptoms–metacognitions relationship. Together, this interaction supports an integration of the S-REF model and unity and diversity model (Miyake & Friedman, 2012; Wells, 2009). Specifically, adolescents with emerging inhibitory difficulties—difficulties ignoring or overriding thought or behaviour—may be more vulnerable to the CAS (i.e., perseverative thinking style) and the perpetual cycle it facilitates, once activated by negative metacognitions. This is possibly because negative metacognitions are highly intrusive (Wells, 2009), rendering their activation particularly difficult to ignore. The inability to ignore negative metacognitions (e.g., belief that worrying about assessments is uncontrollable), may interfere with task-relevant, adaptive behaviour (e.g., studying). The outcome of this interference (e.g., inadequate study) may exacerbate psychological distress and the CAS (e.g., increased worrying), depleting cognitive resources to support inhibition. Together, this process may be appraised as supporting initial negative metacognitions, cultivating a perpetual cycle that maintains distress and inhibitory deficits.

Positive Metacognitions on Psychological Distress

Unexpectedly, increased incongruency costs (i.e., poorer EF) did not significantly strengthen the association between positive metacognitions and psychological distress. That is, adolescents with poorer EF and increased beliefs that worrying is beneficial were not more likely to report higher levels of psychological distress. This finding contradicts earlier research which found EF moderated the association between psychological distress and metacognitions (Reinholdt-Dunne et al., 2019) and positive metacognitions and post-traumatic stress symptoms (Bardeen & Fergus, 2018). This discrepancy may be explained by these studies use of self-report EF measures, which may not reflect actual executive abilities. Furthermore, as previously discussed, while the current study removes the bias of self-reported EF, the objective measurement of common EF used here may require additional measures to accurately capture this skill in early adolescence. Therefore, future research must investigate whether common EF, assessed as a latent factor, strengthens the association between positive metacognitions and psychological distress.
The current finding provides additional support for the S-REF model (Wells, 2009). Specifically, positive metacognitions are theoretically experienced as less intrusive relative to negative metacognitions (Wells, 2009), which indicates that better inhibitory abilities may not be required to ignore them. Therefore, other potential moderators need to be explored. Set-shifting deficits are one potential moderator which have been associated with adolescent psychological distress (Bloemen et al., 2018; Kertz et al., 2016). Potentially, adolescents with increased positive metacognitions and shifting deficits may struggle to change coping strategies (e.g., seeking support) or mental sets (e.g., worrying is not helpful) despite contradictory outcomes challenging their positive metacognitions (e.g., failing a test despite using worry to prepare). As this shifting deficit may prolong CAS-activation, theoretically adolescents’ psychological distress should increase.
Other potential moderators include the simultaneous endorsement of other metacognitions or coping strategies. For example, Wells (2000) has proposed the co-occurrence of negative and positive metacognitions predicts greater psychopathology. Research has also demonstrated adaptive metacognitions (e.g., I can refrain from worrying) predicts adaptive coping (Beer & Moneta, 2012), which can weaken the depressive symptoms–rumination relationship (Thompson et al., 2010). Together, this research suggests that lack of negative metacognitions or the presence of adaptive metacognitions and coping may weaken the influence of positive metacognitions on psychological distress. This outcome may result from an increased likelihood of adaptively resolving discrepancies, which terminates the CAS (Wells, 2009). Therefore, these potential moderators require investigation.

Implications

Collectively, the current findings indicate increased positive and negative metacognitions can increase adolescent psychological distress, particularly for those with poorer EF. These results provide theoretical support and extend the S-REF model by validating the individual and interactive relationships between EF, metacognitions, and psychological distress. The current findings also have practical implications for clinicians and continued research. Metacognitions and EF of young adolescent clients can be assessed and targeted in therapy. Specifically, metacognitive therapy may equip at-risk adolescents with strategies to modify metacognitions or directly improve executive abilities required to disengage from the CAS, so that psychological distress and its associated negative clinical consequences (e.g., progression into psychopathology) are less likely, as previously found (Thorslund et al., 2020; Walczak et al., 2021). However, given the interaction between EF and negative metacognitions only increased the prediction of psychological distress by 6%, continued research is required regarding the influence of other moderators.

Limitations

This study has several limitations, firstly, metacognitions and psychological distress were assessed by self-report measures. Although the MCQ-A and K10 are well-validated, due to their retrospective nature and emphasis on negative internal states, they can be subject to error and bias (e.g., negativity bias; Sato & Kawahara, 2011; Shrout et al., 2018). This study also used a cross-sectional design, meaning that causation could not be confirmed. In addition, results of interaction effects should be interpreted with caution as the power analyses conducted did not account for this. Relevant demographic information about participants’ racial/ethnic identification and culture/geographic background were also not collected and, in the LABS, a proxy measure of socioeconomic status was used. Therefore, future studies should include other, more objective measures of socioeconomic status. Furthermore, participants were recruited from a high socio-economic region of Australia, limiting the generalisability of the results. Next, although there is evidence that stage of puberty can influence adolescent psychological distress (Van Rijn et al., 2023), this was not measured in the current study. However, the constrained age range in this cohort reduces the likelihood of difference due to puberty. A puberty measure has since been added to the LABS research program which can be included in future longitudinal follow-up studies. Lastly, confounding variables that also influence adolescent psychological distress, such as socioeconomic status, personality traits, adaptive metacognition, and environmental factors (e.g., parental or peer conflict or participant hunger), were not all controlled for (Beer & Moneta, 2012; Benzi et al., 2019; Reiss et al., 2019). However, there are numerous study strengths. Specifically, this study utilised an objective EF test that controlled for baseline processing speed. Furthermore, the findings extended and provided further support for the associations between the S-REF model, EF, and psychological distress in a relatively large and appropriately powered community sample of Australian adolescents.

Conclusion and Future Directions

Our findings suggest that positive and negative metacognitions increase adolescent psychological distress. Further, adolescents with poorer EF may be especially susceptible to the deleterious impact of negative metacognitions on psychological distress, consistent with the S-REF model (Wells & Matthew, 1996). Future research could investigate the longitudinal associations between metacognitions and psychological distress throughout adolescence.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by funding from the Australian Commonwealth Government’s ‘Prioritizing Mental Health Initiative’ (2018-25).

Declarations

Conflict of Interest

Rebekah G. Belte, Tamara de Regt, Lee Kannis-Dymand, Amanda Boyes, Marcella Parker, and Daniel F. Hermens declare that there were no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship or the publication of this article.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Ethical approval obtained by the UniSC Human Ethics Committee (approval number A181064).
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants and their legal guardians included in the study. Participants and their guardians gave written informed consent.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijf je als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen jouw vak. Met het online abonnement heb je toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kun je op je gemak en wanneer het jou het beste uitkomt verdiepen in jouw vakgebied.

BSL Academy Accare GGZ collective

BSL GOP_opleiding GZ-psycholoog

Literatuur
go back to reference Barua, N., Singh, S., Agarwal, V., & Arya, A. (2020). Executive functions, metacognitive beliefs, and thought control strategies in adolescents with obsessive compulsive disorder. International Journal of Advanced Research, 7(1), 672–682. Barua, N., Singh, S., Agarwal, V., & Arya, A. (2020). Executive functions, metacognitive beliefs, and thought control strategies in adolescents with obsessive compulsive disorder. International Journal of Advanced Research, 7(1), 672–682.
go back to reference Beaudequin, D., Schwenn, P., McLoughlin, L. T., Parker, M. J., Broadhouse, K., Simcock, G., Boyes, A., Kannis-Dymand, L., Wood, A., Lagopoulos, J., & Hermens, D. F. (2020). Using measures of intrinsic homeostasis and extrinsic modulation to evaluate mental health in adolescents: Preliminary results from the longitudinal adolescent brain study (LABS). Psychiatry Research, 285, 112848–112848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112848CrossRefPubMed Beaudequin, D., Schwenn, P., McLoughlin, L. T., Parker, M. J., Broadhouse, K., Simcock, G., Boyes, A., Kannis-Dymand, L., Wood, A., Lagopoulos, J., & Hermens, D. F. (2020). Using measures of intrinsic homeostasis and extrinsic modulation to evaluate mental health in adolescents: Preliminary results from the longitudinal adolescent brain study (LABS). Psychiatry Research, 285, 112848–112848. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​psychres.​2020.​112848CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Beer, N., & Moneta, G. B. (2012). Coping and perceived stress as a function of positive metacognitions and positive meta-emotions. Individual Differences Research, 10(2), 105–116. Beer, N., & Moneta, G. B. (2012). Coping and perceived stress as a function of positive metacognitions and positive meta-emotions. Individual Differences Research, 10(2), 105–116.
go back to reference CANTAB. (2009). The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. Cambridge: Cambridge Cognition Limited. CANTAB. (2009). The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. Cambridge: Cambridge Cognition Limited.
go back to reference Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Cohen, J. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cohen, J. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Cook, R. D., & Weisberg, S. (1982). Residuals and influence in regression. London: Chapman and Hall. Cook, R. D., & Weisberg, S. (1982). Residuals and influence in regression. London: Chapman and Hall.
go back to reference Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications Ltd. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications Ltd.
go back to reference Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press. Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
go back to reference Hickie, I. B., Scott, E. M., Cross, S. P., Iorfino, F., Davenport, T. A., Guastella, A. J., Naismith, S. L., Carpenter, J. S., Rohleder, C., Crouse, J. J., Hermens, D. F., Koethe, D., Markus Leweke, F., Tickell, A. M., Sawrikar, V., & Scott, J. (2019). Right care, first time: A highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health. Medical Journal of Australia, 211(9), S3–S46. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50383CrossRefPubMed Hickie, I. B., Scott, E. M., Cross, S. P., Iorfino, F., Davenport, T. A., Guastella, A. J., Naismith, S. L., Carpenter, J. S., Rohleder, C., Crouse, J. J., Hermens, D. F., Koethe, D., Markus Leweke, F., Tickell, A. M., Sawrikar, V., & Scott, J. (2019). Right care, first time: A highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health. Medical Journal of Australia, 211(9), S3–S46. https://​doi.​org/​10.​5694/​mja2.​50383CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Iorfino, F., Scott, E. M., Carpenter, J. S., Cross, S. P., Hermens, D. F., Killedar, M., Nichles, A., Zmicerevska, N., White, D., Guastella, A. J., Scott, J., McGorry, P. D., & Hickie, I. B. (2019). Clinical stage transitions in persons aged 12 to 25 years presenting to early intervention mental health services with anxiety, mood, and psychotic disorders. JAMA Psychiatry, 76(11), 1167–1175. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2360CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Iorfino, F., Scott, E. M., Carpenter, J. S., Cross, S. P., Hermens, D. F., Killedar, M., Nichles, A., Zmicerevska, N., White, D., Guastella, A. J., Scott, J., McGorry, P. D., & Hickie, I. B. (2019). Clinical stage transitions in persons aged 12 to 25 years presenting to early intervention mental health services with anxiety, mood, and psychotic disorders. JAMA Psychiatry, 76(11), 1167–1175. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​jamapsychiatry.​2019.​2360CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Kessler, R. C., & Mroczek, D. (1992). An update of the development of mental health screening scales for US national health interview study. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. Kessler, R. C., & Mroczek, D. (1992). An update of the development of mental health screening scales for US national health interview study. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
go back to reference Lace, J. W., Greif, T. R., McGrath, A., Grant, A. F., Merz, Z. C., Teague, C. L., & Handal, P. J. (2019). Investigating the factor structure of the K10 and identifying cut-off scores denoting nonspecific psychological distress and need for treatment. Mental Health & Prevention, 13, 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhp.2019.01.008CrossRef Lace, J. W., Greif, T. R., McGrath, A., Grant, A. F., Merz, Z. C., Teague, C. L., & Handal, P. J. (2019). Investigating the factor structure of the K10 and identifying cut-off scores denoting nonspecific psychological distress and need for treatment. Mental Health & Prevention, 13, 100–106. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​mhp.​2019.​01.​008CrossRef
go back to reference Liang, J.-X., Gao, Y., Chen, I.-H., Chen, X.-M., & Zheng, Y.-Y. (2022). The association between post-traumatic stress disorder and psychological distress among primary school and middle school teachers during the COVID-19 epidemic: A moderated mediation analysis. Sustainability (basel, Switzerland), 14(19), 12128. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912128CrossRef Liang, J.-X., Gao, Y., Chen, I.-H., Chen, X.-M., & Zheng, Y.-Y. (2022). The association between post-traumatic stress disorder and psychological distress among primary school and middle school teachers during the COVID-19 epidemic: A moderated mediation analysis. Sustainability (basel, Switzerland), 14(19), 12128. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​su141912128CrossRef
go back to reference Martel, M. M., Pan, P. M., Hoffmann, M. S., Gadelha, A., Rosário, M. C., Mari, J. J., Manfro, G. G., Miguel, E. C., Paus, T., Bressan, R. A., Rohde, L. A., & Salum, G. A. (2017). A general psychopathology factor (P Factor) in children: Structural model analysis and external validation through familial risk and child global executive function. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(1), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000205CrossRefPubMed Martel, M. M., Pan, P. M., Hoffmann, M. S., Gadelha, A., Rosário, M. C., Mari, J. J., Manfro, G. G., Miguel, E. C., Paus, T., Bressan, R. A., Rohde, L. A., & Salum, G. A. (2017). A general psychopathology factor (P Factor) in children: Structural model analysis and external validation through familial risk and child global executive function. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(1), 137–148. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​abn0000205CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Moura, L. M., Crossley, N. A., Zugman, A., Pan, P. M., Gadelha, A., Del Aquilla, M. A. G., Picon, F. A., Anes, M., Amaro, E., Jr., de Jesus Mari, J., Miguel, E. C., Rohde, L. A., Bressan, R. A., McGuire, P., Sato, J. R., & Jackowski, A. P. (2017). Coordinated brain development: Exploring the synchrony between changes in grey and white matter during childhood maturation. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 11(3), 808–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-016-9555-0CrossRefPubMed Moura, L. M., Crossley, N. A., Zugman, A., Pan, P. M., Gadelha, A., Del Aquilla, M. A. G., Picon, F. A., Anes, M., Amaro, E., Jr., de Jesus Mari, J., Miguel, E. C., Rohde, L. A., Bressan, R. A., McGuire, P., Sato, J. R., & Jackowski, A. P. (2017). Coordinated brain development: Exploring the synchrony between changes in grey and white matter during childhood maturation. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 11(3), 808–817. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11682-016-9555-0CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Park, S., & Bills, D. (2015). Parental involvement and private high school attendance. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 2(4), 66–74. Park, S., & Bills, D. (2015). Parental involvement and private high school attendance. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 2(4), 66–74.
go back to reference Pelicioni, P. H. S., Lord, S. R., Okubo, Y., Sturnieks, D. L., & Menant, J. C. (2020). People with Parkinson’s disease exhibit reduced cognitive and motor cortical activity when undertaking complex stepping tasks requiring inhibitory control. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 34(12), 1088–1098. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968320969943CrossRefPubMed Pelicioni, P. H. S., Lord, S. R., Okubo, Y., Sturnieks, D. L., & Menant, J. C. (2020). People with Parkinson’s disease exhibit reduced cognitive and motor cortical activity when undertaking complex stepping tasks requiring inhibitory control. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 34(12), 1088–1098. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​1545968320969943​CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Schultz, K., Kannis-Dymand, L., Jamieson, D., McLoughlin, L. T., Loughnan, S., Allen, A., & Hermens, D. F. (2023). Examining the longitudinal relationship between metacognitive beliefs and psychological distress in an adolescent population: A preliminary analysis. Child Psychiatry and Human Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-023-01611-zCrossRefPubMed Schultz, K., Kannis-Dymand, L., Jamieson, D., McLoughlin, L. T., Loughnan, S., Allen, A., & Hermens, D. F. (2023). Examining the longitudinal relationship between metacognitive beliefs and psychological distress in an adolescent population: A preliminary analysis. Child Psychiatry and Human Development. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10578-023-01611-zCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Şen Demirdöğen, E., Ünlü, N., Aluç, N., Sönmez, E., Ekiz, B., Çalkan, B., Gündoğdu, G. S., Güler, G., Kök, Ö., Afşar, İ, Akdeniz, B., & Yavuz, M. (2021). The relationships among attachment quality, depressive symptom levels, and metacognition problems in adolescents. Çocuk Ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi, 28(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjcamh.galenos.2021.79188CrossRef Şen Demirdöğen, E., Ünlü, N., Aluç, N., Sönmez, E., Ekiz, B., Çalkan, B., Gündoğdu, G. S., Güler, G., Kök, Ö., Afşar, İ, Akdeniz, B., & Yavuz, M. (2021). The relationships among attachment quality, depressive symptom levels, and metacognition problems in adolescents. Çocuk Ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi, 28(2), 131–137. https://​doi.​org/​10.​4274/​tjcamh.​galenos.​2021.​79188CrossRef
go back to reference Shakeshaft, Y. L., Lecerf, T., Morosan, L., Badoud, D. M., & Debbané, M. (2020). Validation of the French version of the meta-cognition questionnaire for adolescents (MCQ-Af): Evolution of metacognitive beliefs with age and their links with anxiety during adolescence. PLoS ONE, 15(3), e0230171–e0230171. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230171CrossRef Shakeshaft, Y. L., Lecerf, T., Morosan, L., Badoud, D. M., & Debbané, M. (2020). Validation of the French version of the meta-cognition questionnaire for adolescents (MCQ-Af): Evolution of metacognitive beliefs with age and their links with anxiety during adolescence. PLoS ONE, 15(3), e0230171–e0230171. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0230171CrossRef
go back to reference Slykerman, R. F., Kang, J., Van Zyl, N., Barthow, C., Wickens, K., Stanley, T., Coomarasamy, C., Purdie, G., Murphy, R., Crane, J., & Mitchell, E. A. (2018). Effect of early probiotic supplementation on childhood cognition, behaviour and mood a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Acta Paediatrica, 107(12), 2172–2178. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.14590CrossRefPubMed Slykerman, R. F., Kang, J., Van Zyl, N., Barthow, C., Wickens, K., Stanley, T., Coomarasamy, C., Purdie, G., Murphy, R., Crane, J., & Mitchell, E. A. (2018). Effect of early probiotic supplementation on childhood cognition, behaviour and mood a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Acta Paediatrica, 107(12), 2172–2178. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​apa.​14590CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Solmi, M., Radua, J., Olivola, M., Croce, E., Soardo, L., Salazar de Pablo, G., Shin, J., Kirkbride, J. B., Jones, P., Kim, J. H., Kim, J. Y., Carvalho, A. F., Seeman, M. V., Correll, C. U., & Fusar-Poli, P. (2021). Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: Large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies. Molecular Psychiatry, 27(1), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01161-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Solmi, M., Radua, J., Olivola, M., Croce, E., Soardo, L., Salazar de Pablo, G., Shin, J., Kirkbride, J. B., Jones, P., Kim, J. H., Kim, J. Y., Carvalho, A. F., Seeman, M. V., Correll, C. U., & Fusar-Poli, P. (2021). Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: Large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies. Molecular Psychiatry, 27(1), 281–295. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1038/​s41380-021-01161-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). London: Pearson Education. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). London: Pearson Education.
go back to reference Walczak, M., Austgulen, E., Kirsten, L., & Breinholst, S. (2021). Examining changes in the cognitive attentional syndrome and attentional control following metacognitive therapy for children with generalized anxiety disorder. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 14(4), 639–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41811-021-00124-8CrossRef Walczak, M., Austgulen, E., Kirsten, L., & Breinholst, S. (2021). Examining changes in the cognitive attentional syndrome and attentional control following metacognitive therapy for children with generalized anxiety disorder. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 14(4), 639–655. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s41811-021-00124-8CrossRef
go back to reference Wells, A. (2000). Emotional disorders and meta-cognition: Innovative cognitive therapy. New York: Wiley. Wells, A. (2000). Emotional disorders and meta-cognition: Innovative cognitive therapy. New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Wells, A. (2009). Chapter 1: Theory and nature of metacognitive therapy. In A. Wells (Ed.), Metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression (pp. 1–22). New York: The Guilford Press. Wells, A. (2009). Chapter 1: Theory and nature of metacognitive therapy. In A. Wells (Ed.), Metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression (pp. 1–22). New York: The Guilford Press.
go back to reference Williams, P. G., Rau, H. K., Suchy, Y., Thorgusen, S. R., & Smith, T. W. (2017). On the validity of self-report assessment of cognitive abilities: Attentional control scale associations with cognitive performance, emotional adjustment, and personality. Psychological Assessment, 29(5), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000361CrossRefPubMed Williams, P. G., Rau, H. K., Suchy, Y., Thorgusen, S. R., & Smith, T. W. (2017). On the validity of self-report assessment of cognitive abilities: Attentional control scale associations with cognitive performance, emotional adjustment, and personality. Psychological Assessment, 29(5), 519–530. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​pas0000361CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wolters, L. H., Hogendoorn, S. M., Oudega, M., Vervoort, L., de Haan, E., Prins, P. J., & Boer, F. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire-Adolescent Version (MCQ-A) in non-clinical adolescents and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26(2), 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.11.013CrossRef Wolters, L. H., Hogendoorn, S. M., Oudega, M., Vervoort, L., de Haan, E., Prins, P. J., & Boer, F. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire-Adolescent Version (MCQ-A) in non-clinical adolescents and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26(2), 343–351. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​janxdis.​2011.​11.​013CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The Relationships Between Metacognitive Beliefs, Executive Functioning, and Psychological Distress in Early Adolescence
Auteurs
Rebekah G. Belte
Tamara De Regt
Lee Kannis-Dymand
Amanda Boyes
Marcella Parker
Daniel F. Hermens
Publicatiedatum
06-07-2024
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Cognitive Therapy and Research / Uitgave 6/2024
Print ISSN: 0147-5916
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2819
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10506-9