Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Mindfulness 11/2022

10-10-2022 | ORIGINAL PAPER

The Relationship Between Negative Affect, State Mindfulness, and the Role of Personality

Auteurs: Johannes A. Karl, Ronald Fischer

Gepubliceerd in: Mindfulness | Uitgave 11/2022

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Objectives

Are affective states influencing state mindfulness and can this explain the link between personality and mindfulness? Mindfulness is commonly thought to decrease negative affect, but a number of studies have reported reductions in mindfulness in negative affect situations. This highlights a potential mechanism explaining previously observed negative relationships between individual differences such as Neuroticism and mindfulness, via their shared relationship with negative affect.

Methods

In an experiment, 331 participants were exposed to a negative affect stimulus to investigate whether previously established relationships between Neuroticism, Behavioral Inhibition, and Mindfulness are due to differences in negative affect reactivity. It was expected that participants high on Neuroticism and Behavioral Inhibition to show greater negative affect reactivity which in turn would reduce their state Non-Judgmental Acceptance and Acting with Awareness.

Results

While change in negative affect was related to lower Non-Judgmental Acceptance and Acting with Awareness, negative affect reactivity did not mediate the relationship between Neuroticism/BIS and these state mindfulness facets. Importantly, only Non-Judgmental Acceptance and Acting with Awareness facets of mindfulness were affected by negative affect change, but not Attention. This indicates that greater negative affect might require allocation of cognitive resources to stress-related processes such as threat monitoring, reducing mindful emotion processing but not attention.

Conclusions

The current study found that situational mindfulness might be influenced by state affect highlighting the need to more strongly consider the environmental factors which can shape affect in mindfulness interventions.

Trial Registration

Open Science Framework (https://​osf.​io/​kmyh2).
Literatuur
go back to reference Burger, J., Hoekstra, R. H. A., Mansueto, A. C., & Epskamp, S. (2022). Network estimation from time series and panel data. Routledge.CrossRef Burger, J., Hoekstra, R. H. A., Mansueto, A. C., & Epskamp, S. (2022). Network estimation from time series and panel data. Routledge.CrossRef
go back to reference Feldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: The development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29(3), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-006-9035-8CrossRef Feldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: The development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29(3), 177–190. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10862-006-9035-8CrossRef
go back to reference Kalokerinos, E. K., Murphy, S. C., Koval, P., Bailen, N. H., Crombez, G., Hollenstein, T., Gleeson, J., Thompson, R. J., Ryckeghem, D. M. L. V., Kuppens, P., & Bastian, B. (2020). Neuroticism may not reflect emotional variability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(17), 9270–9276. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919934117CrossRef Kalokerinos, E. K., Murphy, S. C., Koval, P., Bailen, N. H., Crombez, G., Hollenstein, T., Gleeson, J., Thompson, R. J., Ryckeghem, D. M. L. V., Kuppens, P., & Bastian, B. (2020). Neuroticism may not reflect emotional variability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(17), 9270–9276. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1073/​pnas.​1919934117CrossRef
go back to reference Kievit, R. A., Brandmaier, A. M., Ziegler, G., van Harmelen, A.-L., de Mooij, S. M. M., Moutoussis, M., Goodyer, I. M., Bullmore, E., Jones, P. B., Fonagy, P., Lindenberger, U., & Dolan, R. J. (2018). Developmental cognitive neuroscience using latent change score models: A tutorial and applications. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 33, 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.11.007CrossRefPubMed Kievit, R. A., Brandmaier, A. M., Ziegler, G., van Harmelen, A.-L., de Mooij, S. M. M., Moutoussis, M., Goodyer, I. M., Bullmore, E., Jones, P. B., Fonagy, P., Lindenberger, U., & Dolan, R. J. (2018). Developmental cognitive neuroscience using latent change score models: A tutorial and applications. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 33, 99–117. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​dcn.​2017.​11.​007CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Krägeloh, C. (2020). Mindfulness research and terminology science. 마음공부Mindful Practice, 1, 53–84. Krägeloh, C. (2020). Mindfulness research and terminology science. 마음공부Mindful Practice, 1, 53–84.
go back to reference McCrae, R., & Costa, P. T. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the Five-Factor Model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51–87). Guilford. McCrae, R., & Costa, P. T. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the Five-Factor Model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51–87). Guilford.
Metagegevens
Titel
The Relationship Between Negative Affect, State Mindfulness, and the Role of Personality
Auteurs
Johannes A. Karl
Ronald Fischer
Publicatiedatum
10-10-2022
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Mindfulness / Uitgave 11/2022
Print ISSN: 1868-8527
Elektronisch ISSN: 1868-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-022-01989-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 11/2022

Mindfulness 11/2022 Naar de uitgave