Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

12-02-2019 | Original Article

The relation between state and trait risk taking and problem-solving

Auteurs: Carola Salvi, Edward Bowden

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 5/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

People can solve problems in two main styles: through a methodical analysis, or by a sudden insight (also known as ‘Aha!’ or ‘Eureka!’ experience). Analytical solutions are achieved primarily with conscious deliberation in a trial-and-error fashion. ‘Aha!’ moments, instead, happen suddenly, often without conscious deliberation and are considered a critical facet of creative cognition. Previous research has indicated an association between creativity and risk taking (a personality trait); however, few studies have investigated how a short-term situational state of risk modulates these two different problem-solving styles. In this research, we looked at how both state and trait risks taking is related to different problem-solving styles. To measure risk as a personality trait, we administered the Balloon Analog Risk Task. To investigate risk as a state, we created a scenario, where people had to bet on their problem-solving performance at the beginning of each trial, and we compared the performance of this group with a control group that did not have to bet. The results show no association between risk as a trait and problem-solving style; however, the risk state scenario did produce a shift in dominant problem-solving style with participants in the risk scenario group solving more problems via analysis. We also found that two factors are related to problem-solving accuracy: the amount bet (i.e., when people place higher bets, they solve more problems), and success on the previous trial, especially if the solution was achieved via analysis. Furthermore, the data reveal that when under risk, females are better problem solvers than males.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
The instructions about this ratio read as: “The explosion point varies across balloons, ranging from the first pump to the 128th pump. The ideal number of pumps is 64. What that means is that if you were to make the same number of pumps on every balloon, your best strategy would be to make 64 pumps for every balloon. This would give you the most money over a long period of time. However, the actual number of pumps for any particular balloon will vary, so the best overall strategy may not be the best strategy for any one balloon.”
 
2
Two participants were removed from the problem-solving analysis because they rarely reported using one of the solution styles. Participant 1, female, reported solving by analysis for only 0.02% of her solutions, while participant 2, male, did not report solving any problems by analysis.
 
3
No main effects within or between groups were found.
 
4
No main effects within or between groups were found.
 
5
One possible explanation is that participants bet differently on the two tasks because they viewed outcomes in the BART as based on luck but viewed outcomes in the CRA task as based on ability.
 
6
Because we transformed the data in a continuous variable we did not need to exclude those two participants who reported solving too few problems via either insight or analysis.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity (Vol. 87). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity (Vol. 87). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
go back to reference Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B. A., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social influences on creativity: Theeffects of contracted-for reward. Journal of personality and social psychology, 50(1), 14.CrossRef Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B. A., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social influences on creativity: Theeffects of contracted-for reward. Journal of personality and social psychology, 50(1), 14.CrossRef
go back to reference Ashby, F. G., Isen, aM., & Turken, aU. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106(3), 529–550.CrossRef Ashby, F. G., Isen, aM., & Turken, aU. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106(3), 529–550.CrossRef
go back to reference Benedek, M. (2018). 10 Internally Directed Attention in Creative Cognition. The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity, 180. Benedek, M. (2018). 10 Internally Directed Attention in Creative Cognition. The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity, 180.
go back to reference Benedek, M., Schickel, R. J., Jauk, E., Fink, A., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Alpha power increases in right parietal cortex reflects focused internal attention. Neuropsychologia, 56, 393–400.CrossRef Benedek, M., Schickel, R. J., Jauk, E., Fink, A., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Alpha power increases in right parietal cortex reflects focused internal attention. Neuropsychologia, 56, 393–400.CrossRef
go back to reference Bowden, E., & Beeman, M. J. (1998). Getting the right idea: Semantic activation in the right hemisphere may help solve insight problems. Psychological Science, 9(6), 435–440.CrossRef Bowden, E., & Beeman, M. J. (1998). Getting the right idea: Semantic activation in the right hemisphere may help solve insight problems. Psychological Science, 9(6), 435–440.CrossRef
go back to reference Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers: A Journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc, 35(4), 634–639.CrossRef Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers: A Journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc, 35(4), 634–639.CrossRef
go back to reference Cristofori, I., Salvi, C., Beeman, M., & Grafman, J. (2018). The effects of expected reward on creative problem solving. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(5), 925–931.CrossRef Cristofori, I., Salvi, C., Beeman, M., & Grafman, J. (2018). The effects of expected reward on creative problem solving. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(5), 925–931.CrossRef
go back to reference Cummings, L. L., & Mize, G. W. (1968). Risk-taking and organizational creativity. Personnel Administration, 1(31), 38–47. Cummings, L. L., & Mize, G. W. (1968). Risk-taking and organizational creativity. Personnel Administration, 1(31), 38–47.
go back to reference Dominowski, R. L., & Dallob, P. (1995). Insight and Problem Solving. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The Nature of Insight (pp. 273–278). MIT Press. Dominowski, R. L., & Dallob, P. (1995). Insight and Problem Solving. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The Nature of Insight (pp. 273–278). MIT Press.
go back to reference Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Verbal reports on thinking. In C. Faerch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Multilingual matters, No. 30. Introspection in second language research (pp. 24–53). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Verbal reports on thinking. In C. Faerch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Multilingual matters, No. 30. Introspection in second language research (pp. 24–53). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
go back to reference Friedman, R. S., & Foster, J. (2005). Effects of motivational cues on perceptual asymmetry: implications for creativity and analytical problem solving ronald. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 263–275.CrossRef Friedman, R. S., & Foster, J. (2005). Effects of motivational cues on perceptual asymmetry: implications for creativity and analytical problem solving ronald. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 263–275.CrossRef
go back to reference Grunewald, K., & Bowden, E. M. (2018). Whose insight is it anyway?. In Insight (pp. 28–50). Routledge. Grunewald, K., & Bowden, E. M. (2018). Whose insight is it anyway?. In Insight (pp. 28–50). Routledge.
go back to reference Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence (Vol. 5). New York: McGraw Hill. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence (Vol. 5). New York: McGraw Hill.
go back to reference Hsee, C. K., & Weber, E. U. (1997). A fundamental prediction error: self–others discrepancies in risk preference. Journal of experimental psychology: general, 126(1), 45.CrossRef Hsee, C. K., & Weber, E. U. (1997). A fundamental prediction error: self–others discrepancies in risk preference. Journal of experimental psychology: general, 126(1), 45.CrossRef
go back to reference Hsee, C. K., & Weber, E. U. (1999). Cross-national differences in risk preference and lay predictions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(2), 165–179.CrossRef Hsee, C. K., & Weber, E. U. (1999). Cross-national differences in risk preference and lay predictions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(2), 165–179.CrossRef
go back to reference Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology., 52, 1122–1131.CrossRef Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology., 52, 1122–1131.CrossRef
go back to reference Laukkonen, R. E., & Tangen, J. M. (2018). How to detect insight moments in problem solving experiments. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 282.CrossRef Laukkonen, R. E., & Tangen, J. M. (2018). How to detect insight moments in problem solving experiments. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 282.CrossRef
go back to reference Mednick, S. A. (1968). Remote associates test. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 213–214.CrossRef Mednick, S. A. (1968). Remote associates test. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 213–214.CrossRef
go back to reference Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. In H. A. Simon (Ed.), Communications (Vol. 104). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. In H. A. Simon (Ed.), Communications (Vol. 104). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
go back to reference Nygren, T. E. (1998). Reacting to Perceived High- and Low-Risk Win-Lose Opportunities in a Risky Decision- Making Task : Is It Framing or Affect or Bth? Motivation and Emotion, 22(1), 73–98.CrossRef Nygren, T. E. (1998). Reacting to Perceived High- and Low-Risk Win-Lose Opportunities in a Risky Decision- Making Task : Is It Framing or Affect or Bth? Motivation and Emotion, 22(1), 73–98.CrossRef
go back to reference Nygren, T. E., Isen, A. M., Taylor, P. J., & Dulin, J. (1996). The influence of positive affect on the decision rule in risk situations: Focus on outcome (and especially avoidance of loss) rather than probability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0038.CrossRef Nygren, T. E., Isen, A. M., Taylor, P. J., & Dulin, J. (1996). The influence of positive affect on the decision rule in risk situations: Focus on outcome (and especially avoidance of loss) rather than probability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66(1), 59–72. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1006/​obhd.​1996.​0038.CrossRef
go back to reference Schooler, J. W., & Melcher, J. (1995). The ineffability of insight. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 97–133). Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press. Schooler, J. W., & Melcher, J. (1995). The ineffability of insight. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 97–133). Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press.
go back to reference Shen, W., Hommel, B., Yuan, Y., & Zhang, W. (2018). Risk taking and creativity: Convergent, but not divergent thinking is better in low-risk takers. Creativity Research Journal, 30(2). Shen, W., Hommel, B., Yuan, Y., & Zhang, W. (2018). Risk taking and creativity: Convergent, but not divergent thinking is better in low-risk takers. Creativity Research Journal, 30(2).
go back to reference Wegbreit, E., Suzuki, S., Grabowecky, M., Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2012). Visual attention modulates insight versus analytic solving of verbal problems. The Journal of Problem Solving, 4(2), 94–115.CrossRef Wegbreit, E., Suzuki, S., Grabowecky, M., Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2012). Visual attention modulates insight versus analytic solving of verbal problems. The Journal of Problem Solving, 4(2), 94–115.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The relation between state and trait risk taking and problem-solving
Auteurs
Carola Salvi
Edward Bowden
Publicatiedatum
12-02-2019
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01152-y