Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The health state classifier EQ-5D of the EuroQoL group has been expanded to a 5-level instrument (EQ-5D-5L), but studies on psychometric properties of this new instrument, applied to the general population, are rare.
A sample of 2,469 subjects, representatively selected from the German general population, was asked to fill in the EQ-5D-5L and several other questionnaires. Crude sum scores of the EQ-5D-5L were calculated and compared with scores derived from two sets of utilities, one from a German and one from a UK sample.
The mean sum score (0–100 scale) was 91.5. Males reported better health states than females, and there was a nearly linear age trend. The list of the 45 most frequent health patterns (those with at least 0.2 % of the respondents) showed that almost half of the participants (47.5 %) responded being in the optimal health state, indicating a ceiling effect. Correlations between EQ-5D-5L scores and other questionnaires were very similar for all three scoring systems of the EQ-5D-5L. Finally, normative scores are given on the basis of sum scores.
The applicability of the EQ-5D-5L in the general population is limited because of the skewness. Sum scores are useful because of their simplicity, international generalizability, and construct validity.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Abdin, E., Subramaniam, M., Vaingankar, J. A., Luo, N., & Chong, S. A. (2013). Measuring health-related quality of life among adults in Singapore: Population norms for the EQ-5D. Quality of Life Research,. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0405-x.
Hinz, A., Klaiberg, A., Brahler, E., & Konig, H. H. (2006). The quality of life questionnaire EQ-5D: Modelling and norm values for the general population [Der Lebensqualitaetsfragebogen EQ-5D: Modelle und Normwerte fuer die Allgemeinbevoelkerung]. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 56, 42–48. CrossRef
Xie, F., Pullenayegum, E., Gaebel, K., Oppe, M., & Krabbe, P. F. M. (2012). Eliciting preferences to the EQ-5D-5L health states: Discrete choice experiment or multiprofile case of best-worst scaling. Value in Health, 15, A198–A199. CrossRef
Golicki, D., Zawodnik, S., Janssen, M. F., Kiljan, A., & Hermanowski, T. (2010). Psychometric comparison of EQ-5D and EQ-5D-5L in a student population. Value in Health, 13, A240. CrossRef
Pickard, A. S., Kohlmann, T., Janssen, M. F., Bonsel, G., Rosenbloom, S., & Cella, D. (2007). Evaluating equivalency between response systems—Application of the Rasch model to a 3-level and 5-level EQ-5D. Medical Care, 45, 812–819.
EuroQoL Group. (2013). http://www.euroqol.org/about-eq-5d/valuation-of-eq-5d/eq-5d-5l-value-sets.html.
Wilke, C. T., Pickard, A. S., Walton, S. M., Moock, J., Kohlmann, T., & Lee, T. A. (2010). Statistical implications of utility weighted and equally weighted HRQL measures: An empirical study. Health Economics, 19, 101–110. PubMed
Morfeld, M., Bullinger, M., Nantke, J., & Brahler, E. (2005). The version 2.0 of the SF-36 Health Survey: Results of a population-representative study. Sozial- und Präventivmedizin, 50, 292–300. CrossRef
- The quality of life questionnaire EQ-5D-5L: psychometric properties and normative values for the general German population
- Springer International Publishing