Top

Quality of Life Research

Gepubliceerd in:

01-03-2012

The psychosocial impact of cancer: evidence in support of independent general positive and negative components

Auteurs: Jin-Shei Lai, Sofia F. Garcia, John M. Salsman, Sarah Rosenbloom, David Cella

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 2/2012

Abstract

Purpose

Considerable research has demonstrated the negative psychosocial impact of cancer. Recent work has highlighted positive psychosocial outcomes. Research is now needed to evaluate the relationship between negative and positive impacts. This paper reports the development and validation of a measurement model capturing positive and negative psychosocial illness impacts.

Methods

The sample included 754 cancer patients on- or post-treatment. Item development was informed by literature review, expert input patient interviews and the results of a pilot study of 205 cancer patients, resulting in 43 positive and 46 negative items. Factor analyses were used to evaluate the dimensionality of the item pools. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to examine relationships between psychosocial illness impact and other variables.

Results

Unidimensionality was demonstrated within but not across negative and positive impact items. ANOVA results showed differential relationships between negative and positive impacts, respectively, and patient sociodemographic and clinical variables.

Conclusion

Positive and negative psychosocial illness impacts are best conceptualized and measured as two independent factors. Computerized adaptive tests and short-form measures developed from this comprehensive psychosocial illness impact item bank may benefit future research and clinical applications.

vorige artikel Perceived health in lung cancer patients: the role of positive and negative affect

volgende artikel Social relationships as a major determinant in the valuation of health states

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Charmaz, K. (2000). Experiencing chronic illness. In G. L. Albrecht, R. Fitzpatrick & S. C. Susan (Eds.), Handbook of social studies in health and medicine (pp. 277–292). London, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.

Cordova, M. J., et al. (1995). Frequency and correlates of post-traumatic-stress-disorder like symptoms after treatment for breast cancer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 6–981.CrossRef

Derogatis, L. R., et al. (1983). The prevalence of psychiatric disorders among cancer patients. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 249(6), 751–757.CrossRef

Kornblith, A. B. (1998). Psychosocial adaption of cancer survivors. In J. C. Holland (Ed.), Psycho-oncology (pp. 223–254). New York, New York: Oxford University Press.

Moyer, A., & Salovey, P. (1996). Psychosocial sequelae of breast cancer and its treatment. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 18, 110–125.CrossRef

Stanton, A. L., Collins, C. A., & Sworowski, L. A. (2001). Adjustment to chronic illness: Theory and research. In A. Baum, T. A. Revenson & J. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp. 387–403). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Zabora, J., et al. (2001). The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psycho-Oncology, 10(1), 19–28.PubMedCrossRef

Hewitt, M., et al. (2006). From cancer patient to cancer survivor: Lost in transition. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

Adler, N. E., Page, A., & Institute of Medicine Committee on Psychosocial Services to Cancer Patients/Families in a Community. (2008). Cancer care for the whole patient: Meeting psychosocial health needs. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

10.

Reuben, S. H., et al., (2004). Living beyond cancer: Finding a new balance: President’s cancer panel 2003–2004 annual report. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Health and Human Services.

11.

Affleck, G., & Tennen, H. (1996). Construing benefits from adversity: adaptational significance and dispositional underpinnings. Journal of Personality, 64(4), 899–922.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Andrykowski, M. A., Brady, M. J., & Hunt, J. W. (1993). Positive psychosocial adjustment in potential bone marrow transplant recipients: Cancer as a psychosocial transition. Psycho-Oncology, 2(261), 276.

13.

Antoni, M. H., & Carver, C. S. (2003). Cognitive behavioral stress management intervention effects on benefit finding in breast cancer patients. Psychosocial and physiological correlates. Paper presented at the society of behavioral medicine, twenty-fourth annual meeting. Salt Lake City, UT.

14.

Bellizzi, K. M. (2004). Expressions of generativity and posttraumatic growth in adult cancer survivors. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 58(4), 267–287.CrossRef

15.

Bellizzi, K. M., & Blank, T. O. (2006). Predicting posttraumatic growth in breast cancer survivors. Health Psychology, 25(1), 47–56.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Cordova, M. J., et al. (2001). Posttraumatic growth following breast cancer: A controlled comparison study. Health Psychology, 20(3), 176–185.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Park, C. L., & Lechner, S. C. (2006). Measurement issues in assessing growth following stressful life experiences. In L. G. Calhoun & R. G. Tedeschi (Eds.), Handbook of posttraumatic growth: Research and practice (pp. 47–67). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

18.

Petrie, K. J., et al. (1999). Positive effects of illness reported by myocardial infarction and breast cancer patients. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 47, 537–543.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Sears, S. R., Stanton, A. L., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2003). The yellow brick road and the emerald city: Benefit finding, positive reappraisal coping and posttraumatic growth in women with early-stage breast cancer. Health Psychology, 22(5), 487–497.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Taylor, S. E. (1983). Adjustment to Threatening Events: A Theory of Cognitive Adaptation. American Psychologist, 38(11), 1161–1173.

21.

Tedeschi, R. G., Park, C. L., & Calhoun, L. G. (1998). Posttraumatic growth: Positive change in the aftermath of crisis. The LEA series in personality and clinical psychology. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

22.

Tomich, P. L., & Helgeson, V. S. (2002). Five years later: A cross-sectional comparison of breast cancer survivors with healthy women. Psycho-Oncology, 11(2), 154–169.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Tomich, P. L., & Helgeson, V. S. (2004). Is finding something good in the bad always good? Benefit finding among women with breast cancer. Health Psychology, 23(1), 16–23.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1995). Trauma and transformation: Growing in the aftermath of suffering. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

25.

Bellizzi, K. M., et al. (2007). Positive and negative life changes experienced by survivors of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 34(2), 188–199.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Bower, J. E., et al. (2005). Perceptions of positive meaning and vulnerability following breast cancer: Predictors and outcomes among long-term breast cancer survivors. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 29(3), 236–245.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Curbow, B., et al. (1993). Loss and recovery themes of long-term survivors of bone marrow transplants. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 10(4), 1–13.CrossRef

28.

Curbow, B., et al. (1993). Personal changes, dispositional optimism, and psychological adjustment to bone marrow transplantation. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16(5), 423–443.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Antoni, M. H., et al. (2001). Cognitive-behavioral stress management intervention decreases the prevalence of depression and enhances benefit finding among women under treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Health Psychology, 20(1), 20–32.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Horowitz, M., Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. (1979). Impact of event scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41(3), 209–218.PubMed

32.

McMillen, J. C., & Fisher, R. H. (1998). The perceived benefit scales: Measuring perceived positive life changes after negative events. Social Work Research, 22(3), 173–187.CrossRef

33.

Park, C. L., Cohen, L. H., & Murch, R. L. (1996). Assessment and prediction of stress-related growth. Journal of Personality, 64(1), 71–105.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1996). The post-traumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 455–471.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Calhoun, L. G., & Tedeschi, R. G. (1991). Receiving benefits in traumatic events: Some issues for practicing psychologists. The Journal of Training and Practice in Professional Psychology, 5(1), 45–52.

36.

Zebrack, B. J., et al. (2006). Assessing the impact of cancer: Development of a new instrument for long-term survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 15(5), 407–421.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Zebrack, B. J., et al. (2008). The impact of cancer and quality of life for long-term survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 17(9), 891–900.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Frazier, P., et al. (2004). Correlates of levels and patterns of positive life changes following sexual assault. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(1), 19–30.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Vardy, J., et al. (2006). Assessing cognitive function in cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 14(11), 1111–1118.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Lai, J. S., et al. (2009). Evaluating the dimensionality of perceived cognitive function. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 37(6), 982–995.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561–573.CrossRef

42.

Lai, J. S., Rosenbloom, S., & Cella, D. (2004). Using Item Response Theory (IRT) to build illness impact item banks in cancer. Presented at ‘Advances in Health Outcomes Measurement: Exploring the Current State and the Future Applications of Item response Theory, Item Banks, and Computer-adaptive Testing’ sponsored by Drug Information Association and National Cancer Institute. June 23–25. Bethesda, MD, U.S.A.

43.

Lai, J. S., et al. (2004). Building core HRQL measures: Positive and negative psychological impact of cancer. Quality of Life Research, 13(9), 1503.

44.

S. A. S. Institute Inc. (2003). SAS/STAT, Version 9.1. Cary, NC.

45.

Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.CrossRef

46.

Cattell, R. B. (1966). The screen test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.CrossRef

47.

Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structure equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

48.

Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10.CrossRef

49.

Chen, F. F., West, S. G., & Sousa, K. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(2), 189–225.CrossRef

50.

Lai, J. S., Crane, P. K., & Cella, D. (2006). Factor analysis techniques for assessing sufficient unidimensionality of cancer related fatigue. Quality of Life Research, 15(7), 1179–1190.PubMedCrossRef

51.

McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.

52.

Stanton, A. L., & Snider, P. R. (1993). Coping with a breast cancer diagnosis: A prospective study. Health Psychology, 12(1), 16–23.PubMedCrossRef

53.

Vinokur, A. D., et al. (1989). Physical and psychosocial functioning and adjustment to breast cancer: Long term follow-up of a screening population. Cancer, 63(2), 394–405.PubMedCrossRef

54.

Stanton, A. L., et al. (2005). Promoting adjustment after treatment for cancer. Cancer, 104(11 Suppl), 2608–2613.PubMedCrossRef

55.

Cassileth, B. R., et al. (1984). Psychosocial status in chronic illness. A comparative analysis of six diagnostic groups. The New England Journal of Medicine, 311(8), 506–511.PubMedCrossRef

56.

Ganz, P. A., et al. (1998). Life after breast cancer: understanding women’s health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16(2), 501–514.PubMed

57.

Fife, B. L. (1994). The conceptualization of meaning in illness. Social Science and Medicine, 38(2), 309–316.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Langeveld, N. E., et al. (2004). Quality of life, self-esteem and worries in young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 13(12), 867–881.PubMedCrossRef

59.

Taïeb, O., et al. (2003). Posttraumatic stress symptoms after childhood cancer. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 12(6), 255–264.PubMedCrossRef

60.

Stanton, A. L., Bower, J. E., & Low, C. A. (2006). Posttraumatic growth after cancer. In L. G. Calhoun & R. G. Tedeschi (Eds.), Handbook of posttraumatic growth: Research and practice (pp. 138–175). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

61.

Soni, M. K., & Cella, D. (2002). Quality of life and symptom measures in oncology: An overview. The American Journal of Managed Care, 8(18 Suppl), S560–S573.PubMed

62.

Hahn, E. A., & Cella, D. (2003). Health outcomes assessment in vulnerable populations: Measurement challenges and recommendations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(Suppl 2), S35–S42.PubMedCrossRef

63.

Cella, D., & Chang, C. H. (2000). A discussion of item response theory (IRT) and its applications in health status assessment. Medical Care, 38(9 Suppl), 1166–1172.

64.

Cella, D., Chang, C. H., & Heinemann, A. W. (2002). Item Response Theory (IRT): Applications in quality of life measurement, analysis, and interpretation. In M. Mesbah, B. Cole & M. L. T. Lee (Eds.), Statistical methods for quality of life studies: Design, measurements, and analysis (pp. 169–186). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

65.

Gershon, R., et al. (2003). Item response theory and health-related quality of life in cancer. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 3(6), 783–791.CrossRef

Titel: The psychosocial impact of cancer: evidence in support of independent general positive and negative components
Auteurs: Jin-Shei Lai
Sofia F. Garcia
John M. Salsman
Sarah Rosenbloom
David Cella
Publicatiedatum: 01-03-2012
Uitgeverij: Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9935-2

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2012

Rasch analysis in the development of a simplified version of the national eye institute visual-function questionnaire-25 for utility estimation

Verification of the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 palliative (EORTCQLQ-C15-PAL)

Use of the Distress Thermometer to discern clinically relevant quality of life differences in women with breast cancer

Health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors of different sexual orientations

Assessing the effect of darbepoetin alfa on patient-reported fatigue in chemotherapy-induced anemia in four randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials

Differences in quality of life of hemodialysis patients between dialysis centers