Top

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Gepubliceerd in:

17-04-2015

The Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the Antisocial Process Screening Device Self-Report Version in Chinese Adolescents

Auteurs: Meng-Cheng Wang, Qiaowen Deng, Cherie Armour, XiangYang Bi, Hong Zeng

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 4/2015

Abstract

The present study examined the factor structure, internal consistency and criterion validity of the Antisocial Process Screening Device-Self-Report (APSD-SR) in a large sample of Chinese community youth with an average age of 13.89 (SD = 1.27) years. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis supported a four factor solution (Impulsivity [IMP], Callous-Unemotional [CU], Narcissism [NAR], and Asocial behavior [ASO]). The internal consistencies of the APSD total scale and subscales were low to marginal, which were comparable with previous studies. Moreover, the APSD scores were related to criterion variables in ways consistent with predictions based on the new four-factor model. Our findings support the overall utility of the APSD-SR preliminarily for assessing antisocial behavior and psychopathic traits in Chinese community youth.

vorige artikel Empathy Faking in Psychopathic Offenders: The Vulnerability of Empathy Measures

volgende artikel The Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory-Short Version in Spanish Adolescents—Factor Structure, Reliability, and Relation with Aggression, Bullying, and Cyber Bullying

Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213–232. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.101.2.213.CrossRefPubMed

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.

Andershed, H., Kerr, M., Stattin, H., & Levander, S. (2002). Psychopathic traits in non-referred youths: Initial test of a new assessment tool. In E. Blaauw & L. Sheridan (Eds.), Psychopaths: Current international perspectives (pp. 131–158). The Hague: Elsevier.

Bijttebier, P., & Decoene, S. (2009). Assessment of psychopathic traits in children and adolescents: further validation of the antisocial process screening device and the childhood psychopathy scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 157–163. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.25.3.157.CrossRef

Burke, J. D., Loeber, R., & Lahey, B. B. (2007). Adolescent conduct disorder and interpersonal callousness as predictors of psychopathy in young adults. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 36, 334–346. doi:10.1080/15374410701444223.CrossRef

Burns, G. L. (2000). Problem of item overlap between the psychopathy screening device and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder rating scales. Psychological Assessment, 12, 447–450. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.4.447.CrossRefPubMed

Caputo, A. A., Frick, P. J., & Brodsky, S. L. (1999). Family violence and juvenile sex offending: the potential mediating role of psychopathic traits and negative attitudes toward women. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 338–356. doi:10.1177/0093854899026003004.CrossRef

Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319. doi:10.1037//1040-3590.7.3.309.CrossRef

Colins, O. F., Bijttebier, P., Broekaert, E., & Andershed, H. (2014). Psychopathic-like traits among detained female adolescents reliability and validity of the antisocial process screening device and the youth psychopathic traits inventory. Assessment, 21, 195–209. doi:10.1177/1073191113481997.CrossRefPubMed

Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13, 171–188. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.171.CrossRefPubMed

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555.CrossRef

de Wied, M., van der Baan, H., Raaijmakers, Q., de Ruiter, C., & Meeus, W. (2014). Factor structure and construct validity of the Dutch version of the Antisocial Process Screening Device. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36, 84–92. doi:10.1007/s10862-013-9371-4.CrossRef

DiStefano, C. (2002). The impact of categorization with confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 327–346. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0903-2.CrossRef

Edens, J. F., Hart, S. D., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, J. K., & Olver, M. E. (2000). Use of the Personality Assessment Inventory to assess psychopathy in offender populations. Psychological Assessment, 12, 132–139. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.2.132.CrossRefPubMed

Edens, J. F., Skeem, J. L., Cruise, K. R., & Cauffman, E. (2001). Assessment of “juvenile psychopathy” and its association with violence: a critical review*. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 19, 53–80. doi:10.1002/bsl.425.CrossRef

Edens, J. F., & Vincent, G. M. (2008). Juvenile psychopathy: a clinical construct in need of restraint? Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 8, 186–197. doi:10.1080/15228930801964042.CrossRef

Eremsoy, C. E., Karanci, A. N., & Berument, S. K. (2011). Psychometric properties of the antisocial process screening device in a non-clinical sample of Turkish children. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2319–2323. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.452.CrossRef

Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272.CrossRef

Falkenbach, D. M., Poythress, N. G., & Heide, K. M. (2003). Psychopathic features in a juvenile diversion population: reliability and predictive validity of two self‐report measures. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 787–805. doi:10.1002/bsl.562.CrossRef

Fite, P. J., Greening, L., Stoppelbein, L., & Fabiano, G. A. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis of the antisocial process screening device with a clinical inpatient population. Assessment, 16, 103–114. doi:10.1177/1073191108319893.CrossRefPubMed

Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466–491. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

Forth, A. E., Hart, S. D., & Hare, R. D. (1990). Assessment of psychopathy in male young offenders. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 342–344. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.2.3.342.CrossRef

Forth, A. E., Kosson, D. S., & Hare, R. D. (2003). Hare psychopathy checklist-revised: Youth version. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

Frick, P., Barry, C., & Bodin, S. (2000a). Applying the concept of psychopathy to children: Implications for the assessment of antisocial youth. In C. Gacono (Ed.), The clinical and forensic assessment of psychopathy: A practitioner’s guide (pp. 1–24). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Frick, P. J., Bodin, S. D., & Barry, C. T. (2000b). Psychopathic traits and conduct problems in community and clinic-referred samples of children: further development of the psychopathy screening device. Psychological Assessment, 12, 382–393. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.4.382.CrossRefPubMed

Frick, P. J., & Hare, R. D. (2001). The antisocial process screening device. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

Frick, P. J., Kimonis, E. R., Dandreaux, D. M., & Farell, J. M. (2003). The 4 year stability of psychopathic traits in non‐referred youth. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 713–736. doi:10.1002/bsl.568.CrossRef

Frick, P. J., O’Brien, B. S., Wootton, J. M., & McBurnett, K. (1994). Psychopathy and conduct problems in children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 700–707. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.103.4.700.CrossRefPubMed

Funder, D. C., Kolar, D. C., & Blackman, M. C. (1995). Agreement among judges of personality: interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 656–672. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.656.CrossRefPubMed

Fung, A. L. C., Raine, A., & Gao, Y. (2009). Cross-cultural generalizability of the reactive–proactive aggression questionnaire (RPQ). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 473–479. doi:10.1080/00223890903088420.CrossRefPubMed

Goodwin, B. E., Sellbom, M., & Salekin, R. T. (in press). Elucidating the construct validity of the antisocial process screening device (APSD) in a sample of young adults. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. doi: 10.1007/s10862-014-9444-z

Hare, R. D. (1991). The hare psychopathy checklist-revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

Hare, R. D. (2003). Hare psychopathy checklist-revised (PCL-R): Second edition, technical manual. Toronto: Mult-Health Systems.

IBM SPSS Inc. (2009). IBM SPSS missing values for windows (Version 17). Armonk: IBM.

Johnstone, L., & Cooke, D. J. (2004). Psychopathic–like traits in childhood: conceptual and measurement concerns. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 22, 103–125. doi:10.1002/bsl.577.CrossRef

Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

Kotler, J. S., & McMahon, R. J. (2010). Assessment of child and adolescent psychopathy. In R. T. Salek & D. R. Lynam (Eds.), Handbook of child & adolescent psychopathy (pp. 79–109). New York: The Guilford Press.

Laajasalo, T., Saukkonen, S., Kivivuori, J., Salmi, V., Lipsanen, J., & Aronen, E. T. (2014). Self-reported psychopathic-like features among Finnish community youth: Investigation of the factor structure of the antisocial personality screening device. Journal of Adolescence, 37, 1185–1188. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.08.010.CrossRefPubMed

Leung, P. W., Kwong, S. L., Tang, C. P., Ho, T. P., Hung, S. F., Lee, C. C., & Liu, W. S. (2006). Test–retest reliability and criterion validity of the Chinese version of CBCL, TRF, and YSR. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 970–973. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01570.x.CrossRefPubMed

Lilienfeld, S. O., & Fowler, K. A. (2006). The self-report assessment of psychopathy: Problems, pitfalls, and promises. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 107–132). New York: Guilford Press.

Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. O. (2004). Applying multigroup confirmatory factor models for continuous outcomes to Likert scale data complicates meaningful group comparisons. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 514–534. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1104-2.CrossRef

Lynam, D. R. (1997). Pursuing the psychopath: capturing the fledgling psychopath in a nomological net. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 425–438. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.106.3.425.CrossRefPubMed

McMahon, R. J., Witkiewitz, K., & Kotler, J. S. (2010). Predictive validity of Callous-Unemotional traits measured in early adolescence with respect to multiple antisocial outcomes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 752–763. doi:10.1037/a0020796.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

Munoz, L. C., & Frick, P. J. (2007). The reliability, stability, and predictive utility of the self-report version of the Antisocial Process Screening Device. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 299–312. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00560.x.CrossRefPubMed

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, California: Muthén & Muthén.

O’Kearney, R., & Dadds, M. (2004). Developmental and gender differences in the language for emotions across the adolescent years. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 913–938. doi:10.1080/02699930341000356.CrossRef

Pechorro, P., Maroco, J., Poiares, C., & Vieira, R. X. (2013). Validation of the Portuguese version of the Antisocial Process Screening Device–Self-Report with a focus on delinquent behavior and behavior problems. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57, 112–126. doi:10.1177/0306624X11427174.CrossRefPubMed

Petrila, J., & Skeem, J. L. (2003). An introduction to the special issues on juvenile psychopathy and some reflections on the current debate. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 689–694. doi:10.1002/bsl.569.CrossRef

Poythress, N. G., Dembo, R., Wareham, J., & Greenbaum, P. E. (2006a). Construct validity of the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory (YPI) and the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD) with justice-involved adolescents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 26–55. doi:10.1177/0093854805282518.CrossRef

Poythress, N. G., Douglas, K. S., Falkenbach, D., Cruise, K., Lee, Z., Murrie, D. C., & Vitacco, M. (2006b). Internal consistency reliability of the self-report Antisocial Process Screening Device. Assessment, 13, 107–113. doi:10.1177/1073191105284279.CrossRefPubMed

Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Gatzke-Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, C., & Liu, J. (2006). The reactive–proactive aggression questionnaire: differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 159–171. doi:10.1002/ab.20115.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

Ray, J. V., Hall, J., Rivera-Hudson, N., Poythress, N. G., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Morano, M. (2013). The relation between self-reported psychopathic traits and distorted response styles: a meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 1–14. doi:10.1037/a0026482.CrossRef

Salekin, R. T. (2006). Psychopathy in children and adolescents: Key issues in conceptualization and assessment. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 389–414). New York: Guilford Press.

Salekin, R. T., & Lynam, D. R. (2010). Child and adolescent psychopathy: An introduction. In R. T. Salekin & D. R. Lynam (Eds.), Handbook of child and adolescent psychopathy (pp. 1–11). New York: Guilford Press.

Skeem, J. L., Polaschek, D. L., Patrick, C. J., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2011). Psychopathic personality: bridging the gap between scientific evidence and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 95–162. doi:10.1177/1529100611426706.CrossRefPubMed

Silk, K. R. (2008). Personality disorder in adolescence: the diagnosis that dare not speak its name. Personality and Mental Health, 2, 46–48. doi:10.1002/pmh.31.CrossRef

Spain, S. E., Douglas, K. S., Poythress, N. G., & Epstein, M. (2004). The relationship between psychopathic features, violence and treatment outcome: the comparison of three youth measures of psychopathic features. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 22, 85–102. doi:10.1002/bsl.576.CrossRef

Vahl, P., Colins, O. F., Lodewijks, H. P., Markus, M. T., Doreleijers, T. A., & Vermeiren, R. R. (2014). Psychopathic-like traits in detained adolescents: clinical usefulness of self-report. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 23, 691–699. doi:10.1007/s00787-013-0497-4.CrossRef

Viding, E., Blair, R. R., Moffitt, T. E., & Plomin, R. (2005). Evidence for substantial genetic risk for psychopathy in 7-year-olds. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 46, 592–597. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00393.x.CrossRef

Vitacco, M. J., Rogers, R., & Neumann, C. S. (2003). The antisocial process screening device: an examination of its construct and criterion-related validity. Assessment, 10, 143–150. doi:10.1177/1073191103010002005.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: The Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the Antisocial Process Screening Device Self-Report Version in Chinese Adolescents
Auteurs: Meng-Cheng Wang
Qiaowen Deng
Cherie Armour
XiangYang Bi
Hong Zeng
Publicatiedatum: 17-04-2015
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-015-9486-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2015

The Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale - Parent Version: Extended Applicability and Validity for Use with Younger Youth and Children with Histories of Early-Life Caregiver Neglect

The Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory-Short Version in Spanish Adolescents—Factor Structure, Reliability, and Relation with Aggression, Bullying, and Cyber Bullying

Reliability and Validity of a Photo Rating Measure of Alopecia

Dyadic Attunement and Physiological Synchrony During Mother-Child Interactions: An Exploratory Study in Children With and Without Externalizing Behavior Problems

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

The Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the Antisocial Process Screening Device Self-Report Version in Chinese Adolescents

Abstract

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2015

The Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale - Parent Version: Extended Applicability and Validity for Use with Younger Youth and Children with Histories of Early-Life Caregiver Neglect

The Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory-Short Version in Spanish Adolescents—Factor Structure, Reliability, and Relation with Aggression, Bullying, and Cyber Bullying

Reliability and Validity of a Photo Rating Measure of Alopecia

Dyadic Attunement and Physiological Synchrony During Mother-Child Interactions: An Exploratory Study in Children With and Without Externalizing Behavior Problems

A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of Trait Social Anxiety Self-Report Measures

Interactive Effects of Anxiety Sensitivity and Emotion Regulation on Anxiety Symptoms

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

The Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale - Parent Version: Extended Applicability and Validity for Use with Younger Youth and Children with Histories of Early-Life Caregiver Neglect

The Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory-Short Version in Spanish Adolescents—Factor Structure, Reliability, and Relation with Aggression, Bullying, and Cyber Bullying

Reliability and Validity of a Photo Rating Measure of Alopecia

Dyadic Attunement and Physiological Synchrony During Mother-Child Interactions: An Exploratory Study in Children With and Without Externalizing Behavior Problems

A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of Trait Social Anxiety Self-Report Measures

Interactive Effects of Anxiety Sensitivity and Emotion Regulation on Anxiety Symptoms