Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 6/2018

24-06-2017 | Original Article

The processing of price comparison is not holistic but componential

Auteurs: Pedro Macizo, Fernando Ojedo

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

In three experiments, we evaluate whether the processing of prices is holistic or componential. When participants receive two prices and they select the higher price, distance effects are found when the distances between the two prices are defined holistically but not when they are defined in terms of digits (Experiment 1). This result suggests that prices are processed holistically. However, we show that the holistic distance effect can be explained by the compatibility between the digits and the monetary category of prices (euro and cent). After controlling for the holistic distance, compatible trials (e.g., 8 euro–4 cent, 8 > 4, and euro > cent) are processed faster than incompatible trials (e.g., 8 cent–4 euro, 8 > 4 but cent < euro) with simultaneous and sequential presentation of prices (Experiment 2). Moreover, the compatibility effect is modulated by the ratio of intra monetary category comparisons (8 euro–6 euro) and inter monetary category comparisons (8 euro–4 cents) (Experiment 3). The existence of compatibility effects between the digits and the monetary category of prices suggests that cognitive processing of prices is not holistic but componential.
Voetnoten
1
We are indebted to an anonymous reviewer of a previous (unpublished) version of this paper (in which only Experiment 1 was included). The author provided this argumentation and also inspired the experiments reported here manipulating the compatibility between the digit and the monetary category of prices.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A. (2005). Size does matter: The effects of magnitude representation congruency on price perceptions and purchase likelihood. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 64–76. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_9.CrossRef Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A. (2005). Size does matter: The effects of magnitude representation congruency on price perceptions and purchase likelihood. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 64–76. doi:10.​1207/​s15327663jcp1501​_​9.CrossRef
go back to reference Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A. (2007). Distortion of price discount perceptions: The right digit effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 162–173. doi:10.1086/518526.CrossRef Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A. (2007). Distortion of price discount perceptions: The right digit effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 162–173. doi:10.​1086/​518526.CrossRef
go back to reference Dehaene, S., & Marques, J. F. (2002). Cognitive euroscience: Scalar variability in price estimation and the cognitive consequences of switching to the euro. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Experimental Psychology, 55, 705–731. doi:10.1080/02724980244000044.CrossRefPubMed Dehaene, S., & Marques, J. F. (2002). Cognitive euroscience: Scalar variability in price estimation and the cognitive consequences of switching to the euro. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Experimental Psychology, 55, 705–731. doi:10.​1080/​0272498024400004​4.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Huber, S., Bahnmueller, J., Klein, E., & Moeller, K. (2015). Testing a model of componential processing of multi-symbol numbers -evidence from measurement units. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0805-8.PubMed Huber, S., Bahnmueller, J., Klein, E., & Moeller, K. (2015). Testing a model of componential processing of multi-symbol numbers -evidence from measurement units. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. doi:10.​3758/​s13423-015-0805-8.PubMed
go back to reference Huber, S., Cornelesen, S., Moeller, K., & Nuerk, H. C. (2014). Towards a model framework of generalized parallel componential processing of multi-symbol numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. doi:10.1037/xlm0000043. Huber, S., Cornelesen, S., Moeller, K., & Nuerk, H. C. (2014). Towards a model framework of generalized parallel componential processing of multi-symbol numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. doi:10.​1037/​xlm0000043.
go back to reference Macizo, P., & Herrera, A. (2010). Two-digit number comparison: Decade-unit and unit-decade produce the same compatibility effect with number words. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 17–24. doi:10.1037/a0015803.CrossRefPubMed Macizo, P., & Herrera, A. (2010). Two-digit number comparison: Decade-unit and unit-decade produce the same compatibility effect with number words. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 17–24. doi:10.​1037/​a0015803.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nuerk, H. C., Moeller, K., Klein, E., Willmes, K., & Fischer, M. H. (2011). Extending the mental number line—a review of multi-digit number processing. Journal of Psychology, 219, 3–22. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000041. Nuerk, H. C., Moeller, K., Klein, E., Willmes, K., & Fischer, M. H. (2011). Extending the mental number line—a review of multi-digit number processing. Journal of Psychology, 219, 3–22. doi:10.​1027/​2151-2604/​a000041.
go back to reference Thomas, M., & Morwitz, V. G. (2005). Penny wise and pound foolish: The left digit effect in price cognition. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 54–64. doi:10.1086/429600.CrossRef Thomas, M., & Morwitz, V. G. (2005). Penny wise and pound foolish: The left digit effect in price cognition. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 54–64. doi:10.​1086/​429600.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The processing of price comparison is not holistic but componential
Auteurs
Pedro Macizo
Fernando Ojedo
Publicatiedatum
24-06-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0884-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2018

Psychological Research 6/2018 Naar de uitgave