Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

05-04-2019 | Original Article

The primacy order effect in complex decision making

Auteurs: Arnaud Rey, Kévin Le Goff, Marlène Abadie, Pierre Courrieu

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to assess the role of information order in situations of complex decision making in which participants have to process a large amount of information (e.g., Dijksterhuis et al. Science 311(5763): 1005–1007, 2006). In two experiments, participants were presented with information about four cars, each characterized by 12 attributes. Immediately following the presentation of the 48 sentences describing these four cars, participants had to choose the one they would prefer to purchase. Two cars shared exactly the same positive and negative attributes, but they were displayed in a different order for each car. For one car, positive attributes were systematically displayed at the beginning while it was the reverse for the other car. The two remaining cars were used as fillers and had a lower number of positive attributes than the target cars in Experiment 1 and a higher number of positive attributes in Experiment 2. Results revealed a massive effect of information order with a clear preference for the car with positive information presented at the beginning. The second experiment further showed that this order effect was maintained and still strong even if the target cars did not have more positive attributes than the filler cars. Interestingly, in both experiments, participants never noticed that two cars were exactly characterized by the same list of attributes. These data clearly demonstrate that information order is a critical factor in complex decision-making situations involving a large amount of information.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
A simple equation for the non-linear decreasing function could be: \(b\left( t \right) = a \times b\left( {t - 1} \right)\), with 0.9 ≤ a ≤ 1.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Abadie, M., Waroquier, L., & Terrier, P. (2015). Information presentation format moderates the unconscious-thought effect: The role of recollection. Memory,24(8), 1123–1133.CrossRef Abadie, M., Waroquier, L., & Terrier, P. (2015). Information presentation format moderates the unconscious-thought effect: The role of recollection. Memory,24(8), 1123–1133.CrossRef
go back to reference Acker, F. (2008). New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: Additional empirical data and meta-analysis. Judgment and Decision Making,3(4), 292–303. Acker, F. (2008). New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: Additional empirical data and meta-analysis. Judgment and Decision Making,3(4), 292–303.
go back to reference Ambady, N., & Skowronski, J. J. (Eds.). (2008). First impressions. New York: Guilford Press. Ambady, N., & Skowronski, J. J. (Eds.). (2008). First impressions. New York: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Anderson, N. H. (1965). Primacy effects in personality impression formation using a generalized order effect paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2(1), 1–9.CrossRef Anderson, N. H. (1965). Primacy effects in personality impression formation using a generalized order effect paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2(1), 1–9.CrossRef
go back to reference Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,41(3), 258–290.CrossRef Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,41(3), 258–290.CrossRef
go back to reference Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without- attention effect. Science,311(5763), 1005–1007.CrossRef Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without- attention effect. Science,311(5763), 1005–1007.CrossRef
go back to reference Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist,49(8), 709–724.CrossRef Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist,49(8), 709–724.CrossRef
go back to reference González Vallejo, C., Cheng, J., Phillips, N., Chimeli, J., Bellezza, F., Harman, J., Lassiter, G. D., & Lindberg, M. J. (2014). Early positive information impacts final evaluations: No deliberation-without-attention effect and a test of a dynamic judgment model. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,27(3), 209–225.CrossRef González Vallejo, C., Cheng, J., Phillips, N., Chimeli, J., Bellezza, F., Harman, J., Lassiter, G. D., & Lindberg, M. J. (2014). Early positive information impacts final evaluations: No deliberation-without-attention effect and a test of a dynamic judgment model. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,27(3), 209–225.CrossRef
go back to reference Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review,93, 258–268.CrossRef Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review,93, 258–268.CrossRef
go back to reference Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist,58(9), 697–720.CrossRef Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist,58(9), 697–720.CrossRef
go back to reference Lange, N. D., Thomas, R. P., Buttaccio, D. R., Illingworth, D. A., & Davelaar, E. J. (2013). Working memory dynamics bias the generation of beliefs: The influence of data presentation rate on hypothesis generation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,20(1), 171–176.CrossRef Lange, N. D., Thomas, R. P., Buttaccio, D. R., Illingworth, D. A., & Davelaar, E. J. (2013). Working memory dynamics bias the generation of beliefs: The influence of data presentation rate on hypothesis generation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,20(1), 171–176.CrossRef
go back to reference Lassiter, G. D., Lindberg, M. J., González-Vallejo, C., Bellezza, F. S., & Phillips, N. D. (2009). The deliberation-without-attention effect: Evidence for an artifactual interpretation. Psychological Science, 20(6), 671–675.CrossRef Lassiter, G. D., Lindberg, M. J., González-Vallejo, C., Bellezza, F. S., & Phillips, N. D. (2009). The deliberation-without-attention effect: Evidence for an artifactual interpretation. Psychological Science, 20(6), 671–675.CrossRef
go back to reference Mehlhorn, K., Taatgen, N. A., Lebiere, C., & Krems, J. F. (2011). Memory activation and the availability of explanations in sequential diagnostic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,37(6), 1391–1411.PubMed Mehlhorn, K., Taatgen, N. A., Lebiere, C., & Krems, J. F. (2011). Memory activation and the availability of explanations in sequential diagnostic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,37(6), 1391–1411.PubMed
go back to reference Newell, B. R., Wong, K. Y., Cheung, J. C., & Rakow, T. (2009). Think, blink or sleep on it? The impact of modes of thought on complex decision making. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,62(4), 707–732.CrossRef Newell, B. R., Wong, K. Y., Cheung, J. C., & Rakow, T. (2009). Think, blink or sleep on it? The impact of modes of thought on complex decision making. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,62(4), 707–732.CrossRef
go back to reference Nieuwenstein, M. R., Wierenga, T., Morey, R. D., Wicherts, J. M., Blom, T. N., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & van Rijn, H. (2015). On making the right choice: A meta-analysis and large-scale replication attempt of the unconscious thought advantage. Judgment and Decision Making,10, 1–17. Nieuwenstein, M. R., Wierenga, T., Morey, R. D., Wicherts, J. M., Blom, T. N., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & van Rijn, H. (2015). On making the right choice: A meta-analysis and large-scale replication attempt of the unconscious thought advantage. Judgment and Decision Making,10, 1–17.
go back to reference Peterson, C. R., & DuCharme, W. M. (1967). A primacy effect in subjective probability revision. Journal of Experimental Psychology,73(1), 61–65.CrossRef Peterson, C. R., & DuCharme, W. M. (1967). A primacy effect in subjective probability revision. Journal of Experimental Psychology,73(1), 61–65.CrossRef
go back to reference Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin,119(1), 3–22.CrossRef Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin,119(1), 3–22.CrossRef
go back to reference Sprenger, A., & Dougherty, M. R. (2012). Generating and evaluating options for decision making: The impact of sequentially presented evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition,38(3), 550–575.CrossRef Sprenger, A., & Dougherty, M. R. (2012). Generating and evaluating options for decision making: The impact of sequentially presented evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition,38(3), 550–575.CrossRef
go back to reference Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). On the time course of perceptual choice: The leaky competing accumulator model. Psychological Review,108, 550–592.CrossRef Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). On the time course of perceptual choice: The leaky competing accumulator model. Psychological Review,108, 550–592.CrossRef
go back to reference Waroquier, L., Marchiori, D., Klein, O., & Cleeremans, A. (2009). Methodological pitfalls of the unconscious thought paradigm. Judgment and Decision Making,4(7), 601–610. Waroquier, L., Marchiori, D., Klein, O., & Cleeremans, A. (2009). Methodological pitfalls of the unconscious thought paradigm. Judgment and Decision Making,4(7), 601–610.
Metagegevens
Titel
The primacy order effect in complex decision making
Auteurs
Arnaud Rey
Kévin Le Goff
Marlène Abadie
Pierre Courrieu
Publicatiedatum
05-04-2019
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01178-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2020

Psychological Research 6/2020 Naar de uitgave