Top

Gepubliceerd in:

12-04-2021 | Original Article

The mnemonic effects of insight on false memory in the DRM paradigm

Auteurs: Xiumin Du, Can Cui, Zhaohui Hu, Ke Zhang, Yaowu Song

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 2/2022

Abstract

Insight accompanied by an 'aha!' experience has a mnemonic effect. Previous studies of insight have often focused on the mnemonic effect of insight on veridical memories, while the effect of insight on false memories is not known. More understanding of the mnemonic effect of insight on false memories could have implications for the mechanism of insightful mnemonic effects. The present research examined whether insight has a mnemonic effect on false memories. Participants were asked to perform Chinese verbal compound remote associate (CRA) tasks and then complete the Deese–Roediger–McDermott (DRM) task, the critical lure of which was also the solution to the Chinese CRA problem. Compared to non-insight, insight was associated with a lower critical lures rate in Experiment 1 and with lower critical lures and unrelated words rates in Experiment 2 when the presentation of DRM list words was random. Giving a warning before DRM tasks could reduce the critical lures rate of non-insight but had little effect on insightful solutions in Experiment 3. These findings indicate that insight can reduce false memories.

vorige artikel Effects of temporal order and intentionality on reflective attention to words in noise

volgende artikel Mindfulness and false memories: state and dispositional mindfulness does not increase false memories for naturalistic scenes presented in a virtual environment

Auble, P. M., Franks, J. J., Soraci, S. A. (1979). Effort toward comprehension: Elaboration or “aha”? Memory & Cognition, 7(6), 426–434. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198259.CrossRef

Aziz-Zadeh, L., Kaplan, J. T., & Iacoboni, M. (2009). “Aha!”: The neural correlates of verbal insight solutions. Human Brain Mapping, 30(3), 908–916. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20554.CrossRefPubMed

Bookbinder, S. H., & Brainerd, C. J. (2016). Emotion and false memory: The context–content paradox. Psychological Bulletin, 142(12), 1315. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000077.CrossRefPubMed

Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003a). Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(3), 730–737. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196539.CrossRef

Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003b). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(4), 634–639. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195543.CrossRef

Cabeza, R., Rao, S. M., Wagner, A. D., Mayer, A. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2001). Can medial temporal lobe regions distinguish true from false? An event-related functional MRI study of veridical and illusory recognition memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(8), 4805–4810. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.081082698.CrossRef

Cristofori, I., Salvi, C., Beeman, M., & Grafman, J. (2018). The effects of expected reward on creative problem solving. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(5), 925–931. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-0613-5.CrossRef

Cui, C., Zhang, K., Du, X. M., Sun, X., & Luo, J. (2020). Event-related potentials support the mnemonic effect of spontaneous insight solution. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01421-1.CrossRefPubMed

Danek, A. H., Fraps, T., von Muller, A., Grothe, B., & Ollinger, M. (2013). Aha! experiences leave a mark: Facilitated recall of insight solutions. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 77(5), 659–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0454-8.CrossRefPubMed

Danek, A. H., Williams, J., & Wiley, J. (2018). Closing the gap: Connecting sudden representational change to the subjective Aha! experience in insightful problem solving. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 84(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-0977-8.CrossRefPubMed

Deese, J. (1959). Influence of inter-item associative strength upon immediate free recall. Psychological Reports, 5(3), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.5.3.305-312.CrossRef

Dennis, N. A., Bowman, C. R., & Vandekar, S. N. (2012). True and phantom recollection: An fMRI investigation of similar and distinct neural correlates and connectivity. NeuroImage, 59(3), 2982–2993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.079.CrossRefPubMed

Dewhurst, S. A., Bould, E., Knott, L. M., & Thorley, C. (2009). The roles of encoding and retrieval processes in associative and categorical memory illusions. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.09.002.CrossRef

Du, X., Zhang, K., Wang, J., Luo, J., & Luo, J. (2017). Can people recollect well and change their source memory bias of “Aha!” experiences? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.85.CrossRef

Flegal, K. E., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (2014). Get the gist? The effects of processing depth on false recognition in short-term and long-term memory. Memory & Cognition, 42(5), 701–711. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0391-9.CrossRef

Gallo, D. A., Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (2001). Associative false recognition occurs without strategic criterion shifts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 579–586. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196194.CrossRef

Geraci, L., McCabe, D. P., & Guillory, J. J. (2009). On interpreting the relationship between remember-know judgments and confidence: The role of instructions. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(3), 701–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.04.010.CrossRefPubMed

Gutchess, A. H., & Schacter, D. L. (2012). The neural correlates of gist-based true and false recognition. NeuroImage, 59(4), 3418–3426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.078.CrossRefPubMed

Heaps, C. M., & Nash, M. (2001). Comparing recollective experience in true and false autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(4), 920–930. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.4.920.CrossRefPubMed

Huff, M. J., & Bodner, G. E. (2013). When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 1246–1256. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031338.CrossRefPubMed

Jung-Beeman, M., Bowden, E. M., Haberman, J., Frymiare, J. L., Arambel-Liu, S., Greenblatt, R., Kounios, J., et al. (2004). Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. PLoS Biology, 2(4), E97. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020097.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kim, H., & Cabeza, R. (2007). Trusting our memories: Dissociating the neural correlates of confidence in veridical versus illusory memories. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(45), 12190–12197. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3408-07.2007.CrossRefPubMed

Kizilirmak, J. M., Gomes, G., da Silva, J., Imamoglu, F., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (2016). Generation and the subjective feeling of “aha!” are independently related to learning from insight. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 80(6), 1059–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0697-2.CrossRefPubMed

Kizilirmak, J. M., Thuerich, H., Folta-Schoofs, K., Schott, B. H., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (2016). Neural correlates of learning from induced insight: A case for reward-based episodic encoding. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1693. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01693.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ludmer, R., Dudai, Y., & Rubin, N. (2011). Uncovering camouflage: Amygdala activation predicts long-term memory of induced perceptual insight. Neuron, 69(5), 1002–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Luo, J. (2004). Neural correlates of insight. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 36(02), 219–234.

Luo, J., Li, W., Fink, A., Jia, L., Xiao, X., Qiu, J., & Zhang, Q. (2011). The time course of breaking mental sets and forming novel associations in insight-like problem solving: An ERP investigation. Experimental Brain Research, 212(4), 583–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2761-5.CrossRefPubMed

Mai, X. Q., Luo, J., Wu, J. H., & Luo, Y. J. (2004). “Aha!” effects in a guessing riddle task: An event-related potential study. Human Brain Mapping, 22(4), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20030.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mäntylä, T. (1993). Knowing but not remembering: Adult age differences in recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 21(3), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03208271.CrossRef

Marini, M., Agosta, S., Mazzoni, G., Barba, G. D., & Sartori, G. (2012). True and false DRM memories: Differences detected with an implicit task. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 310. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00310.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

McCabe, D. P., & Smith, A. D. (2002). The effect of warnings on false memories in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 30(7), 1065–1077. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194324.CrossRef

Metcalf, K., Langdon, R., & Coltheart, M. (2007). Models of confabulation: A critical review and a new framework. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290600694901.CrossRefPubMed

Nie, Q.-Y., & Luo, J. (2012). “Aha!” and “Haha!”: The common and distinct cognitive brain processes underlying insight and humor. Advances in Psychological Science, 20(2), 219–227.CrossRef

Okado, Y., & Stark, C. (2003). Neural processing associated with true and false memory retrieval. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3(4), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.3758/cabn.3.4.323.CrossRef

Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, Cognition, 21(4), 803. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803.CrossRef

Rosenstreich, E. (2016). Mindfulness and false-memories: The impact of mindfulness practice on the DRM paradigm. Journal of Psychology, 150(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2015.1004298.CrossRef

Segal, E. (2004). Incubation in insight problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1601_13.CrossRef

Shen, W., Bai, H., Ball, L. J., Yuan, Y., & Wang, M. (2020) What makes creative advertisements memorable? The role of insight. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01439-5

Simon, H. A. (1995). Explaining the ineffable: Al on the topics of intuition, insight and inspiration. Paper presented at the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

Slotnick, S. D., & Schacter, D. L. (2004). A sensory signature that distinguishes true from false memories. Nature Neuroscience, 7(6), 664–672. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1252.CrossRefPubMed

Thomas, A. K., & Sommers, M. S. (2005). Attention to item-specific processing eliminates age effects in false memories. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.08.001.CrossRef

Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 26(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0080017.CrossRef

Van Kesteren, M. T., Ruiter, D. J., Fernández, G., & Henson, R. N. (2012). How schema and novelty augment memory formation. Trends in Neurosciences, 35(4), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2012.02.001.CrossRefPubMed

Williams, H. L., Conway, M. A., & Moulin, C. J. (2013). Remembering and knowing: Using another’s subjective report to make inferences about memory strength and subjective experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(2), 572–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.03.009.CrossRefPubMed

Yang, H., Yang, S., Ceci, S. J., & Isen, A. M. (2014). Positive affect facilitates the effect of a warning on false memory in the DRM paradigm. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(3), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.950177.CrossRef

Zhou-Chu, Y.-Z. (2007). Are intentional processes of study list necessary for the creation of false memory: Evidence for unconscious activation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39(01), 43–49.

Titel: The mnemonic effects of insight on false memory in the DRM paradigm
Auteurs: Xiumin Du
Can Cui
Zhaohui Hu
Ke Zhang
Yaowu Song
Publicatiedatum: 12-04-2021
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01513-6

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2022

The contributions of working memory domains and processes to early mathematical knowledge between preschool and first grade

Two processing stages of the SNARC effect

What factors underlie our experience of the passage of time? Theoretical consequences

The effect of pain on reference memory for duration

The role of working memory for task-order coordination in dual-task situations

Auditory and visual short-term memory: influence of material type, contour, and musical expertise