Top

Gepubliceerd in:

23-07-2020 | Empirical Research

The Mediating and Moderating Effects of Social Support and School Climate on the Association between Cyber Victimization and Internalizing Symptoms

Auteurs: Brett Holfeld, Rachel Baitz

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence | Uitgave 11/2020

Abstract

Although the link between cyber victimization and internalizing symptoms is well established, questions remain about the factors that may describe this association and whether they differ by gender. In the current study, the mediating and moderating roles of social support (peers, family) and experiences of school climate (i.e., students’ feelings of safety and caring within the school environment) were examined on the association between cyber victimization and internalizing symptoms among early adolescent boys and girls. Participants included 1151 students (51.4% boys) aged 10 to 16 (M_age = 12.7, SD = 0.93). Results from a hierarchical regression model indicate moderation effects of peer support and school climate; higher levels of cyber victimization were more strongly associated with internalizing symptoms when adolescents reported lower levels of peer support whereas higher levels of cyber victimization were more strongly associated with internalizing symptoms when adolescents reported more positive experiences of school climate. Structural mediation models show partial mediation effects with higher levels of cyber victimization associated with lower levels of peer support, lower levels of family support, and poorer experiences of school climate respectively, which in turn, were associated with more internalizing symptoms. The findings highlight the importance of creating safe and supportive environments at home and at school to promote healthy development during early adolescence, however, these efforts may not benefit adolescents who experience repeated cyber victimization.

vorige artikel Navigating the Healthy Context Paradox: Identifying Classroom Characteristics that Improve the Psychological Adjustment of Bullying Victims

volgende artikel Peers and Homophobic Attitudes in Adolescence: Examining Selection and Influence Processes in Friendships and Antipathies

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Pew Research Center “Teens, Social Media, & Technology 2018”. https://www.pewinternet.org/wpcontent/uploads/sites/9/2018/05/PI_2018.05.31_TeensTech_FINAL.pdf.

Attar-Schwartz, S., Mishna, F., & Khoury-Kassabri, M. (2019). The role of classmates’ social support, peer victimization, and gender in externalizing and internalizing behaviours among Canadian youth. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 2335–2346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0852-z.CrossRef

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.CrossRef

Barlett, C., & Coyne, S. M. (2014). A meta-analysis of sex differences in cyber-bullying behavior: the moderating role of age. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 474–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21555.CrossRefPubMed

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Burke, T., Sticca, F., & Perren, S. (2017). Everything’s gonna be alright! The longitudinal interplay among social support, peer victimization, and depressive symptoms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 1999–2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0653-0.CrossRefPubMed

Campbell, M. A., Slee, P. T., Spears, B., Butler, D., & Kift, S. (2013). Do cyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies’ perceptions of the harm they cause to others and their own mental health. School Psychology International, 34, 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034313479698.CrossRef

Cappadocia, M. C., Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. (2013). Cyberbullying: prevalence, stability, and risk factors during adolescence. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 28, 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573513491212.CrossRef

Cohen, S., & McKay, G. (1984). Social support, stress and the buffering hypothesis: a theoretical analysis. In A. Baum, S. E. Taylor, J. E. Singer (Eds), Handbook of psychology and health (pp. 253–267). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.CrossRef

Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., Kim, T. E., & Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 65–83.CrossRef

Davis, K. (2012). Friendship 2.0: adolescents’ experiences of belonging and self-disclosure online. Journal of Adolescence, 35(6), 1527–1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.02.013.CrossRefPubMed

Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: what, why, when and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 1–19.CrossRef

Desjardins, T. L., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2011). Relational victimization and depressive symptoms in adolescence: moderating effects of mother, father, and peer emotional support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9562-1.CrossRefPubMed

DeSmet, A., Veldeman, C., Poels, K., Bastiaensens, S., Van Cleemput, K., Vandebosch, H., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2014). Determinants of self-reported bystander behavior in cyberbullying incidents amongst adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(4), 27–215. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0027.CrossRef

Espelage, D. L., Low, S. K., & Jimerson., S. R. (2014). Understanding school climate, aggression, peer victimization, and bully perpetration: contemporary science, practice, and policy. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000090.CrossRefPubMed

Fanti, K. A., Demetriou, A. G., & Hawa, V. V. (2012). A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: examining risk and protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.643169.CrossRef

Fisher, B. W., Gardella, J. H., & Teurbe-Tolon, A. R. (2016). Peer cybervictimization among adolescents and the associated internalizing and externalizing problems: a meta-analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 1727–1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0541-z.CrossRefPubMed

Forster, M., Grigsby, T. J., Gower, A. L., Mehus, C. J., & McMorris, B. J. (2020). The role of social support in the association between childhood adversity and adolescent self-injury and suicide: findings from a statewide sample of high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49, 1195–1208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01235-9.CrossRefPubMed

Gaffney, H., Farrington, D. P., Espelage, D. L., & Ttofi, M. M. (2019). Are cyberbullying intervention and prevention programs effective? A systematic and meta-analytical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 134–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.201807.002.CrossRef

Galliher, R. V., & Kerpelman, J. L. (2012). The intersection of identity development and peer relationship processes in adolescence and young adulthood: contributions of the special issue. Journal of Adolescence, 35(6), 1409–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.09.007.CrossRefPubMed

Garandeau, C. F., & Salmivalli, C. (2019). Can healthier contexts be harmful? A new perspective on the plight of victims of bullying. Child Development Perspectives, 13, 147–152.CrossRef

Ge, X., Natsuaki, M. N., Neiderhiser, J. M., & Reiss, D. (2009). The longitudinal effects of stressful life events on adolescent depression are buffered by parent-child closeness. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 621–635.CrossRef

Gini, G., Card, N. A., & Pozzoli, T. (2018). A meta-analysis of the differential relations of traditional and cyber-victimization with internalizing problems. Aggressive Behavior, 44(2), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21742.CrossRefPubMed

Gini, G., Holt, M., Pozzoli, T., & Marino, C. (2019). Peer victimization and somatic problems: the role of class victimization levels. Journal of School Health, 90(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12844.CrossRefPubMed

Guerra, C., Pereda, N., Guilera, G., & Abad, J. (2016). Internalizing symptoms polyvictimization in a clinical sample of adolescents: the roles of social support and non-productive coping strategies. Child Abuse and Neglect, 54, 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.03.004.CrossRefPubMed

Haltigan, J. D., & Vaillancourt, T. (2014). Joint trajectories of bullying and peer victimization across elementary and middle school and associations with symptoms of psychopathology. Developmental Psychology, 50(11), 2426–2436.CrossRef

Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2012). School climate 2.0: preventing cyberbullying and sexting one classroom at a time. CA: Corwin Press, Sage Publications.CrossRef

Holfeld, B. (2014). Perceptions and attributions of bystanders to cyber bullying. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.012.

Holfeld, B., & Grabe, M. (2012). Middle school students’ perceptions of and responses to cyber bullying. Special issue (Digital Pathologies). Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(4), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.46.4.e.CrossRef

Holfeld, B., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2015). The nature and frequency of cyber bullying behaviors and victimization experiences among young Canadian children. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 30, 116–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573514556853.CrossRef

Holfeld, B., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2017). Concurrent and longitudinal associations between early adolescents’ experiences of school climate and cyber victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.037.CrossRef

Holfeld, B., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2018). The interrelated effects of traditional and cybervictimization on the development of internalizing symptoms and aggressive behaviors in elementary school. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 64(2), 220–247.CrossRef

Holfeld, B., & Mishna, F. (2019). Internalizing symptoms and externalizing problems: Risk factors for or consequences of cyber victimization? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48, 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0974-7.CrossRefPubMed

Hong, J. S., & Espelage, D. L. (2012). A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: an ecological system analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.03.003.CrossRef

Huitsing, G., Lodder, G. M. A., Oldenburg, B., Schacter, H. L., Salmivalli, C., Juvonen, J., & Veenstra, R. (2019). The healthy context paradox: victims’ adjustment during an anti-bullying intervention. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 2499–2509.CrossRef

Jenkins, L. N., & Demaray, M. K. (2012). Social support and self-concept in relation to peer victimization and peer aggression. Journal of School Violence, 11, 56–74.CrossRef

Kendrick, K., Jutengren, G., & Stattin, H. (2012). The protective role of supportive friends against bullying perpetration and victimization. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1069–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.02.014.CrossRefPubMed

Kim, S., Colwell, S. R., Kata, A., Boyle, M. H., & Georgiades, K. (2018). Cyberbullying victimization and adolescent mental health: evidence of differential effects by sex and mental health problem type. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(3), 661–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0678-4.CrossRefPubMed

Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1073–1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618.CrossRefPubMed

Ladd, G. W., Ettekal, I., Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., Rudolph, K. D., & Andrews, R. K. (2014). Relations among chronic peer group rejection, maladjustment behavioral dispositions, and early adolescents’ peer perceptions. Child Development, 85(3), 971–988. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12214.CrossRefPubMed

Law, D. M., Shapka, J. D., Domene, J. F., & Gagne, M. H. (2012). Are cyberbullies real bullies? An investigation of reactive and proactive online aggression. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 664–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.013.CrossRef

Leadbeater, B., Sukhawathanakul, P., Smith, D., & Bowen, F. (2014). Reciprocal associations between interpersonal and values dimensions of school climate and peer victimization in elementary school children. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 44, 480–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2013.873985.CrossRefPubMed

Leadbeater, B., Sukhawathanakul, P., Thompson, K., & Holfeld, B. (2015). Parent, child, and teacher reports of school climate as predictors of peer victimization, internalizing and externalizing in elementary school. School Mental Health, 7, 261–272.CrossRef

Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation Monograph.

Ma, C. Q., & Huebner, E. S. (2008). Attachment relationships and adolescents’ life satisfaction: some relationships matter more to girls than boys. Psychology in the Schools, 45(2), 177–190.CrossRef

Machmutow, K., Perron, S., Sticca, F., & Alsaker, F. D. (2012). Peer victimization and depressive symptoms: can specific coping strategies buffer the negative impact of cyber victimization? Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties, 17, 403–420.CrossRef

Midamba, N., & Moreno, M. (2019). Differences in parent and adolescent views on cyberbullying in the US. Journal of Children and Media, 13(1), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2018.1544159.CrossRef

Mishna, F., Schwan, K. J., Lefebvre, R., Bhole, P., & Johnston, D. (2014). Students in distress: unanticipated findings in a cyber bullying study. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 341–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.04.010.CrossRef

Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G., & Runions, K. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: a meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55, 602–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007.CrossRefPubMed

Morin, H. K., Bradshaw, C. P., & Berg, J. K. (2015). Examining the link between peer victimization and adjustment problems in adolescence: the role of connectedness and parent engagement. Psychology of Violence, 5(4), 422–432.CrossRef

Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide. 8th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.

National School Climate Council. (2007). The school climate challenge: narrowing the gap between school climate research and school climate policy, practice guidelines and teacher education policy. http://www.ecs.org/school-climate.

Nickerson, A. B., Singleton, D., Schnurr, B., & Collen, M. H. (2014). Perceptions of school climate as a function of bullying involvement. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 30, 157–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2014.888530.CrossRef

Palladino, B. E., Nocentini, A., & Menesini, E. (2016). Evidence-based intervention against bullying and cyberbullying: evaluation of the NoTrap! Program in two independent trials. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21636.CrossRefPubMed

Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2010). Cyberbullying and self-esteem. Journal of School Health, 80, 614–621.CrossRef

Pouwelse, M., Bolman, C., Lodewijkx, H., & Spaa, M. (2011). Gender differences and social support: mediators or moderators between peer victimization and depressive feelings? Psychology in the Schools, 48(8), 800–814.CrossRef

Reyna, V. F., & Farley, F. (2006). Risk and rationality in adolescent decision making: implications for theory, practice, and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x.CrossRefPubMed

Rueger, S. Y., Malecki, C. K., & Demaray, M. K. (2010). Relationship between multiple sources of perceived social support and psychological and academic adjustment in early adolescence: comparisons across gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9368-6.CrossRefPubMed

Rueger, S. Y., Malecki, C. K., Pyun, Y., Aycock, C., & Coyle, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of the association between perceived social support and depression in childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 142(10), 1017–1067. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000058.CrossRefPubMed

Salmivalli, C. (2018). Peer victimization and adjustment in young adulthood: Commentary on the special section. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46, 67–72.CrossRef

Schlomer, G. L., Bauman, S., & Card, N. A. (2010). Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018082.CrossRefPubMed

Smokowski, P. R., Evans, C. B. R., & Cotter, K. L. (2014). The differential impacts of episodic, chronic, and cumulative physical bullying and cyberbullying: the effects of victimization on the school experiences, social support, and mental health of rural adolescents. Violence and Victims, 29, 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00076.CrossRefPubMed

Srinivas, A., White, M., & Omar, H. A. (2011). Teens texting and consequences: a brief review. International Journal of Child and Adolescent Health, 4, 327–331.

Stadler, C., Feifel, J., Rohrmann, S., Vermeiren, R., & Poustka, F. (2010). Peer-victimization and mental health problems in adolescents: are parents and school support protective? Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 41, 371–386.CrossRef

Tennant, J. E., Demaray, M. K., Coyle, S., & Malecki, C. K. (2015). The dangers of the web: cybervictimization, depression, and social support in college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 348–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.014.CrossRef

Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313483907.

Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014.CrossRef

Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.267.CrossRefPubMed

Veiga Simão, A. M., Ferreira, P. C., Freire, I., Caetano, A. P., Martins, M. J., & Vieira, C. (2017). Adolescent cybervictimization—who they turn to and their perceived school climate. Journal of Adolescence, 58, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.04.009.CrossRefPubMed

Waasdorp, T. E., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2015). The overlap between cyberbullying and traditional bullying. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 56, 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.12.002.CrossRefPubMed

Wang, J., Iannotti, R. J., & Nansel, T. R. (2009). School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.021.CrossRefPubMed

Wright, M. F. (2017). Cyber victimization and depression among adolescents with intellectual disabilities and developmental disorders: the moderation of perceived social support. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 10, 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2016.1271486.CrossRef

Yang, C., Sharkey, J. D., Reed, L. A., Chen, C., & Dowdy, E. (2018). Bullying victimization and student engagement in elementary, middle, and high schools: Moderating role of school climate. School Psychology Quarterly: The Official Journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association, 33(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000250.CrossRef

Yeung Thompson, R. S., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2013). Peer victimization and internalizing symptoms from adolescence into young adulthood: building strength through emotional support. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 290–303.CrossRef

Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1998). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30–41.CrossRef

Zullig, K. J., Koopman, T. M., Patton, J. M., & Ubbes, V. A. (2010). School climate: historical review, instrument development, and school assessment. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282909344205.CrossRef

Titel: The Mediating and Moderating Effects of Social Support and School Climate on the Association between Cyber Victimization and Internalizing Symptoms
Auteurs: Brett Holfeld
Rachel Baitz
Publicatiedatum: 23-07-2020
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence / Uitgave 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0047-2891
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6601
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01292-0

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 11/2020

Appearance Esteem Trajectory According to Three Different Sources of Support Among Adolescents Over a School Year

Loneliness, Social Anxiety Symptoms, and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescence: Longitudinal Distinctiveness and Correlated Change

Effortful Control and Community Violence Exposure as Predictors of Developmental Trajectories of Self-serving Cognitive Distortions in Adolescence: A Growth Mixture Modeling Approach

Emotion Regulation as a Risk Factor for Suicide Ideation among Adolescents and Young Adults: The Mediating Role of Belongingness

Navigating the Healthy Context Paradox: Identifying Classroom Characteristics that Improve the Psychological Adjustment of Bullying Victims

Pubertal Synchrony and Depressive Symptoms: Differences by Race and Sex