Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 5/2007

01-06-2007 | Original Paper

The mathematical relationship among different forms of responsiveness coefficients

Auteurs: G. R. Norman, Kathleen W. Wyrwich, Donald L. Patrick

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 5/2007

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Background

Little consensus exists regarding the most appropriate measure of responsiveness. While most indices are variants on Cohen’s effect size, the mathematical relationships among these indices have not been elucidated. Consequently, the health-related quality of life (HRQL) literature contains many publications in which a variety of different indices are computed and differences among them noted. These differences are completely predictable when the underlying analytical form of each coefficient is explicated.

Methods

In this paper, we begin with a mathematical analysis of the variance components underlying an observed change score. From this, we determine analytically the relationships among the more commonly used indices of responsiveness.

Conclusions

Based on this analysis, we conclude that Cohen’s effect size and the Standardized Response Mean are the two most appropriate measures, as each provides unique information and each best captures an important relation between treatment effect and variability in response. However, the latter should be interpreted with caution, as under some circumstances, any measure based on variability in change scores can give misleading information. On this basis, we recommend that future analysis of responsiveness be restricted to the Cohen effect size to ensure interpretability and comparability with treatment effects in other domains.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
These equations for variance components can be determined from standard statistical texts and some measurement books, e.g. Ref. [6].
 
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference American Psychological Association. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological tests. American Psychological Association. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological tests.
2.
go back to reference Anderson, J. J., Firschein, H. E., & Meenan, R. F. (1989). Sensitivity of a health status measure to short-term clinical changes in arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 32, 844–850. PubMedCrossRef Anderson, J. J., Firschein, H. E., & Meenan, R. F. (1989). Sensitivity of a health status measure to short-term clinical changes in arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 32, 844–850. PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chren, M. M., Lasek, R. J., Flocke, S. A., & Zyzanski, S. J. (1997). Improved discriminative and evaluative capability of a refined version of Skindex, a quality-of-life instrument for patients with skin diseases. Archives of Dermatology, 133, 1433–40. PubMedCrossRef Chren, M. M., Lasek, R. J., Flocke, S. A., & Zyzanski, S. J. (1997). Improved discriminative and evaluative capability of a refined version of Skindex, a quality-of-life instrument for patients with skin diseases. Archives of Dermatology, 133, 1433–40. PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cohen, J. J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (p. 8). Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ. Cohen, J. J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (p. 8). Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
5.
go back to reference Crosby, R. D., Kolotkin, R. L., & Williams, G. R. (2003). Defining clinically meaningful change in health related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56, 395–407 PubMedCrossRef Crosby, R. D., Kolotkin, R. L., & Williams, G. R. (2003). Defining clinically meaningful change in health related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56, 395–407 PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Deyo, R. A., & Centor, R. M. (1986). Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performance. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 39, 897–906. PubMedCrossRef Deyo, R. A., & Centor, R. M. (1986). Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performance. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 39, 897–906. PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Deyo, R. A., Diehr, P., & Patrick, D. L. (1991). Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures: Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Controlled Clinical Trials, 2, 142S–158S CrossRef Deyo, R. A., Diehr, P., & Patrick, D. L. (1991). Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures: Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Controlled Clinical Trials, 2, 142S–158S CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick, R., Ziebland, S., Jenkinson, C., & Mowat, A. (1992). Importance of sensitivity to change as a criterion for selecting health status instruments. Quality in Health Care, 1, 89–93. PubMed Fitzpatrick, R., Ziebland, S., Jenkinson, C., & Mowat, A. (1992). Importance of sensitivity to change as a criterion for selecting health status instruments. Quality in Health Care, 1, 89–93. PubMed
9.
go back to reference Guyatt, G. H., Walter, S. D., & Norman, G. R. (1987). Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of an evaluative instrument. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40, 171–178. PubMedCrossRef Guyatt, G. H., Walter, S. D., & Norman, G. R. (1987). Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of an evaluative instrument. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40, 171–178. PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hays, R. D., & Hadorn, D. (1992). Responsiveness to change: An aspect of validity, not a separate dimension. Quality of Life Research, 1, 73–75 PubMedCrossRef Hays, R. D., & Hadorn, D. (1992). Responsiveness to change: An aspect of validity, not a separate dimension. Quality of Life Research, 1, 73–75 PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kirshner, B., & Guyatt, G. (1985). A methodological framework for assessing health indices. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 38, 27–36. PubMedCrossRef Kirshner, B., & Guyatt, G. (1985). A methodological framework for assessing health indices. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 38, 27–36. PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Liang, M. J., Fossel, A. H., & Larson, M. G. (1990). Comparison of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Medical Care, 28, 632–642. PubMedCrossRef Liang, M. J., Fossel, A. H., & Larson, M. G. (1990). Comparison of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Medical Care, 28, 632–642. PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lindebloom, R., Sprangers, M. A. G., & Zwinderman, A. (2005). Responsiveness: A reinvention of the wheel? Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3, 8. CrossRef Lindebloom, R., Sprangers, M. A. G., & Zwinderman, A. (2005). Responsiveness: A reinvention of the wheel? Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3, 8. CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Norman, G. R., Stratford, P., & Regehr, G. (1997). Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lesson of Cronbach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50, 869–879 PubMedCrossRef Norman, G. R., Stratford, P., & Regehr, G. (1997). Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lesson of Cronbach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50, 869–879 PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Norman, G. R., Stratford, P., & Regehr, G. (1997) Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lesson of Cronbach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50, 869–879. PubMedCrossRef Norman, G. R., Stratford, P., & Regehr, G. (1997) Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lesson of Cronbach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50, 869–879. PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Norman, G. R., Wyrwich, K. W., & Sloan, J. A. (2003). Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Medical Care, 41, 582–592. PubMedCrossRef Norman, G. R., Wyrwich, K. W., & Sloan, J. A. (2003). Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Medical Care, 41, 582–592. PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference O’Keeffe, S. T., Lye, M., Donnellan, C., & Carmichael, D. N. (1998). Reproducibility and responsiveness of quality of life assessment and six minute walk test in elderly heart failure patients. Heart, 80, 377–382. PubMed O’Keeffe, S. T., Lye, M., Donnellan, C., & Carmichael, D. N. (1998). Reproducibility and responsiveness of quality of life assessment and six minute walk test in elderly heart failure patients. Heart, 80, 377–382. PubMed
18.
go back to reference Pickard, A. S., Johnson, J. A., & Feeny, D. H. (2005). Responsiveness of generic health related quality of life measures in stroke. Quality of Life Research, 14, 207–219 PubMedCrossRef Pickard, A. S., Johnson, J. A., & Feeny, D. H. (2005). Responsiveness of generic health related quality of life measures in stroke. Quality of Life Research, 14, 207–219 PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Reilly, M. C., & Zbrozek, A. S. (1992). Assessing the responsiveness of a quality-of-life instrument and the measurement of symptom severity in essential hypertension. Pharmacoeconomics 2, 54–66. PubMed Reilly, M. C., & Zbrozek, A. S. (1992). Assessing the responsiveness of a quality-of-life instrument and the measurement of symptom severity in essential hypertension. Pharmacoeconomics 2, 54–66. PubMed
20.
go back to reference Sprangers, M. A. G., Moinpour, C. M., Moynihan, T. J., Patrick, D. L., & Revecki, D. A. (2002). Assessing meaningful change in quality of life over time: A user’s guide for clinicians. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77, 561–571 PubMedCrossRef Sprangers, M. A. G., Moinpour, C. M., Moynihan, T. J., Patrick, D. L., & Revecki, D. A. (2002). Assessing meaningful change in quality of life over time: A user’s guide for clinicians. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77, 561–571 PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Stratford, P. W., Binkley, J. M., & Riddle, D. L. (1996). Health status measures: strategies and analytical methods for assessing change scores. Physical Theraphy, 76, 1109–1123. Stratford, P. W., Binkley, J. M., & Riddle, D. L. (1996). Health status measures: strategies and analytical methods for assessing change scores. Physical Theraphy, 76, 1109–1123.
22.
go back to reference Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (1993). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (p. 142). Oxford University Press Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (1993). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (p. 142). Oxford University Press
23.
go back to reference Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2003). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use, 3rd ed. (p. 141). Oxford University Press Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2003). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use, 3rd ed. (p. 141). Oxford University Press
24.
go back to reference Terwee, C. B., Dekker, F. W., Wiersinga, W. M., Prummel, M. F., & Bossuyt, P. M. M. (2003). On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: Guidelines for instrument evaluation. Quality of Life Research, 12, 349–362. PubMedCrossRef Terwee, C. B., Dekker, F. W., Wiersinga, W. M., Prummel, M. F., & Bossuyt, P. M. M. (2003). On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: Guidelines for instrument evaluation. Quality of Life Research, 12, 349–362. PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ware, J. E., Kemp, J. P., Buchner, D. A., Singer, A. E., Nolop, K. B., & Goss, T. F. (1998). The responsiveness of disease-specific and generic health measures to changes in the severity of asthma among adults. Quality of Life Research, 7, 235–244 PubMedCrossRef Ware, J. E., Kemp, J. P., Buchner, D. A., Singer, A. E., Nolop, K. B., & Goss, T. F. (1998). The responsiveness of disease-specific and generic health measures to changes in the severity of asthma among adults. Quality of Life Research, 7, 235–244 PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Wells, G., Beaton, D., Shea, B., Boers M., Simon, L., Strand, V., Brooks, P., & Tugwell, P. (2001). Minimal clinically important differences: Review of methods. The Journal of Rheumatology, 28, 406–412. PubMed Wells, G., Beaton, D., Shea, B., Boers M., Simon, L., Strand, V., Brooks, P., & Tugwell, P. (2001). Minimal clinically important differences: Review of methods. The Journal of Rheumatology, 28, 406–412. PubMed
27.
go back to reference Wright, J. G., & Young, N. L. (1997). A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50, 239–246 PubMedCrossRef Wright, J. G., & Young, N. L. (1997). A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50, 239–246 PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Wyrwich, K. W., Tierney, W. M., & Wolinsky, F. D. (2002). Using the standard error of measurement to identify important changes on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 11, 1–7. PubMedCrossRef Wyrwich, K. W., Tierney, W. M., & Wolinsky, F. D. (2002). Using the standard error of measurement to identify important changes on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 11, 1–7. PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The mathematical relationship among different forms of responsiveness coefficients
Auteurs
G. R. Norman
Kathleen W. Wyrwich
Donald L. Patrick
Publicatiedatum
01-06-2007
Uitgeverij
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 5/2007
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9180-x