Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-00538-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Worldwide, a growing number of healthcare students require clinical environments for learning. Some wards have become adapted ‘student wards’ to meet this demand. Benefits have been reported from the students’, supervisors’ and patients’ perspectives. There is no definition of a student ward, and little research on what the term means. A deeper understanding of the characteristics of student wards is needed to support their use. The aim of this study is to describe what characterises the learning environment on one student ward.
An ethnographic approach was used for an observational study on a student ward in a hospital in Sweden. Student nurses, supervisors and others on the ward were observed. Field notes were thematically analysed.
Four themes were identified: ‘Student-led learning’ described students learning by actively performing clinical tasks and taking responsibility for patients and for their own learning. ‘Learning together’ described peer learning and supervision. ‘Staff’s approach to learning’ described personalised relationships between the students and staff and the build-up of trust, the unified inter-professional approach to teaching, and the supervisors’ motivation for teaching and for their own learning. ‘Student-dedicated space’ described the effect of the student room on the learning environment.
This study describes the characteristics of a student ward that centred around a community of practice that shared a view of learning as a priority, allowing staff to provide clinical care without compromising students’ learning. This qualitative study at a single centre lays the groundwork for future research into other student wards.
Manser T. Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:143–51. CrossRef
Moscato SR, Miller J, Logsdon K, Weinberg S, Chorpenning L. Dedicated education unit: an innovative clinical partner education model. Nurs Outlook. 2007;55:31–7. CrossRef
Lachmann H, Ponzer S, Johansson UB, Benson L, Karlgren K. Capturing students’ learning experiences and academic emotions at an interprofessional training ward. J Interprof Care. 2013;27:137–45. CrossRef
Moscato SR, Nishioka VM, Coe MT. Dedicated education unit: implementing an innovation in replication sites. J Nurs Educ. 2013;52:259–67. CrossRef
Brewer ML, Stewart-Wynne EG. An Australian hospital-based student training ward delivering safe, client-centred care while developing students’ interprofessional practice capabilities. J Interprof Care. 2013;27:482–8. CrossRef
McKown T, McKeon L, Webb S, McKown L, Webb S. Using quality and safety education for nurses to guide clinical teaching on a new dedicated education unit. J Nurs Educ. 2011;50:706–10. CrossRef
Hallin K, Kiessling A. A safe place with space for learning: experiences from an interprofessional training ward. J Interprof Care. 2016;30:141–8. CrossRef
Pelling S, Kalen A, Hammar M, Wahlstrom O, Wahlström O. Preparation for becoming members of health care teams: findings from a 5-year evaluation of a student interprofessional training ward. J Interprof Care. 2011;25:328–32. CrossRef
Manninen K, Henriksson EW, Scheja M, Silén C. Patients’ approaches to students’ learning at a clinical education ward—an ethnographic study. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:131. CrossRef
Mulready-Shick J, Kafel KW, Banister G, Mylott L. Enhancing quality and safety competency development at the unit level: an initial evaluation of student learning and clinical teaching on dedicated education units. J Nurs Educ. 2009;48:716–9. CrossRef
Ranse K, Grealish L. Nursing students’ perceptions of learning in the clinical setting of the Dedicated Education Unit. J Adv Nurs. 2007;58:171–9. CrossRef
Dapremont J, Lee S. Partnering to educate: dedicated education units. Nurse Educ Pract. 2013;13:335–7. CrossRef
Gonda J, Wotton K, Edgecombe K, Mason P. Dedicated education units: 2. An evaluation. Contemp Nurse. 1999;8:172–6. CrossRef
Edgecombe K, Wotton K, Gonda J, Mason P. Dedicated education units: 1. A new concept for clinical teaching and learning. Contemp Nurse. 1999;8:166–71. CrossRef
Fröberg M, Leanderson C, Fläckman B, Hedman-Lagerlöf E, Björklund K, Nilsson GH, et al. Experiences of a student-run clinic in primary care: a mixed-method study with students, patients and supervisors. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018;36:36–46. CrossRef
Staun M, Bergström B, Wadensten B. Evaluation of a PBL strategy in clinical supervision of nursing students: patient-centred training in student-dedicated treatment rooms. Nurse Educ Today. 2010;30:631–7. CrossRef
Reeves S, Freeth D. The London training ward: an innovative interprofessional learning initiative. J Interprof Care. 2002;16:41–52. CrossRef
Lidskog M, Löfmark A, Ahlström G. Learning through participating on an interprofessional training ward. J Interprof Care. 2009;23:486–97. CrossRef
Barney T, Russell M, Clark M. Evaluation of the provision of fieldwork training through a rural student unit. Aust J Rural Health. 1998;6:202–7. CrossRef
Ponzer S, Hylin U, Kusoffsky A, Lauffs M, Lonka K, Mattiasson AC, et al. Interprofessional training in the context of clinical practice: goals and students’ perceptions on clinical education wards. Med Educ. 2004;38:727–36. CrossRef
Hallin K, Henriksson P, Dalén N, Kiessling A. Effects of interprofessional education on patient perceived quality of care. Med Teach. 2011;33:e22–e6. CrossRef
Mulready-Shick J, Flanagan KM, Banister GE, Mylott L, Curtin LJ. Evaluating dedicated education units for clinical education quality. J Nurs Educ. 2013;52:606–14. CrossRef
Flott EA, Linden L. The clinical learning environment in nursing education: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72:501–13. CrossRef
Gruppen LD, Irby DM, Durning SJ, Maggio LA. Conceptualizing learning environments in the health professions. Acad Med. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002702. CrossRef
Weiss KB, Bagian JP, Nasca TJ. The clinical learning environment. JAMA. 2013;309:1687. CrossRef
Atkinson P, Pugsley L. Making sense of ethnography and medical education. Med Educ. 2005;39:228–34. CrossRef
Reeves S, Peller J, Goldman J, Kitto S. Ethnography in qualitative educational research: AMEE Guide No. 80. Med Teach. 2013;35(8):e1365. CrossRef
Wenger E. Communities of practice : learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. CrossRef
Hägg-Martinell A, Hult H, Henriksson P, Kiessling A. Community of practice and student interaction at an acute medical ward: an ethnographic study. Med Teach. 2015;38:1–8.
Hägg-Martinell A, Hult H, Henriksson P, Kiessling A. Medical students’ opportunities to participate and learn from activities at an internal medicine ward: an ethnographic study. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e13046. CrossRef
Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26:1753–60. CrossRef
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101. CrossRef
Dornan T. Workplace learning. Perspect Med Educ. 2012;1:15–23. CrossRef
Manninen K, Elisabet WH, Scheja M, Silén C. Self-centeredness or patient-centeredness—final year nursing students’ experiences of learning at a clinical education ward. Health Educ. 2013;113:132–43. CrossRef
Manninen K. Experiencing authenticity—the core of student learning in clinical practice. Perspect Med Educ. 2014;5(5):308–11. CrossRef
Dornan T, Boshuizen H, King N, Scherpbier A. Experience-based learning: a model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students’ workplace learning. Med Educ. 2007;41:84–91. CrossRef
Topping KJ. The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: a typology and review of the literature. High Educ. 1996;32:321–45. CrossRef
Ross MT, Cameron HS. Peer assisted learning: a planning and implementation framework: AMEE guide no. 30. Med Teach. 2007;29:527–45. CrossRef
Silberberg P, Ahern C, van de Mortel TF. ‘Learners as teachers’ in general practice: stakeholders’ views of the benefits and issues. Educ Prim Care. 2013;24:410–7. CrossRef
Bene KL, Bergus G. When learners become teachers: a review of peer teaching in medical student education. Fam Med. 2014;46:783–7.
ten Cate O. A teaching rotation and a student teaching qualification for senior medical students. Med Teach. 2007;29:566–71. CrossRef
Spencer J. Learning and teaching in the clinical environment. BMJ. 2003;326:591–4. CrossRef
Dandavino M, Snell L, Wiseman J. Why medical students should learn how to teach. Med Teach. 2007;29:558–65. CrossRef
ten Cate O, Durning S. Peer teaching in medical education: twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Med Teach. 2007;29:591–9. CrossRef
Lockspeiser TM, O’Sullivan P, Teherani A, Muller J. Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008;13:361–72. CrossRef
Högskoleförordning https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/hogskoleforordning-1993100_sfs-1993-100. Accessed 8th August 2019.
Lidskog M, Löfmark A, Ahlström G. Learning about each other: students’ conceptions before and after interprofessional education on a training ward. J Interprof Care. 2008;22:521–33. CrossRef
Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning : legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. CrossRef
Dornan T. Medical education: theory and practice. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2011.
Lopez-Dicastillo O, Belintxon M, Soriano E, Sleeter C, Casanova MA. The challenges of participant observations of cultural encounters within an ethnographic study. Procedia—Soc Behav Sci. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014;132:522:6.
- The learning environment on a student ward: an observational study
- Bohn Stafleu van Loghum