Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
IRB approval The Institutional Review Board of the Salvatore Maugeri Foundation’s Scientific Institute in Lissone approved the study, which was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.
To create an Italian version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory (PBAPI-I) and evaluate its psychometric properties.
The PBAPI was culturally adapted in accordance with international standards. The psychometric testing included factor analysis, investigating reliability by internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and test/retest stability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC), and exploring construct validity by comparing the PBAPI-I with a pain numerical rating scale (NRS), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS) and the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory (Pearson’s correlation).
One hundred and sixty-seven subjects with chronic low back pain (83 % compliance) completed the tool. Factor analysis revealed a three-factor (Time, Mystery and Self-Blame), 16-item solution (explained variance: 80 %). The questionnaire was internally consistent (α = 0.91–0.96), and its stability was good (ICCs = 0.73–0.82). As expected, the construct validity estimates indicated that the Time and Mystery subscales moderately correlated with the NRS (r = 0.33–0.54), RMDQ (r = 0.34–0.47), PCS (r = 0.37–0.49) and TSK (r = 0.30–0.43), whereas the correlations between the Self-Blame subscale and the same measures were poorer. The correlations with the HADS were moderate and poor (anxiety: r = 0.37–0.05; depression: r = 0.39–0.07). Maladaptive coping strategies were more related to pain beliefs than adaptive strategies.
The PBAPI-I has good psychometric properties that replicate those of other versions.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25, 3186–3189. CrossRef
Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., et al. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health, 8(2), 94–104. PubMedCrossRef
Huskinson, E. C. (1974). Measurement of pain. Lancet, 2, 1127–1131. CrossRef
Monticone, M., Baiardi, P., Ferrari, S., Foti, C., Mugnai, R., Pillastrini, P., et al. (2012). Development of the Italian version of the Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS-I): cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Quality of Life Research, 21(6), 1045–1050. PubMedCrossRef
Monticone, M., Giorgi, I., Baiardi, P., Barbieri, M., Rocca, B., & Bonezzi, C. (2010). Development of the Italian version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, TSK-I. Cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 35(12), 1241–1246.
Monticone, M., Ferrante, S., Giorgi, I., Galandra, C., Rocca, B., & Foti, C. (2013). Development of the Italian version of the 42-item Chronic Pain Coping Inventory, CPCI-I: Cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity. Quality of Life Research, 22(6), 1459–1465.
Wong, W. S., Williams, D. A., Mak, K. H., & Fielding, R. (2011). Assessing attitudes toward and beliefs about pain among Chinese patients with chronic pain: Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory (ChPBPI). Journal of Pain and Symptoms Management, 42(2), 308–318. CrossRef
- The Italian version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity
- Springer International Publishing