Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

01-04-2015 | Letter | Uitgave 2/2015 Open Access

Perspectives on Medical Education 2/2015

The issue of ‘informed consent’ in medical student introductions

Tijdschrift:
Perspectives on Medical Education > Uitgave 2/2015
Auteurs:
Rahul Prashanth Ravindran, David George Lester, Khizr Ather Nawab, Sayinthen Vivekanantham
‘Good morning! My name is John Smith and I am a medical student.’ This familiar phrase is employed by medical students the world over in a variety of formats. Despite the varying terminology, the purpose of this introduction remains to obtain ‘informed consent’ from patients. Even though the importance of informed consent is universally acknowledged by doctors, patients and students, Silver-Isenstadt and Ubel [1] found evidence for a worrying decline in the perceived importance of conveying one’s student status in medical students as they progress through medical school. This was in contrast to patients’ desires for clear communication of medical student roles and the scope of their involvement, especially in the context of invasive procedures in operating theatres under the influence of anaesthesia [1]. This calls into question the adequacy of current medical student introductions in obtaining true informed consent.
Recently, Carson-Stevens et al. [2] surveyed medical students’ perceptions on the role of terminology used for introducing themselves and found that students knowingly employed varying terminology, often choosing to introduce themselves as ‘student doctors’. Students perceived this to have a dual benefit of increasing the probability of patient consent and reassuring patients of the near-professional status of the student [2]. However, Santen et al. [3] confirmed that even when informed of the medical student’s relative inexperience, 90 % of patients consented to a procedure in the emergency department although 66 % of patients did feel that they should be informed if the medical student is performing the procedure for the first time [3].
We believe that the continued use of ambiguous introductions by medical students restricts patient autonomy by withholding essential information, and this also erodes trust in the student/doctor-patient relationship. We propose that medical students approach the matter of clinical introduction by introducing themselves unambiguously as medical students, explaining their affiliation with the medical team and indicating the breadth of their experience prior to requesting consent.

Conflicts of interest notification

No conflicts of interest.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2015

Perspectives on Medical Education 2/2015 Naar de uitgave