Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
According to the New Look theory, size perception is affected by emotional factors. Although previous studies have attempted to explain the effects of both emotion and motivation on size perception, they have failed to identify the underlying mechanisms. This study aimed to investigate the underlying mechanisms of size perception by applying attention toward facial expressions using the Ebbinghaus illusion as a measurement tool. The participants, female university students, were asked to judge the size of a target stimulus relative to the size of facial expressions (i.e., happy, angry, and neutral) surrounding the target. The results revealed that the participants perceived angry and neutral faces to be larger than happy faces. This finding indicates that individuals pay closer attention to neutral and angry faces than happy ones. These results suggest that the mechanisms underlying size perception involve cognitive processes that focus attention toward relevant stimuli and block out irrelevant stimuli.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Bradley, B. P., Mogg, K., Millar, N., Bonham-Carter, C., Fergusson, E., Jenkins, J., & Parr, M. (1997). Attentional bias for emotional faces. Cognition and Emotion, 11, 25–42. CrossRef
Brendl, C. M., Markman, A. B., & Messner, C. (2003). The devaluation effect: Activating a need devalues unrelated objects. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 463–473. CrossRef
Bruner, J. S., & Danilova, M. V. (1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42, 33–44. CrossRef
Cannon, W. B. (1929). Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear, and rage. New York: Littleton.
Coren, S., & Girgus, J. S. (1978). Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Eastwood, J. D., Smilek, D., & Merikle, P. M. (2003). Negative facial expression captures attention and disrupts performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 65, 352–358. CrossRef
Ekman, P. (1982). Emotion in the human face (2nd ed.). Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
Elliot, A. J. (2006). The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 111–116. CrossRef
Esteves, F., Dimberg, U., & Öhman, A. (1994). Automatically elicited fear: Conditioned skin conductance responses to masked facial expressions. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 99–108.
Izard, C. E., & Bartlett, E. S. (1972). Patterns of emotions: A new analysis of anxiety and depression. Oxford: Academic Press.
Knutson, B. (1996). Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 165–182. CrossRef
Lee, T. H., Lee, K., Lee, K. Y., Choi, J. S., & Kim, H. T. (2006). Korea University facial expression collection: KUFEC. Seoul: Lab of Behavioral Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Korea University.
Parrot, W. G., & Hertel, P. (1999). Research methods in cognition and emotion. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 61–81). New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Planalp, S., DeFrancisco, V. L., & Rutherford, D. (1996). Varieties of cues to emotion in naturally occurring situations. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 137–153. CrossRef
Plutchik, R. A. (1980). Emotion: A psychoevolutionary synthesis. New York: Harper & Row.
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Veltkamp, M., Aarts, H., & Custers, R. (2008). Perception in the service of goal pursuit: Motivation to attain goals enhances the perceived size of goal-instrumental objects. Social Cognition, 26, 720–736. CrossRef
- The influence of attention toward facial expressions on size perception
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg