Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00426-016-0768-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Previous research has indicated that implicit motives can reliably predict which behaviors people select or decide to perform. However, so far, the question of how these motives are able to predict this action selection process has received little attention. Based on ideomotor theory, we argue that implicit motives can predict action selection when an action has become associated with a motive-congruent (dis)incentive through repeated experiences with the action-outcome relationship. This idea was investigated by examining whether the implicit need for power (nPower) would come to predict action selection (i.e., choosing to press either of two buttons) when these actions had repeatedly resulted in motive-congruent (dis)incentives (i.e., submissive or dominant faces). Both Studies 1 and 2 indicated that participants became more likely to select the action predictive of the motive-congruent outcome as their history with the action-outcome relationship increased. Study 2 indicated that this effect stemmed from both an approach towards incentives and an avoidance of disincentives. These results indicate that implicit motives (particularly the power motive) can predict action selection as a result of learning which actions yield motive-congruent (dis)incentives. Our findings therefore offer a model of how implicit motives can come to predict which behaviors people select to perform.
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 40 kb)426_2016_768_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Berridge, K. C. (2001). Reward learning: reinforcement, incentives, and expectations. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 40, pp. 223–278). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333. doi: 10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2069.
de Vries, M., Holland, R. W., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2008). In the winning mood: affect in the Iowa Gambling Task. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 42–50.
Donhauser, P. W., Rösch, A. G., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2015). The implicit need for power predicts recognition speed for dynamic changes in facial expressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 1–8. doi: 10.1007/s11031-015-9484-z.
Fodor, E. M. (2010). Power motivation. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 3–29). Oxford: University Press. CrossRef
Hommel, B. (2013). Ideomotor action control: on the perceptual grounding of voluntary actions and agents. In W. Prinz, M. Beisert, & A. Herwig (Eds.), Action Science: Foundations of an Emerging Discipline (pp. 113–136). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Köllner, M. G., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2014). Meta-analytic evidence of low convergence between implicit and explicit measures of the needs for achievement, affiliation, and power. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00826.
McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pang, J. S. (2010). Content coding methods in implicit motive assessment: Standards of measurement and best practices for the Picture Story Exercise. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 119–150). Oxford: University Press. CrossRef
Schultheiss, O. C. (2007). A biobehavioral model of implicit power motivation arousal, reward and frustration. In E. Harmon-Jones & P. Winkielman (Eds.), Social neuroscience: integrating biological and psychological explanations of social behavior (pp. 176–196). New York: Guilford.
Schultheiss, O. C., & Pang, J. S. (2007). Measuring implicit motives. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 322–344). New York: Guilford.
Schultheiss, O. C., Wirth, M. M., Torges, C. M., Pang, J. S., Villacorta, M. A., & Welsh, K. M. (2005b). Effects of implicit power motivation on men’s and women’s implicit learning and testosterone changes after social victory or defeat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 174–188. doi: 10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.11. CrossRefPubMed
Schultheiss, O. C., Wirth, M. M., Waugh, C. E., Stanton, S. J., Meier, E. A., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. (2008). Exploring the motivational brain: effects of implicit power motivation on brain activation in response to facial expressions of emotion. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3, 333–343. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsn030. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Schultheiss, O. C., Yankova, D., Dirlikov, B., & Schad, D. J. (2009). Are implicit and explicit motive measures statistically independent? A fair and balanced test using the Picture Story Exercise and a cue- and response-matched questionnaire measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 72–81. doi: 10.1080/00223890802484456. CrossRefPubMed
Slabbinck, H., De Houwer, J., & Van Kenhove, P. (2013). Convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity of the Pictorial Attitude Implicit Association Test and the Picture Story Exercise as measures of the implicit power motive. European Journal of Personality, 27, 30–38. doi: 10.1002/per.1846. CrossRef
Stanton, S. J., Hall, J. L., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2010). Properties of motive-specific incentives. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 245–278). Oxford: University Press. CrossRef
Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: an experimental study of the associative processes in animals. The Psychological Review: Monograph Supplements, 2, 1–109. doi: 10.1037/h0092987.
Veenhoven, R. (2004). Happiness as an aim in public policy: the greatest happiness principle. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive Psychology in Practice (pp. 658–678). Hoboken: Wiley.
Winter, D. G. (1994). Manual for scoring motive imagery in running text. Retrieved from http://www.psych2.phil.uni-erlangen.de/~oschult/humanlab/squirrel/winter1994.pdf.
- The implicit power motive predicts action selection
Peter F. Stoeckart
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg