Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Bimanual coordination is governed by constraints that permit congruent movements to be performed more easily than incongruent movements. Theories concerning the origin of these constraints range from low level motor-muscle explanations to high level perceptual–cognitive ones. To elucidate the processes underlying coordinative constraints, we asked subjects to use a pair of left–right joysticks to acquire corresponding pairs of congruent and incongruent targets presented on a video monitor under task conditions designed to systematically modulate the impact of several perceptual–cognitive processes commonly required for bimanual task performance. These processes included decoding symbolic cues, detecting goal targets, conceptualizing movements in terms of goal target configuration, planning movement trajectories, producing saccades and perceiving visual feedback. Results demonstrate that constraints arise from target detection and trajectory planning processes that can occur prior to movement initiation as well as from inherent muscle properties that emerge during movement execution, and that the manifestation of these constraints can be significantly altered by the ability to visually monitor movement progress.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Bernstein, N. (1967). The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements. London: Pergamon Press.
Blinch, J., Cameron, B. D., Franks, I. M., & Chua, R. (2011). Bimanual reaches with symbolic cues exhibit errors in target selection. Experimental Brain Research, 212(4), 541–554. CrossRef
Bogaerts, H., & Swinnen, S. P. (2001). Spatial interactions during bimanual coordination patterns: The effect of directional compatibility. Motor Control, 5(2), 183–199. PubMed
Boyles, J., Panzer, S., & Shea, C. H. (2012). Increasingly complex bimanual multi-frequency coordination patterns are equally easy to perform with on-line relative velocity feedback. Experimental Brain Research, 216(4), 515–525. CrossRef
Cardoso de Oliveira, S., & Barthelemy, S. (2005). Visual feedback reduces bimanual coupling of movement amplitudes, but not of directions. Experimental Brain Research, 162(1), 78–88. CrossRef
Carson, R. G., & Riek, S. (1998). The influence of joint position on the dynamics of perception-action coupling. Experimental Brain Research, 121(1), 103–114. CrossRef
Franz, E. A. (2004). On the perceptual control of bimanual performance. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(4), 380–381. PubMed
Franz, E. A., & McCormick, R. (2010). Conceptual unifying constraints override sensorimotor interference during anticipatory control of bimanual actions. Experimental Brain Research, 205(2), 273–282. CrossRef
Franz, E. A., Zelaznik, H. N., & McCabe, G. (1991). Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task. Acta Psychologica (Amst), 77(2), 137–151. CrossRef
Goodman, D., & Kelso, J. A. (1980). Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109(4), 475–495. CrossRef
Hazeltine, E., Diedrichsen, J., Kennerley, S. W., & Ivry, R. B. (2003). Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not the specification of motor parameters. Psychological Research, 67(1), 56–70. PubMed
Hoffman, J.E., Nelson, E., & Houck, M.R. (1983). The role of attentional resources in automatic detection. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 379–410.
Kelso, J. A. (1984). Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. American Journal of Physiology, 246(6 Pt 2), R1000–R1004. PubMed
Marteniuk, R. G., MacKenzie, C. L., & Baba, D. M. (1984). Bimanual movement control: Information processing and interaction effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 335–365.
Obhi, S. S., & Haggard, P. (2004). Internally generated and externally triggered actions are physically distinct and independently controlled. Experimental Brain Research, 156(4), 518–523. CrossRef
Rosenbaum, D. A. (1983). The movement precuing technique: Assumptions, application, and extension. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp. 271–274). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Rothkopf, C. A., Ballard, D. H., & Hayhoe, M. M. (2007). Task and context determine where you look. Journal of Vision, 7(14), 16.1–16.20. CrossRef
Spijkers, W., Heuer, H., Kleinsorge, T., & van der Loo, H. (1997). Preparation of bimanual movements with same and different amplitudes: Specification interference as revealed by reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 96, 207–227. CrossRef
Weigelt, C., & Cardoso de Oliveira, S. (2003). Visuomotor transformations affect bimanual coupling. Experimental Brain Research, 148(4), 439–450.
- The impact of perceptual, cognitive and motor factors on bimanual coordination
N. M. Procacci
T. R. Stanford
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg