Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 6/2013

01-11-2013 | Original Article

The impact of perceptual, cognitive and motor factors on bimanual coordination

Auteurs: N. M. Procacci, T. R. Stanford

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Bimanual coordination is governed by constraints that permit congruent movements to be performed more easily than incongruent movements. Theories concerning the origin of these constraints range from low level motor-muscle explanations to high level perceptual–cognitive ones. To elucidate the processes underlying coordinative constraints, we asked subjects to use a pair of left–right joysticks to acquire corresponding pairs of congruent and incongruent targets presented on a video monitor under task conditions designed to systematically modulate the impact of several perceptual–cognitive processes commonly required for bimanual task performance. These processes included decoding symbolic cues, detecting goal targets, conceptualizing movements in terms of goal target configuration, planning movement trajectories, producing saccades and perceiving visual feedback. Results demonstrate that constraints arise from target detection and trajectory planning processes that can occur prior to movement initiation as well as from inherent muscle properties that emerge during movement execution, and that the manifestation of these constraints can be significantly altered by the ability to visually monitor movement progress.
Literatuur
go back to reference Albert, N. B., Weigelt, M., Hazeltine, E., & Ivry, R. B. (2007). Target selection during bimanual reaching to direct cues is unaffected by the perceptual similarity of the targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(5), 1107–1116.PubMedCrossRef Albert, N. B., Weigelt, M., Hazeltine, E., & Ivry, R. B. (2007). Target selection during bimanual reaching to direct cues is unaffected by the perceptual similarity of the targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(5), 1107–1116.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bernstein, N. (1967). The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements. London: Pergamon Press. Bernstein, N. (1967). The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements. London: Pergamon Press.
go back to reference Blinch, J., Cameron, B. D., Franks, I. M., & Chua, R. (2011). Bimanual reaches with symbolic cues exhibit errors in target selection. Experimental Brain Research, 212(4), 541–554.CrossRef Blinch, J., Cameron, B. D., Franks, I. M., & Chua, R. (2011). Bimanual reaches with symbolic cues exhibit errors in target selection. Experimental Brain Research, 212(4), 541–554.CrossRef
go back to reference Bogaerts, H., Buekers, M. J., Zaal, F. T., & Swinnen, S. P. (2003). When visuo-motor incongruence aids motor performance: The effect of perceiving motion structures during transformed visual feedback on bimanual coordination. Behavioural Brain Research, 138(1), 45–57.PubMedCrossRef Bogaerts, H., Buekers, M. J., Zaal, F. T., & Swinnen, S. P. (2003). When visuo-motor incongruence aids motor performance: The effect of perceiving motion structures during transformed visual feedback on bimanual coordination. Behavioural Brain Research, 138(1), 45–57.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bogaerts, H., & Swinnen, S. P. (2001). Spatial interactions during bimanual coordination patterns: The effect of directional compatibility. Motor Control, 5(2), 183–199.PubMed Bogaerts, H., & Swinnen, S. P. (2001). Spatial interactions during bimanual coordination patterns: The effect of directional compatibility. Motor Control, 5(2), 183–199.PubMed
go back to reference Boyles, J., Panzer, S., & Shea, C. H. (2012). Increasingly complex bimanual multi-frequency coordination patterns are equally easy to perform with on-line relative velocity feedback. Experimental Brain Research, 216(4), 515–525.CrossRef Boyles, J., Panzer, S., & Shea, C. H. (2012). Increasingly complex bimanual multi-frequency coordination patterns are equally easy to perform with on-line relative velocity feedback. Experimental Brain Research, 216(4), 515–525.CrossRef
go back to reference Cardoso de Oliveira, S., & Barthelemy, S. (2005). Visual feedback reduces bimanual coupling of movement amplitudes, but not of directions. Experimental Brain Research, 162(1), 78–88.CrossRef Cardoso de Oliveira, S., & Barthelemy, S. (2005). Visual feedback reduces bimanual coupling of movement amplitudes, but not of directions. Experimental Brain Research, 162(1), 78–88.CrossRef
go back to reference Carson, R. G., & Riek, S. (1998). The influence of joint position on the dynamics of perception-action coupling. Experimental Brain Research, 121(1), 103–114.CrossRef Carson, R. G., & Riek, S. (1998). The influence of joint position on the dynamics of perception-action coupling. Experimental Brain Research, 121(1), 103–114.CrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, L. (1971). Synchronous bimanual movements performed by homologous and non-homologous muscles. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 32(2), 639–644.PubMedCrossRef Cohen, L. (1971). Synchronous bimanual movements performed by homologous and non-homologous muscles. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 32(2), 639–644.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Debaere, F., Wenderoth, N., Sunaert, S., Van Hecke, P., & Swinnen, S. (2003). Internal vs. external generation of movements: Differential neural pathways involved in bimanual coordination performed in the presence or absence of augmented visual feedback. Neuroimage, 19, 764–776.PubMedCrossRef Debaere, F., Wenderoth, N., Sunaert, S., Van Hecke, P., & Swinnen, S. (2003). Internal vs. external generation of movements: Differential neural pathways involved in bimanual coordination performed in the presence or absence of augmented visual feedback. Neuroimage, 19, 764–776.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Diedrichsen, J., Hazeltine, E., Kennerley, S., & Ivry, R. B. (2001). Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions. Psychological Science, 12(6), 493–498.PubMedCrossRef Diedrichsen, J., Hazeltine, E., Kennerley, S., & Ivry, R. B. (2001). Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions. Psychological Science, 12(6), 493–498.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Diedrichsen, J., Hazeltine, E., Nurss, W. K., & Ivry, R. B. (2003). The role of the corpus callosum in the coupling of bimanual isometric force pulses. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90(4), 2409–2418.PubMedCrossRef Diedrichsen, J., Hazeltine, E., Nurss, W. K., & Ivry, R. B. (2003). The role of the corpus callosum in the coupling of bimanual isometric force pulses. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90(4), 2409–2418.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Franz, E. A. (2004). On the perceptual control of bimanual performance. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(4), 380–381.PubMed Franz, E. A. (2004). On the perceptual control of bimanual performance. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(4), 380–381.PubMed
go back to reference Franz, E. A., & McCormick, R. (2010). Conceptual unifying constraints override sensorimotor interference during anticipatory control of bimanual actions. Experimental Brain Research, 205(2), 273–282.CrossRef Franz, E. A., & McCormick, R. (2010). Conceptual unifying constraints override sensorimotor interference during anticipatory control of bimanual actions. Experimental Brain Research, 205(2), 273–282.CrossRef
go back to reference Franz, E. A., Zelaznik, H. N., & McCabe, G. (1991). Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task. Acta Psychologica (Amst), 77(2), 137–151.CrossRef Franz, E. A., Zelaznik, H. N., & McCabe, G. (1991). Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task. Acta Psychologica (Amst), 77(2), 137–151.CrossRef
go back to reference Franz, E. A., Zelaznik, H. N., Swinnen, S. S., & Walter, C. (2001). Spatial conceptual influences on the coordination of bimanual actions: When a dual task becomes a single task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33(1), 103–112.PubMedCrossRef Franz, E. A., Zelaznik, H. N., Swinnen, S. S., & Walter, C. (2001). Spatial conceptual influences on the coordination of bimanual actions: When a dual task becomes a single task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33(1), 103–112.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Goodale, M. A., Westwood, D. A., & Milner, A. D. (2004). Two distinct modes of control for object-directed action. Progress in Brain Research, 144, 131–144.PubMedCrossRef Goodale, M. A., Westwood, D. A., & Milner, A. D. (2004). Two distinct modes of control for object-directed action. Progress in Brain Research, 144, 131–144.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Goodman, D., & Kelso, J. A. (1980). Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109(4), 475–495.CrossRef Goodman, D., & Kelso, J. A. (1980). Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109(4), 475–495.CrossRef
go back to reference Hazeltine, E., Diedrichsen, J., Kennerley, S. W., & Ivry, R. B. (2003). Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not the specification of motor parameters. Psychological Research, 67(1), 56–70.PubMed Hazeltine, E., Diedrichsen, J., Kennerley, S. W., & Ivry, R. B. (2003). Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not the specification of motor parameters. Psychological Research, 67(1), 56–70.PubMed
go back to reference Heuer, H., & Klein, W. (2006). The influence of movement cues on intermanual interactions. Psychological Research, 70(4), 229–244.PubMedCrossRef Heuer, H., & Klein, W. (2006). The influence of movement cues on intermanual interactions. Psychological Research, 70(4), 229–244.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hoffman, J.E., Nelson, E., & Houck, M.R. (1983). The role of attentional resources in automatic detection. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 379–410. Hoffman, J.E., Nelson, E., & Houck, M.R. (1983). The role of attentional resources in automatic detection. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 379–410.
go back to reference Hoffman, J. E., & Subramaniam, B. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception and Psychophysics, 57(6), 787–795.PubMedCrossRef Hoffman, J. E., & Subramaniam, B. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception and Psychophysics, 57(6), 787–795.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Janczyk, M., Skirde, S., Weigelt, M., & Kunde, W. (2009). Visual and tactile action effects determine bimanual coordination performance. Human Movement Science, 28(4), 437–449.PubMedCrossRef Janczyk, M., Skirde, S., Weigelt, M., & Kunde, W. (2009). Visual and tactile action effects determine bimanual coordination performance. Human Movement Science, 28(4), 437–449.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kelso, J. A. (1984). Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. American Journal of Physiology, 246(6 Pt 2), R1000–R1004.PubMed Kelso, J. A. (1984). Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. American Journal of Physiology, 246(6 Pt 2), R1000–R1004.PubMed
go back to reference Kelso, J. A., Southard, D. L., & Goodman, D. (1979). On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Science, 203(4384), 1029–1031.PubMedCrossRef Kelso, J. A., Southard, D. L., & Goodman, D. (1979). On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Science, 203(4384), 1029–1031.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kunde, W., Krauss, H., & Weigelt, M. (2009). Goal congruency without stimulus congruency in bimanual coordination. Psychological Research, 73, 34–42.PubMedCrossRef Kunde, W., Krauss, H., & Weigelt, M. (2009). Goal congruency without stimulus congruency in bimanual coordination. Psychological Research, 73, 34–42.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kunde, W., & Weigelt, M. (2005). Goal-congruency in bimanual object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 145–156.PubMedCrossRef Kunde, W., & Weigelt, M. (2005). Goal-congruency in bimanual object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 145–156.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Marteniuk, R. G., MacKenzie, C. L., & Baba, D. M. (1984). Bimanual movement control: Information processing and interaction effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 335–365. Marteniuk, R. G., MacKenzie, C. L., & Baba, D. M. (1984). Bimanual movement control: Information processing and interaction effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 335–365.
go back to reference Mechsner, F., Kerzel, D., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature, 414(6859), 69–73.PubMedCrossRef Mechsner, F., Kerzel, D., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature, 414(6859), 69–73.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Obhi, S. S., & Haggard, P. (2004). Internally generated and externally triggered actions are physically distinct and independently controlled. Experimental Brain Research, 156(4), 518–523.CrossRef Obhi, S. S., & Haggard, P. (2004). Internally generated and externally triggered actions are physically distinct and independently controlled. Experimental Brain Research, 156(4), 518–523.CrossRef
go back to reference Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.PubMedCrossRef Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Oliveira, F. T., & Ivry, R. B. (2008). The representation of action: Insights from bimanual coordination. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(2), 130–135.PubMedCrossRef Oliveira, F. T., & Ivry, R. B. (2008). The representation of action: Insights from bimanual coordination. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(2), 130–135.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rosenbaum, D. A. (1983). The movement precuing technique: Assumptions, application, and extension. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp. 271–274). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1983). The movement precuing technique: Assumptions, application, and extension. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp. 271–274). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
go back to reference Rothkopf, C. A., Ballard, D. H., & Hayhoe, M. M. (2007). Task and context determine where you look. Journal of Vision, 7(14), 16.1–16.20.CrossRef Rothkopf, C. A., Ballard, D. H., & Hayhoe, M. M. (2007). Task and context determine where you look. Journal of Vision, 7(14), 16.1–16.20.CrossRef
go back to reference Salter, J. E., Wishart, L. R., Lee, T. D., & Simon, D. (2004). Perceptual and motor contributions to bimanual coordination. Neuroscience Letters, 363(2), 102–107.PubMedCrossRef Salter, J. E., Wishart, L. R., Lee, T. D., & Simon, D. (2004). Perceptual and motor contributions to bimanual coordination. Neuroscience Letters, 363(2), 102–107.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Spijkers, W., Heuer, H., Kleinsorge, T., & van der Loo, H. (1997). Preparation of bimanual movements with same and different amplitudes: Specification interference as revealed by reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 96, 207–227.CrossRef Spijkers, W., Heuer, H., Kleinsorge, T., & van der Loo, H. (1997). Preparation of bimanual movements with same and different amplitudes: Specification interference as revealed by reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 96, 207–227.CrossRef
go back to reference Swinnen, S., Jardin, K., Meulenbroek, R., Dounskaia, N., & Brandt, H.-V. D. (1997). Egocentric and allocentric constraints in the expression of patterns of interlimb coordination. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(3), 348–377.PubMedCrossRef Swinnen, S., Jardin, K., Meulenbroek, R., Dounskaia, N., & Brandt, H.-V. D. (1997). Egocentric and allocentric constraints in the expression of patterns of interlimb coordination. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(3), 348–377.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Swinnen, S. P., Jardin, K., Verschueren, S., Meulenbroek, R., Franz, L., Dounskaia, N., et al. (1998). Exploring interlimb constraints during bimanual graphic performance: Effects of muscle grouping and direction. Behavioural Brain Research, 90(1), 79–87.PubMedCrossRef Swinnen, S. P., Jardin, K., Verschueren, S., Meulenbroek, R., Franz, L., Dounskaia, N., et al. (1998). Exploring interlimb constraints during bimanual graphic performance: Effects of muscle grouping and direction. Behavioural Brain Research, 90(1), 79–87.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Swinnen, S. P., Puttemans, V., Vangheluwe, S., Wenderoth, N., Levin, O., & Dounskaia, N. (2003). Directional interference during bimanual coordination: Is interlimb coupling mediated by afferent or efferent processes. Behavioural Brain Research, 139(1–2), 177–195.PubMedCrossRef Swinnen, S. P., Puttemans, V., Vangheluwe, S., Wenderoth, N., Levin, O., & Dounskaia, N. (2003). Directional interference during bimanual coordination: Is interlimb coupling mediated by afferent or efferent processes. Behavioural Brain Research, 139(1–2), 177–195.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Weigelt, C., & Cardoso de Oliveira, S. (2003). Visuomotor transformations affect bimanual coupling. Experimental Brain Research, 148(4), 439–450. Weigelt, C., & Cardoso de Oliveira, S. (2003). Visuomotor transformations affect bimanual coupling. Experimental Brain Research, 148(4), 439–450.
Metagegevens
Titel
The impact of perceptual, cognitive and motor factors on bimanual coordination
Auteurs
N. M. Procacci
T. R. Stanford
Publicatiedatum
01-11-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0468-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2013

Psychological Research 6/2013 Naar de uitgave