Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1194-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
This study investigated the “healthy context paradox”: the potentially adverse effects of school anti-bullying norms on victims’ psychological (depression, social anxiety, and self-esteem) and school adjustment. Based on the person-group (dis)similarity model, social comparison theory, similarity attraction in friendship formation, and attributional theory, it was hypothesized that the emotional plight of victims is intensified in intervention schools with a visible, school-wide anti-bullying program, as compared with victims in control schools with “a care as usual” approach. Longitudinal multilevel regression analyses were conducted on Randomized Controlled Trial data from the Dutch implementation of the KiVa anti-bullying program (baseline and 1-year follow-up data on 4356 students from 245 classrooms in 99 schools, 68% intervention students, 49% boys, 9–10 years-old). The findings revealed that—despite the overall success of the intervention—those who remained or became victimized in intervention schools had more depressive symptoms and lower self-esteem after being targeted by the intervention for 1 year, compared to those who remained or became victimized in control schools. These effects were not found for social anxiety and school well-being. The findings underscore the importance of individual × environment interactions in understanding the consequences of victimization and emphasize the need for adults and classmates to provide continuing support for remaining or new victims who are victimized in schools that implement anti-bullying interventions.
Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Barker, E. D., Girard, A., Dionne, G., Tremblay, R. E., & Boivin, M. (2013). Do other people’s plights matter? A genetically informed twin study of the role of social context in the link between peer victimization and children’s aggression and depression symptoms. Developmental Psychology, 49, 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025665. CrossRefPubMed
Chorpita, B. F., Yim, L., Moffitt, C., Umemoto, L. A., & Francis, S. E. (2000). Assessment of symptoms of DSM-IV anxiety and depression in children: A revised child anxiety and depression scale. Behavior Research and Therapy, 38, 835–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00130-8. CrossRef
Copeland, W. E., Wolke, D., Angold, A., & Costello, E. J. (2013). Adult psychiatric outcomes of bullying and being bullied by peers in childhood and adolescence. JAMA Psychiatry, 70, 419–426. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.504. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Evans, C. B. R., Fraser, M. W., & Cotter, K. L. (2014). The effectiveness of school-based bullying prevention programs: a systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 532–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.004. CrossRef
Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2009). School-based programs to reduce bullying and victimization. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2009, 6.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. CrossRef
Furmark, T., Tillfors, M., Everz, P. O., Marteinsdottir, I., Gefvert, O., & Fredrikson, M. (1999). Social phobia in the general population: Prevalence and sociodemographic profile. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 34, 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001270050163. CrossRefPubMed
Garandeau, C. F., Vartio, A., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2018). School bullies’ intention to change behavior following teacher interventions: Effects of empathy arousal, condemning of bullying, and blaming of the perpetrator. Prevention Science, 17, 1034–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0712-x. CrossRef
Garnefski, N., & Kraaij, V. (2016). Specificity of relations between adolescents’ cognitive emotion regulation strategies and symptoms of depression and anxiety. Cognition and Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1232698
Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (1998). Self-blame and peer victimization in middle school: An attributional analysis. Developmental Psychology, 34, 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-16184.108.40.2067. CrossRefPubMed
Graham, S., Juvonen, J., (2001). An attributional approach to peer victimization. In J. Juvonen, S. Graham (Sds.) Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 49–72). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Haataja, A., Voeten, M., Boulton, A. J., Ahtola, A., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). The KiVa antibullying curriculum and outcome: does fidelity matter? Journal of School Psychology, 52, 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.07.001. CrossRefPubMed
Hodges, E. V., & Perry, D. G. (1999). Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimization by peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 677–685. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.117. CrossRefPubMed
Huitsing, G., Veenstra, R., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2012). “It must be me” or “ It could be them?”: the impact of the social network position of bullies and victims on victims’ adjustment. Social Networks, 34, 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.07.002. CrossRef
Juvonen, J., Galván, A., (2008). Peer influence in involuntary social groups: Lessons from research on bullying. In M. J. Prinstein, K. A. Dodge, (Eds.), Peer influence processes among youth (pp. 225–244). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 4–6. Child Development, 82, 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01557.x. CrossRefPubMed
Kaufman, T. M. L., Kretschmer, T., Huitsing, G., & Veenstra, R. (2018). Why does a universal anti-bullying program not help all children? explaining persistent victimization during an intervention. Prevention Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0906-5
Kretschmer, T., Veenstra, R., Branje, S., Reijneveld, S. A., Meeus, W. H. J., Deković, M., & Oldehinkel, A. J. (2018). How competent are adolescent bullying perpetrators and victims in mastering normative developmental tasks in early adulthood? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46, 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-017-0316-3. CrossRefPubMed
Lazarsfeld, P. F., Merton, R. K., (1954). Friendship as social process: a substantive and methodological analysis. In: M. Berger, T. Abel, C. Page (Eds.), Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 18–66). New York, NY: Van Nostrand.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415. CrossRef
Morrow, M. T., Hubbard, J. A., & Sharp, M. K. (2018). Preadolescents’ daily peer victimization and perceived social competence: moderating effects of classroom aggression. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2017.1416618
Mynard, H., & Joseph, S. (2000). Development of the multidimensional peer-victimization scale. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(2000)26:2<169::AID-AB3>3.0.CO;2-A. CrossRef
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Olweus, D. (1996). The revised Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Bergen, Norway: Research Center for Health Promotion (HEMIL Center), University of Bergen.
Olweus, D., (2010). Understanding and researching bullying: Some critical issues. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: an international perspective (pp. 9–33). New York, NY: Routledge.
Perren, S., Ettekal, I., & Ladd, G. W. (2013). The impact of peer victimization on later maladjustment: Mediating and moderating effects of hostile and self-blaming attributions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02618.x. CrossRefPubMed
Poskiparta, E., Kaukiainen, A., Pöyhönen, V., Salmivalli, C., (2012). Anti-bullying computer game as part of the kiva program: students’ perceptions of the game. In A. Costabile, B. Spears (Eds.), The impact of technology on relationships in educational settings: international perspective (pp. 158–168). New York, NY: Routledge.
Rasbash, J, Steele, F, Browne, W. J., & Goldstein, H. (2017). A useras guide to MLwiN, v3.00. Bristol, UK: University of Bristol, Centre for Multilevel Modelling.
Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., & Telch, M. J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.07.009. CrossRef
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. CrossRef
Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007. CrossRef
Salmivalli, C., Garandeau, C. F., Veenstra, R., (2011). KiVa anti-bullying program: Implications for school adjustment. In A. M. Ryan, G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 279–307). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Schacter, H. L., & Juvonen, J. (2018). Dynamic changes in peer victimization and adjustment across middle school: Does friends’ victimization alleviate distress? Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13038
Sheppard, C. S., Giletta, M., & Prinstein, M. J. (2016). Peer victimization trajectories at the adolescent transition: associations among chronic victimization, peer-reported status, and adjustment. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2016.1261713. in press. CrossRefPubMed
Sijtsema, J. J., Rambaran, A. J., & Ojanen, T. J. (2013). Overt and relational victimization and adolescent friendships: Selection, de-selection, and social influence. Social Influence, 8, 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2012.739097. CrossRef
Van der Ploeg, R., Steglich, C., & Veenstra, R. (2016). The Support Group Approach in the Dutch KiVa anti-bullying programme: Effects on victimisation, defending, and well-being at school. Educational Research, 3, 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2016.1184949. CrossRef
Veenstra, R. (2015). Signaleren en tegengaan van pesten: Het KiVa antipestprogramma. Eindrapportage voor Onderwijs Bewijs [Signaling and reducing bullying in schools: The KiVa anti-bullying program. Final report for education effectiveness research). The Hague: Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. Retrieved May 1, 2018 http://tinyurl.com/KiVa-onderwijsbewijs.
Veenstra, R., Dijkstra, J. K., Kreager, D. A., (2018). Pathways, networks, and norms: a sociological perspective on peer research. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen, K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. 2nd edition (pp. 45–63,. New York, NY: Guilford.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. CrossRef
Williford, A., Boulton, A., Noland, B., Little, T. D., Karna, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2012). Effects of the KiVa anti-bullying program on adolescents’ depression, anxiety, and perception of peers. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-011-9551-1. CrossRefPubMed
Wright, J. C., Giammarino, M., & Parad, H. W. (1986). Social status in small groups: individual-group similarity and the social "misfit". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 523–536. CrossRef
Yeager, D. S., Fong, C. J., Lee, H. Y., & Espelage, D. L. (2015). Declines in efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents: Theory and a three-level meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37, 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.005. CrossRef
- The Healthy Context Paradox: Victims’ Adjustment During an Anti-Bullying Intervention
Gerine M. A. Lodder
Hannah L. Schacter
- Springer US